Prevalence and Contents of Advance Directives of Patients with ESRD Receiving Dialysis

ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life. Advance directives are inte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.2204-2209
Hauptverfasser: Feely, Molly A, Hildebrandt, Daniel, Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj, Mueller, Paul S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2209
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2204
container_title Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology
container_volume 11
creator Feely, Molly A
Hildebrandt, Daniel
Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj
Mueller, Paul S
description ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life. Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction on managing medical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academic medical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. Among 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old; men =61.2%), 49% had advance directives, of which only 10.6% mentioned dialysis and only 3% specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P
doi_str_mv 10.2215/CJN.12131115
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5142080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1841803492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1dad1b2a7e0ffcfaf3f5733acbd5e63b39304189b80d808c0b5f17b7f2a1e9e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUlPwzAQhS0EoqVw44xy5ECLx46b5IKE2rKpgqos4mY5zrg1SpMSp0H996Sr4DSjmU9vnuYRcg60wxiI697TcwcYcAAQB6QJQoh2RMXn4b73oUFOnPui1Pc5E8ekwYJQdP2INsnHqMBKpZhp9FSWeL08KzErnZcb7zap1GretwXq0la4no5UadfEjy2n3uB13PfGqNFWNpvUqEqXzrpTcmRU6vBsW1vk_W7w1ntoD1_uH3u3w7bmoV-2IVEJxEwFSI3RRhluRMC50nEisMtjHvHafRjFIU1CGmoaCwNBHBimACME3iI3G935Ip5homtjhUrlvLAzVSxlrqz8v8nsVE7ySgrwGQ1pLXC5FSjy7wW6Us6s05imKsN84SSE9X3K_YjV6NUG1UXuXIFmfwaoXEUh6yjkLooav_hrbQ_vfs9_AUOihZI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1841803492</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and Contents of Advance Directives of Patients with ESRD Receiving Dialysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Feely, Molly A ; Hildebrandt, Daniel ; Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj ; Mueller, Paul S</creator><creatorcontrib>Feely, Molly A ; Hildebrandt, Daniel ; Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj ; Mueller, Paul S</creatorcontrib><description>ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life. Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction on managing medical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academic medical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. Among 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old; men =61.2%), 49% had advance directives, of which only 10.6% mentioned dialysis and only 3% specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P&lt;0.001) and have died during the study period (64.4% versus 46.6%; P&lt;0.001) than patients who did not have advance directives. Notably, for patients receiving dialysis who had advance directives, more of the advance directives addressed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.2%), mechanical ventilation (37.1%), artificial nutrition and hydration (34.3%), and pain management (43.4%) than dialysis (10.6%). Although one-half of the patients receiving dialysis in our study had advance directives, end of life management of dialysis was rarely addressed. Future research should focus on improving discernment and documentation of end of life values, goals, and preferences, such as dialysis-specific advance directives, among these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1555-9041</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-905X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2215/CJN.12131115</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27856490</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Nephrology</publisher><subject>Advance Directives ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nutritional Support ; Original ; Pain Management ; Renal Dialysis ; Respiration, Artificial ; Retrospective Studies ; Terminal Care</subject><ispartof>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.2204-2209</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Nephrology 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1dad1b2a7e0ffcfaf3f5733acbd5e63b39304189b80d808c0b5f17b7f2a1e9e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1dad1b2a7e0ffcfaf3f5733acbd5e63b39304189b80d808c0b5f17b7f2a1e9e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142080/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142080/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27856490$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feely, Molly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildebrandt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Paul S</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and Contents of Advance Directives of Patients with ESRD Receiving Dialysis</title><title>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</title><addtitle>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><description>ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life. Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction on managing medical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academic medical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. Among 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old; men =61.2%), 49% had advance directives, of which only 10.6% mentioned dialysis and only 3% specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P&lt;0.001) and have died during the study period (64.4% versus 46.6%; P&lt;0.001) than patients who did not have advance directives. Notably, for patients receiving dialysis who had advance directives, more of the advance directives addressed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.2%), mechanical ventilation (37.1%), artificial nutrition and hydration (34.3%), and pain management (43.4%) than dialysis (10.6%). Although one-half of the patients receiving dialysis in our study had advance directives, end of life management of dialysis was rarely addressed. Future research should focus on improving discernment and documentation of end of life values, goals, and preferences, such as dialysis-specific advance directives, among these patients.