Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification
While cotinine is commonly used as a biomarker to validate self-reported smoking status, the selection of an optimal cotinine cutoff value for distinguishing true smokers from true nonsmokers shows a lack of standardization among studies. This review describes how the cutoff values have been derived...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2016-12, Vol.13 (12), p.1236 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1236 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Kim, Sungroul |
description | While cotinine is commonly used as a biomarker to validate self-reported smoking status, the selection of an optimal cotinine cutoff value for distinguishing true smokers from true nonsmokers shows a lack of standardization among studies. This review describes how the cutoff values have been derived, and explains the issues involved in the generalization of a cutoff value. In this study, we conducted an English-language literature search in PubMed using the keywords "cotinine" and "cutoff" or "self-reported" and "smoking status" and "validation" for the years 1985-2014. We obtained 104 articles, 32 of which provided (1) sensitivity and specificity of a cutoff value and (2) determination methods for the given cutoff value. We found that the saliva cotinine cutoff value range of 10-25 ng/mL, serum and urine cotinine cutoff of 10-20 ng/mL and 50-200 ng/mL, respectively, have been commonly used to validate self-reported smoking status using a 2 × 2 table or a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. We also found that recent large population-based studies in the U.S. and UK reported lower cutoff values for cotinine in serum (3 ng/mL) and saliva (12 ng/mL), compared to the traditionally accepted ones (15 and 14 ng/mg, respectively). |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph13121236 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5201377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2582823296</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6245fbee693fd1b4f603c7934332529a025e3a28913941aeb337c436aea1b5fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4Mobk6vHqXgxUtnkpemzUWQ-hMGO0y9hrRLtsyumUk78b-3simbp_fgfd6X75cvQucEDwEEvrYL7VdzAoQSCvwA9QnnOGYck8OdvYdOQlhgDBnj4hj1aCoy4Dzpo7vxWvu11Z-RM1HuGlvbWkd52zhjojdVtTpExvlosnTvtp5Fk0Y1bYjySoVgjS1VY119io6MqoI-284Ben24f8mf4tH48Tm_HcUly1gTc8oSU2jNBZgpKZjhGMpUAAOgCRUK00SDopkgIBhRugBISwZcaUWKxExhgG42uqu2WOppqevGq0quvF0q_yWdsnL_Utu5nLm1TCgmkKadwNVWwLuPLlojlzaUuqpUrV0bJMkSygXuDHbo5T904Vpfd_EkTTKaUaCCd9RwQ5XeheC1-TNDsPwpSO4X1D1c7Eb4w38bgW__h4zc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582823296</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Kim, Sungroul</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sungroul</creatorcontrib><description>While cotinine is commonly used as a biomarker to validate self-reported smoking status, the selection of an optimal cotinine cutoff value for distinguishing true smokers from true nonsmokers shows a lack of standardization among studies. This review describes how the cutoff values have been derived, and explains the issues involved in the generalization of a cutoff value. In this study, we conducted an English-language literature search in PubMed using the keywords "cotinine" and "cutoff" or "self-reported" and "smoking status" and "validation" for the years 1985-2014. We obtained 104 articles, 32 of which provided (1) sensitivity and specificity of a cutoff value and (2) determination methods for the given cutoff value. We found that the saliva cotinine cutoff value range of 10-25 ng/mL, serum and urine cotinine cutoff of 10-20 ng/mL and 50-200 ng/mL, respectively, have been commonly used to validate self-reported smoking status using a 2 × 2 table or a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. We also found that recent large population-based studies in the U.S. and UK reported lower cutoff values for cotinine in serum (3 ng/mL) and saliva (12 ng/mL), compared to the traditionally accepted ones (15 and 14 ng/mg, respectively).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13121236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27983665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biomarkers ; Cotinine ; Cotinine - analysis ; Cotinine - blood ; Cotinine - urine ; Female ; Humans ; Metabolites ; Nicotine ; Population ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; Questionnaires ; Review ; ROC Curve ; Saliva ; Saliva - chemistry ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Smoking ; Smoking - metabolism ; Standardization ; Tobacco smoke ; Urine</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016-12, Vol.13 (12), p.1236</ispartof><rights>2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 by the author; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6245fbee693fd1b4f603c7934332529a025e3a28913941aeb337c436aea1b5fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6245fbee693fd1b4f603c7934332529a025e3a28913941aeb337c436aea1b5fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201377/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5201377/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27983665$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sungroul</creatorcontrib><title>Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>While cotinine is commonly used as a biomarker to validate self-reported smoking status, the selection of an optimal cotinine cutoff value for distinguishing true smokers from true nonsmokers shows a