Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans
The recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has allowed the non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in humans. Early studies showed that cerebellar activity, as reflected in the excitability of the dentate-thalamo-cortica...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cerebellum & ataxias 2016-11, Vol.3 (1), p.19-19, Article 19 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 19 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Cerebellum & ataxias |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Tremblay, Sara Austin, Duncan Hannah, Ricci Rothwell, John C |
description | The recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has allowed the non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in humans. Early studies showed that cerebellar activity, as reflected in the excitability of the dentate-thalamo-cortical pathway, can be assessed with paired stimulation of the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex (M1) (cerebellar inhibition of motor cortex, CBI). Following this, many attempts have been made, using techniques such as repetitive TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), to modulate the activity of the cerebellum and the dentate-thalamo-cortical output, and measure their impact on M1 activity. The present article reviews literature concerned with the impact of non-invasive stimulation of cerebellum on M1 measures of excitability and "plasticity" in both healthy and clinical populations. The main conclusion from the 27 reviewed articles is that the effects of cerebellar "plasticity" protocols on M1 activity are generally inconsistent. Nevertheless, two measurements showed relatively reproducible effects in healthy individuals: reduced response of M1 to sensorimotor "plasticity" (paired-associative stimulation, PAS) and reduced CBI following repetitive TMS and TES. We discuss current challenges, such as the low power of reviewed studies, variability in stimulation parameters employed and lack of understanding of physiological mechanisms underlying CBI. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40673-016-0057-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5111316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470388135</galeid><sourcerecordid>A470388135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506z-b78ec16c16b39af612587f71e526d5ac3cf36d0266ecd8f0058ce85a5b9c14033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptklFrHCEQx6W0NCHNB8hLWSiUvpg66-q6L4UQ0qaQJi9tXsV1Z3OGXU119yD36ev2knBXiqKj85vRGf6EnAA7BVDyc6qYrDllICljoqabV-SwZIJTpWp4vWMfkOOU7hljUIqmLJu35KCsVZNteUhur4Onzq9Ncmss2micL9Lkxnkwkwu-MKkwxRTCkJfsmLvHwmLEFofBRPoDCucnjMYucMqHYjWPxqd35E1vhoTHT_sR-fX14uf5Jb26-fb9_OyKWsHkhra1Qgsyz5Y3ppf5h6rua0BRyk4Yy23PZcdKKdF2qs91KotKGNE2FirG-RH5ss37MLcjdhb9FM2gH6IbTXzUwTi97_Fupe_CWgsA4CBzgk9PCWL4PWOa9OiSXarzGOakQVWVZLlbKqMf_kHvwxx9Lm-hRNXIiu1Qd2ZA7Xwf8rt2SarPqppxpYCLTJ3-h8qjw9HZ4LF3-X4v4ONOwArNMK1SGOa_fd8HYQvaGFKK2L80A5hehKO3wtFZOHoRjt7kmPe7XXyJeJYJ_wO_6bzS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845496408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tremblay, Sara ; Austin, Duncan ; Hannah, Ricci ; Rothwell, John C</creator><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Sara ; Austin, Duncan ; Hannah, Ricci ; Rothwell, John C</creatorcontrib><description>The recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has allowed the non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in humans. Early studies showed that cerebellar activity, as reflected in the excitability of the dentate-thalamo-cortical pathway, can be assessed with paired stimulation of the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex (M1) (cerebellar inhibition of motor cortex, CBI). Following this, many attempts have been made, using techniques such as repetitive TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), to modulate the activity of the cerebellum and the dentate-thalamo-cortical output, and measure their impact on M1 activity. The present article reviews literature concerned with the impact of non-invasive stimulation of cerebellum on M1 measures of excitability and "plasticity" in both healthy and clinical populations. The main conclusion from the 27 reviewed articles is that the effects of cerebellar "plasticity" protocols on M1 activity are generally inconsistent. Nevertheless, two measurements showed relatively reproducible effects in healthy individuals: reduced response of M1 to sensorimotor "plasticity" (paired-associative stimulation, PAS) and reduced CBI following repetitive TMS and TES. We discuss current challenges, such as the low power of reviewed studies, variability in stimulation parameters employed and lack of understanding of physiological mechanisms underlying CBI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-8871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-8871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40673-016-0057-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27895926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Brain ; Neurophysiology ; Review</subject><ispartof>Cerebellum & ataxias, 2016-11, Vol.3 (1), p.19-19, Article 19</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506z-b78ec16c16b39af612587f71e526d5ac3cf36d0266ecd8f0058ce85a5b9c14033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506z-b78ec16c16b39af612587f71e526d5ac3cf36d0266ecd8f0058ce85a5b9c14033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4116-0495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111316/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5111316/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Ricci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothwell, John C</creatorcontrib><title>Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans</title><title>Cerebellum & ataxias</title><addtitle>Cerebellum Ataxias</addtitle><description>The recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has allowed the non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in