Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage

The purpose of this study was to determine if any of the factors radiologist, examination category, time of week, and week effect PACS usage, with PACS usage defined as the sequential order of computer commands issued by a radiologist in a PACS during interpretation and dictation. We initially hypot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of digital imaging 2016-12, Vol.29 (6), p.670-676
Hauptverfasser: Forsberg, Daniel, Rosipko, Beverly, Sunshine, Jeffrey L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 676
container_issue 6
container_start_page 670
container_title Journal of digital imaging
container_volume 29
creator Forsberg, Daniel
Rosipko, Beverly
Sunshine, Jeffrey L.
description The purpose of this study was to determine if any of the factors radiologist, examination category, time of week, and week effect PACS usage, with PACS usage defined as the sequential order of computer commands issued by a radiologist in a PACS during interpretation and dictation. We initially hypothesized that only radiologist and examination category would have significant effects on PACS usage. Command logs covering 8 weeks of PACS usage were analyzed. For each command trace (describing performed activities of an attending radiologist interpreting a single examination), the PACS usage variables number of commands, number of command classes, bigram repetitiveness, and time to read were extracted. Generalized linear models were used to determine the significance of the factors on the PACS usage variables. The statistical results confirmed the initial hypothesis that radiologist and examination category affect PACS usage and that the factors week and time of week to a large extent have no significant effect. As such, this work provides direction for continued efforts to analyze system data to better understand PACS utilization, which in turn can provide input to enable optimal utilization and configuration of corresponding systems. These continued efforts were, in this work, exemplified by a more detailed analysis using PACS usage profiles, which revealed insights directly applicable to improve PACS utilization through modified system configuration.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10278-016-9881-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5114227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826681635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a98ea094c99459f7d041fc3dda73c0d26b7fac2ee263f7b9090c07885d7ca003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1KxDAQx4Moun48gBdZ8OLB6kza5uMiLItfICi6greQTdNa6TaadAVvvoav55OYZVdRQfCUw_zmP5n5EbKNcIAA_DAgUC4SQJZIITDBJdJDhiLhlN8tkx4IyRMUQq6R9RAeAJDnPFsla5SDlJTSHtk_0aZzPvQHZWlNV7dV_1oXtWtcVYfu_fUt9K8Gw5v-bdCV3SQrpW6C3Vq8G2R0cjwaniUXl6fnw8FFYnJIu0RLYTXIzEiZ5bLkBWRYmrQoNE8NFJSNeakNtZaytORjCRIMcCHyghsNkG6Qo3ns43Q8sYWxbed1ox59PdH-RTldq5-Vtr5XlXtWOWJGKY8Be4sA756mNnRqUgdjm0a31k2DQsGyPE9F-h-UMiaQpXlEd3-hD27q23iISGXxoMjYjMI5ZbwLwdvy698IamZNza2paE3NrCmMPTvfF_7q-NQUAToHQiy1lfXfRv-Z-gFvYqHE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840991665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Forsberg, Daniel ; Rosipko, Beverly ; Sunshine, Jeffrey L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forsberg, Daniel ; Rosipko, Beverly ; Sunshine, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine if any of the factors radiologist, examination category, time of week, and week effect PACS usage, with PACS usage defined as the sequential order of computer commands issued by a radiologist in a PACS during interpretation and dictation. We initially hypothesized that only radiologist and examination category would have significant effects on PACS usage. Command logs covering 8 weeks of PACS usage were analyzed. For each command trace (describing performed activities of an attending radiologist interpreting a single examination), the PACS usage variables number of commands, number of command classes, bigram repetitiveness, and time to read were extracted. Generalized linear models were used to determine the significance of the factors on the PACS usage variables. The statistical results confirmed the initial hypothesis that radiologist and examination category affect PACS usage and that the factors week and time of week to a large extent have no significant effect. As such, this work provides direction for continued efforts to analyze system data to better understand PACS utilization, which in turn can provide input to enable optimal utilization and configuration of corresponding systems. These continued efforts were, in this work, exemplified by a more detailed analysis using PACS usage profiles, which revealed insights directly applicable to improve PACS utilization through modified system configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-1889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-727X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9881-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27099222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Categories ; Commands ; Digital imaging ; Imaging ; Logs ; Mathematical models ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Optimization ; Radiology ; Systems analysis ; Utilization</subject><ispartof>Journal of digital imaging, 2016-12, Vol.29 (6), p.670-676</ispartof><rights>Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2016</rights><rights>Journal of Digital Imaging is a copyright of Springer, 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a98ea094c99459f7d041fc3dda73c0d26b7fac2ee263f7b9090c07885d7ca003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a98ea094c99459f7d041fc3dda73c0d26b7fac2ee263f7b9090c07885d7ca003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114227/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114227/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27099222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forsberg, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosipko, Beverly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunshine, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage</title><title>Journal of digital imaging</title><addtitle>J