Get Tough, Get Toxic, or Get a Bodyguard: Identifying Candidate Traits Conferring Belowground Resistance to Herbivores in Grasses

Grasses (Poaceae) are the fifth-largest plant family by species and their uses for crops, forage, fiber, and fuel make them the most economically important. In grasslands, which broadly-defined cover 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface outside of Greenland and Antarctica, 40-60% of net prima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in plant science 2017-01, Vol.7, p.1925
Hauptverfasser: Moore, Ben D, Johnson, Scott N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1925
container_title Frontiers in plant science
container_volume 7
creator Moore, Ben D
Johnson, Scott N
description Grasses (Poaceae) are the fifth-largest plant family by species and their uses for crops, forage, fiber, and fuel make them the most economically important. In grasslands, which broadly-defined cover 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface outside of Greenland and Antarctica, 40-60% of net primary productivity and 70-98% of invertebrate biomass occurs belowground, providing extensive scope for interactions between roots and rhizosphere invertebrates. Grasses invest 50-70% of fixed carbon into root construction, which suggests roots are high value tissues that should be defended from herbivores, but we know relatively little about such defenses. In this article, we identify candidate grass root defenses, including physical (tough) and chemical (toxic) resistance traits, together with indirect defenses involving recruitment of root herbivores' natural enemies. We draw on relevant literature to establish whether these defenses are present in grasses, and specifically in grass roots, and which herbivores of grasses are affected by these defenses. Physical defenses could include structural macro-molecules such as lignin, cellulose, suberin, and callose in addition to silica and calcium oxalate. Root hairs and rhizosheaths, a structural adaptation unique to grasses, might also play defensive roles. To date, only lignin and silica have been shown to negatively affect root herbivores. In terms of chemical resistance traits, nitrate, oxalic acid, terpenoids, alkaloids, amino acids, cyanogenic glycosides, benzoxazinoids, phenolics, and proteinase inhibitors have the potential to negatively affect grass root herbivores. Several good examples demonstrate the existence of indirect defenses in grass roots, including maize, which can recruit entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) via emission of (E)-β-caryophyllene, and similar defenses are likely to be common. In producing this review, we aimed to equip researchers with candidate root defenses for further research.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpls.2016.01925
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5214545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28105030</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-28de8a0bf0662b7292aa0cc6e18e31669bcf1be7f7f3f8bdbf22452aa252a0ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUUtPAjEQboxGCHL2ZvoDeLTdB7seTGSjQEJiYjDx1rTb6VIDW9Luohz95y6gBOcwj8x832TmQ-iWkkEQJOlQb1Z-wAiNB4SmLLpAbRrHYT-M2fvlWd5CXe8_SGMRIWk6ukYtltCmCEgbfU-gwgtbF8sePqZfJu9h6w6VwGOrdkUtnLrHMwVlZfTOlAXORKmMEhXghROm8jizpQbn9r0xrOxn4WxdKvwK3vhKlDngyuIpOGm21oHHpsQTJ7wHf4OutFh56P7GDnp7flpk0_78ZTLLHuf9PIzSqs8SBYkgUpM4ZnLEUiYEyfMYaAJBc2sqc00ljPRIBzqRSmrGwqgZYo0jUgQd9HDk3dRyDSpvjnFixTfOrIXbcSsM_98pzZIXdssjRsMojBqC4ZEgd9Z7B_qEpYTvBeF7QfheEH4QpEHcna88zf-9P_gBWHCK0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Get Tough, Get Toxic, or Get a Bodyguard: Identifying Candidate Traits Conferring Belowground Resistance to Herbivores in Grasses</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Moore, Ben D ; Johnson, Scott N</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ben D ; Johnson, Scott N</creatorcontrib><description>Grasses (Poaceae) are the fifth-largest plant family by species and their uses for crops, forage, fiber, and fuel make them the most economically important. In grasslands, which broadly-defined cover 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface outside of Greenland and Antarctica, 40-60% of net primary productivity and 70-98% of invertebrate biomass occurs belowground, providing extensive scope for interactions between roots and rhizosphere invertebrates. Grasses invest 50-70% of fixed carbon into root construction, which suggests roots are high value tissues that should be defended from herbivores, but we know relatively little about such defenses. In this article, we identify candidate grass root defenses, including physical (tough) and chemical (toxic) resistance traits, together with indirect defenses involving