A randomized, blinded, controlled USA field study to assess the use of fluralaner topical solution in controlling feline flea infestations
Fleas are a common ectoparasite of domestic cats and there is a need for novel treatments that improve feline flea control. This investigator-blinded, multi-center randomized, positive-controlled study evaluated the flea control in cats provided by a single owner-applied treatment with a fluralaner...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Parasites & vectors 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.37-37, Article 37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Parasites & vectors |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Meadows, Cheyney Guerino, Frank Sun, Fangshi |
description | Fleas are a common ectoparasite of domestic cats and there is a need for novel treatments that improve feline flea control.
This investigator-blinded, multi-center randomized, positive-controlled study evaluated the flea control in cats provided by a single owner-applied treatment with a fluralaner topical formulation compared with a positive control. Households with up to five healthy cats, all at least 12 weeks of age and weighing at least 1.2 kg (2.6 lb), were randomized in an approximate 3:1 ratio of fluralaner to positive control. All cats in households randomized to the positive control group were dispensed three treatments, at 4-week intervals, of a commercial formulation of fipronil/(S)-methoprene. All cats in households randomized to the fluralaner group were dispensed an initial treatment at enrollment and a second treatment at week 12 for an additional 3-week observation of treatment safety. One primary cat with at least five live fleas at enrollment was randomly selected within each household. Flea counts were performed on all primary cats at 4-week intervals through week 12. Efficacy measurement was based on reduction in flea counts from baseline. Treatment was considered effective at weeks 4, 8 and 12 if mean live flea count reductions were 90% or greater and statistically significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) from counts at enrollment.
In 18 investigational veterinary clinics across 11 USA states, 116 households (224 cats) were randomized to receive topical fluralaner and 45 households (87 cats) were randomized to the fipronil-methoprene combination. Fluralaner was demonstrated to be effective at 4 weeks (99.1% flea count reduction), 8 weeks (99.5%), and 12 weeks (99.0%), and all reductions were significantly different from the enrollment count (all P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13071-017-1972-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5248512</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A480559423</galeid><sourcerecordid>A480559423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48f9f630eb9fb2b8120c569482393281ecd1f654fc03a8e11c4156398dea05ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG8k4I2CU_M5m7kRluJHoSBYex0ymZNtSmayJjNi_Qn-as-wde2KzEXCnOd9k3PyVtVzRk8Z083bwgRdsZqyVc3aFa_lg-qYrVRTC0HVw3v7o-pJKTeUNrRVzePqiGtGRSv5cfVrTbId-zSEn9C_IV0MY79sXBqnnGKEnlxdrokPEHtSprm_JVMithQohUzXQOYCJHni45xttCNkrG-Ds5GUFOcppJGEcW8Xxg3xgAugAiyWPJTJLlh5Wj3yNhZ4dreeVFcf3n89-1RffP54fra-qJ3ieqql9q1vBIWu9R3vNOPUqaaVmotWYGPgeuYbJb2jwmpgzEmmGtHqHixV4MVJ9W7nu527AXoHeDUbzTaHweZbk2wwh5UxXJtN-m4Ul1oxjgav7gxy-jbj_c0QioO4tJ_mYvBpmNJcqRbRl_-gN2nOI7a3UEpIrRX_S21sBIMzSXiuW0zNWmqKRpILpE7_Q-HXwxBwwOAD_j8QvD4QLI8AP6aNnUsx55dfDlm2Y11OpWTw-3kwapawmV3YDIbNLGEzEjUv7g9yr_iTLvEbnRjPjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865348852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized, blinded, controlled USA field study to assess the use of fluralaner topical solution in controlling feline flea infestations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Meadows, Cheyney ; Guerino, Frank ; Sun, Fangshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Meadows, Cheyney ; Guerino, Frank ; Sun, Fangshi</creatorcontrib><description>Fleas are a common ectoparasite of domestic cats and there is a need for novel treatments that improve feline flea control.
This investigator-blinded, multi-center randomized, positive-controlled study evaluated the flea control in cats provided by a single owner-applied treatment with a fluralaner topical formulation compared with a positive control. Households with up to five healthy cats, all at least 12 weeks of age and weighing at least 1.2 kg (2.6 lb), were randomized in an approximate 3:1 ratio of fluralaner to positive control. All cats in households randomized to the positive control group were dispensed three treatments, at 4-week intervals, of a commercial formulation of fipronil/(S)-methoprene. All cats in households randomized to the fluralaner group were dispensed an initial treatment at enrollment and a second treatment at week 12 for an additional 3-week observation of treatment safety. One primary cat with at least five live fleas at enrollment was randomly selected within each household. Flea counts were performed on all primary cats at 4-week intervals through week 12. Efficacy measurement was based on reduction in flea counts from baseline. Treatment was considered effective at weeks 4, 8 and 12 if mean live flea count reductions were 90% or greater and statistically significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) from counts at enrollment.
