Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure

We sought to develop a process that would allow us to perform a prospective review of outlining in trials using expert reviewers based in multiple centres. We implemented a specific information technology infrastructure and workflow that could serve all organizations involved in the radiotherapy qua...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of radiology 2016-08, Vol.89 (1064), p.20160020-20160020
Hauptverfasser: Gwynne, Sarah, Jones, Gareth, Maggs, Rhydian, Eaton, David, Miles, Elizabeth, Staffurth, John, Nixon, Lisette, Ray, Ruby, Lewis, Geraint, Crosby, Tom, Spezi, Emiliano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20160020
container_issue 1064
container_start_page 20160020
container_title British journal of radiology
container_volume 89
creator Gwynne, Sarah
Jones, Gareth
Maggs, Rhydian
Eaton, David
Miles, Elizabeth
Staffurth, John
Nixon, Lisette
Ray, Ruby
Lewis, Geraint
Crosby, Tom
Spezi, Emiliano
description We sought to develop a process that would allow us to perform a prospective review of outlining in trials using expert reviewers based in multiple centres. We implemented a specific information technology infrastructure and workflow that could serve all organizations involved in the radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) process. Data were processed and packaged in the computational environment for radiotherapy research (CERR) binary format and securely transmitted to the expert reviewer at the designated remote organization. It was opened and reviewed using the distributed CERR-compiled application, and a standardized report was sent to the respective centre. Centres were expected to correct any unacceptable deviations and resubmit outlining for approval prior to commencing treatment. 75% of reviews were completed and fed back to centres within 3 working days. There were no delays in treatment start date. Our distributed RTQA review approach provides a method of prospective outlining review at multiple centres, without compromising the quality, delaying the start of treatment or the need for significant additional infrastructure resources. Future progress in the area of prospective individual case review will need to be supported by additional resources for clinician time to undertake the reviews. Trial groups around the world have formulated different approaches to address the need for the prospective review of radiotherapy (RT) data with clinical trials, in line with available resources. We report a UK solution that has allowed the workload for outlining review to be distributed across a wider group of volunteer reviewers without the need for any additional infrastructure costs and has already been adopted within the UK RT trials community.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/bjr.20160020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5124880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1891873244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-13ec7fd77e06f51bb6dba5b51ff4a30dad8195c414b2130142f4fba716bbd79d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhxhn5yIEUj-PEyQUJVQUqVYJDkbhZdjzuuiRxsJ1dFf48XvohuHEaWe-jVzN-CHkJ7AR407811_GEM2gZ4-wR2YAUXdV17NtjsmGMyQp41xyRZyldH55Nz56SIy65aKBuN-TXlxjSgkP2O6QRdx73NDgatfUhbzHq5Ybm6PWYaN7GsF5tqZ-WESecs84-zAc6ZT1bHa3_iZZO65j9UOKIdB_idzeGPS05Pb-kfnZRpxzXIa8Rn5MnrhTji7t5TL5-OLs8_VRdfP54fvr-ohoEyFxBjYN0VkpkrWvAmNYa3ZgGnBO6ZlbbDvqmsMJwqBkI7oQzWkJrjJW9rY_Ju9veZTUT2j-76VEt0U863qigvfo3mf1WXYWdaoCL8pWl4PVdQQw_VkxZTT4NOI56xrAmBV0Pnay5EP-B8rbtecsO6JtbdCgKUkT3sBEwdVCrilp1r7bgr_6-4gG-d1n_BsfzpIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826692604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Gwynne, Sarah ; Jones, Gareth ; Maggs, Rhydian ; Eaton, David ; Miles, Elizabeth ; Staffurth, John ; Nixon, Lisette ; Ray, Ruby ; Lewis, Geraint ; Crosby, Tom ; Spezi, Emiliano</creator><creatorcontrib>Gwynne, Sarah ; Jones, Gareth ; Maggs, Rhydian ; Eaton, David ; Miles, Elizabeth ; Staffurth, John ; Nixon, Lisette ; Ray, Ruby ; Lewis, Geraint ; Crosby, Tom ; Spezi, Emiliano</creatorcontrib><description>We sought to develop a process that would allow us to perform a prospective review of outlining in trials using expert reviewers based in multiple centres. We implemented a specific information technology infrastructure and workflow that could serve all organizations involved in the radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) process. Data were processed and packaged in the computational environment for radiotherapy research (CERR) binary format and securely transmitted to the expert reviewer at the designated remote organization. It was opened and reviewed using the distributed CERR-compiled application, and a standardized report was sent to the respective centre. Centres were expected to correct any unacceptable deviations and resubmit outlining for approval prior to commencing treatment. 