humans. Early studies showed that cerebellar activity, as reflected in the excitability of the dentate-thalamo-cortical pathway, can be assessed with paired stimulation of the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex (M1) (cerebellar inhibition of motor cortex, CBI). Following this, many attempts have been made, using techniques such as repetitive TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), to modulate the activity of the cerebellum and the dentate-thalamo-cortical output, and measure their impact on M1 activity. The present article reviews literature concerned with the impact of non-invasive stimulation of cerebellum on M1 measures of excitability and "plasticity" in both healthy and clinical populations. The main conclusion from the 27 reviewed articles is that the effects of cerebellar "plasticity" protocols on M1 activity are generally inconsistent. Nevertheless, two measurements showed relatively reproducible effects in healthy individuals: reduced response of M1 to sensorimotor "plasticity" (paired-associative stimulation, PAS) and reduced CBI following repetitive TMS and TES. We discuss current challenges, such as the low power of reviewed studies, variability in stimulation parameters employed and lack of understanding of physiological mechanisms underlying CBI.</description><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Neurophysiology</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>2053-8871</issn><issn>2053-8871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptklFrHCEQx6W0NCHNB8hLWSiUvpg66-q6L4UQ0qaQJi9tXsV1Z3OGXU119yD36ev2knBXiqKj85vRGf6EnAA7BVDyc6qYrDllICljoqabV-SwZIJTpWp4vWMfkOOU7hljUIqmLJu35KCsVZNteUhur4Onzq9Ncmss2micL9Lkxnkwkwu-MKkwxRTCkJfsmLvHwmLEFofBRPoDCucnjMYucMqHYjWPxqd35E1vhoTHT_sR-fX14uf5Jb26-fb9_OyKWsHkhra1Qgsyz5Y3ppf5h6rua0BRyk4Yy23PZcdKKdF2qs91KotKGNE2FirG-RH5ss37MLcjdhb9FM2gH6IbTXzUwTi97_Fupe_CWgsA4CBzgk9PCWL4PWOa9OiSXarzGOakQVWVZLlbKqMf_kHvwxx9Lm-hRNXIiu1Qd2ZA7Xwf8rt2SarPqppxpYCLTJ3-h8qjw9HZ4LF3-X4v4ONOwArNMK1SGOa_fd8HYQvaGFKK2L80A5hehKO3wtFZOHoRjt7kmPe7XXyJeJYJ_wO_6bzS</recordid><startdate>20161116</startdate><enddate>20161116</enddate><creator>Tremblay, Sara</creator><creator>Austin, Duncan</creator><creator>Hannah, Ricci</creator><creator>Rothwell, John C</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-0495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161116</creationdate><title>Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans</title><author>Tremblay, Sara ; Austin, Duncan ; Hannah, Ricci ; Rothwell, John C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506z-b78ec16c16b39af612587f71e526d5ac3cf36d0266ecd8f0058ce85a5b9c14033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Neurophysiology</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tremblay, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, Ricci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothwell, John C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cerebellum & ataxias</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tremblay, Sara</au><au>Austin, Duncan</au><au>Hannah, Ricci</au><au>Rothwell, John C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans</atitle><jtitle>Cerebellum & ataxias</jtitle><addtitle>Cerebellum Ataxias</addtitle><date>2016-11-16</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>19-19</pages><artnum>19</artnum><issn>2053-8871</issn><eissn>2053-8871</eissn><abstract>The recent development of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has allowed the non-invasive assessment of cerebellar function in humans. Early studies showed that cerebellar activity, as reflected in the excitability of the dentate-thalamo-cortical pathway, can be assessed with paired stimulation of the cerebellum and the primary motor cortex (M1) (cerebellar inhibition of motor cortex, CBI). Following this, many attempts have been made, using techniques such as repetitive TMS and transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), to modulate the activity of the cerebellum and the dentate-thalamo-cortical output, and measure their impact on M1 activity. The present article reviews literature concerned with the impact of non-invasive stimulation of cerebellum on M1 measures of excitability and "plasticity" in both healthy and clinical populations. The main conclusion from the 27 reviewed articles is that the effects of cerebellar "plasticity" protocols on M1 activity are generally inconsistent. Nevertheless, two measurements showed relatively reproducible effects in healthy individuals: reduced response of M1 to sensorimotor "plasticity" (paired-associative stimulation, PAS) and reduced CBI following repetitive TMS and TES. We discuss current challenges, such as the low power of reviewed studies, variability in stimulation parameters employed and lack of understanding of physiological mechanisms underlying CBI.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27895926</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40673-016-0057-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4116-0495</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2053-8871 |
ispartof | Cerebellum & ataxias, 2016-11, Vol.3 (1), p.19-19, Article 19 |
issn | 2053-8871 2053-8871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5111316 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Brain Neurophysiology Review |
title | Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A54%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-invasive%20brain%20stimulation%20as%20a%20tool%20to%20study%20cerebellar-M1%20interactions%20in%20humans&rft.jtitle=Cerebellum%20&%20ataxias&rft.au=Tremblay,%20Sara&rft.date=2016-11-16&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=19-19&rft.artnum=19&rft.issn=2053-8871&rft.eissn=2053-8871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40673-016-0057-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA470388135%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845496408&rft_id=info:pmid/27895926&rft_galeid=A470388135&rfr_iscdi=true |