In 18 investigational veterinary clinics across 11 USA states, 116 households (224 cats) were randomized to receive topical fluralaner and 45 households (87 cats) were randomized to the fipronil-methoprene combination. Fluralaner was demonstrated to be effective at 4 weeks (99.1% flea count reduction), 8 weeks (99.5%), and 12 weeks (99.0%), and all reductions were significantly different from the enrollment count (all P < 0.0001). The fipronil-methoprene combination was < 90% effective at each post-treatment assessment, with peak efficacy of 75.4% at 12 weeks (all P < 0.0001). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in either group.
Owner-applied fluralaner topical treatment was safe in cats and was highly effective in killing fleas over the subsequent 12 weeks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-3305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-1972-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28103942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Animals ; Care and treatment ; Cat diseases ; Cat Diseases - drug therapy ; Cat Diseases - prevention & control ; Cats ; Control ; Flea Infestations - drug therapy ; Flea Infestations - prevention & control ; Flea Infestations - veterinary ; Fleas ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - administration & dosage ; Insecticides - adverse effects ; Isoxazoles - administration & dosage ; Isoxazoles - adverse effects ; Parasite Load ; Parasitic diseases ; Single-Blind Method ; Solutions - administration & dosage ; Solutions - adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome ; United States</subject><ispartof>Parasites & vectors, 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.37-37, Article 37</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48f9f630eb9fb2b8120c569482393281ecd1f654fc03a8e11c4156398dea05ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48f9f630eb9fb2b8120c569482393281ecd1f654fc03a8e11c4156398dea05ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248512/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5248512/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28103942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meadows, Cheyney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerino, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Fangshi</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized, blinded, controlled USA field study to assess the use of fluralaner topical solution in controlling feline flea infestations</title><title>Parasites & vectors</title><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><description>Fleas are a common ectoparasite of domestic cats and there is a need for novel treatments that improve feline flea control.
This investigator-blinded, multi-center randomized, positive-controlled study evaluated the flea control in cats provided by a single owner-applied treatment with a fluralaner topical formulation compared with a positive control. Households with up to five healthy cats, all at least 12 weeks of age and weighing at least 1.2 kg (2.6 lb), were randomized in an approximate 3:1 ratio of fluralaner to positive control. All cats in households randomized to the positive control group were dispensed three treatments, at 4-week intervals, of a commercial formulation of fipronil/(S)-methoprene. All cats in households randomized to the fluralaner group were dispensed an initial treatment at enrollment and a second treatment at week 12 for an additional 3-week observation of treatment safety. One primary cat with at least five live fleas at enrollment was randomly selected within each household. Flea counts were performed on all primary cats at 4-week intervals through week 12. Efficacy measurement was based on reduction in flea counts from baseline. Treatment was considered effective at weeks 4, 8 and 12 if mean live flea count reductions were 90% or greater and statistically significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) from counts at enrollment.
In 18 investigational veterinary clinics across 11 USA states, 116 households (224 cats) were randomized to receive topical fluralaner and 45 households (87 cats) were randomized to the fipronil-methoprene combination. Fluralaner was demonstrated to be effective at 4 weeks (99.1% flea count reduction), 8 weeks (99.5%), and 12 weeks (99.0%), and all reductions were significantly different from the enrollment count (all P < 0.0001). The fipronil-methoprene combination was < 90% effective at each post-treatment assessment, with peak efficacy of 75.4% at 12 weeks (all P < 0.0001). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in either group.
Owner-applied fluralaner topical treatment was safe in cats and was highly effective in killing fleas over the subsequent 12 weeks.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cat diseases</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cat Diseases - prevention & control</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Flea Infestations - drug therapy</subject><subject>Flea Infestations - prevention & control</subject><subject>Flea Infestations - veterinary</subject><subject>Fleas</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Insecticides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Isoxazoles - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Isoxazoles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Parasite Load</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Solutions - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Solutions - adverse effects</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1756-3305</issn><issn>1756-3305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdRbK3-AG8k4I2CU_M5m7kRluJHoSBYex0ymZNtSmayJjNi_Qn-as-wde2KzEXCnOd9k3PyVtVzRk8Z083bwgRdsZqyVc3aFa_lg-qYrVRTC0HVw3v7o-pJKTeUNrRVzePqiGtGRSv5cfVrTbId-zSEn9C_IV0MY79sXBqnnGKEnlxdrokPEHtSprm_JVMithQohUzXQOYCJHni45xttCNkrG-Ds5GUFOcppJGEcW8Xxg3xgAugAiyWPJTJLlh5Wj3yNhZ4dreeVFcf3n89-1RffP54fra-qJ3ieqql9q1vBIWu9R3vNOPUqaaVmotWYGPgeuYbJb2jwmpgzEmmGtHqHixV4MVJ9W7nu527AXoHeDUbzTaHweZbk2wwh5UxXJtN-m4Ul1oxjgav7gxy-jbj_c0QioO4tJ_mYvBpmNJcqRbRl_-gN2nOI7a3UEpIrRX_S21sBIMzSXiuW0zNWmqKRpILpE7_Q-HXwxBwwOAD_j8QvD4QLI8AP6aNnUsx55dfDlm2Y11OpWTw-3kwapawmV3YDIbNLGEzEjUv7g9yr_iTLvEbnRjPjw</recordid><startdate>20170119</startdate><enddate>20170119</enddate><creator>Meadows, Cheyney</creator><creator>Guerino, Frank</creator><creator>Sun, Fangshi</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170119</creationdate><title>A