Control of gaze while walking: Task structure, reward, and uncertainty

While it is universally acknowledged that both bottom up and top down factors contribute to allocation of gaze, we currently have limited understanding of how top-down factors determine gaze choices in the context of ongoing natural behavior. One purely top-down model by Sprague, Ballard, and Robins...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.28-28
Hauptverfasser: Tong, Matthew H, Zohar, Oran, Hayhoe, Mary M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 17
creator Tong, Matthew H
Zohar, Oran
Hayhoe, Mary M
description While it is universally acknowledged that both bottom up and top down factors contribute to allocation of gaze, we currently have limited understanding of how top-down factors determine gaze choices in the context of ongoing natural behavior. One purely top-down model by Sprague, Ballard, and Robinson (2007) suggests that natural behaviors can be understood in terms of simple component behaviors, or modules, that are executed according to their reward value, with gaze targets chosen in order to reduce uncertainty about the particular world state needed to execute those behaviors. We explore the plausibility of the central claims of this approach in the context of a task where subjects walk through a virtual environment performing interceptions, avoidance, and path following. Many aspects of both walking direction choices and gaze allocation are consistent with this approach. Subjects use gaze to reduce uncertainty for task-relevant information that is used to inform action choices. Notably the addition of motion to peripheral objects did not affect fixations when the objects were irrelevant to the task, suggesting that stimulus saliency was not a major factor in gaze allocation. The modular approach of independent component behaviors is consistent with the main aspects of performance, but there were a number of deviations suggesting that modules interact. Thus the model forms a useful, but incomplete, starting point for understanding top-down factors in active behavior.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/17.1.28
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5256682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1861599348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-ae6b31845e559769fe5c4c4512c034845a82ffa44d7abcbe78cd82dc5ee6e4fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUMFKAzEQDaLYWsU_kNz00NZNNslmPQhSrAoFL_UcstnZdu12U5NdS_16U1pLhWHmMfN483gIXZNoSIhI7kkyJEMqT1CX8JgNkljQ0yPcQRfef0YRjXhEzlGHSkJYgF00Htm6cbbCtsAz_QN4PS-r0HW1KOvZA55qv8C-ca1pWgd97GCtXd7Hus5xWxtwjS7rZnOJzgpdebjazx76GD9PR6-DyfvL2-hpMjCxSJuBBpHFRDIOnKeJSAvghhnGCTVRzMJeS1oUmrE80ZnJIJEmlzQ3HEAAK0zcQ4873VWbLSE3EMzrSq1cudRuo6wu1f9LXc7VzH4rTrkQkgaBu72As18t-EYtS2-gqnQNtvWKSEF4mgYzgXq7oxpnvXdQHN6QSG1TVySUolvmzbGrA-8v5vgXcjp9oQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861599348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Control of gaze while walking: Task structure, reward, and uncertainty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tong, Matthew H ; Zohar, Oran ; Hayhoe, Mary M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tong, Matthew H ; Zohar, Oran ; Hayhoe, Mary M</creatorcontrib><description>While it is universally acknowledged that both bottom up and top down factors contribute to allocation of gaze, we currently have limited understanding of how top-down factors determine gaze choices in the context of ongoing natural behavior. One purely top-down model by Sprague, Ballard, and Robinson (2007) suggests that natural behaviors can be understood in terms of simple component behaviors, or modules, that are executed according to their reward value, with gaze targets chosen in order to reduce uncertainty about the particular world state needed to execute those behaviors. We explore the plausibility of the central claims of this approach in the context of a task where subjects walk through a virtual environment performing interceptions, avoidance, and path following. Many aspects of both walking direction choices and gaze allocation are consistent with this approach. Subjects use gaze to reduce uncertainty for task-relevant information that is used to inform action choices. Notably the addition of motion to peripheral objects did not affect fixations when the objects were irrelevant to the task, suggesting that stimulus saliency was not a major factor in gaze allocation. The modular approach of independent component behaviors is consistent with the main aspects of performance, but there were a number of deviations suggesting that modules interact. Thus the model forms a useful, but incomplete, starting point for understanding top-down factors in active behavior.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/17.1.28</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28114501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Eye Movements - physiology ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Theoretical ; Psychomotor Performance ; Reward ; Uncertainty ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Walking ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.28-28</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-ae6b31845e559769fe5c4c4512c034845a82ffa44d7abcbe78cd82dc5ee6e4fc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256682/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5256682/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28114501$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tong, Matthew H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohar, Oran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayhoe, Mary M</creatorcontrib><title>Control of gaze while walking: Task