Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?

•Half of DWI-convicted persons enrolling in DWI and drug courts completed the programs.•Completing a specialty program was associated with lower re-arrest rates for DWI.•Enrolling in but not completing a specialty court program did result in a reduction in recidivism.•DWI court completers were less...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Accident analysis and prevention 2016-12, Vol.97, p.197-205
Hauptverfasser: Sloan, Frank A., Gifford, Elizabeth J., Eldred, Lindsey M., McCutchan, Sabrina A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 205
container_issue
container_start_page 197
container_title Accident analysis and prevention
container_volume 97
creator Sloan, Frank A.
Gifford, Elizabeth J.
Eldred, Lindsey M.
McCutchan, Sabrina A.
description •Half of DWI-convicted persons enrolling in DWI and drug courts completed the programs.•Completing a specialty program was associated with lower re-arrest rates for DWI.•Enrolling in but not completing a specialty court program did result in a reduction in recidivism.•DWI court completers were less re-arrest prone than drug court completers.•Only slightly over 1% of arrestees for DWI were referred to a specialty court. Using North Carolina administrative data, this study examined recidivism following participation in specialty hybrid drug and driving while intoxicated (DWI) court programs. Three court program participation levels were considered—being referred to, enrolling in, and completing a specialty court program. Measures of DWI recidivism were: arrest and total number of arrests for DWI, and being convicted of DWI during follow-up periods of two and, alternatively, four years. Propensity score matching was used to obtain comparable control groups. Using a four-year follow-up, persons convicted of a DWI who completed a specialty court program were associated with a greater reduction in DWI re-arrests and re-convictions than did matched individuals who were never referred to a specialty court program. DWI courts were more effective in reducing re-arrests than hybrid drug courts were. Although promising from the vantage point of participants, few persons convicted of a DWI were referred to either court type, thus limiting this strategy’s potential effectiveness in reducing DWI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5154895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001457516303153</els_id><sourcerecordid>1859500680</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-dab183b9ba6941b07f7dc33153f7b471731b1c7a089af5fc8b01775798157b423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFvFCEUx4nR2G31A3gxHL3MyBuGAWKiMa3VJk28aDwSYJhdNjPDCEzNfnvZbG30YnoCwu_98t77I_QKSA0Eurf7Wuulbsq1JqImjXyCNiC4rBrC-FO0IYRA1TLOztB5Svvy5IKz5-is4R0TTdNt0HIVXMJ55_ASg9HGjz4fcBjw1Y8brGN0KeNBjyMewjiGX37e4kXH7K1fdPZhxn4-oXOPdwcTfY_7uG5xjk7nyc0Z27DGfLRvo57ShxfoWfEl9_L-vEDfrz99u_xS3X79fHP58bayrGW56rUBQY00upMtGMIH3ltKgdGBm5YDp2DAck2E1AMbrDAEOGdcCmAFaOgFen_yLquZXG9LK1GPaol-0vGggvbq35_Z79Q23CkGrBWSFcGbe0EMP9eyBzX5ZN046tmFNSkQghDagWwfgTLJCOkEeQRKWScol7SgcEJtDClFNzw0D0Qd81d7VfJXx_wVEarkX2pe_z31Q8WfwAvw7gS4svs776JK1rvZut5HZ7Pqg_-P_jf1fMFF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835683793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sloan, Frank A. ; Gifford, Elizabeth J. ; Eldred, Lindsey M. ; McCutchan, Sabrina A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sloan, Frank A. ; Gifford, Elizabeth J. ; Eldred, Lindsey M. ; McCutchan, Sabrina A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Half of DWI-convicted persons enrolling in DWI and drug courts completed the programs.•Completing a specialty program was associated with lower re-arrest rates for DWI.•Enrolling in but not completing a specialty court program did result in a reduction in recidivism.•DWI court completers were less re-arrest prone than drug court completers.•Only slightly over 1% of arrestees for DWI were referred to a specialty court. Using North Carolina administrative data, this study examined recidivism following participation in specialty hybrid drug and driving while intoxicated (DWI) court programs. Three court program participation levels were considered—being referred to, enrolling in, and completing a specialty court program. Measures of DWI recidivism were: arrest and total number of arrests for DWI, and being convicted of DWI during follow-up periods of two and, alternatively, four years. Propensity score matching was used to obtain comparable control groups. Using a four-year follow-up, persons convicted of a DWI who completed a specialty court program were associated with a greater reduction in DWI re-arrests and re-convictions than did matched individuals who were never referred to a specialty court program. DWI courts were more effective in reducing re-arrests than hybrid drug