The impact of skin colour on human photobiological responses
Summary Terrestrial solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exerts both beneficial and adverse effects on human skin. Epidemiological studies show a lower incidence of skin cancer in people with pigmented skins compared to fair skins. This is attributed to photoprotection by epidermal melanin, as is the p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pigment cell and melanoma research 2016-11, Vol.29 (6), p.607-618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 618 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | Pigment cell and melanoma research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Fajuyigbe, Damilola Young, Antony R. |
description | Summary
Terrestrial solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exerts both beneficial and adverse effects on human skin. Epidemiological studies show a lower incidence of skin cancer in people with pigmented skins compared to fair skins. This is attributed to photoprotection by epidermal melanin, as is the poorer vitamin D status of those with darker skins. We summarize a wide range of photobiological responses across different skin colours including DNA damage and immunosuppression. Some studies show the generally modest photoprotective properties of melanin, but others show little or no effect. DNA photodamage initiates non‐melanoma skin cancer and is reduced by a factor of about 3 in pigmented skin compared with white skin. This suggests that if such a modest reduction in DNA damage can result in the significantly lower skin cancer incidence in black skin, the use of sunscreen protection might be extremely beneficial for susceptible population. Many contradictory results may be explained by protocol differences, including differences in UVR spectra and exposure protocols. We recommend that skin type comparisons be done with solar‐simulated radiation and standard erythema doses or physical doses (J/m2) rather than those based solely on clinical endpoints such as minimal erythema dose (MED). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/pcmr.12511 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5132026</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4268615671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4861-6a53ea7f2fb6bb4fddcc7fcd0387022e7e2812d8338ab76c906a655e5f22d65e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAURi1ERduBDT8ARWKDKmXwI36MhCrRAaZF5aGqiO4sx7npuE3i1E6A-fd1mYeABd7Yss89ur4fQs8JnpK0Xve2DVNCOSGP0AGRnOekUFePd2dJ9tFhjDcYC8xn7Anap7LghcLFAXpzuYTMtb2xQ-brLN66LrO-8WPIfJctx9Z0Wb_0gy9dur121jRZgNj7LkJ8ivZq00R4ttkn6NuH95fz0_z8y-Js_vY8t4USJBeGMzCypnUpyrKoq8paWdsKMyUxpSCBKkIrxZgypRR2hoURnAOvKa0EBzZBx2tvP5YtVBa6IZhG98G1Jqy0N07__dK5pb72PzQnjGIqkuDVRhD83Qhx0K2LFprGdODHqImiQlI1YyyhL_9Bb9IwuvS9RKWpFYJSlaijNWWDjzFAvWuGYP0Qin4IRf8OJcEv_mx_h25TSABZAz9dA6v_qPTX-aeLrTRf17g4wK9djQm3Wkgmuf7-eaE_Xs1P6MXsnRbsHiOapvM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845446228</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of skin colour on human photobiological responses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Fajuyigbe, Damilola ; Young, Antony R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fajuyigbe, Damilola ; Young, Antony R.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Terrestrial solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exerts both beneficial and adverse effects on human skin. Epidemiological studies show a lower incidence of skin cancer in people with pigmented skins compared to fair skins. This is attributed to photoprotection by epidermal melanin, as is the poorer vitamin D status of those with darker skins. We summarize a wide range of photobiological responses across different skin colours including DNA damage and immunosuppression. Some studies show the generally modest photoprotective properties of melanin, but others show little or no effect. DNA photodamage initiates non‐melanoma skin cancer and is reduced by a factor of about 3 in pigmented skin compared with white skin. This suggests that if such a modest reduction in DNA damage can result in the significantly lower skin cancer incidence in black skin, the use of sunscreen protection might be extremely beneficial for susceptible population. Many contradictory results may be explained by protocol differences, including differences in UVR spectra and exposure protocols. We recommend that skin type comparisons be done with solar‐simulated radiation and standard erythema doses or physical doses (J/m2) rather than those based solely on clinical endpoints such as minimal erythema dose (MED).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-1471</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-148X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12511</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27454804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; DNA damage ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; melanin ; Melanoma ; photobiology ; Radiation standards ; Review ; Reviews ; Skin - radiation effects ; Skin cancer ; skin colour ; Skin Neoplasms - etiology ; Skin Pigmentation ; skin type ; Solar radiation ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects ; Vitamin D</subject><ispartof>Pigment cell and melanoma research, 2016-11, Vol.29 (6), p.607-618</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4861-6a53ea7f2fb6bb4fddcc7fcd0387022e7e2812d8338ab76c906a655e5f22d65e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4861-6a53ea7f2fb6bb4fddcc7fcd0387022e7e2812d8338ab76c906a655e5f22d65e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpcmr.12511$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpcmr.12511$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27454804$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fajuyigbe, Damilola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Antony R.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of skin colour on human photobiological responses</title><title>Pigment cell and melanoma research</title><addtitle>Pigment Cell Melanoma Res</addtitle><description>Summary
