The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013

An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km . IFLs are critical for stabilizing terrestrial carbon storage, harboring biodiversity, regulating hydrological regimes, an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science advances 2017-01, Vol.3 (1), p.e1600821-e1600821
Hauptverfasser: Potapov, Peter, Hansen, Matthew C, Laestadius, Lars, Turubanova, Svetlana, Yaroshenko, Alexey, Thies, Christoph, Smith, Wynet, Zhuravleva, Ilona, Komarova, Anna, Minnemeyer, Susan, Esipova, Elena
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e1600821
container_issue 1
container_start_page e1600821
container_title Science advances
container_volume 3
creator Potapov, Peter
Hansen, Matthew C
Laestadius, Lars
Turubanova, Svetlana
Yaroshenko, Alexey
Thies, Christoph
Smith, Wynet
Zhuravleva, Ilona
Komarova, Anna
Minnemeyer, Susan
Esipova, Elena
description An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km . IFLs are critical for stabilizing terrestrial carbon storage, harboring biodiversity, regulating hydrological regimes, and providing other ecosystem functions. Although the remaining IFLs comprise only 20% of tropical forest area, they account for 40% of the total aboveground tropical forest carbon. We show that global IFL extent has been reduced by 7.2% since the year 2000. An increasing rate of global IFL area reduction was found, largely driven by the tripling of IFL tropical forest loss in 2011-2013 compared to that in 2001-2003. Industrial logging, agricultural expansion, fire, and mining/resource extraction were the primary causes of IFL area reduction. Protected areas (International Union for Conservation of Nature categories I to III) were found to have a positive effect in slowing the reduction of IFL area from timber harvesting but were less effective in limiting agricultural expansion. The certification of logging concessions under responsible management had a negligible impact on slowing IFL fragmentation in the Congo Basin. Fragmentation of IFLs by logging and establishment of roads and other infrastructure initiates a cascade of changes that lead to landscape transformation and loss of conservation values. Given that only 12% of the global IFL area is protected, our results illustrate the need for planning and investment in carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation efforts that target the most valuable remaining forests, as identified using the IFL approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/sciadv.1600821
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5235335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1861566353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-77db8ee1ace0eb3bb67b01dad804652c9265250f9156a06e3d15e8790cc3bbe13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUc1LwzAUD6I4qbt6lBy9bOajSVsPggy_YOBlHiWk6esWbZuZdBP_ezM3x4SQ9-D9PvLyQ-iCkjGlTF4HY3W1HlNJSM7oETpjPBMjJtL8-KAfoGEI74QQmkopaHGKBiwnRcaoPENvswXgRoce1951vQUfsKvxl20q8B2EcINnXpsP281x48Lv0Ha9NpHgPEReo7sqGL2EsJFoMYtOuHexUn6OTmrdBBjuaoJeH-5nk6fR9OXxeXI3HZlUyH6UZVWZA1BtgEDJy1JmJaGVrnKSSsFMweItSF1QITWRwCsqIM8KYkwEA-UJut3qLldlC5WBrve6UUtvW-2_ldNW_Z90dqHmbq0E44LHk6CrnYB3n6u4lmptMNDE5cCtgqK5jN5yA07QeAs1Pv6Hh3pvQ4naxKK2sahdLJFwefi4PfwvBP4DhQyJ7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1861566353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Potapov, Peter ; Hansen, Matthew C ; Laestadius, Lars ; Turubanova, Svetlana ; Yaroshenko, Alexey ; Thies, Christoph ; Smith, Wynet ; Zhuravleva, Ilona ; Komarova, Anna ; Minnemeyer, Susan ; Esipova, Elena</creator><creatorcontrib>Potapov, Peter ; Hansen, Matthew C ; Laestadius, Lars ; Turubanova, Svetlana ; Yaroshenko, Alexey ; Thies, Christoph ; Smith, Wynet ; Zhuravleva, Ilona ; Komarova, Anna ; Minnemeyer, Susan ; Esipova, Elena</creatorcontrib><description>An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km . IFLs are critical for stabilizing terrestrial carbon storage, harboring biodiversity, regulating hydrological regimes, and providing other ecosystem functions. Although the remaining IFLs comprise only 20% of tropical forest area, they account for 40% of the total aboveground tropical forest carbon. We show that global IFL extent has been reduced by 7.2% since the year 2000. An increasing rate of global IFL area reduction was found, largely driven by the tripling of IFL tropical forest loss in 2011-2013 compared to that in 2001-2003. Industrial logging, agricultural expansion, fire, and mining/resource extraction were the primary causes of IFL area reduction. Protected areas (International Union for Conservation of Nature categories I to III) were found to have a positive effect in slowing the reduction of IFL area from timber harvesting but were less effective in limiting agricultural expansion. The certification of logging concessions under responsible management had a negligible impact on