75% of reviews were completed and fed back to centres within 3 working days. There were no delays in treatment start date. Our distributed RTQA review approach provides a method of prospective outlining review at multiple centres, without compromising the quality, delaying the start of treatment or the need for significant additional infrastructure resources. Future progress in the area of prospective individual case review will need to be supported by additional resources for clinician time to undertake the reviews. Trial groups around the world have formulated different approaches to address the need for the prospective review of radiotherapy (RT) data with clinical trials, in line with available resources. We report a UK solution that has allowed the workload for outlining review to be distributed across a wider group of volunteer reviewers without the need for any additional infrastructure costs and has already been adopted within the UK RT trials community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1285</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-880X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27245136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The British Institute of Radiology</publisher><subject>Radiotherapy and Oncology</subject><ispartof>British journal of radiology, 2016-08, Vol.89 (1064), p.20160020-20160020</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology 2016 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-13ec7fd77e06f51bb6dba5b51ff4a30dad8195c414b2130142f4fba716bbd79d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-13ec7fd77e06f51bb6dba5b51ff4a30dad8195c414b2130142f4fba716bbd79d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27928,27929</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27245136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gwynne, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggs, Rhydian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staffurth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Lisette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Ruby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Geraint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosby, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spezi, Emiliano</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure</title><title>British journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><description>We sought to develop a process that would allow us to perform a prospective review of outlining in trials using expert reviewers based in multiple centres. We implemented a specific information technology infrastructure and workflow that could serve all organizations involved in the radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) process. Data were processed and packaged in the computational environment for radiotherapy research (CERR) binary format and securely transmitted to the expert reviewer at the designated remote organization. It was opened and reviewed using the distributed CERR-compiled application, and a standardized report was sent to the respective centre. Centres were expected to correct any unacceptable deviations and resubmit outlining for approval prior to commencing treatment. 75% of reviews were completed and fed back to centres within 3 working days. There were no delays in treatment start date. Our distributed RTQA review approach provides a method of prospective outlining review at multiple centres, without compromising the quality, delaying the start of treatment or the need for significant additional infrastructure resources. Future progress in the area of prospective individual case review will need to be supported by additional resources for clinician time to undertake the reviews. Trial groups around the world have formulated different approaches to address the need for the prospective review of radiotherapy (RT) data with clinical trials, in line with available resources. We report a UK solution that has allowed the workload for outlining review to be distributed across a wider group of volunteer reviewers without the need for any additional infrastructure costs and has already been adopted within the UK RT trials community.</description><subject>Radiotherapy and Oncology</subject><issn>0007-1285</issn><issn>1748-880X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0Eokvhxhn5yIEUj-PEyQUJVQUqVYJDkbhZdjzuuiRxsJ1dFf48XvohuHEaWe-jVzN-CHkJ7AR407811_GEM2gZ4-wR2YAUXdV17NtjsmGMyQp41xyRZyldH55Nz56SIy65aKBuN-TXlxjSgkP2O6QRdx73NDgatfUhbzHq5Ybm6PWYaN7GsF5tqZ-WESecs84-zAc6ZT1bHa3_iZZO65j9UOKIdB_idzeGPS05Pb-kfnZRpxzXIa8Rn5MnrhTji7t5TL5-OLs8_VRdfP54fvr-ohoEyFxBjYN0VkpkrWvAmNYa3ZgGnBO6ZlbbDvqmsMJwqBkI7oQzWkJrjJW9rY_Ju9veZTUT2j-76VEt0U863qigvfo3mf1WXYWdaoCL8pWl4PVdQQw_VkxZTT4NOI56xrAmBV0Pnay5EP-B8rbtecsO6JtbdCgKUkT3sBEwdVCrilp1r7bgr_6-4gG-d1n_BsfzpIQ</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Gwynne, Sarah</creator><creator>Jones, Gareth</creator><creator>Maggs, Rhydian</creator><creator>Eaton, David</creator><creator>Miles, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Staffurth, John</creator><creator>Nixon, Lisette</creator><creator>Ray, Ruby</creator><creator>Lewis, Geraint</creator><creator>Crosby, Tom</creator><creator>Spezi, Emiliano</creator><general>The