Magnetic Susceptibility from Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Can Differentiate New Enhancing from Nonenhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium Injection

Magnetic susceptibility values of multiple sclerosis lesions increase as they change from gadolinium-enhancing to nonenhancing. Can susceptibility values measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping without gadolinium injection be used to identify the status of lesion enhancement in surveillance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 2016-10, Vol.37 (10), p.1794-1799
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Y, Gauthier, S A, Gupta, A, Tu, L, Comunale, J, Chiang, G C-Y, Chen, W, Salustri, C A, Zhu, W, Wang, Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1799
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1794
container_title American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
container_volume 37
creator Zhang, Y
Gauthier, S A
Gupta, A
Tu, L
Comunale, J
Chiang, G C-Y
Chen, W
Salustri, C A
Zhu, W
Wang, Y
description Magnetic susceptibility values of multiple sclerosis lesions increase as they change from gadolinium-enhancing to nonenhancing. Can susceptibility values measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping without gadolinium injection be used to identify the status of lesion enhancement in surveillance MR imaging used to monitor patients with MS? In patients who had prior MR imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in a current MR imaging, new T2-weighted lesions were evaluated for enhancement on conventional T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium, and their susceptibility values were measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of using quantitative susceptibility mapping in distinguishing new gadolinium-enhancing from new nonenhancing lesions. A generalized estimating equation was used to assess differences in susceptibility values among lesion types. In 54 patients, we identified 86 of 133 new lesions that were gadolinium-enhancing and had relative susceptibility values significantly lower than those of nonenhancing lesions (β = -17.2; 95% CI, -20.2 to -14.2; P < .0001). Using susceptibility values to discriminate enhancing from nonenhancing lesions, we performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and found that the area under the curve was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). Sensitivity was measured at 88.4%, and specificity, at 91.5%, with a cutoff value of 11.2 parts per billion for quantitative susceptibility mapping-measured susceptibility. During routine MR imaging monitoring to detect new MS lesion activity, quantitative susceptibility mapping can be used without gadolinium injection for accurate identification of the BBB leakage status in new T2WI lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.3174/ajnr.A4856
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5201451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826707578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-abb1141318029aad82c03c717b3671bc86091a02266c593b8d66e4ae400da6b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdFqFDEUhoModq3e-ACSSxGmJpOZJHMjlLXWwm5FVPAunMlkdrPMJNMk09JX6lM229ZFvQrk__iSc36E3lJywqioPsLOhZPTStb8GVrQhvGiqZvfz9GC0KYuOCXyCL2KcUcIqRtRvkRHpWC8Zowu0N0aNs4kq_GPOWozJdvawaZb3Ac_4u8zuGQTJHtt_gfWME3WbfASHP5s-94Ek1lIBl-aG3zmtuD0Pn8QXXpnDjfreUh2GrJRDyb4aCNemWi9i_jGpq2fEz6Hzg_W2XnEF25ndMrpa_SihyGaN0_nMfr15ezn8mux-nZ-sTxdFZoJmQpoW0oryqgkZQPQyVITpgUVLeOCtlpy0lAgZcm5rhvWyo5zU4GpCOmAtxU7Rp8evdPcjqbTeawAg5qCHSHcKg9W_Zs4u1Ubf63qktCqplnw_kkQ_NVsYlKjzasbBnDGz1FRWXJBRC1kRj88ojrvIQbTH56hRO3LVfty1UO5GX7398cO6J822T1_TKZX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826707578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic Susceptibility from Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Can Differentiate New Enhancing from Nonenhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium Injection</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhang, Y ; Gauthier, S A ; Gupta, A ; Tu, L ; Comunale, J ; Chiang, G C-Y ; Chen, W ; Salustri, C A ; Zhu, W ; Wang, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y ; Gauthier, S A ; Gupta, A ; Tu, L ; Comunale, J ; Chiang, G C-Y ; Chen, W ; Salustri, C A ; Zhu, W ; Wang, Y</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic susceptibility values of multiple sclerosis lesions increase as they change from gadolinium-enhancing to nonenhancing. Can susceptibility values measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping without gadolinium injection be used to identify the status of lesion enhancement in surveillance MR imaging used to monitor patients with MS? In patients who had prior MR imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in a current MR imaging, new T2-weighted lesions were evaluated for enhancement on conventional T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium, and their susceptibility values were measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of using quantitative susceptibility mapping in distinguishing new gadolinium-enhancing from new nonenhancing lesions. A generalized estimating equation was used to assess differences in susceptibility values among lesion types. In 54 patients, we identified 86 of 133 new lesions that were gadolinium-enhancing and had relative susceptibility values significantly