lack of standardization among studies. This review describes how the cutoff values have been derived, and explains the issues involved in the generalization of a cutoff value. In this study, we conducted an English-language literature search in PubMed using the keywords "cotinine" and "cutoff" or "self-reported" and "smoking status" and "validation" for the years 1985-2014. We obtained 104 articles, 32 of which provided (1) sensitivity and specificity of a cutoff value and (2) determination methods for the given cutoff value. We found that the saliva cotinine cutoff value range of 10-25 ng/mL, serum and urine cotinine cutoff of 10-20 ng/mL and 50-200 ng/mL, respectively, have been commonly used to validate self-reported smoking status using a 2 × 2 table or a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. We also found that recent large population-based studies in the U.S. and UK reported lower cutoff values for cotinine in serum (3 ng/mL) and saliva (12 ng/mL), compared to the traditionally accepted ones (15 and 14 ng/mg, respectively).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cotinine</subject><subject>Cotinine - analysis</subject><subject>Cotinine - blood</subject><subject>Cotinine - urine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Saliva</subject><subject>Saliva - chemistry</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - metabolism</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Tobacco smoke</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4Mobk6vHqXgxUtnkpemzUWQ-hMGO0y9hrRLtsyumUk78b-3simbp_fgfd6X75cvQucEDwEEvrYL7VdzAoQSCvwA9QnnOGYck8OdvYdOQlhgDBnj4hj1aCoy4Dzpo7vxWvu11Z-RM1HuGlvbWkd52zhjojdVtTpExvlosnTvtp5Fk0Y1bYjySoVgjS1VY119io6MqoI-284Ben24f8mf4tH48Tm_HcUly1gTc8oSU2jNBZgpKZjhGMpUAAOgCRUK00SDopkgIBhRugBISwZcaUWKxExhgG42uqu2WOppqevGq0quvF0q_yWdsnL_Utu5nLm1TCgmkKadwNVWwLuPLlojlzaUuqpUrV0bJMkSygXuDHbo5T904Vpfd_EkTTKaUaCCd9RwQ5XeheC1-TNDsPwpSO4X1D1c7Eb4w38bgW__h4zc</recordid><startdate>20161214</startdate><enddate>20161214</enddate><creator>Kim, Sungroul</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161214</creationdate><title>Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification</title><author>Kim, Sungroul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-6245fbee693fd1b4f603c7934332529a025e3a28913941aeb337c436aea1b5fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cotinine</topic><topic>Cotinine - analysis</topic><topic>Cotinine - blood</topic><topic>Cotinine - urine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Saliva</topic><topic>Saliva - chemistry</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - metabolism</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Tobacco smoke</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sungroul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Sungroul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2016-12-14</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1236</spage><pages>1236-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>While cotinine is commonly used as a biomarker to validate self-reported smoking status, the selection of an optimal cotinine cutoff value for distinguishing true smokers from true nonsmokers shows a lack of standardization among studies. This review describes how the cutoff values have been derived, and explains the issues involved in the generalization of a cutoff value. In this study, we conducted an English-language literature search in PubMed using the keywords "cotinine" and "cutoff" or "self-reported" and "smoking status" and "validation" for the years 1985-2014. We obtained 104 articles, 32 of which provided (1) sensitivity and specificity of a cutoff value and (2) determination methods for the given cutoff value. We found that the saliva cotinine cutoff value range of 10-25 ng/mL, serum and urine cotinine cutoff of 10-20 ng/mL and 50-200 ng/mL, respectively, have been commonly used to validate self-reported smoking status using a 2 × 2 table or a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. We also found that recent large population-based studies in the U.S. and UK reported lower cutoff values for cotinine in serum (3 ng/mL) and saliva (12 ng/mL), compared to the traditionally accepted ones (15 and 14 ng/mg, respectively).</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>27983665</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph13121236</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016-12, Vol.13 (12), p.1236 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5201377 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Adult Biomarkers Cotinine Cotinine - analysis Cotinine - blood Cotinine - urine Female Humans Metabolites Nicotine Population Population studies Population-based studies Questionnaires Review ROC Curve Saliva Saliva - chemistry Sensitivity and Specificity Smoking Smoking - metabolism Standardization Tobacco smoke Urine |
title | Overview of Cotinine Cutoff Values for Smoking Status Classification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A44%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overview%20of%20Cotinine%20Cutoff%20Values%20for%20Smoking%20Status%20Classification&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Kim,%20Sungroul&rft.date=2016-12-14&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1236&rft.pages=1236-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph13121236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2582823296%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582823296&rft_id=info:pmid/27983665&rfr_iscdi=true |