recruitment of root herbivores' natural enemies. We draw on relevant literature to establish whether these defenses are present in grasses, and specifically in grass roots, and which herbivores of grasses are affected by these defenses. Physical defenses could include structural macro-molecules such as lignin, cellulose, suberin, and callose in addition to silica and calcium oxalate. Root hairs and rhizosheaths, a structural adaptation unique to grasses, might also play defensive roles. To date, only lignin and silica have been shown to negatively affect root herbivores. In terms of chemical resistance traits, nitrate, oxalic acid, terpenoids, alkaloids, amino acids, cyanogenic glycosides, benzoxazinoids, phenolics, and proteinase inhibitors have the potential to negatively affect grass root herbivores. Several good examples demonstrate the existence of indirect defenses in grass roots, including maize, which can recruit entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) via emission of (E)-β-caryophyllene, and similar defenses are likely to be common. In producing this review, we aimed to equip researchers with candidate root defenses for further research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-462X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-462X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01925</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28105030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>Plant Science</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in plant science, 2017-01, Vol.7, p.1925</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Moore and Johnson. 2017 Moore and Johnson</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-28de8a0bf0662b7292aa0cc6e18e31669bcf1be7f7f3f8bdbf22452aa252a0ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-28de8a0bf0662b7292aa0cc6e18e31669bcf1be7f7f3f8bdbf22452aa252a0ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214545/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5214545/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28105030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ben D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Scott N</creatorcontrib><title>Get Tough, Get Toxic, or Get a Bodyguard: Identifying Candidate Traits Conferring Belowground Resistance to Herbivores in Grasses</title><title>Frontiers in plant science</title><addtitle>Front Plant Sci</addtitle><description>Grasses (Poaceae) are the fifth-largest plant family by species and their uses for crops, forage, fiber, and fuel make them the most economically important. In grasslands, which broadly-defined cover 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface outside of Greenland and Antarctica, 40-60% of net primary productivity and 70-98% of invertebrate biomass occurs belowground, providing extensive scope for interactions between roots and rhizosphere invertebrates. Grasses invest 50-70% of fixed carbon into root construction, which suggests roots are high value tissues that should be defended from herbivores, but we know relatively little about such defenses. In this article, we identify candidate grass root defenses, including physical (tough) and chemical (toxic) resistance traits, together with indirect defenses involving recruitment of root herbivores' natural enemies. We draw on relevant literature to establish whether these defenses are present in grasses, and specifically in grass roots, and which herbivores of grasses are affected by these defenses. Physical defenses could include structural macro-molecules such as lignin, cellulose, suberin, and callose in addition to silica and calcium oxalate. Root hairs and rhizosheaths, a structural adaptation unique to grasses, might also play defensive roles. To date, only lignin and silica have been shown to negatively affect root herbivores. In terms of chemical resistance traits, nitrate, oxalic acid, terpenoids, alkaloids, amino acids, cyanogenic glycosides, benzoxazinoids, phenolics, and proteinase inhibitors have the potential to negatively affect grass root herbivores. Several good examples demonstrate the existence of indirect defenses in grass roots, including maize, which can recruit entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) via emission of (E)-β-caryophyllene, and similar defenses are likely to be common. In producing this review, we aimed to equip researchers with candidate root defenses for further research.