Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education

The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:CBE life sciences education 2016-12, Vol.15 (4), p.mr1
Hauptverfasser: Eaton, Carrie Diaz, Allen, Deborah, Anderson, Laurel J, Bowser, Gillian, Pauley, Mark A, Williams, Kathy S, Uno, Gordon E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page mr1
container_title CBE life sciences education
container_volume 15
creator Eaton, Carrie Diaz
Allen, Deborah
Anderson, Laurel J
Bowser, Gillian
Pauley, Mark A
Williams, Kathy S
Uno, Gordon E
description The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.
doi_str_mv 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5132389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1120452</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1120452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRSMEEqWwZYfkH0iZsRMn2SBBVV6qAAFdW449bgNNjJwE1L-npaiC1Vxp7jmLG0WnCCPEPDs3JY1QxiBiwCTbiwZYCIyzAsX-n3wYHbXtG0AiAdNB9PTS13XVMe9YtyD2TC3pYBZs7H2wVaO7yjfsgbovH95b5nxgs8ZSmAdte90Ru6r80s9XbGJ781M-jg6cXrZ08nuH0ex68jq-jaePN3fjy2lsRCq7uCzAOU0opXWGJGFmkVPOeZrkGVkSXDoQQCaxjqfCWkgKC0UmwZUgJIhhdLH1fvRlTdZQ0wW9VB-hqnVYKa8r9f_TVAs1958qRcFFXqwFo63ABN-2gdyORVCbQdV6UIVSgVCbQdfA2RagUJldeXKPyCFJufgGv4V1Vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Eaton, Carrie Diaz ; Allen, Deborah ; Anderson, Laurel J ; Bowser, Gillian ; Pauley, Mark A ; Williams, Kathy S ; Uno, Gordon E</creator><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Carrie Diaz ; Allen, Deborah ; Anderson, Laurel J ; Bowser, Gillian ; Pauley, Mark A ; Williams, Kathy S ; Uno, Gordon E</creatorcontrib><description>The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society for Cell Biology</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; Biology ; College Science ; Educational Change ; Educational Innovation ; Evaluation ; Meeting Report ; Networks ; Participation ; Surveys ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>CBE life sciences education, 2016-12, Vol.15 (4), p.mr1</ispartof><rights>2016 C. D. Eaton CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( ). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132389/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132389/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1120452$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Laurel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowser, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauley, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kathy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uno, Gordon E</creatorcontrib><title>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</title><title>CBE life sciences education</title><description>The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Innovation</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Meeting Report</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>1931-7913</issn><issn>1931-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRSMEEqWwZYfkH0iZsRMn2SBBVV6qAAFdW449bgNNjJwE1L-npaiC1Vxp7jmLG0WnCCPEPDs3JY1QxiBiwCTbiwZYCIyzAsX-n3wYHbXtG0AiAdNB9PTS13XVMe9YtyD2TC3pYBZs7H2wVaO7yjfsgbovH95b5nxgs8ZSmAdte90Ru6r80s9XbGJ781M-jg6cXrZ08nuH0ex68jq-jaePN3fjy2lsRCq7uCzAOU0opXWGJGFmkVPOeZrkGVkSXDoQQCaxjqfCWkgKC0UmwZUgJIhhdLH1fvRlTdZQ0wW9VB-hqnVYKa8r9f_TVAs1958qRcFFXqwFo63ABN-2gdyORVCbQdV6UIVSgVCbQdfA2RagUJldeXKPyCFJufgGv4V1Vg</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</creator><creator>Allen, Deborah</creator><creator>Anderson, Laurel J</creator><creator>Bowser, Gillian</creator><creator>Pauley, Mark A</creator><creator>Williams, Kathy S</creator><creator>Uno, Gordon E</creator><general>American Society for Cell Biology</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</title><author>Eaton, Carrie Diaz ; Allen, Deborah ; Anderson, Laurel J ; Bowser, Gillian ; Pauley, Mark A ; Williams, Kathy S ; Uno, Gordon E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Innovation</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Meeting Report</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Laurel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowser, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauley, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kathy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uno, Gordon E</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</au><au>Allen, Deborah</au><au>Anderson, Laurel J</au><au>Bowser, Gillian</au><au>Pauley, Mark A</au><au>Williams, Kathy S</au><au>Uno, Gordon E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1120452</ericid><atitle>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</atitle><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>mr1</spage><pages>mr1-</pages><issn>1931-7913</issn><eissn>1931-7913</eissn><abstract>The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.</abstract><pub>American Society for Cell Biology</pub><doi>10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-7913
ispartof CBE life sciences education, 2016-12, Vol.15 (4), p.mr1
issn 1931-7913
1931-7913
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5132389
source PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Best Practices
Biology
College Science
Educational Change
Educational Innovation
Evaluation
Meeting Report
Networks
Participation
Surveys
Undergraduate Study
title Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T16%3A21%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Summit%20of%20the%20Research%20Coordination%20Networks%20for%20Undergraduate%20Biology%20Education&rft.jtitle=CBE%20life%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Eaton,%20Carrie%20Diaz&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=mr1&rft.pages=mr1-&rft.issn=1931-7913&rft.eissn=1931-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147&rft_dat=%3Ceric_pubme%3EEJ1120452%3C/eric_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1120452&rfr_iscdi=true