Cost-effectiveness of Early Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 by Stage of Liver Fibrosis in a US Treatment-Naive Population

IMPORTANCE: Novel treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are highly efficacious but costly. Thus, many insurers cover therapy only in advanced fibrosis stages. The added health benefits and costs of early treatment are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) treating al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA internal medicine 2016-01, Vol.176 (1), p.65-73
Hauptverfasser: Chahal, Harinder S, Marseille, Elliot A, Tice, Jeffrey A, Pearson, Steve D, Ollendorf, Daniel A, Fox, Rena K, Kahn, James G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title JAMA internal medicine
container_volume 176
creator Chahal, Harinder S
Marseille, Elliot A
Tice, Jeffrey A
Pearson, Steve D
Ollendorf, Daniel A
Fox, Rena K
Kahn, James G
description IMPORTANCE: Novel treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are highly efficacious but costly. Thus, many insurers cover therapy only in advanced fibrosis stages. The added health benefits and costs of early treatment are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) treating all patients with HCV vs only those with advanced fibrosis and (2) treating each stage of fibrosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study used a decision-analytic model for the treatment of HCV genotype 1. The model used a lifetime horizon and societal perspective and was representative of all US patients with HCV genotype 1 who had not received previous treatment. Comparisons in the model included antiviral treatment of all fibrosis stages (METAVIR [Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Virial Hepatitis] stages F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]) vs treatment of stages F3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis) and F4 only and by specific fibrosis stage. Data were collected from March 1 to September 1, 2014, and analyzed from September 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Six HCV therapy options (particularly combined sofosbuvir and ledipasvir therapy) or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cost and health outcomes were measured using total medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), calculated as the difference in costs between strategies divided by the difference in QALYs. RESULTS: We simulated 1000 individuals, but present the results normalized to a single HCV-infected person. In the base-case analysis, among patients receiving 8 or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir treatment, treating all fibrosis stages compared with treating stages F3 and F4 adds 0.73 QALYs and $28 899, for an ICER of $39 475 per QALY gained. Treating at stage F2 (portal fibrosis with rare septa) costs $19 833 per QALY gained vs waiting until stage F3; treating at stage F1 (portal fibrosis without septa), $81 165 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F2; and treating at stage F0, $187 065 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F1. Results for other regimens show a similar pattern. At base-case drug prices, treating 50% of all eligible US patients with HCV genotype 1 would cost $53 billion. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER for treating all stages vs treating stages F3 and F4 was most sensitive to cohort age, drug costs, utility values in stages F1 and F2, and percentage of patients eligible for
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5144154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2471608</ama_id><sourcerecordid>26595724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-9db819da022ade77351805e384faf079d4607469d64b73510d3def9d49b5e16a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd1O3DAQhS1UBAh4gV60foEsM4ntJDeVqhV_0opWAnprTTYTarSbRLYXaa_74nW0sIBvbM05843tI8R3hBkC4MUzrcn1kX2_5naWA-qZAcQDcZKjqTKDqL7sz2COxXkIz5BWBaCK4kgc50bXuszVifg3H0LMuOt4Gd0L9xyCHDp5SX61lQ-eKa65j1PphkeKLrog5_KP85sgr7kf4nZkibLZyvtITzwZF4nj5ZVr_BCS2_WS5OP9Oyy7o-SQv4dxs0rEoT8Thx2tAp-_7qfi8eryYX6TLX5d385_LjLSkMesbpsK65Ygz6nlsiw0VqC5qFRHHZR1qwyUytStUc0kQlu03KVy3WhGQ8Wp-LHjjpsm_dwy3cXTyo7erclv7UDOflZ699c-DS9Wo1KoVQKUO8AyPS147va9CHaKxn6Kxk7R2Cma1Pnt4-h931sQyfB1Z0iAd1WVaKAq_gPo-pjx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness of Early Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 by Stage of Liver Fibrosis in a US Treatment-Naive Population</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Chahal, Harinder S ; Marseille, Elliot A ; Tice, Jeffrey A ; Pearson, Steve D ; Ollendorf, Daniel A ; Fox, Rena K ; Kahn, James G</creator><creatorcontrib>Chahal, Harinder S ; Marseille, Elliot A ; Tice, Jeffrey A ; Pearson, Steve D ; Ollendorf, Daniel A ; Fox, Rena K ; Kahn, James G</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Novel treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are highly efficacious but costly. Thus, many insurers cover therapy only in advanced fibrosis stages. The added health benefits and costs of early treatment are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) treating all patients with HCV vs only those with advanced fibrosis and (2) treating each stage of fibrosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study used a decision-analytic model for the treatment of HCV genotype 1. The model used a lifetime horizon and societal perspective and was representative of all US patients with HCV genotype 1 who had not received previous treatment. Comparisons in the model included antiviral