Digit Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>J Digit Imaging</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine if any of the factors radiologist, examination category, time of week, and week effect PACS usage, with PACS usage defined as the sequential order of computer commands issued by a radiologist in a PACS during interpretation and dictation. We initially hypothesized that only radiologist and examination category would have significant effects on PACS usage. Command logs covering 8 weeks of PACS usage were analyzed. For each command trace (describing performed activities of an attending radiologist interpreting a single examination), the PACS usage variables number of commands, number of command classes, bigram repetitiveness, and time to read were extracted. Generalized linear models were used to determine the significance of the factors on the PACS usage variables. The statistical results confirmed the initial hypothesis that radiologist and examination category affect PACS usage and that the factors week and time of week to a large extent have no significant effect. As such, this work provides direction for continued efforts to analyze system data to better understand PACS utilization, which in turn can provide input to enable optimal utilization and configuration of corresponding systems. These continued efforts were, in this work, exemplified by a more detailed analysis using PACS usage profiles, which revealed insights directly applicable to improve PACS utilization through modified system configuration.</description><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Commands</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Logs</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Utilization</subject><issn>0897-1889</issn><issn>1618-727X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1KxDAQx4Moun48gBdZ8OLB6kza5uMiLItfICi6greQTdNa6TaadAVvvoav55OYZVdRQfCUw_zmP5n5EbKNcIAA_DAgUC4SQJZIITDBJdJDhiLhlN8tkx4IyRMUQq6R9RAeAJDnPFsla5SDlJTSHtk_0aZzPvQHZWlNV7dV_1oXtWtcVYfu_fUt9K8Gw5v-bdCV3SQrpW6C3Vq8G2R0cjwaniUXl6fnw8FFYnJIu0RLYTXIzEiZ5bLkBWRYmrQoNE8NFJSNeakNtZaytORjCRIMcCHyghsNkG6Qo3ns43Q8sYWxbed1ox59PdH-RTldq5-Vtr5XlXtWOWJGKY8Be4sA756mNnRqUgdjm0a31k2DQsGyPE9F-h-UMiaQpXlEd3-hD27q23iISGXxoMjYjMI5ZbwLwdvy698IamZNza2paE3NrCmMPTvfF_7q-NQUAToHQiy1lfXfRv-Z-gFvYqHE</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Forsberg, Daniel</creator><creator>Rosipko, Beverly</creator><creator>Sunshine, Jeffrey L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage</title><author>Forsberg, Daniel ; Rosipko, Beverly ; Sunshine, Jeffrey L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-a98ea094c99459f7d041fc3dda73c0d26b7fac2ee263f7b9090c07885d7ca003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Commands</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Logs</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forsberg, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosipko, Beverly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunshine, Jeffrey L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of digital imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forsberg, Daniel</au><au>Rosipko, Beverly</au><au>Sunshine, Jeffrey L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of digital imaging</jtitle><stitle>J Digit Imaging</stitle><addtitle>J Digit Imaging</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>670</spage><epage>676</epage><pages>670-676</pages><issn>0897-1889</issn><eissn>1618-727X</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine if any of the factors radiologist, examination category, time of week, and week effect PACS usage, with PACS usage defined as the sequential order of computer commands issued by a radiologist in a PACS during interpretation and dictation. We initially hypothesized that only radiologist and examination category would have significant effects on PACS usage. Command logs covering 8 weeks of PACS usage were analyzed. For each command trace (describing performed activities of an attending radiologist interpreting a single examination), the PACS usage variables number of commands, number of command classes, bigram repetitiveness, and time to read were extracted. Generalized linear models were used to determine the significance of the factors on the PACS usage variables. The statistical results confirmed the initial hypothesis that radiologist and examination category affect PACS usage and that the factors week and time of week to a large extent have no significant effect. As such, this work provides direction for continued efforts to analyze system data to better understand PACS utilization, which in turn can provide input to enable optimal utilization and configuration of corresponding systems. These continued efforts were, in this work, exemplified by a more detailed analysis using PACS usage profiles, which revealed insights directly applicable to improve PACS utilization through modified system configuration.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>27099222</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10278-016-9881-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0897-1889
ispartof Journal of digital imaging, 2016-12, Vol.29 (6), p.670-676
issn 0897-1889
1618-727X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5114227
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Categories
Commands
Digital imaging
Imaging
Logs
Mathematical models
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Optimization
Radiology
Systems analysis
Utilization
title Factors Affecting Radiologist’s PACS Usage
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A55%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Affecting%20Radiologist%E2%80%99s%20PACS%20Usage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20digital%20imaging&rft.au=Forsberg,%20Daniel&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=670&rft.epage=676&rft.pages=670-676&rft.issn=0897-1889&rft.eissn=1618-727X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10278-016-9881-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826681635%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840991665&rft_id=info:pmid/27099222&rfr_iscdi=true