slowing IFL fragmentation in the Congo Basin. Fragmentation of IFLs by logging and establishment of roads and other infrastructure initiates a cascade of changes that lead to landscape transformation and loss of conservation values. Given that only 12% of the global IFL area is protected, our results illustrate the need for planning and investment in carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation efforts that target the most valuable remaining forests, as identified using the IFL approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2375-2548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-2548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600821</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28097216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Conservation Biology ; SciAdv r-articles</subject><ispartof>Science advances, 2017-01, Vol.3 (1), p.e1600821-e1600821</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017, The Authors 2017 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-77db8ee1ace0eb3bb67b01dad804652c9265250f9156a06e3d15e8790cc3bbe13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-77db8ee1ace0eb3bb67b01dad804652c9265250f9156a06e3d15e8790cc3bbe13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1091-2882 ; 0000-0002-5568-0504 ; 0000-0003-4683-138X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5235335/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5235335/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28097216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potapov, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laestadius, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turubanova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaroshenko, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thies, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Wynet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuravleva, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komarova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minnemeyer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esipova, Elena</creatorcontrib><title>The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013</title><title>Science advances</title><addtitle>Sci Adv</addtitle><description>An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km . IFLs are critical for stabilizing terrestrial carbon storage, harboring biodiversity, regulating hydrological regimes, and providing other ecosystem functions. Although the remaining IFLs comprise only 20% of tropical forest area, they account for 40% of the total aboveground tropical forest carbon. We show that global IFL extent has been reduced by 7.2% since the year 2000. An increasing rate of global IFL area reduction was found, largely driven by the tripling of IFL tropical forest loss in 2011-2013 compared to that in 2001-2003. Industrial logging, agricultural expansion, fire, and mining/resource extraction were the primary causes of IFL area reduction. Protected areas (International Union for Conservation of Nature categories I to III) were found to have a positive effect in slowing the reduction of IFL area from timber harvesting but were less effective in limiting agricultural expansion. The certification of logging concessions under responsible management had a negligible impact on slowing IFL fragmentation in the Congo Basin. Fragmentation of IFLs by logging and establishment of roads and other infrastructure initiates a cascade of changes that lead to landscape transformation and loss of conservation values. Given that only 12% of the global IFL area is protected, our results illustrate the need for planning and investment in carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation efforts that target the most valuable remaining forests, as identified using the IFL approach.</description><subject>Conservation Biology</subject><subject>SciAdv r-articles</subject><issn>2375-2548</issn><issn>2375-2548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUc1LwzAUD6I4qbt6lBy9bOajSVsPggy_YOBlHiWk6esWbZuZdBP_ezM3x4SQ9-D9PvLyQ-iCkjGlTF4HY3W1HlNJSM7oETpjPBMjJtL8-KAfoGEI74QQmkopaHGKBiwnRcaoPENvswXgRoce1951vQUfsKvxl20q8B2EcINnXpsP281x48Lv0Ha9NpHgPEReo7sqGL2EsJFoMYtOuHexUn6OTmrdBBjuaoJeH-5nk6fR9OXxeXI3HZlUyH6UZVWZA1BtgEDJy1JmJaGVrnKSSsFMweItSF1QITWRwCsqIM8KYkwEA-UJut3qLldlC5WBrve6UUtvW-2_ldNW_Z90dqHmbq0E44LHk6CrnYB3n6u4lmptMNDE5cCtgqK5jN5yA07QeAs1Pv6Hh3pvQ4naxKK2sahdLJFwefi4PfwvBP4DhQyJ7A</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Potapov, Peter</creator><creator>Hansen, Matthew C</creator><creator>Laestadius, Lars</creator><creator>Turubanova, Svetlana</creator><creator>Yaroshenko, Alexey</creator><creator>Thies, Christoph</creator><creator>Smith, Wynet</creator><creator>Zhuravleva, Ilona</creator><creator>Komarova, Anna</creator><creator>Minnemeyer, Susan</creator><creator>Esipova, Elena</creator><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1091-2882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5568-0504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-138X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013</title><author>Potapov, Peter ; Hansen, Matthew C ; Laestadius, Lars ; Turubanova, Svetlana ; Yaroshenko, Alexey ; Thies, Christoph ; Smith, Wynet ; Zhuravleva, Ilona ; Komarova, Anna ; Minnemeyer, Susan ; Esipova, Elena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-77db8ee1ace0eb3bb67b01dad804652c9265250f9156a06e3d15e8790cc3bbe13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Conservation Biology</topic><topic>SciAdv r-articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potapov, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laestadius, Lars</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turubanova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaroshenko, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thies, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Wynet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuravleva, Ilona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komarova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minnemeyer, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esipova, Elena</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Science advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potapov, Peter</au><au>Hansen, Matthew C</au><au>Laestadius, Lars</au><au>Turubanova, Svetlana</au><au>Yaroshenko, Alexey</au><au>Thies, Christoph</au><au>Smith, Wynet</au><au>Zhuravleva, Ilona</au><au>Komarova, Anna</au><au>Minnemeyer, Susan</au><au>Esipova, Elena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013</atitle><jtitle>Science advances</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Adv</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e1600821</spage><epage>e1600821</epage><pages>e1600821-e1600821</pages><issn>2375-2548</issn><eissn>2375-2548</eissn><abstract>An intact forest landscape (IFL) is a seamless mosaic of forest and naturally treeless ecosystems with no remotely detected signs of human activity and a minimum area of 500 km . IFLs are critical for stabilizing terrestrial carbon storage, harboring biodiversity, regulating hydrological regimes, and providing other ecosystem functions. Although the remaining IFLs comprise only 20% of tropical forest area, they account for 40% of the total aboveground tropical forest carbon. We show that global IFL extent has been reduced by 7.2% since the year 2000. An increasing rate of global IFL area reduction was found, largely driven by the tripling of IFL tropical forest loss in 2011-2013 compared to that in 2001-2003. Industrial logging, agricultural expansion, fire, and mining/resource extraction were the primary causes of IFL area reduction. Protected areas (International Union for Conservation of Nature categories I to III) were found to have a positive effect in slowing the reduction of IFL area from timber harvesting but were less effective in limiting agricultural expansion. The certification of logging concessions under responsible management had a negligible impact on slowing IFL fragmentation in the Congo Basin. Fragmentation of IFLs by logging and establishment of roads and other infrastructure initiates a cascade of changes that lead to landscape transformation and loss of conservation values. Given that only 12% of the global IFL area is protected, our results illustrate the need for planning and investment in carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation efforts that target the most valuable remaining forests, as identified using the IFL approach.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>28097216</pmid><doi>10.1126/sciadv.1600821</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1091-2882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5568-0504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-138X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2375-2548
ispartof Science advances, 2017-01, Vol.3 (1), p.e1600821-e1600821
issn 2375-2548
2375-2548
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5235335
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Conservation Biology
SciAdv r-articles
title The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A47%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20last%20frontiers%20of%20wilderness:%20Tracking%20loss%20of%20intact%20forest%20landscapes%20from%202000%20to%202013&rft.jtitle=Science%20advances&rft.au=Potapov,%20Peter&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e1600821&rft.epage=e1600821&rft.pages=e1600821-e1600821&rft.issn=2375-2548&rft.eissn=2375-2548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/sciadv.1600821&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1861566353%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1861566353&rft_id=info:pmid/28097216&rfr_iscdi=true