Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol
IntroductionAround 300 people sustain a new traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Australia each year; a relatively low incidence injury with extremely high long-term associated costs. Care standards are inconsistent nationally, lacking in consensus across important components of care such as preho...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ open 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e012377-e012377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e012377 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e012377 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Sharwood, Lisa N Stanford, Ralph Middleton, James W Burns, Brian Joseph, Anthony Flower, Oliver Rigby, Oran Ball, Jonathon Dhaliwal, Shelly |
description | IntroductionAround 300 people sustain a new traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Australia each year; a relatively low incidence injury with extremely high long-term associated costs. Care standards are inconsistent nationally, lacking in consensus across important components of care such as prehospital spinal immobilisation, timing of surgery and timeliness of transfer to specialist services. This study aims to develop ‘expertly defined’ and agreed standards of care across the majority of disciplines involved for these patients.Methods and analysisA modified e-Delphi process will be used to gain consensus for best practice across specific clinical early care areas for the patient with TSCI; invited participants will include clinicians across Australia with relevant and significant expertise. A rapid literature review will identify available evidence, including any current guidelines from 2005 to 2015. Level and strength of evidence identified, including areas of contention, will be used to formulate the first round survey questions and statements. Participants will undertake 2–3 online survey rounds, responding anonymously to questionnaires regarding care practices and indicating their agreement or otherwise with practice standard statements. Relevant key stakeholders, including patients, will also be interviewed face to face.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for this study was obtained by the NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee on 14 January 2016 (HREC/12/CIPHS/74). Seeking comprehensive understanding of how the variation in early care pathways and treatment can be addressed to achieve optimal patient outcomes and economic costs; the overall aim is the agreement to a consistent approach to the triage, treatment, transport and definitive care of acute TSCI victims. The agreed practice standards of care will inform the development of a Clinical Pathway with practice change strategies for implementation. These standards will offer a benchmark for state-wide and potentially national policy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012377 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5253580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4304933771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b500t-4a63be20f78ef28e39c3c92a7fcc4fb2b798d974f4ea4a70d2882cbbcb8ae4f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1qHSEYhofS0IQ0V1AoQjfdTKqOjk4XhZL-BQLZtGtR5zPH05lxqs4JuYbedB3OaUiyKHWj4PM--PNW1SuCzwlp2ndm3IYZpppi0taY0EaIZ9UJxYzVLeb8-YP1cXWW0haXwXjHOX1RHVNJMBNYnFS_L8c5hp2fbpDVEVDKeup17BNyIaJZZw9TTujW5w1Ks5_0gHLUy6iRDaPx0xrUaAy9dx56BPUnGOaNR0VqISVUbKvzJ2zC0ENEfsoQdx5u0_uSS3np71Y2BxuGl9WR00OCs8N8Wv348vn7xbf66vrr5cXHq9pwjHPNdNsYoNgJCY5KaDrb2I5q4axlzlAjOtl3gjkGmmmBeyoltcZYIzUwJ5vT6sPeOy9mhN6WG0Y9qDn6Ucc7FbRXj3cmv1E3Yac45Q2XuAjeHgQx_FogZTX6ZGEY9ARhSYrIlvDyxJwX9M0TdBuWWJ4xKdq2tCn_Qbt_UcWFMZdMiEI1e8rGkFIEd39kgtXaCnVohVpbofatKKnXD297n_nbgQKc74GS_i_jH01Ixww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860058477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sharwood, Lisa N ; Stanford, Ralph ; Middleton, James W ; Burns, Brian ; Joseph, Anthony ; Flower, Oliver ; Rigby, Oran ; Ball, Jonathon ; Dhaliwal, Shelly</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharwood, Lisa N ; Stanford, Ralph ; Middleton, James W ; Burns, Brian ; Joseph, Anthony ; Flower, Oliver ; Rigby, Oran ; Ball, Jonathon ; Dhaliwal, Shelly</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionAround 300 people sustain a new traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Australia each year; a relatively low incidence injury with extremely high long-term associated costs. Care standards are inconsistent nationally, lacking in consensus across important components of care such as prehospital spinal immobilisation, timing of surgery and timeliness of transfer to specialist services. This study aims to develop ‘expertly defined’ and agreed standards of care across the majority of disciplines involved for these patients.Methods and analysisA modified e-Delphi process will be used to gain consensus for best practice across specific clinical early care areas for the patient with TSCI; invited participants will include clinicians across Australia with relevant and significant expertise. A rapid literature review will identify available evidence, including any current guidelines from 2005 to 2015. Level and strength of evidence identified, including areas of contention, will be used to formulate the first round survey questions and statements. Participants will undertake 2–3 online survey rounds, responding anonymously to questionnaires regarding care practices and indicating their agreement or otherwise with practice standard statements. Relevant key stakeholders, including patients, will also be interviewed face to face.