Comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and conventional plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture: A meta-analysis

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and conventional plate osteosynthesis (CPO) for humeral shaft fracture. Potential academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, Medline (1966-2016.3), PubMed (1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2016-09, Vol.95 (39), p.e4955-e4955
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Bin-Feng, Liu, Liang-le, Yang, Guo-Jing, Zhang, Lei, Lin, Xi-Peng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e4955
container_issue 39
container_start_page e4955
container_title Medicine (Baltimore)
container_volume 95
creator Yu, Bin-Feng
Liu, Liang-le
Yang, Guo-Jing
Zhang, Lei
Lin, Xi-Peng
description The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and conventional plate osteosynthesis (CPO) for humeral shaft fracture. Potential academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, Medline (1966-2016.3), PubMed (1966-2016.3), Embase (1980-2016.3), and ScienceDirect (1966-2016.3). Gray studies were identified from the references of the included literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT involving MIPO and CPO for humeral shaft fracture were included. Two independent reviewers performed independent data abstraction. I statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Fixed or random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Two RCTs and 3 non-RCTs met the inclusion criteria. There was a lower incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in patients with MIPO (P = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in in the risk of developing nonunion, delay union, malformation, screw loosening, infection, operation time, UCLA, and MEPS function score between the 2 groups. MIPO decreased incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy and is an efficacy and safety technique for humeral shaft fracture. Due to the limited quality and data of the evidence currently available, more high-quality RCTs are required.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MD.0000000000004955
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5265932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1825216745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-4c08ab38aba54cca53c00fdd98bc7754b1c7b929cf349418305f98ec83c6617f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1OJCEUhYnRjK3OE5gYlm7KgQIKcGFiWp0x0cxmXBOKBhtTBS1QnfQT-Npi_IlOvAm5C75z7r05ABxidIKR5L9uL07Qp6KSsS0ww4x0DZMd3QYzhFrWcMnpLtjL-QEhTHhLf4DdlneCCiJn4Gkex5VOPscAo4OjD37Uw7CBPqx19msLV4MuFsZcbMybUJY2-wx1WEATw9qG4mPQw_eUiwkup9GmCuSldgW6pE2Zkj2F53C0RTe6ijeVPQA7Tg_Z_nzr--Du6vLf_E9z8_f39fz8pjFEoNJQg4TuSX2aUWM0IwYht1hI0RvOGe2x4b1spXGESooFQcxJYY0gpuswd2QfnL36rqZ-tAtTD6jbqVWqZ6eNitqrrz_BL9V9XCvWdkySthocvxmk-DjZXNTos7HDoIONU1ZYtKzFHaesouQVNSnmnKz7GIOReolQ3V6o_yOsqqPPG35o3jMjzxJunD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1825216745</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and conventional plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture: A meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Yu, Bin-Feng ; Liu, Liang-le ; Yang, Guo-Jing ; Zhang, Lei ; Lin, Xi-Peng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Bin-Feng ; Liu, Liang-le ; Yang, Guo-Jing ; Zhang, Lei ; Lin, Xi-Peng</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and conventional plate osteosynthesis (CPO) for humeral shaft fracture. Potential academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, Medline (1966-2016.3), PubMed (1966-2016.3), Embase (1980-2016.3), and ScienceDirect (1966-2016.3). Gray studies were identified from the references of the included literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT involving MIPO and CPO for humeral shaft fracture were included. Two independent reviewers performed independent data abstraction. I statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Fixed or random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Two RCTs and 3 non-RCTs met the inclusion criteria. There was a lower incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in patients with MIPO (P = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in in the risk of developing nonunion, delay union, malformation, screw loosening, infection, operation time, UCLA, and MEPS function score between the 2 groups. MIPO decreased incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy and is an efficacy and safety technique for humeral shaft fracture. Due to the limited quality and data of the evidence currently available, more high-quality RCTs are required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004955</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27684839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer Health</publisher><subject>Adult ; Bone Plates ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures - surgery ; Male ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2016-09, Vol.95 (39), p.e4955-e4955</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-4c08ab38aba54cca53c00fdd98bc7754b1c7b929cf349418305f98ec83c6617f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265932/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5265932/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27684839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Bin-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liang-le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guo-Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Xi-Peng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and conventional plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture: A meta-analysis</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and conventional