The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation

To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 fem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2016-09, Vol.89 (1065), p.20160030-20160030
Hauptverfasser: Hui, Terrence C H, Tan, Gideon Z L, Tan, Alvin K W, Pua, Uei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20160030
container_issue 1065
container_start_page 20160030
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 89
creator Hui, Terrence C H
Tan, Gideon Z L
Tan, Alvin K W
Pua, Uei
description To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded. 97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1). Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT. This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20160030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5124915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1806437481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LxDAQhoMoun7cPEuOHqxmkqZJL4Is6wcIXlbwFtJ0uhtp09q0C_57u-iKnoZhHt53eAg5B3YNXOY3xXt_zRlkjAm2R2agUp1ozd72yYwxphLgWh6R4xjft6vM2SE54kqoTDExI4vlGukYkbYVdW1AWqBt6HxJfaDWrT1ufFjRMfgOS-_G2vY0dj7Ymtpx1WAY7ODbcEoOKltHPPuZJ-T1frGcPybPLw9P87vnxAmdDokAoawouau0A84tpE6CZFIj46rKrQLMSighcwohLW3BuWYWJyCX0pVcnJDb79xuLBos3dTf29p0vW9s_2la683_S_Brs2o3RgJPc5BTwOVPQN9-jBgH0_josK5twHaMBjTLUjEphAm9-kZd38bYY_VbA8xszZvJvNmZn_CLv6_9wjvV4gv6MH8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806437481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hui, Terrence C H ; Tan, Gideon Z L ; Tan, Alvin K W ; Pua, Uei</creator><creatorcontrib>Hui, Terrence C H ; Tan, Gideon Z L ; Tan, Alvin K W ; Pua, Uei</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded. 97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1). Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT. This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27376703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Cements - therapeutic use ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Fractures, Compression - surgery ; Humans ; Interventional and Vascular ; Kyphoplasty - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; MSK/Soft tissues ; Radiography, Interventional ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fractures - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2016-09, Vol.89 (1065), p.20160030-20160030</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2016 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27376703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hui, Terrence C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gideon Z L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Alvin K W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pua, Uei</creatorcontrib><title>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded. 97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1). Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT. This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interventional and Vascular</subject><subject>Kyphoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MSK/Soft tissues</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LxDAQhoMoun7cPEuOHqxmkqZJL4Is6wcIXlbwFtJ0uhtp09q0C_57u-iKnoZhHt53eAg5B3YNXOY3xXt_zRlkjAm2R2agUp1ozd72yYwxphLgWh6R4xjft6vM2SE54kqoTDExI4vlGukYkbYVdW1AWqBt6HxJfaDWrT1ufFjRMfgOS-_G2vY0dj7Ymtpx1WAY7ODbcEoOKltHPPuZJ-T1frGcPybPLw9P87vnxAmdDokAoawouau0A84tpE6CZFIj46rKrQLMSighcwohLW3BuWYWJyCX0pVcnJDb79xuLBos3dTf29p0vW9s_2la683_S_Brs2o3RgJPc5BTwOVPQN9-jBgH0_josK5twHaMBjTLUjEphAm9-kZd38bYY_VbA8xszZvJvNmZn_CLv6_9wjvV4gv6MH8A</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Hui, Terrence C H</creator><creator>Tan, Gideon Z L</creator><creator>Tan, Alvin K W</creator><creator>Pua, Uei</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</title><author>Hui, Terrence C H ; Tan, Gideon Z L ; Tan, Alvin K W ; Pua, Uei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interventional and Vascular</topic><topic>Kyphoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MSK/Soft tissues</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hui, Terrence C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gideon Z L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Alvin K W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pua, Uei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hui, Terrence C H</au><au>Tan, Gideon Z L</au><au>Tan, Alvin K W</au><au>Pua, Uei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1065</issue><spage>20160030</spage><epage>20160030</epage><pages>20160030-20160030</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded. 97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over &gt;50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1). Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT. This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>27376703</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20160030</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2016-09, Vol.89 (1065), p.20160030-20160030
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5124915
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Cements - therapeutic use
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods
Feasibility Studies
Female
Fractures, Compression - surgery
Humans
Interventional and Vascular
Kyphoplasty - methods
Male
Middle Aged
MSK/Soft tissues
Radiography, Interventional
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Fractures - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20cone%20beam%20CT%20in%20achieving%20unipedicular%20spinal%20augmentation&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Hui,%20Terrence%20C%20H&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1065&rft.spage=20160030&rft.epage=20160030&rft.pages=20160030-20160030&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20160030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1806437481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806437481&rft_id=info:pmid/27376703&rfr_iscdi=true