courts were. Although promising from the vantage point of participants, few persons convicted of a DWI were referred to either court type, thus limiting this strategy’s potential effectiveness in reducing DWI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27658226</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accident analysis ; Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Constraining ; Drinking and driving ; Driving Under the Influence - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Driving Under the Influence - prevention &amp; control ; Driving Under the Influence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Drugs ; DWI courts ; Female ; Forensic engineering ; Humans ; Hybrid drug courts ; Judicial Role ; Law Enforcement ; Male ; Matching ; North Carolina ; Preventive Health Services ; Propensity Score ; Recidivism ; Reduction ; Strategy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Accident analysis and prevention, 2016-12, Vol.97, p.197-205</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-dab183b9ba6941b07f7dc33153f7b471731b1c7a089af5fc8b01775798157b423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-dab183b9ba6941b07f7dc33153f7b471731b1c7a089af5fc8b01775798157b423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5785-0423</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658226$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sloan, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldred, Lindsey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCutchan, Sabrina A.</creatorcontrib><title>Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?</title><title>Accident analysis and prevention</title><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><description>•Half of DWI-convicted persons enrolling in DWI and drug courts completed the programs.•Completing a specialty program was associated with lower re-arrest rates for DWI.•Enrolling in but not completing a specialty court program did result in a reduction in recidivism.•DWI court completers were less re-arrest prone than drug court completers.•Only slightly over 1% of arrestees for DWI were referred to a specialty court. Using North Carolina administrative data, this study examined recidivism following participation in specialty hybrid drug and driving while intoxicated (DWI) court programs. Three court program participation levels were considered—being referred to, enrolling in, and completing a specialty court program. Measures of DWI recidivism were: arrest and total number of arrests for DWI, and being convicted of DWI during follow-up periods of two and, alternatively, four years. Propensity score matching was used to obtain comparable control groups. Using a four-year follow-up, persons convicted of a DWI who completed a specialty court program were associated with a greater reduction in DWI re-arrests and re-convictions than did matched individuals who were never referred to a specialty court program. DWI courts were more effective in reducing re-arrests than hybrid drug courts were. Although promising from the vantage point of participants, few persons convicted of a DWI were referred to either court type, thus limiting this strategy’s potential effectiveness in reducing DWI.</description><subject>Accident analysis</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Constraining</subject><subject>Drinking and driving</subject><subject>Driving Under the Influence - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Driving Under the Influence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Driving Under the Influence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>DWI courts</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forensic engineering</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hybrid drug courts</subject><subject>Judicial Role</subject><subject>Law Enforcement</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Matching</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Preventive Health Services</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4575</issn><issn>1879-2057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFvFCEUx4nR2G31A3gxHL3MyBuGAWKiMa3VJk28aDwSYJhdNjPDCEzNfnvZbG30YnoCwu_98t77I_QKSA0Eurf7Wuulbsq1JqImjXyCNiC4rBrC-FO0IYRA1TLOztB5Svvy5IKz5-is4R0TTdNt0HIVXMJ55_ASg9HGjz4fcBjw1Y8brGN0KeNBjyMewjiGX37e4kXH7K1fdPZhxn4-oXOPdwcTfY_7uG5xjk7nyc0Z27DGfLRvo57ShxfoWfEl9_L-vEDfrz99u_xS3X79fHP58bayrGW56rUBQY00upMtGMIH3ltKgdGBm5YDp2DAck2E1AMbrDAEOGdcCmAFaOgFen_yLquZXG9LK1GPaol-0vGggvbq35_Z79Q23CkGrBWSFcGbe0EMP9eyBzX5ZN046tmFNSkQghDagWwfgTLJCOkEeQRKWScol7SgcEJtDClFNzw0D0Qd81d7VfJXx_wVEarkX2pe_z31Q8WfwAvw7gS4svs776JK1rvZut5HZ7Pqg_-P_jf1fMFF</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Sloan, Frank A.</creator><creator>Gifford, Elizabeth J.</creator><creator>Eldred, Lindsey M.