The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation
To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 fem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of radiology 2016-09, Vol.89 (1065), p.20160030-20160030 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 20160030 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1065 |
container_start_page | 20160030 |
container_title | British journal of radiology |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Hui, Terrence C H Tan, Gideon Z L Tan, Alvin K W Pua, Uei |
description | To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation.
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded.
97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1).
Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT.
This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/bjr.20160030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5124915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1806437481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1LxDAQhoMoun7cPEuOHqxmkqZJL4Is6wcIXlbwFtJ0uhtp09q0C_57u-iKnoZhHt53eAg5B3YNXOY3xXt_zRlkjAm2R2agUp1ozd72yYwxphLgWh6R4xjft6vM2SE54kqoTDExI4vlGukYkbYVdW1AWqBt6HxJfaDWrT1ufFjRMfgOS-_G2vY0dj7Ymtpx1WAY7ODbcEoOKltHPPuZJ-T1frGcPybPLw9P87vnxAmdDokAoawouau0A84tpE6CZFIj46rKrQLMSighcwohLW3BuWYWJyCX0pVcnJDb79xuLBos3dTf29p0vW9s_2la683_S_Brs2o3RgJPc5BTwOVPQN9-jBgH0_josK5twHaMBjTLUjEphAm9-kZd38bYY_VbA8xszZvJvNmZn_CLv6_9wjvV4gv6MH8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806437481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hui, Terrence C H ; Tan, Gideon Z L ; Tan, Alvin K W ; Pua, Uei</creator><creatorcontrib>Hui, Terrence C H ; Tan, Gideon Z L ; Tan, Alvin K W ; Pua, Uei</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation.
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded.
97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1).
Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT.
This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27376703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Cements - therapeutic use ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Fractures, Compression - surgery ; Humans ; Interventional and Vascular ; Kyphoplasty - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; MSK/Soft tissues ; Radiography, Interventional ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Fractures - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2016-09, Vol.89 (1065), p.20160030-20160030</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2016 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27376703$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hui, Terrence C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gideon Z L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Alvin K W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pua, Uei</creatorcontrib><title>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation.
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded.
97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1).
Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT.
This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Compression - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interventional and Vascular</subject><subject>Kyphoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MSK/Soft tissues</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1LxDAQhoMoun7cPEuOHqxmkqZJL4Is6wcIXlbwFtJ0uhtp09q0C_57u-iKnoZhHt53eAg5B3YNXOY3xXt_zRlkjAm2R2agUp1ozd72yYwxphLgWh6R4xjft6vM2SE54kqoTDExI4vlGukYkbYVdW1AWqBt6HxJfaDWrT1ufFjRMfgOS-_G2vY0dj7Ymtpx1WAY7ODbcEoOKltHPPuZJ-T1frGcPybPLw9P87vnxAmdDokAoawouau0A84tpE6CZFIj46rKrQLMSighcwohLW3BuWYWJyCX0pVcnJDb79xuLBos3dTf29p0vW9s_2la683_S_Brs2o3RgJPc5BTwOVPQN9-jBgH0_josK5twHaMBjTLUjEphAm9-kZd38bYY_VbA8xszZvJvNmZn_CLv6_9wjvV4gv6MH8A</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Hui, Terrence C H</creator><creator>Tan, Gideon Z L</creator><creator>Tan, Alvin K W</creator><creator>Pua, Uei</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</title><author>Hui, Terrence C H ; Tan, Gideon Z L ; Tan, Alvin K W ; Pua, Uei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-3137a3d2cf8c122a14c515058e027f9a71e6d1d16c7e14dab2280ae058955cd23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Cements - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Compression - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interventional and Vascular</topic><topic>Kyphoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MSK/Soft tissues</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hui, Terrence C H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Gideon Z L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Alvin K W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pua, Uei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hui, Terrence C H</au><au>Tan, Gideon Z L</au><au>Tan, Alvin K W</au><au>Pua, Uei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1065</issue><spage>20160030</spage><epage>20160030</epage><pages>20160030-20160030</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>To assess the feasibility of cone beam CT (CBCT) in achieving unipedicular access during spinal cement augmentation.
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent CBCT-guided unipedicular spinal augmentation procedures between 1 January 2012 and 15 June 2015 was performed. 59 patients (43 females 16 males; mean-age, 74.0 years; range, 52-90 years) underwent unipedicular spinal augmentation in 78 vertebral levels (T5-T9, n = 14; T10-L2, n = 42; L3-L5, n = 22). Degree of cross-over in contralateral hemivertebral body, complications and 30-day mortality were recorded.
97% (76/78) of procedures were technically successful. Two procedures failed owing to vertebral sclerosis. For vertebroplasty, all cases (6/6) demonstrated cross-over filling of cement and 50% (3/6) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For kyphoplasty, 13 out of 15 procedures demonstrated balloon and cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. Two kyphoplasty procedures required the second pedicle after midline cross-over of cement failed. Of the kyphoplasty procedures that were successfully performed with the unipedicular approach, 76.9% (10/13) showed cement cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. For stentoplasty, all cases (55/55) showed midline stent-cement complex cross-over and 78.2% (43/55) exhibited stent-cement complex cross-over >50% of contralateral half of the vertebral body. There was no major complication or mortality. Minor complications included asymptomatic cement extravasation (6.4%, n = 5) and self-limiting haematoma (1.3%, n = 1).
Unipedicular access for spinal augmentation procedures is achieved at a high success rate with the use of CBCT.
This article describes the novel use of CBCT to achieve unipedicular spinal augmentation. Unipedicular spinal augmentation has the potential to reduce risk, duration, radiation and cost while achieving similar results.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>27376703</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20160030</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1285 |
ispartof | British journal of radiology, 2016-09, Vol.89 (1065), p.20160030-20160030 |
issn | 0007-1285 1748-880X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5124915 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Bone Cements - therapeutic use Cone-Beam Computed Tomography - methods Feasibility Studies Female Fractures, Compression - surgery Humans Interventional and Vascular Kyphoplasty - methods Male Middle Aged MSK/Soft tissues Radiography, Interventional Retrospective Studies Spinal Fractures - surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | The use of cone beam CT in achieving unipedicular spinal augmentation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20cone%20beam%20CT%20in%20achieving%20unipedicular%20spinal%20augmentation&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Hui,%20Terrence%20C%20H&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1065&rft.spage=20160030&rft.epage=20160030&rft.pages=20160030-20160030&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20160030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1806437481%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806437481&rft_id=info:pmid/27376703&rfr_iscdi=true |