Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks-lessons from the REVAMP study

Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbishment. Gove...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 2017-01, Vol.14 (1), p.5-5, Article 5
Hauptverfasser: Veitch, Jenny, Salmon, Jo, Giles-Corti, Billie, Crawford, David, Dullaghan, Kate, Carver, Alison, Timperio, Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
container_volume 14
creator Veitch, Jenny
Salmon, Jo
Giles-Corti, Billie
Crawford, David
Dullaghan, Kate
Carver, Alison
Timperio, Anna
description Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbishment. Government agencies often modify parks, providing opportunities for natural experiment studies of these interventions. Such an opportunity was provided by the modification of a large park in Victoria, Australia in 2013 when the Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study was established. Based on insights from the REVAMP study, this paper discusses challenges involved in conducting natural experiments in park settings, focussing on issues that may help design more effective future evaluations of the impact of park refurbishment. Natural experiments offer unique opportunities to evaluate the impact of large-scale changes to the built environment. They provide valuable data that might not otherwise be possible to gather, because of the costs associated with modification of the environment. However, factors beyond the control of the study team contribute to the complexity of both organising and conducting natural experiments, with potential flow-on effects to the quality of data. Therefore many extraneous factors need to be considered when designing, costing and conducting natural experiments; studies should identify opportunities to include key partners from the inception of the project, be flexible yet robust, and allow sufficient funding to accommodate unexpected changes in the research protocol. Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547 , registration date 11.1.2014.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5240380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A478122491</galeid><sourcerecordid>A478122491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ac6ba014dfe60cb412bf40fd1ff05e424ceb0ef5fe6214a3a05442da956af973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9vFCEQx4mxsT_0D_DFbOKLfdgKLHDsi8nl0mqTGk3b-EpYdtij7sK5sE3738t6be0ZQwhk5jPDzPBF6C3BJ4RI8TESWgtRYpI3E7jEL9ABYYu65FLIl8_u--gwxhuMKyIxf4X2qcR1tpMDdLVa674H30EsnC9M8O1kkvNd4XWaRt0XcLeB0Q3g0x9io8efsewhxuBjYccwFGkNxeXpj-XX70VMU3v_Gu1Z3Ud483Aeoeuz0-vVl_Li2-fz1fKiNJzKVGojGo0Jay0IbBpGaGMZti2xFnNglBloMFie3ZQwXWnMGaOtrrnQtl5UR-jTNu1magZoTa4w16s2uVg93qugndr1eLdWXbhVnDJcSZwTfHhIMIZfE8SkBhcN9L32EKao8ogJFxLLOqPv_0FvwjT63N1McVLnjuhfqtM9KOdtyO-aOalasoUklLKaZOrkP1ReLQwufwBYl-07Acc7AZlJcJc6PcWozq8ud1myZc0YYhzBPs2DYDWLRm1Fo7Jo1CwaNc_h3fNBPkU8qqT6DSegvA0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865195282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks-lessons from the REVAMP study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Veitch, Jenny ; Salmon, Jo ; Giles-Corti, Billie ; Crawford, David ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Carver, Alison ; Timperio, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Veitch, Jenny ; Salmon, Jo ; Giles-Corti, Billie ; Crawford, David ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Carver, Alison ; Timperio, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbishment. Government agencies often modify parks, providing opportunities for natural experiment studies of these interventions. Such an opportunity was provided by the modification of a large park in Victoria, Australia in 2013 when the Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study was established. Based on insights from the REVAMP study, this paper discusses challenges involved in conducting natural experiments in park settings, focussing on issues that may help design more effective future evaluations of the impact of park refurbishment. Natural experiments offer unique opportunities to evaluate the impact of large-scale changes to the built environment. They provide valuable data that might not otherwise be possible to gather, because of the costs associated with modification of the environment. However, factors beyond the control of the study team contribute to the complexity of both organising and conducting natural experiments, with potential flow-on effects to the quality of data. Therefore many extraneous factors need to be considered when designing, costing and conducting natural experiments; studies should identify opportunities to include key partners from the inception of the project, be flexible yet robust, and allow sufficient funding to accommodate unexpected changes in the research protocol. Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547 , registration date 11.1.2014.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-5868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-5868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28095861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Central business districts ; Chronic illnesses ; Cities ; Councils ; Debate ; Environment ; Environment Design ; Ethics ; Exercise ; Experiments ; Funding ; Health promotion ; Humans ; Intervention ; Management ; Medical research ; Parks ; Physical fitness ; Problem Solving ; Public Facilities ; Public health ; Recreation ; Research Design ; Researchers ; Victoria</subject><ispartof>The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017-01, Vol.14 (1), p.5-5, Article 5</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ac6ba014dfe60cb412bf40fd1ff05e424ceb0ef5fe6214a3a05442da956af973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ac6ba014dfe60cb412bf40fd1ff05e424ceb0ef5fe6214a3a05442da956af973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240380/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5240380/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28095861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Veitch, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles-Corti, Billie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullaghan, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carver, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timperio, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks-lessons from the REVAMP study</title><title>The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity</title><addtitle>Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act</addtitle><description>Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbishment. Government agencies often modify parks, providing opportunities for natural experiment studies of these interventions. Such an opportunity was provided by the modification of a large park in Victoria, Australia in 2013 when the Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study was established. Based on insights from the REVAMP study, this paper discusses challenges involved in conducting natural experiments in park settings, focussing on issues that may help design more effective future evaluations of the impact of park refurbishment. Natural experiments offer unique opportunities to evaluate the impact of large-scale changes to the built environment. They provide valuable data that might not otherwise be possible to gather, because of the costs associated with modification of the environment. However, factors beyond the control of the study team contribute to the complexity of both organising and conducting natural experiments, with potential flow-on effects to the quality of data. Therefore many extraneous factors need to be considered when designing, costing and conducting natural experiments; studies should identify opportunities to include key partners from the inception of the project, be flexible yet robust, and allow sufficient funding to accommodate unexpected changes in the research protocol. Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547 , registration date 11.1.2014.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Central business districts</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Debate</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environment Design</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Parks</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Public Facilities</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Victoria</subject><issn>1479-5868</issn><issn>1479-5868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9vFCEQx4mxsT_0D_DFbOKLfdgKLHDsi8nl0mqTGk3b-EpYdtij7sK5sE3738t6be0ZQwhk5jPDzPBF6C3BJ4RI8TESWgtRYpI3E7jEL9ABYYu65FLIl8_u--gwxhuMKyIxf4X2qcR1tpMDdLVa674H30EsnC9M8O1kkvNd4XWaRt0XcLeB0Q3g0x9io8efsewhxuBjYccwFGkNxeXpj-XX70VMU3v_Gu1Z3Ud483Aeoeuz0-vVl_Li2-fz1fKiNJzKVGojGo0Jay0IbBpGaGMZti2xFnNglBloMFie3ZQwXWnMGaOtrrnQtl5UR-jTNu1magZoTa4w16s2uVg93qugndr1eLdWXbhVnDJcSZwTfHhIMIZfE8SkBhcN9L32EKao8ogJFxLLOqPv_0FvwjT63N1McVLnjuhfqtM9KOdtyO-aOalasoUklLKaZOrkP1ReLQwufwBYl-07Acc7AZlJcJc6PcWozq8ud1myZc0YYhzBPs2DYDWLRm1Fo7Jo1CwaNc_h3fNBPkU8qqT6DSegvA0</recordid><startdate>20170117</startdate><enddate>20170117</enddate><creator>Veitch, Jenny</creator><creator>Salmon, Jo</creator><creator>Giles-Corti, Billie</creator><creator>Crawford, David</creator><creator>Dullaghan, Kate</creator><creator>Carver, Alison</creator><creator>Timperio, Anna</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170117</creationdate><title>Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks-lessons from the REVAMP study</title><author>Veitch, Jenny ; Salmon, Jo ; Giles-Corti, Billie ; Crawford, David ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Carver, Alison ; Timperio, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-ac6ba014dfe60cb412bf40fd1ff05e424ceb0ef5fe6214a3a05442da956af973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Central business districts</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Debate</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environment Design</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Parks</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Public Facilities</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Victoria</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Veitch, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmon, Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles-Corti, Billie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullaghan, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carver, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timperio, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Veitch, Jenny</au><au>Salmon, Jo</au><au>Giles-Corti, Billie</au><au>Crawford, David</au><au>Dullaghan, Kate</au><au>Carver, Alison</au><au>Timperio, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks-lessons from the REVAMP study</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act</addtitle><date>2017-01-17</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>5-5</pages><artnum>5</artnum><issn>1479-5868</issn><eissn>1479-5868</eissn><abstract>Experimental evidence on the role of the built environment for promoting physical activity is important for informing how to create cities that promote active living. Parks provide opportunities for physical activity; however, there is little robust evidence on the impact of park refurbishment. Government agencies often modify parks, providing opportunities for natural experiment studies of these interventions. Such an opportunity was provided by the modification of a large park in Victoria, Australia in 2013 when the Recording and EValuating Activity in a Modified Park (REVAMP) study was established. Based on insights from the REVAMP study, this paper discusses challenges involved in conducting natural experiments in park settings, focussing on issues that may help design more effective future evaluations of the impact of park refurbishment. Natural experiments offer unique opportunities to evaluate the impact of large-scale changes to the built environment. They provide valuable data that might not otherwise be possible to gather, because of the costs associated with modification of the environment. However, factors beyond the control of the study team contribute to the complexity of both organising and conducting natural experiments, with potential flow-on effects to the quality of data. Therefore many extraneous factors need to be considered when designing, costing and conducting natural experiments; studies should identify opportunities to include key partners from the inception of the project, be flexible yet robust, and allow sufficient funding to accommodate unexpected changes in the research protocol. Current controlled trial ISRCTN50745547 , registration date 11.1.2014.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>28095861</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-5868
ispartof The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017-01, Vol.14 (1), p.5-5, Article 5
issn 1479-5868
1479-5868
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5240380
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Australia
Central business districts
Chronic illnesses
Cities
Councils
Debate
Environment
Environment Design
Ethics
Exercise
Experiments
Funding
Health promotion
Humans
Intervention
Management
Medical research
Parks
Physical fitness
Problem Solving
Public Facilities
Public health
Recreation
Research Design
Researchers
Victoria
title Challenges in conducting natural experiments in parks-lessons from the REVAMP study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T21%3A05%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Challenges%20in%20conducting%20natural%20experiments%20in%20parks-lessons%20from%20the%20REVAMP%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20behavioral%20nutrition%20and%20physical%20activity&rft.au=Veitch,%20Jenny&rft.date=2017-01-17&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=5-5&rft.artnum=5&rft.issn=1479-5868&rft.eissn=1479-5868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12966-016-0460-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA478122491%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865195282&rft_id=info:pmid/28095861&rft_galeid=A478122491&rfr_iscdi=true