treatment of all fibrosis stages (METAVIR [Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Virial Hepatitis] stages F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]) vs treatment of stages F3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis) and F4 only and by specific fibrosis stage. Data were collected from March 1 to September 1, 2014, and analyzed from September 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Six HCV therapy options (particularly combined sofosbuvir and ledipasvir therapy) or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cost and health outcomes were measured using total medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), calculated as the difference in costs between strategies divided by the difference in QALYs. RESULTS: We simulated 1000 individuals, but present the results normalized to a single HCV-infected person. In the base-case analysis, among patients receiving 8 or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir treatment, treating all fibrosis stages compared with treating stages F3 and F4 adds 0.73 QALYs and $28 899, for an ICER of $39 475 per QALY gained. Treating at stage F2 (portal fibrosis with rare septa) costs $19 833 per QALY gained vs waiting until stage F3; treating at stage F1 (portal fibrosis without septa), $81 165 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F2; and treating at stage F0, $187 065 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F1. Results for other regimens show a similar pattern. At base-case drug prices, treating 50% of all eligible US patients with HCV genotype 1 would cost $53 billion. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER for treating all stages vs treating stages F3 and F4 was most sensitive to cohort age, drug costs, utility values in stages F1 and F2, and percentage of patients eligible for 8-week therapy. Except for patients aged 70 years, the ICER remains less than $100 000 per QALY gained. A 46% reduction in cost of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir therapy decreases the ICER for treating at all fibrosis stages by 48%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this simulated model, treating HCV infection at early stages of fibrosis appeared to improve health outcomes and to be cost-effective but incurred substantial aggregate costs. The findings may have implications for health care coverage policies and clinical decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26595724</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Antiviral Agents - economics ; Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use ; Benzimidazoles - therapeutic use ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Decision Support Techniques ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Fluorenes - therapeutic use ; Genotype ; Hepacivirus - genetics ; Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy ; Hepatitis C, Chronic - economics ; Hepatitis C, Chronic - virology ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis - economics ; Liver Cirrhosis - pathology ; Liver Cirrhosis - virology ; Middle Aged ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sofosbuvir - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; United States ; Viral Load ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>JAMA internal medicine, 2016-01, Vol.176 (1), p.65-73</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-9db819da022ade77351805e384faf079d4607469d64b73510d3def9d49b5e16a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/articlepdf/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6011$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,230,314,776,780,881,3327,27901,27902,76231,76234</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26595724$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chahal, Harinder S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marseille, Elliot A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Jeffrey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Steve D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ollendorf, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Rena K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, James G</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness of Early Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 by Stage of Liver Fibrosis in a US Treatment-Naive Population</title><title>JAMA internal medicine</title><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Novel treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are highly efficacious but costly. Thus, many insurers cover therapy only in advanced fibrosis stages. The added health benefits and costs of early treatment are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) treating all patients with HCV vs only those with advanced fibrosis and (2) treating each stage of fibrosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study used a decision-analytic model for the treatment of HCV genotype 1. The model used a lifetime horizon and societal perspective and was representative of all US patients with HCV genotype 1 who had not received previous treatment. Comparisons in the model included antiviral treatment of all fibrosis stages (METAVIR [Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Virial Hepatitis] stages F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]) vs treatment of stages F3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis) and F4 only and by specific fibrosis stage. Data were collected from March 1 to September 1, 2014, and