randomized, blinded, controlled USA field study to assess the use of fluralaner topical solution in controlling feline flea infestations</title><author>Meadows, Cheyney ; Guerino, Frank ; Sun, Fangshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-48f9f630eb9fb2b8120c569482393281ecd1f654fc03a8e11c4156398dea05ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cat diseases</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cat Diseases - prevention & control</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Flea Infestations - drug therapy</topic><topic>Flea Infestations - prevention & control</topic><topic>Flea Infestations - veterinary</topic><topic>Fleas</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Insecticides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Isoxazoles - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Isoxazoles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Parasite Load</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Solutions - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Solutions - adverse effects</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meadows, Cheyney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerino, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Fangshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Parasites & vectors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meadows, Cheyney</au><au>Guerino, Frank</au><au>Sun, Fangshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized, blinded, controlled USA field study to assess the use of fluralaner topical solution in controlling feline flea infestations</atitle><jtitle>Parasites & vectors</jtitle><addtitle>Parasit Vectors</addtitle><date>2017-01-19</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>37-37</pages><artnum>37</artnum><issn>1756-3305</issn><eissn>1756-3305</eissn><abstract>Fleas are a common ectoparasite of domestic cats and there is a need for novel treatments that improve feline flea control.
This investigator-blinded, multi-center randomized, positive-controlled study evaluated the flea control in cats provided by a single owner-applied treatment with a fluralaner topical formulation compared with a positive control. Households with up to five healthy cats, all at least 12 weeks of age and weighing at least 1.2 kg (2.6 lb), were randomized in an approximate 3:1 ratio of fluralaner to positive control. All cats in households randomized to the positive control group were dispensed three treatments, at 4-week intervals, of a commercial formulation of fipronil/(S)-methoprene. All cats in households randomized to the fluralaner group were dispensed an initial treatment at enrollment and a second treatment at week 12 for an additional 3-week observation of treatment safety. One primary cat with at least five live fleas at enrollment was randomly selected within each household. Flea counts were performed on all primary cats at 4-week intervals through week 12. Efficacy measurement was based on reduction in flea counts from baseline. Treatment was considered effective at weeks 4, 8 and 12 if mean live flea count reductions were 90% or greater and statistically significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) from counts at enrollment.
In 18 investigational veterinary clinics across 11 USA states, 116 households (224 cats) were randomized to receive topical fluralaner and 45 households (87 cats) were randomized to the fipronil-methoprene combination. Fluralaner was demonstrated to be effective at 4 weeks (99.1% flea count reduction), 8 weeks (99.5%), and 12 weeks (99.0%), and all reductions were significantly different from the enrollment count (all P < 0.0001). The fipronil-methoprene combination was < 90% effective at each post-treatment assessment, with peak efficacy of 75.4% at 12 weeks (all P < 0.0001). No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in either group.
Owner-applied fluralaner topical treatment was safe in cats and was highly effective in killing fleas over the subsequent 12 weeks.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>28103942</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13071-017-1972-4</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-3305 |
ispartof | Parasites & vectors, 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.37-37, Article 37 |
issn | 1756-3305 1756-3305 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5248512 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Administration, Topical Animals Care and treatment Cat diseases Cat Diseases - drug therapy Cat Diseases - prevention & control Cats Control Flea Infestations - drug therapy Flea Infestations - prevention & control Flea Infestations - veterinary Fleas Insecticides Insecticides - administration & dosage Insecticides - adverse effects Isoxazoles - administration & dosage Isoxazoles - adverse effects Parasite Load Parasitic diseases Single-Blind Method Solutions - administration & dosage Solutions - adverse effects Treatment Outcome United States |
title | A randomized, blinded, controlled USA field study to assess the use of fluralaner topical solution in controlling feline flea infestations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized,%20blinded,%20controlled%20USA%20field%20study%20to%20assess%20the%20use%20of%20fluralaner%20topical%20solution%20in%20controlling%20feline%20flea%20infestations&rft.jtitle=Parasites%20&%20vectors&rft.au=Meadows,%20Cheyney&rft.date=2017-01-19&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=37-37&rft.artnum=37&rft.issn=1756-3305&rft.eissn=1756-3305&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13071-017-1972-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA480559423%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865348852&rft_id=info:pmid/28103942&rft_galeid=A480559423&rfr_iscdi=true |