lower than those of nonenhancing lesions (β = -17.2; 95% CI, -20.2 to -14.2; P &lt; .0001). Using susceptibility values to discriminate enhancing from nonenhancing lesions, we performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and found that the area under the curve was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). Sensitivity was measured at 88.4%, and specificity, at 91.5%, with a cutoff value of 11.2 parts per billion for quantitative susceptibility mapping-measured susceptibility. During routine MR imaging monitoring to detect new MS lesion activity, quantitative susceptibility mapping can be used without gadolinium injection for accurate identification of the BBB leakage status in new T2WI lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4856</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27365331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><subject>Adult Brain ; Editor's Choice</subject><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2016-10, Vol.37 (10), p.1794-1799</ispartof><rights>2016 American Society of Neuroradiology.</rights><rights>2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 American Journal of Neuroradiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-abb1141318029aad82c03c717b3671bc86091a02266c593b8d66e4ae400da6b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-abb1141318029aad82c03c717b3671bc86091a02266c593b8d66e4ae400da6b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9580-8499 ; 0000-0003-1404-8526 ; 0000-0002-4015-1781 ; 0000-0003-2816-0340 ; 0000-0001-6063-0109 ; 0000-0001-9925-0816 ; 0000-0002-2251-3777 ; 0000-0002-0969-9300 ; 0000-0001-8014-2364 ; 0000-0002-0254-6563</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201451/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201451/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27365331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comunale, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, G C-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salustri, C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic Susceptibility from Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Can Differentiate New Enhancing from Nonenhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium Injection</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><description>Magnetic susceptibility values of multiple sclerosis lesions increase as they change from gadolinium-enhancing to nonenhancing. Can susceptibility values measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping without gadolinium injection be used to identify the status of lesion enhancement in surveillance MR imaging used to monitor patients with MS? In patients who had prior MR imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in a current MR imaging, new T2-weighted lesions were evaluated for enhancement on conventional T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium, and their susceptibility values were measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of using quantitative susceptibility mapping in distinguishing new gadolinium-enhancing from new nonenhancing lesions. A generalized estimating equation was used to assess differences in susceptibility values among lesion types. In 54 patients, we identified 86 of 133 new lesions that were gadolinium-enhancing and had relative susceptibility values significantly lower than those of nonenhancing lesions (β = -17.2; 95% CI, -20.2 to -14.2; P &lt; .0001). Using susceptibility values to discriminate enhancing from nonenhancing lesions, we performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and found that the area under the curve was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). Sensitivity was measured at 88.4%, and specificity, at 91.5%, with a cutoff value of 11.2 parts per billion for quantitative susceptibility mapping-measured susceptibility. During routine MR imaging monitoring to detect new MS lesion activity, quantitative susceptibility mapping can be used without gadolinium injection for accurate identification of the BBB leakage status in new T2WI lesions.</description><subject>Adult Brain</subject><subject>Editor's Choice</subject><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkdFqFDEUhoModq3e-ACSSxGmJpOZJHMjlLXWwm5FVPAunMlkdrPMJNMk09JX6lM229ZFvQrk__iSc36E3lJywqioPsLOhZPTStb8GVrQhvGiqZvfz9GC0KYuOCXyCL2KcUcIqRtRvkRHpWC8Zowu0N0aNs4kq_GPOWozJdvawaZb3Ac_4u8zuGQTJHtt_gfWME3WbfASHP5s-94Ek1lIBl-aG3zmtuD0Pn8QXXpnDjfreUh2GrJRDyb4aCNemWi9i_jGpq2fEz6Hzg_W2XnEF25ndMrpa_SihyGaN0_nMfr15ezn8mux-nZ-sTxdFZoJmQpoW0oryqgkZQPQyVITpgUVLeOCtlpy0lAgZcm5rhvWyo5zU4GpCOmAtxU7Rp8evdPcjqbTeawAg5qCHSHcKg9W_Zs4u1Ubf63qktCqplnw_kkQ_NVsYlKjzasbBnDGz1FRWXJBRC1kRj88ojrvIQbTH56hRO3LVfty1UO5GX7398cO6J822T1_TKZX</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Zhang, Y</creator><creator>Gauthier, S A</creator><creator>Gupta, A</creator><creator>Tu, L</creator><creator>Comunale, J</creator><creator>Chiang, G C-Y</creator><creator>Chen, W</creator><creator>Salustri, C A</creator><creator>Zhu, W</creator><creator>Wang, Y</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-8499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-8526</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-1781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2816-0340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-0109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-0816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-3777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0969-9300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8014-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0254-6563</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Magnetic