analyzed from September 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Six HCV therapy options (particularly combined sofosbuvir and ledipasvir therapy) or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cost and health outcomes were measured using total medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), calculated as the difference in costs between strategies divided by the difference in QALYs. RESULTS: We simulated 1000 individuals, but present the results normalized to a single HCV-infected person. In the base-case analysis, among patients receiving 8 or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir treatment, treating all fibrosis stages compared with treating stages F3 and F4 adds 0.73 QALYs and $28 899, for an ICER of $39 475 per QALY gained. Treating at stage F2 (portal fibrosis with rare septa) costs $19 833 per QALY gained vs waiting until stage F3; treating at stage F1 (portal fibrosis without septa), $81 165 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F2; and treating at stage F0, $187 065 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F1. Results for other regimens show a similar pattern. At base-case drug prices, treating 50% of all eligible US patients with HCV genotype 1 would cost $53 billion. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER for treating all stages vs treating stages F3 and F4 was most sensitive to cohort age, drug costs, utility values in stages F1 and F2, and percentage of patients eligible for 8-week therapy. Except for patients aged 70 years, the ICER remains less than $100 000 per QALY gained. A 46% reduction in cost of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir therapy decreases the ICER for treating at all fibrosis stages by 48%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this simulated model, treating HCV infection at early stages of fibrosis appeared to improve health outcomes and to be cost-effective but incurred substantial aggregate costs. The findings may have implications for health care coverage policies and clinical decision making.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antiviral Agents - economics</subject><subject>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Benzimidazoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Fluorenes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Hepacivirus - genetics</subject><subject>Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hepatitis C, Chronic - economics</subject><subject>Hepatitis C, Chronic - virology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - economics</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - pathology</subject><subject>Liver Cirrhosis - virology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sofosbuvir - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Viral Load</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2168-6106</issn><issn>2168-6114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd1O3DAQhS1UBAh4gV60foEsM4ntJDeVqhV_0opWAnprTTYTarSbRLYXaa_74nW0sIBvbM05843tI8R3hBkC4MUzrcn1kX2_5naWA-qZAcQDcZKjqTKDqL7sz2COxXkIz5BWBaCK4kgc50bXuszVifg3H0LMuOt4Gd0L9xyCHDp5SX61lQ-eKa65j1PphkeKLrog5_KP85sgr7kf4nZkibLZyvtITzwZF4nj5ZVr_BCS2_WS5OP9Oyy7o-SQv4dxs0rEoT8Thx2tAp-_7qfi8eryYX6TLX5d385_LjLSkMesbpsK65Ygz6nlsiw0VqC5qFRHHZR1qwyUytStUc0kQlu03KVy3WhGQ8Wp-LHjjpsm_dwy3cXTyo7erclv7UDOflZ699c-DS9Wo1KoVQKUO8AyPS147va9CHaKxn6Kxk7R2Cma1Pnt4-h931sQyfB1Z0iAd1WVaKAq_gPo-pjx</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Chahal, Harinder S</creator><creator>Marseille, Elliot A</creator><creator>Tice, Jeffrey A</creator><creator>Pearson, Steve D</creator><creator>Ollendorf, Daniel A</creator><creator>Fox, Rena K</creator><creator>Kahn, James G</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness of Early Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 by Stage of Liver Fibrosis in a US Treatment-Naive Population</title><author>Chahal, Harinder S ; Marseille, Elliot A ; Tice, Jeffrey A ; Pearson, Steve D ; Ollendorf, Daniel A ; Fox, Rena K ; Kahn, James G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a502t-9db819da022ade77351805e384faf079d4607469d64b73510d3def9d49b5e16a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antiviral Agents - economics</topic><topic>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Benzimidazoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Fluorenes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Hepacivirus - genetics</topic><topic>Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hepatitis C, Chronic - economics</topic><topic>Hepatitis C, Chronic - virology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - economics</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - pathology</topic><topic>Liver Cirrhosis - virology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sofosbuvir - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Viral Load</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chahal, Harinder S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marseille, Elliot A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tice, Jeffrey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Steve D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ollendorf, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Rena K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, James G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA internal medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chahal, Harinder S</au><au>Marseille, Elliot A</au><au>Tice, Jeffrey A</au><au>Pearson, Steve D</au><au>Ollendorf, Daniel