Terrestrial solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exerts both beneficial and adverse effects on human skin. Epidemiological studies show a lower incidence of skin cancer in people with pigmented skins compared to fair skins. This is attributed to photoprotection by epidermal melanin, as is the poorer vitamin D status of those with darker skins. We summarize a wide range of photobiological responses across different skin colours including DNA damage and immunosuppression. Some studies show the generally modest photoprotective properties of melanin, but others show little or no effect. DNA photodamage initiates non‐melanoma skin cancer and is reduced by a factor of about 3 in pigmented skin compared with white skin. This suggests that if such a modest reduction in DNA damage can result in the significantly lower skin cancer incidence in black skin, the use of sunscreen protection might be extremely beneficial for susceptible population. Many contradictory results may be explained by protocol differences, including differences in UVR spectra and exposure protocols. We recommend that skin type comparisons be done with solar‐simulated radiation and standard erythema doses or physical doses (J/m2) rather than those based solely on clinical endpoints such as minimal erythema dose (MED).</description><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>melanin</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>photobiology</subject><subject>Radiation standards</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>Skin cancer</subject><subject>skin colour</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - etiology</subject><subject>Skin Pigmentation</subject><subject>skin type</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vitamin D</subject><issn>1755-1471</issn><issn>1755-148X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAURi1ERduBDT8ARWKDKmXwI36MhCrRAaZF5aGqiO4sx7npuE3i1E6A-fd1mYeABd7Yss89ur4fQs8JnpK0Xve2DVNCOSGP0AGRnOekUFePd2dJ9tFhjDcYC8xn7Anap7LghcLFAXpzuYTMtb2xQ-brLN66LrO-8WPIfJctx9Z0Wb_0gy9dur121jRZgNj7LkJ8ivZq00R4ttkn6NuH95fz0_z8y-Js_vY8t4USJBeGMzCypnUpyrKoq8paWdsKMyUxpSCBKkIrxZgypRR2hoURnAOvKa0EBzZBx2tvP5YtVBa6IZhG98G1Jqy0N07__dK5pb72PzQnjGIqkuDVRhD83Qhx0K2LFprGdODHqImiQlI1YyyhL_9Bb9IwuvS9RKWpFYJSlaijNWWDjzFAvWuGYP0Qin4IRf8OJcEv_mx_h25TSABZAz9dA6v_qPTX-aeLrTRf17g4wK9djQm3Wkgmuf7-eaE_Xs1P6MXsnRbsHiOapvM</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Fajuyigbe, Damilola</creator><creator>Young, Antony R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>The impact of skin colour on human photobiological responses</title><author>Fajuyigbe, Damilola ; Young, Antony R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4861-6a53ea7f2fb6bb4fddcc7fcd0387022e7e2812d8338ab76c906a655e5f22d65e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>melanin</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>photobiology</topic><topic>Radiation standards</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>Skin cancer</topic><topic>skin colour</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - etiology</topic><topic>Skin Pigmentation</topic><topic>skin type</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vitamin D</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fajuyigbe, Damilola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Antony R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pigment cell and melanoma research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fajuyigbe, Damilola</au><au>Young, Antony R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of skin colour on human photobiological responses</atitle><jtitle>Pigment cell and melanoma research</jtitle><addtitle>Pigment Cell Melanoma Res</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>607-618</pages><issn>1755-1471</issn><eissn>1755-148X</eissn><abstract>Summary
Terrestrial solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exerts both beneficial and adverse effects on human skin. Epidemiological studies show a lower incidence of skin cancer in people with pigmented skins compared to fair skins. This is attributed to photoprotection by epidermal melanin, as is the poorer vitamin D status of those with darker skins. We summarize a wide range of photobiological responses across different skin colours including DNA damage and immunosuppression. Some studies show the generally modest photoprotective properties of melanin, but others show little or no effect. DNA photodamage initiates non‐melanoma skin cancer and is reduced by a factor of about 3 in pigmented skin compared with white skin. This suggests that if such a modest reduction in DNA damage can result in the significantly lower skin cancer incidence in black skin, the use of sunscreen protection might be extremely beneficial for susceptible population. Many contradictory results may be explained by protocol differences, including differences in UVR spectra and exposure protocols. We recommend that skin type comparisons be done with solar‐simulated radiation and standard erythema doses or physical doses (J/m2) rather than those based solely on clinical endpoints such as minimal erythema dose (MED).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27454804</pmid><doi>10.1111/pcmr.12511</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1755-1471 |
ispartof | Pigment cell and melanoma research, 2016-11, Vol.29 (6), p.607-618 |
issn | 1755-1471 1755-148X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5132026 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA DNA damage Health risk assessment Humans melanin Melanoma photobiology Radiation standards Review Reviews Skin - radiation effects Skin cancer skin colour Skin Neoplasms - etiology Skin Pigmentation skin type Solar radiation Ultraviolet radiation Ultraviolet Rays - adverse effects Vitamin D |
title | The impact of skin colour on human photobiological responses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T23%3A57%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20skin%20colour%20on%20human%20photobiological%20responses&rft.jtitle=Pigment%20cell%20and%20melanoma%20research&rft.au=Fajuyigbe,%20Damilola&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=607-618&rft.issn=1755-1471&rft.eissn=1755-148X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/pcmr.12511&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4268615671%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845446228&rft_id=info:pmid/27454804&rfr_iscdi=true |