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for this study was obtained by the NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee on 14 January 2016 (HREC/12/CIPHS/74). Seeking comprehensive understanding of how the variation in early care pathways and treatment can be addressed to achieve optimal patient outcomes and economic costs; the overall aim is the agreement to a consistent approach to the triage, treatment, transport and definitive care of acute TSCI victims. The agreed practice standards of care will inform the development of a Clinical Pathway with practice change strategies for implementation. These standards will offer a benchmark for state-wide and potentially national policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012377</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28104707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Australia ; Best practice ; Clinical outcomes ; Consensus ; Costs ; Critical Pathways - standards ; Delphi method ; Delphi Technique ; Epidemiology ; Health care policy ; Health Services Research ; Hemodynamics ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Organizational Policy ; Patients ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Quality Improvement ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - therapy ; Stakeholders ; Standard of Care ; Surgeons ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e012377-e012377</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2017 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b500t-4a63be20f78ef28e39c3c92a7fcc4fb2b798d974f4ea4a70d2882cbbcb8ae4f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b500t-4a63be20f78ef28e39c3c92a7fcc4fb2b798d974f4ea4a70d2882cbbcb8ae4f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8977-6144</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/1/e012377.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/1/e012377.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27547,27548,27922,27923,53789,53791,77371,77402</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28104707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharwood, Lisa N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flower, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Oran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaliwal, Shelly</creatorcontrib><title>Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>IntroductionAround 300 people sustain a new traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Australia each year; a relatively low incidence injury with extremely high long-term associated costs. Care standards are inconsistent nationally, lacking in consensus across important components of care such as prehospital spinal immobilisation, timing of surgery and timeliness of transfer to specialist services. This study aims to develop ‘expertly defined’ and agreed standards of care across the majority of disciplines involved for these patients.Methods and analysisA modified e-Delphi process will be used to gain consensus for best practice across specific clinical early care areas for the patient with TSCI; invited participants will include clinicians across Australia with relevant and significant expertise. A rapid literature review will identify available evidence, including any current guidelines from 2005 to 2015. Level and strength of evidence identified, including areas of contention, will be used to formulate the first round survey questions and statements. Participants will undertake 2–3 online survey rounds, responding anonymously to questionnaires regarding care practices and indicating their agreement or otherwise with practice standard statements. Relevant key stakeholders, including patients, will also be interviewed face to face.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for this study was obtained by the NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee on 14 January 2016 (HREC/12/CIPHS/74). Seeking comprehensive understanding of how the variation in early care pathways and treatment can be addressed to achieve optimal patient outcomes and economic costs; the overall aim is the agreement to a consistent approach to the triage, treatment, transport and definitive care of acute TSCI victims. The agreed practice standards of care will inform the development of a Clinical Pathway with practice change strategies for implementation. These standards will offer a benchmark for state-wide and potentially national policy.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Critical Pathways - standards</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Organizational Policy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - therapy</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Standard of Care</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>9YT</sourceid><sourceid>ACMMV</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1qHSEYhofS0IQ0V1AoQjfdTKqOjk4XhZL-BQLZtGtR5zPH05lxqs4JuYbedB3OaUiyKHWj4PM--PNW1SuCzwlp2ndm3IYZpppi0taY0EaIZ9UJxYzVLeb8-YP1cXWW0haXwXjHOX1RHVNJMBNYnFS_L8c5hp2fbpDVEVDKeup17BNyIaJZZw9TTujW5w1Ks5_0gHLUy6iRDaPx0xrUaAy9dx56BPUnGOaNR0VqISVUbKvzJ2zC0ENEfsoQdx5u0_uSS3np71Y2BxuGl9WR00OCs8N8Wv348vn7xbf66vrr5cXHq9pwjHPNdNsYoNgJCY5KaDrb2I5q4axlzlAjOtl3gjkGmmmBeyoltcZYIzUwJ5vT6sPeOy9mhN6WG0Y9qDn6Ucc7FbRXj3cmv1E3Yac45Q2XuAjeHgQx_FogZTX6ZGEY9ARhSYrIlvDyxJwX9M0TdBuWWJ4xKdq2tCn_Qbt_UcWFMZdMiEI1e8rGkFIEd39kgtXaCnVohVpbofatKKnXD297n_nbgQKc74GS_i_jH01Ixww</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Sharwood, Lisa N</creator><creator>Stanford, Ralph</creator><creator>Middleton, James