A</au><au>Fox, Rena K</au><au>Kahn, James G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness of Early Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 by Stage of Liver Fibrosis in a US Treatment-Naive Population</atitle><jtitle>JAMA internal medicine</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Intern Med</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>176</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>65-73</pages><issn>2168-6106</issn><eissn>2168-6114</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Novel treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are highly efficacious but costly. Thus, many insurers cover therapy only in advanced fibrosis stages. The added health benefits and costs of early treatment are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) treating all patients with HCV vs only those with advanced fibrosis and (2) treating each stage of fibrosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study used a decision-analytic model for the treatment of HCV genotype 1. The model used a lifetime horizon and societal perspective and was representative of all US patients with HCV genotype 1 who had not received previous treatment. Comparisons in the model included antiviral treatment of all fibrosis stages (METAVIR [Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Virial Hepatitis] stages F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]) vs treatment of stages F3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis) and F4 only and by specific fibrosis stage. Data were collected from March 1 to September 1, 2014, and analyzed from September 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Six HCV therapy options (particularly combined sofosbuvir and ledipasvir therapy) or no treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cost and health outcomes were measured using total medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), calculated as the difference in costs between strategies divided by the difference in QALYs. RESULTS: We simulated 1000 individuals, but present the results normalized to a single HCV-infected person. In the base-case analysis, among patients receiving 8 or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir treatment, treating all fibrosis stages compared with treating stages F3 and F4 adds 0.73 QALYs and $28 899, for an ICER of $39 475 per QALY gained. Treating at stage F2 (portal fibrosis with rare septa) costs $19 833 per QALY gained vs waiting until stage F3; treating at stage F1 (portal fibrosis without septa), $81 165 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F2; and treating at stage F0, $187 065 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F1. Results for other regimens show a similar pattern. At base-case drug prices, treating 50% of all eligible US patients with HCV genotype 1 would cost $53 billion. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER for treating all stages vs treating stages F3 and F4 was most sensitive to cohort age, drug costs, utility values in stages F1 and F2, and percentage of patients eligible for 8-week therapy. Except for patients aged 70 years, the ICER remains less than $100 000 per QALY gained. A 46% reduction in cost of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir therapy decreases the ICER for treating at all fibrosis stages by 48%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this simulated model, treating HCV infection at early stages of fibrosis appeared to improve health outcomes and to be cost-effective but incurred substantial aggregate costs. The findings may have implications for health care coverage policies and clinical decision making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>26595724</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6011</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6106
ispartof JAMA internal medicine, 2016-01, Vol.176 (1), p.65-73
issn 2168-6106
2168-6114
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5144154
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Antiviral Agents - economics
Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use
Benzimidazoles - therapeutic use
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Support Techniques
Drug Therapy, Combination
Fluorenes - therapeutic use
Genotype
Hepacivirus - genetics
Hepatitis C, Chronic - drug therapy
Hepatitis C, Chronic - economics
Hepatitis C, Chronic - virology
Humans
Liver Cirrhosis - economics
Liver Cirrhosis - pathology
Liver Cirrhosis - virology
Middle Aged
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Severity of Illness Index
Sofosbuvir - therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
United States
Viral Load
Young Adult
title Cost-effectiveness of Early Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 by Stage of Liver Fibrosis in a US Treatment-Naive Population
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A40%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20of%20Early%20Treatment%20of%20Hepatitis%20C%20Virus%20Genotype%201%20by%20Stage%20of%20Liver%20Fibrosis%20in%20a%20US%20Treatment-Naive%20Population&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20internal%20medicine&rft.au=Chahal,%20Harinder%20S&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=65-73&rft.issn=2168-6106&rft.eissn=2168-6114&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6011&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E26595724%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26595724&rft_ama_id=2471608&rfr_iscdi=true