Susceptibility from Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Can Differentiate New Enhancing from Nonenhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium Injection</title><author>Zhang, Y ; Gauthier, S A ; Gupta, A ; Tu, L ; Comunale, J ; Chiang, G C-Y ; Chen, W ; Salustri, C A ; Zhu, W ; Wang, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-abb1141318029aad82c03c717b3671bc86091a02266c593b8d66e4ae400da6b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult Brain</topic><topic>Editor's Choice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tu, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comunale, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiang, G C-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salustri, C A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Y</au><au>Gauthier, S A</au><au>Gupta, A</au><au>Tu, L</au><au>Comunale, J</au><au>Chiang, G C-Y</au><au>Chen, W</au><au>Salustri, C A</au><au>Zhu, W</au><au>Wang, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic Susceptibility from Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Can Differentiate New Enhancing from Nonenhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium Injection</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><addtitle>AJNR Am J Neuroradiol</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1794</spage><epage>1799</epage><pages>1794-1799</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><abstract>Magnetic susceptibility values of multiple sclerosis lesions increase as they change from gadolinium-enhancing to nonenhancing. Can susceptibility values measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping without gadolinium injection be used to identify the status of lesion enhancement in surveillance MR imaging used to monitor patients with MS? In patients who had prior MR imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in a current MR imaging, new T2-weighted lesions were evaluated for enhancement on conventional T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium, and their susceptibility values were measured on quantitative susceptibility mapping. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of using quantitative susceptibility mapping in distinguishing new gadolinium-enhancing from new nonenhancing lesions. A generalized estimating equation was used to assess differences in susceptibility values among lesion types. In 54 patients, we identified 86 of 133 new lesions that were gadolinium-enhancing and had relative susceptibility values significantly lower than those of nonenhancing lesions (β = -17.2; 95% CI, -20.2 to -14.2; P &lt; .0001). Using susceptibility values to discriminate enhancing from nonenhancing lesions, we performed receiver operating characteristic analysis and found that the area under the curve was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). Sensitivity was measured at 88.4%, and specificity, at 91.5%, with a cutoff value of 11.2 parts per billion for quantitative susceptibility mapping-measured susceptibility. During routine MR imaging monitoring to detect new MS lesion activity, quantitative susceptibility mapping can be used without gadolinium injection for accurate identification of the BBB leakage status in new T2WI lesions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>27365331</pmid><doi>10.3174/ajnr.A4856</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-8499</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-8526</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-1781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2816-0340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6063-0109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-0816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-3777</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0969-9300</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8014-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0254-6563</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 2016-10, Vol.37 (10), p.1794-1799
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5201451
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult Brain
Editor's Choice
title Magnetic Susceptibility from Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Can Differentiate New Enhancing from Nonenhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesions without Gadolinium Injection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T08%3A07%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20Susceptibility%20from%20Quantitative%20Susceptibility%20Mapping%20Can%20Differentiate%20New%20Enhancing%20from%20Nonenhancing%20Multiple%20Sclerosis%20Lesions%20without%20Gadolinium%20Injection&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Zhang,%20Y&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1794&rft.epage=1799&rft.pages=1794-1799&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3174/ajnr.A4856&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826707578%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826707578&rft_id=info:pmid/27365331&rfr_iscdi=true