</description><subject>Plant Science</subject><issn>1664-462X</issn><issn>1664-462X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUUtPAjEQboxGCHL2ZvoDeLTdB7seTGSjQEJiYjDx1rTb6VIDW9Luohz95y6gBOcwj8x832TmQ-iWkkEQJOlQb1Z-wAiNB4SmLLpAbRrHYT-M2fvlWd5CXe8_SGMRIWk6ukYtltCmCEgbfU-gwgtbF8sePqZfJu9h6w6VwGOrdkUtnLrHMwVlZfTOlAXORKmMEhXghROm8jizpQbn9r0xrOxn4WxdKvwK3vhKlDngyuIpOGm21oHHpsQTJ7wHf4OutFh56P7GDnp7flpk0_78ZTLLHuf9PIzSqs8SBYkgUpM4ZnLEUiYEyfMYaAJBc2sqc00ljPRIBzqRSmrGwqgZYo0jUgQd9HDk3dRyDSpvjnFixTfOrIXbcSsM_98pzZIXdssjRsMojBqC4ZEgd9Z7B_qEpYTvBeF7QfheEH4QpEHcna88zf-9P_gBWHCK0g</recordid><startdate>20170105</startdate><enddate>20170105</enddate><creator>Moore, Ben D</creator><creator>Johnson, Scott N</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170105</creationdate><title>Get Tough, Get Toxic, or Get a Bodyguard: Identifying Candidate Traits Conferring Belowground Resistance to Herbivores in Grasses</title><author>Moore, Ben D ; Johnson, Scott N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-28de8a0bf0662b7292aa0cc6e18e31669bcf1be7f7f3f8bdbf22452aa252a0ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Plant Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, Ben D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Scott N</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in plant science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, Ben D</au><au>Johnson, Scott N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Get Tough, Get Toxic, or Get a Bodyguard: Identifying Candidate Traits Conferring Belowground Resistance to Herbivores in Grasses</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in plant science</jtitle><addtitle>Front Plant Sci</addtitle><date>2017-01-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>1925</spage><pages>1925-</pages><issn>1664-462X</issn><eissn>1664-462X</eissn><abstract>Grasses (Poaceae) are the fifth-largest plant family by species and their uses for crops, forage, fiber, and fuel make them the most economically important. In grasslands, which broadly-defined cover 40% of the Earth's terrestrial surface outside of Greenland and Antarctica, 40-60% of net primary productivity and 70-98% of invertebrate biomass occurs belowground, providing extensive scope for interactions between roots and rhizosphere invertebrates. Grasses invest 50-70% of fixed carbon into root construction, which suggests roots are high value tissues that should be defended from herbivores, but we know relatively little about such defenses. In this article, we identify candidate grass root defenses, including physical (tough) and chemical (toxic) resistance traits, together with indirect defenses involving recruitment of root herbivores' natural enemies. We draw on relevant literature to establish whether these defenses are present in grasses, and specifically in grass roots, and which herbivores of grasses are affected by these defenses. Physical defenses could include structural macro-molecules such as lignin, cellulose, suberin, and callose in addition to silica and calcium oxalate. Root hairs and rhizosheaths, a structural adaptation unique to grasses, might also play defensive roles. To date, only lignin and silica have been shown to negatively affect root herbivores. In terms of chemical resistance traits, nitrate, oxalic acid, terpenoids, alkaloids, amino acids, cyanogenic glycosides, benzoxazinoids, phenolics, and proteinase inhibitors have the potential to negatively affect grass root herbivores. Several good examples demonstrate the existence of indirect defenses in grass roots, including maize, which can recruit entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) via emission of (E)-β-caryophyllene, and similar defenses are likely to be common. In producing this review, we aimed to equip researchers with candidate root defenses for further research.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>28105030</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpls.2016.01925</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-462X
ispartof Frontiers in plant science, 2017-01, Vol.7, p.1925
issn 1664-462X
1664-462X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5214545
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Plant Science
title Get Tough, Get Toxic, or Get a Bodyguard: Identifying Candidate Traits Conferring Belowground Resistance to Herbivores in Grasses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A41%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Get%20Tough,%20Get%20Toxic,%20or%20Get%20a%20Bodyguard:%20Identifying%20Candidate%20Traits%20Conferring%20Belowground%20Resistance%20to%20Herbivores%20in%20Grasses&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20plant%20science&rft.au=Moore,%20Ben%20D&rft.date=2017-01-05&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=1925&rft.pages=1925-&rft.issn=1664-462X&rft.eissn=1664-462X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpls.2016.01925&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E28105030%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28105030&rfr_iscdi=true