British Institute of Radiology</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure</title><author>Gwynne, Sarah ; Jones, Gareth ; Maggs, Rhydian ; Eaton, David ; Miles, Elizabeth ; Staffurth, John ; Nixon, Lisette ; Ray, Ruby ; Lewis, Geraint ; Crosby, Tom ; Spezi, Emiliano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-13ec7fd77e06f51bb6dba5b51ff4a30dad8195c414b2130142f4fba716bbd79d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Radiotherapy and Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gwynne, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggs, Rhydian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miles, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staffurth, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nixon, Lisette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Ruby</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Geraint</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosby, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spezi, Emiliano</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gwynne, Sarah</au><au>Jones, Gareth</au><au>Maggs, Rhydian</au><au>Eaton, David</au><au>Miles, Elizabeth</au><au>Staffurth, John</au><au>Nixon, Lisette</au><au>Ray, Ruby</au><au>Lewis, Geraint</au><au>Crosby, Tom</au><au>Spezi, Emiliano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure</atitle><jtitle>British journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Radiol</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1064</issue><spage>20160020</spage><epage>20160020</epage><pages>20160020-20160020</pages><issn>0007-1285</issn><eissn>1748-880X</eissn><abstract>We sought to develop a process that would allow us to perform a prospective review of outlining in trials using expert reviewers based in multiple centres. We implemented a specific information technology infrastructure and workflow that could serve all organizations involved in the radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) process. Data were processed and packaged in the computational environment for radiotherapy research (CERR) binary format and securely transmitted to the expert reviewer at the designated remote organization. It was opened and reviewed using the distributed CERR-compiled application, and a standardized report was sent to the respective centre. Centres were expected to correct any unacceptable deviations and resubmit outlining for approval prior to commencing treatment. 75% of reviews were completed and fed back to centres within 3 working days. There were no delays in treatment start date. Our distributed RTQA review approach provides a method of prospective outlining review at multiple centres, without compromising the quality, delaying the start of treatment or the need for significant additional infrastructure resources. Future progress in the area of prospective individual case review will need to be supported by additional resources for clinician time to undertake the reviews. Trial groups around the world have formulated different approaches to address the need for the prospective review of radiotherapy (RT) data with clinical trials, in line with available resources. We report a UK solution that has allowed the workload for outlining review to be distributed across a wider group of volunteer reviewers without the need for any additional infrastructure costs and has already been adopted within the UK RT trials community.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The British Institute of Radiology</pub><pmid>27245136</pmid><doi>10.1259/bjr.20160020</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1285
ispartof British journal of radiology, 2016-08, Vol.89 (1064), p.20160020-20160020
issn 0007-1285
1748-880X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5124880
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Radiotherapy and Oncology
title Prospective review of radiotherapy trials through implementation of standardized multicentre workflow and IT infrastructure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T19%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20review%20of%20radiotherapy%20trials%20through%20implementation%20of%20standardized%20multicentre%20workflow%20and%20IT%20infrastructure&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Gwynne,%20Sarah&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1064&rft.spage=20160020&rft.epage=20160020&rft.pages=20160020-20160020&rft.issn=0007-1285&rft.eissn=1748-880X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/bjr.20160020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1891873244%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826692604&rft_id=info:pmid/27245136&rfr_iscdi=true