plate osteosynthesis (CPO) for humeral shaft fracture. Potential academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, Medline (1966-2016.3), PubMed (1966-2016.3), Embase (1980-2016.3), and ScienceDirect (1966-2016.3). Gray studies were identified from the references of the included literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT involving MIPO and CPO for humeral shaft fracture were included. Two independent reviewers performed independent data abstraction. I statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Fixed or random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Two RCTs and 3 non-RCTs met the inclusion criteria. There was a lower incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in patients with MIPO (P = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in in the risk of developing nonunion, delay union, malformation, screw loosening, infection, operation time, UCLA, and MEPS function score between the 2 groups. MIPO decreased incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy and is an efficacy and safety technique for humeral shaft fracture. Due to the limited quality and data of the evidence currently available, more high-quality RCTs are required.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bone Plates</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Humeral Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1OJCEUhYnRjK3OE5gYlm7KgQIKcGFiWp0x0cxmXBOKBhtTBS1QnfQT-Npi_IlOvAm5C75z7r05ABxidIKR5L9uL07Qp6KSsS0ww4x0DZMd3QYzhFrWcMnpLtjL-QEhTHhLf4DdlneCCiJn4Gkex5VOPscAo4OjD37Uw7CBPqx19msLV4MuFsZcbMybUJY2-wx1WEATw9qG4mPQw_eUiwkup9GmCuSldgW6pE2Zkj2F53C0RTe6ijeVPQA7Tg_Z_nzr--Du6vLf_E9z8_f39fz8pjFEoNJQg4TuSX2aUWM0IwYht1hI0RvOGe2x4b1spXGESooFQcxJYY0gpuswd2QfnL36rqZ-tAtTD6jbqVWqZ6eNitqrrz_BL9V9XCvWdkySthocvxmk-DjZXNTos7HDoIONU1ZYtKzFHaesouQVNSnmnKz7GIOReolQ3V6o_yOsqqPPG35o3jMjzxJunD0</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Yu, Bin-Feng</creator><creator>Liu, Liang-le</creator><creator>Yang, Guo-Jing</creator><creator>Zhang, Lei</creator><creator>Lin, Xi-Peng</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and conventional plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture: A meta-analysis</title><author>Yu, Bin-Feng ; Liu, Liang-le ; Yang, Guo-Jing ; Zhang, Lei ; Lin, Xi-Peng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-4c08ab38aba54cca53c00fdd98bc7754b1c7b929cf349418305f98ec83c6617f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bone Plates</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Humeral Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Bin-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Liang-le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Guo-Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Xi-Peng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Bin-Feng</au><au>Liu, Liang-le</au><au>Yang, Guo-Jing</au><au>Zhang, Lei</au><au>Lin, Xi-Peng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and conventional plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>e4955</spage><epage>e4955</epage><pages>e4955-e4955</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and conventional plate osteosynthesis (CPO) for humeral shaft fracture. Potential academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, Medline (1966-2016.3), PubMed (1966-2016.3), Embase (1980-2016.3), and ScienceDirect (1966-2016.3). Gray studies were identified from the references of the included literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCT involving MIPO and CPO for humeral shaft fracture were included. Two independent reviewers performed independent data abstraction. I statistic was used to assess heterogeneity. Fixed or random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Two RCTs and 3 non-RCTs met the inclusion criteria. There was a lower incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy in patients with MIPO (P = 0.006). There was no statistically significant difference in in the risk of developing nonunion, delay union, malformation, screw loosening, infection, operation time, UCLA, and MEPS function score between the 2 groups. MIPO decreased incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve palsy and is an efficacy and safety technique for humeral shaft fracture. Due to the limited quality and data of the evidence currently available, more high-quality RCTs are required.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health</pub><pmid>27684839</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000004955</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-7974
ispartof Medicine (Baltimore), 2016-09, Vol.95 (39), p.e4955-e4955
issn 0025-7974
1536-5964
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5265932
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Bone Plates
Clinical Trials as Topic
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Humans
Humeral Fractures - surgery
Male
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - instrumentation
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title Comparison of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and conventional plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture: A meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A52%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20minimally%20invasive%20plate%20osteosynthesis%20and%20conventional%20plate%20osteosynthesis%20for%20humeral%20shaft%20fracture:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Yu,%20Bin-Feng&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=e4955&rft.epage=e4955&rft.pages=e4955-e4955&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000004955&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1825216745%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1825216745&rft_id=info:pmid/27684839&rfr_iscdi=true