</description><subject>Advance Directives</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nutritional Support</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Terminal Care</subject><issn>1555-9041</issn><issn>1555-905X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUlPwzAQhS0EoqVw44xy5ECLx46b5IKE2rKpgqos4mY5zrg1SpMSp0H996Sr4DSjmU9vnuYRcg60wxiI697TcwcYcAAQB6QJQoh2RMXn4b73oUFOnPui1Pc5E8ekwYJQdP2INsnHqMBKpZhp9FSWeL08KzErnZcb7zap1GretwXq0la4no5UadfEjy2n3uB13PfGqNFWNpvUqEqXzrpTcmRU6vBsW1vk_W7w1ntoD1_uH3u3w7bmoV-2IVEJxEwFSI3RRhluRMC50nEisMtjHvHafRjFIU1CGmoaCwNBHBimACME3iI3G935Ip5homtjhUrlvLAzVSxlrqz8v8nsVE7ySgrwGQ1pLXC5FSjy7wW6Us6s05imKsN84SSE9X3K_YjV6NUG1UXuXIFmfwaoXEUh6yjkLooav_hrbQ_vfs9_AUOihZI</recordid><startdate>20161207</startdate><enddate>20161207</enddate><creator>Feely, Molly A</creator><creator>Hildebrandt, Daniel</creator><creator>Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj</creator><creator>Mueller, Paul S</creator><general>American Society of Nephrology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161207</creationdate><title>Prevalence and Contents of Advance Directives of Patients with ESRD Receiving Dialysis</title><author>Feely, Molly A ; Hildebrandt, Daniel ; Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj ; Mueller, Paul S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-1dad1b2a7e0ffcfaf3f5733acbd5e63b39304189b80d808c0b5f17b7f2a1e9e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Advance Directives</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nutritional Support</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Terminal Care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feely, Molly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildebrandt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Paul S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feely, Molly A</au><au>Hildebrandt, Daniel</au><au>Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jithinraj</au><au>Mueller, Paul S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and Contents of Advance Directives of Patients with ESRD Receiving Dialysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Am Soc Nephrol</addtitle><date>2016-12-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2204</spage><epage>2209</epage><pages>2204-2209</pages><issn>1555-9041</issn><eissn>1555-905X</eissn><abstract>ESRD requiring dialysis is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, including increased rates of cognitive impairment, compared with the general population. About one quarter of patients receiving dialysis choose to discontinue dialysis at the end of life. Advance directives are intended to give providers and surrogates instruction on managing medical decision making, including end of life situations. The prevalence of advance directives is low among patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the contents of advance directives among these patients with advance directives. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis at a tertiary academic medical center between January 1, 2007 and January 1, 2012. We collected demographic data, the prevalence of advance directives, and a content analysis of these advance directives. We specifically examined the advance directives for instructions on management of interventions at end of life, including dialysis. Among 808 patients (mean age of 68.6 years old; men =61.2%), 49% had advance directives, of which only 10.6% mentioned dialysis and only 3% specifically addressed dialysis management at end of life. Patients who had advance directives were more likely to be older (74.5 versus 65.4 years old; P&lt;0.001) and have died during the study period (64.4% versus 46.6%; P&lt;0.001) than patients who did not have advance directives. Notably, for patients receiving dialysis who had advance directives, more of the advance directives addressed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44.2%), mechanical ventilation (37.1%), artificial nutrition and hydration (34.3%), and pain management (43.4%) than dialysis (10.6%). Although one-half of the patients receiving dialysis in our study had advance directives, end of life management of dialysis was rarely addressed. Future research should focus on improving discernment and documentation of end of life values, goals, and preferences, such as dialysis-specific advance directives, among these patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Nephrology</pub><pmid>27856490</pmid><doi>10.2215/CJN.12131115</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1555-9041
ispartof Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2016-12, Vol.11 (12), p.2204-2209
issn 1555-9041
1555-905X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5142080
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Advance Directives
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Female
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Nutritional Support
Original
Pain Management
Renal Dialysis
Respiration, Artificial
Retrospective Studies
Terminal Care
title Prevalence and Contents of Advance Directives of Patients with ESRD Receiving Dialysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A19%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20Contents%20of%20Advance%20Directives%20of%20Patients%20with%20ESRD%20Receiving%20Dialysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Nephrology&rft.au=Feely,%20Molly%20A&rft.date=2016-12-07&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2204&rft.epage=2209&rft.pages=2204-2209&rft.issn=1555-9041&rft.eissn=1555-905X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2215/CJN.12131115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1841803492%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1841803492&rft_id=info:pmid/27856490&rfr_iscdi=true