structure, reward, and uncertainty</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>While it is universally acknowledged that both bottom up and top down factors contribute to allocation of gaze, we currently have limited understanding of how top-down factors determine gaze choices in the context of ongoing natural behavior. One purely top-down model by Sprague, Ballard, and Robinson (2007) suggests that natural behaviors can be understood in terms of simple component behaviors, or modules, that are executed according to their reward value, with gaze targets chosen in order to reduce uncertainty about the particular world state needed to execute those behaviors. We explore the plausibility of the central claims of this approach in the context of a task where subjects walk through a virtual environment performing interceptions, avoidance, and path following. Many aspects of both walking direction choices and gaze allocation are consistent with this approach. Subjects use gaze to reduce uncertainty for task-relevant information that is used to inform action choices. Notably the addition of motion to peripheral objects did not affect fixations when the objects were irrelevant to the task, suggesting that stimulus saliency was not a major factor in gaze allocation. The modular approach of independent component behaviors is consistent with the main aspects of performance, but there were a number of deviations suggesting that modules interact. Thus the model forms a useful, but incomplete, starting point for understanding top-down factors in active behavior.</description><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUMFKAzEQDaLYWsU_kNz00NZNNslmPQhSrAoFL_UcstnZdu12U5NdS_16U1pLhWHmMfN483gIXZNoSIhI7kkyJEMqT1CX8JgNkljQ0yPcQRfef0YRjXhEzlGHSkJYgF00Htm6cbbCtsAz_QN4PS-r0HW1KOvZA55qv8C-ca1pWgd97GCtXd7Hus5xWxtwjS7rZnOJzgpdebjazx76GD9PR6-DyfvL2-hpMjCxSJuBBpHFRDIOnKeJSAvghhnGCTVRzMJeS1oUmrE80ZnJIJEmlzQ3HEAAK0zcQ4873VWbLSE3EMzrSq1cudRuo6wu1f9LXc7VzH4rTrkQkgaBu72As18t-EYtS2-gqnQNtvWKSEF4mgYzgXq7oxpnvXdQHN6QSG1TVySUolvmzbGrA-8v5vgXcjp9oQ</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Tong, Matthew H</creator><creator>Zohar, Oran</creator><creator>Hayhoe, Mary M</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Control of gaze while walking: Task structure, reward, and uncertainty</title><author>Tong, Matthew H ; Zohar, Oran ; Hayhoe, Mary M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-ae6b31845e559769fe5c4c4512c034845a82ffa44d7abcbe78cd82dc5ee6e4fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tong, Matthew H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zohar, Oran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayhoe, Mary M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tong, Matthew H</au><au>Zohar, Oran</au><au>Hayhoe, Mary M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Control of gaze while walking: Task structure, reward, and uncertainty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>28</epage><pages>28-28</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>While it is universally acknowledged that both bottom up and top down factors contribute to allocation of gaze, we currently have limited understanding of how top-down factors determine gaze choices in the context of ongoing natural behavior. One purely top-down model by Sprague, Ballard, and Robinson (2007) suggests that natural behaviors can be understood in terms of simple component behaviors, or modules, that are executed according to their reward value, with gaze targets chosen in order to reduce uncertainty about the particular world state needed to execute those behaviors. We explore the plausibility of the central claims of this approach in the context of a task where subjects walk through a virtual environment performing interceptions, avoidance, and path following. Many aspects of both walking direction choices and gaze allocation are consistent with this approach. Subjects use gaze to reduce uncertainty for task-relevant information that is used to inform action choices. Notably the addition of motion to peripheral objects did not affect fixations when the objects were irrelevant to the task, suggesting that stimulus saliency was not a major factor in gaze allocation. The modular approach of independent component behaviors is consistent with the main aspects of performance, but there were a number of deviations suggesting that modules interact. Thus the model forms a useful, but incomplete, starting point for understanding top-down factors in active behavior.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>28114501</pmid><doi>10.1167/17.1.28</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-7362
ispartof Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2017-01, Vol.17 (1), p.28-28
issn 1534-7362
1534-7362
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5256682
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Eye Movements - physiology
Female
Fixation, Ocular - physiology
Humans
Male
Models, Theoretical
Psychomotor Performance
Reward
Uncertainty
Visual Perception - physiology
Walking
Young Adult
title Control of gaze while walking: Task structure, reward, and uncertainty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A04%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Control%20of%20gaze%20while%20walking:%20Task%20structure,%20reward,%20and%20uncertainty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Tong,%20Matthew%20H&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=28&rft.pages=28-28&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/17.1.28&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1861599348%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861599348&rft_id=info:pmid/28114501&rfr_iscdi=true