Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education
The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | CBE life sciences education 2016-12, Vol.15 (4), p.mr1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | mr1 |
container_title | CBE life sciences education |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Eaton, Carrie Diaz Allen, Deborah Anderson, Laurel J Bowser, Gillian Pauley, Mark A Williams, Kathy S Uno, Gordon E |
description | The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5132389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1120452</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1120452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRSMEEqWwZYfkH0iZsRMn2SBBVV6qAAFdW449bgNNjJwE1L-npaiC1Vxp7jmLG0WnCCPEPDs3JY1QxiBiwCTbiwZYCIyzAsX-n3wYHbXtG0AiAdNB9PTS13XVMe9YtyD2TC3pYBZs7H2wVaO7yjfsgbovH95b5nxgs8ZSmAdte90Ru6r80s9XbGJ781M-jg6cXrZ08nuH0ex68jq-jaePN3fjy2lsRCq7uCzAOU0opXWGJGFmkVPOeZrkGVkSXDoQQCaxjqfCWkgKC0UmwZUgJIhhdLH1fvRlTdZQ0wW9VB-hqnVYKa8r9f_TVAs1958qRcFFXqwFo63ABN-2gdyORVCbQdV6UIVSgVCbQdfA2RagUJldeXKPyCFJufgGv4V1Vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Eaton, Carrie Diaz ; Allen, Deborah ; Anderson, Laurel J ; Bowser, Gillian ; Pauley, Mark A ; Williams, Kathy S ; Uno, Gordon E</creator><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Carrie Diaz ; Allen, Deborah ; Anderson, Laurel J ; Bowser, Gillian ; Pauley, Mark A ; Williams, Kathy S ; Uno, Gordon E</creatorcontrib><description>The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society for Cell Biology</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; Biology ; College Science ; Educational Change ; Educational Innovation ; Evaluation ; Meeting Report ; Networks ; Participation ; Surveys ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>CBE life sciences education, 2016-12, Vol.15 (4), p.mr1</ispartof><rights>2016 C. D. Eaton CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2016 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License ( ). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132389/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5132389/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1120452$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Laurel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowser, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauley, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kathy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uno, Gordon E</creatorcontrib><title>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</title><title>CBE life sciences education</title><description>The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Innovation</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Meeting Report</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>1931-7913</issn><issn>1931-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkMtOwzAQRSMEEqWwZYfkH0iZsRMn2SBBVV6qAAFdW449bgNNjJwE1L-npaiC1Vxp7jmLG0WnCCPEPDs3JY1QxiBiwCTbiwZYCIyzAsX-n3wYHbXtG0AiAdNB9PTS13XVMe9YtyD2TC3pYBZs7H2wVaO7yjfsgbovH95b5nxgs8ZSmAdte90Ru6r80s9XbGJ781M-jg6cXrZ08nuH0ex68jq-jaePN3fjy2lsRCq7uCzAOU0opXWGJGFmkVPOeZrkGVkSXDoQQCaxjqfCWkgKC0UmwZUgJIhhdLH1fvRlTdZQ0wW9VB-hqnVYKa8r9f_TVAs1958qRcFFXqwFo63ABN-2gdyORVCbQdV6UIVSgVCbQdfA2RagUJldeXKPyCFJufgGv4V1Vg</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</creator><creator>Allen, Deborah</creator><creator>Anderson, Laurel J</creator><creator>Bowser, Gillian</creator><creator>Pauley, Mark A</creator><creator>Williams, Kathy S</creator><creator>Uno, Gordon E</creator><general>American Society for Cell Biology</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</title><author>Eaton, Carrie Diaz ; Allen, Deborah ; Anderson, Laurel J ; Bowser, Gillian ; Pauley, Mark A ; Williams, Kathy S ; Uno, Gordon E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-b90ffae166dfce6e17d12e8225487ede326f030ec4df253dd049d09760fb03603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Innovation</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Meeting Report</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Laurel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowser, Gillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauley, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kathy S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uno, Gordon E</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eaton, Carrie Diaz</au><au>Allen, Deborah</au><au>Anderson, Laurel J</au><au>Bowser, Gillian</au><au>Pauley, Mark A</au><au>Williams, Kathy S</au><au>Uno, Gordon E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1120452</ericid><atitle>Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education</atitle><jtitle>CBE life sciences education</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>mr1</spage><pages>mr1-</pages><issn>1931-7913</issn><eissn>1931-7913</eissn><abstract>The first summit of projects funded by the National Science Foundation's Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education (RCN-UBE) program was held January 14-16, 2016, in Washington, DC. Sixty-five scientists and science educators from 38 of the 41 Incubator and Full RCN-UBE awards discussed the value and contributions of RCNs to the national biology education reform effort. The summit illustrated the progress of this innovative UBE track, first awarded in 2009. Participants shared experiences regarding network development and growth, identified best practices and challenges faced in network management, and discussed work accomplished. We report here on key aspects of network evaluation, characteristics of successful networks, and how to sustain and broaden participation in networks. Evidence from successful networks indicates that 5 years (the length of a Full RCN-UBE) may be insufficient time to produce a cohesive and effective network. While online communication promotes the activities of a network and disseminates effective practices, face-to-face meetings are critical for establishing ties between network participants. Creation of these National Science Foundation-funded networks may be particularly useful for consortia of faculty working to address problems or exchange novel solutions discovered while introducing active-learning methods and/ or course-based research into their curricula.</abstract><pub>American Society for Cell Biology</pub><doi>10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1931-7913 |
ispartof | CBE life sciences education, 2016-12, Vol.15 (4), p.mr1 |
issn | 1931-7913 1931-7913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5132389 |
source | PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Best Practices Biology College Science Educational Change Educational Innovation Evaluation Meeting Report Networks Participation Surveys Undergraduate Study |
title | Summit of the Research Coordination Networks for Undergraduate Biology Education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T16%3A21%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Summit%20of%20the%20Research%20Coordination%20Networks%20for%20Undergraduate%20Biology%20Education&rft.jtitle=CBE%20life%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Eaton,%20Carrie%20Diaz&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=mr1&rft.pages=mr1-&rft.issn=1931-7913&rft.eissn=1931-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0147&rft_dat=%3Ceric_pubme%3EEJ1120452%3C/eric_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1120452&rfr_iscdi=true |