W</creator><creator>Burns, Brian</creator><creator>Joseph, Anthony</creator><creator>Flower, Oliver</creator><creator>Rigby, Oran</creator><creator>Ball, Jonathon</creator><creator>Dhaliwal, Shelly</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>9YT</scope><scope>ACMMV</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-6144</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol</title><author>Sharwood, Lisa N ; Stanford, Ralph ; Middleton, James W ; Burns, Brian ; Joseph, Anthony ; Flower, Oliver ; Rigby, Oran ; Ball, Jonathon ; Dhaliwal, Shelly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b500t-4a63be20f78ef28e39c3c92a7fcc4fb2b798d974f4ea4a70d2882cbbcb8ae4f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Critical Pathways - standards</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Organizational Policy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - therapy</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Standard of Care</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharwood, Lisa N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, Ralph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Middleton, James W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burns, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flower, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Oran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ball, Jonathon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaliwal, Shelly</creatorcontrib><collection>BMJ Open Access Journals</collection><collection>BMJ Journals:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharwood, Lisa N</au><au>Stanford, Ralph</au><au>Middleton, James W</au><au>Burns, Brian</au><au>Joseph, Anthony</au><au>Flower, Oliver</au><au>Rigby, Oran</au><au>Ball, Jonathon</au><au>Dhaliwal, Shelly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e012377</spage><epage>e012377</epage><pages>e012377-e012377</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>IntroductionAround 300 people sustain a new traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Australia each year; a relatively low incidence injury with extremely high long-term associated costs. Care standards are inconsistent nationally, lacking in consensus across important components of care such as prehospital spinal immobilisation, timing of surgery and timeliness of transfer to specialist services. This study aims to develop ‘expertly defined’ and agreed standards of care across the majority of disciplines involved for these patients.Methods and analysisA modified e-Delphi process will be used to gain consensus for best practice across specific clinical early care areas for the patient with TSCI; invited participants will include clinicians across Australia with relevant and significant expertise. A rapid literature review will identify available evidence, including any current guidelines from 2005 to 2015. Level and strength of evidence identified, including areas of contention, will be used to formulate the first round survey questions and statements. Participants will undertake 2–3 online survey rounds, responding anonymously to questionnaires regarding care practices and indicating their agreement or otherwise with practice standard statements. Relevant key stakeholders, including patients, will also be interviewed face to face.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for this study was obtained by the NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee on 14 January 2016 (HREC/12/CIPHS/74). Seeking comprehensive understanding of how the variation in early care pathways and treatment can be addressed to achieve optimal patient outcomes and economic costs; the overall aim is the agreement to a consistent approach to the triage, treatment, transport and definitive care of acute TSCI victims. The agreed practice standards of care will inform the development of a Clinical Pathway with practice change strategies for implementation. These standards will offer a benchmark for state-wide and potentially national policy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>28104707</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012377</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-6144</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2017-01, Vol.7 (1), p.e012377-e012377 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5253580 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Australia Best practice Clinical outcomes Consensus Costs Critical Pathways - standards Delphi method Delphi Technique Epidemiology Health care policy Health Services Research Hemodynamics Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Organizational Policy Patients Practice Patterns, Physicians Quality Improvement Spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord Injuries - therapy Stakeholders Standard of Care Surgeons Trauma |
title | Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A06%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20care%20standards%20for%20patients%20with%20spinal%20trauma%20combining%20a%20modified%20e-Delphi%20process%20and%20stakeholder%20interviews:%20a%20study%20protocol&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Sharwood,%20Lisa%20N&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e012377&rft.epage=e012377&rft.pages=e012377-e012377&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012377&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4304933771%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860058477&rft_id=info:pmid/28104707&rfr_iscdi=true |