</creator><creator>McCutchan, Sabrina A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-0423</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?</title><author>Sloan, Frank A. ; Gifford, Elizabeth J. ; Eldred, Lindsey M. ; McCutchan, Sabrina A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c545t-dab183b9ba6941b07f7dc33153f7b471731b1c7a089af5fc8b01775798157b423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accident analysis</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Constraining</topic><topic>Drinking and driving</topic><topic>Driving Under the Influence - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Driving Under the Influence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Driving Under the Influence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>DWI courts</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forensic engineering</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hybrid drug courts</topic><topic>Judicial Role</topic><topic>Law Enforcement</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Matching</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Preventive Health Services</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sloan, Frank A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gifford, Elizabeth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldred, Lindsey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCutchan, Sabrina A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sloan, Frank A.</au><au>Gifford, Elizabeth J.</au><au>Eldred, Lindsey M.</au><au>McCutchan, Sabrina A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?</atitle><jtitle>Accident analysis and prevention</jtitle><addtitle>Accid Anal Prev</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>97</volume><spage>197</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>197-205</pages><issn>0001-4575</issn><eissn>1879-2057</eissn><abstract>•Half of DWI-convicted persons enrolling in DWI and drug courts completed the programs.•Completing a specialty program was associated with lower re-arrest rates for DWI.•Enrolling in but not completing a specialty court program did result in a reduction in recidivism.•DWI court completers were less re-arrest prone than drug court completers.•Only slightly over 1% of arrestees for DWI were referred to a specialty court. Using North Carolina administrative data, this study examined recidivism following participation in specialty hybrid drug and driving while intoxicated (DWI) court programs. Three court program participation levels were considered—being referred to, enrolling in, and completing a specialty court program. Measures of DWI recidivism were: arrest and total number of arrests for DWI, and being convicted of DWI during follow-up periods of two and, alternatively, four years. Propensity score matching was used to obtain comparable control groups. Using a four-year follow-up, persons convicted of a DWI who completed a specialty court program were associated with a greater reduction in DWI re-arrests and re-convictions than did matched individuals who were never referred to a specialty court program. DWI courts were more effective in reducing re-arrests than hybrid drug courts were. Although promising from the vantage point of participants, few persons convicted of a DWI were referred to either court type, thus limiting this strategy’s potential effectiveness in reducing DWI.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27658226</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-0423</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4575
ispartof Accident analysis and prevention, 2016-12, Vol.97, p.197-205
issn 0001-4575
1879-2057
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5154895
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accident analysis
Adult
Case-Control Studies
Constraining
Drinking and driving
Driving Under the Influence - legislation & jurisprudence
Driving Under the Influence - prevention & control
Driving Under the Influence - statistics & numerical data
Drugs
DWI courts
Female
Forensic engineering
Humans
Hybrid drug courts
Judicial Role
Law Enforcement
Male
Matching
North Carolina
Preventive Health Services
Propensity Score
Recidivism
Reduction
Strategy
Young Adult
title Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20probability%20of%20DWI%20arrest%20fall%20following%20participation%20in%20DWI%20and%20hybrid%20drug%20treatment%20court%20programs?&rft.jtitle=Accident%20analysis%20and%20prevention&rft.au=Sloan,%20Frank%20A.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=97&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=197-205&rft.issn=0001-4575&rft.eissn=1879-2057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1859500680%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835683793&rft_id=info:pmid/27658226&rft_els_id=S0001457516303153&rfr_iscdi=true