Putting the behavior into animal movement modeling: Improved activity budgets from use of ancillary tag information

Animal movement research relies on biotelemetry, and telemetry‐based locations are increasingly augmented with ancillary information. This presents an underutilized opportunity to enhance movement process models. Given tags designed to record specific behaviors, efforts are increasing to update move...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology and evolution 2016-11, Vol.6 (22), p.8243-8255
Hauptverfasser: Bestley, Sophie, Jonsen, Ian, Harcourt, Robert G., Hindell, Mark A., Gales, Nicholas J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8255
container_issue 22
container_start_page 8243
container_title Ecology and evolution
container_volume 6
creator Bestley, Sophie
Jonsen, Ian
Harcourt, Robert G.
Hindell, Mark A.
Gales, Nicholas J.
description Animal movement research relies on biotelemetry, and telemetry‐based locations are increasingly augmented with ancillary information. This presents an underutilized opportunity to enhance movement process models. Given tags designed to record specific behaviors, efforts are increasing to update movement models beyond reliance solely upon horizontal movement information to improve inference of space use and activity budgets. We present two state‐space models adapted to incorporate ancillary data to inform three discrete movement states: directed, resident, and an activity state. These were developed for two case studies: (1) a “haulout” model for Weddell seals, and (2) an “activity” model for Antarctic fur seals which intersperse periods of diving activity and inactivity. The methodology is easily implementable with any ancillary data that can be expressed as a proportion (or binary) indicator. A comparison of the models augmented with ancillary information and unaugmented models confirmed that many behavioral states appeared mischaracterized in the latter. Important changes in subsequent activity budgets occurred. Haulout accounted for 0.17 of the overall Weddell seal time budget, with the estimated proportion of time spent in a resident state reduced from a posterior median of 0.69 (0.65–0.73; 95% HPDI) to 0.54 (0.50–0.58 HPDI). The drop was more dramatic in the Antarctic fur seal case, from 0.57 (0.52–0.63 HPDI) to 0.22 (0.20–0.25 HPDI), with 0.35 (0.31–0.39 HPDI) of time spent in the inactive (nondiving) state. These findings reinforce previously raised contentions about the drawbacks of behavioral states inferred solely from horizontal movements. Our findings have implications for assessing habitat requirements; estimating energetics and consumption; and management efforts such as mitigating fisheries interactions. Combining multiple sources of information within integrated frameworks should improve inference of relationships between movement decisions and fitness, the interplay between resource and habitat dependencies, and their changes at the population and landscape level. We present two state‐space models for animal movement that each differently incorporates ancillary telemetry data to inform three distinct movement states. These are applied to two case studies: for Weddell seals that haulout on ice and for Antarctic fur seals that rest at sea. Provision of an array of model structures can improve inference about animal space use and behaviour an
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ece3.2530
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5108274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1843912260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-8b488c788c2d7edcd2980037cb99c8eca05dd3f2da2cd2c3a12971408d16ee7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkVFrFDEUhYMottQ--Ack4Is-bHuTzEwyPghl2dZCQR_0OWSSO7spM5M1yazsvzfr1lIFwUDIJfe7h5wcQl4zuGAA_BItigteC3hGTjlU9ULKWj1_Up-Q85TuoawGeAXyJTnhUkkFLT8l6cucs5_WNG-QdrgxOx8i9VMO1Ex-NAMdww5HnHIpHA4F_UBvx20st44am_3O5z3tZrfGnGgfw0jnhDT0Zd76YTBxT7NZF8k-xNFkH6ZX5EVvhoTnD-cZ-Xa9-rr8tLj7fHO7vLpb2Eo2sFBdpZSVZXMn0VnHWwUgpO3a1iq0BmrnRM-d4aVnhWG8lawC5ViDKHtxRj4edbdzNxaBYiKaQW9j8RX3Ohiv_-xMfqPXYadrBorLqgi8exCI4fuMKevRJ4vF1IRhTpqpGmTTqlr8B1qJlnHeQEHf_oXehzlO5Sc0B1E3XDVKFer9kbIxpBSxf3w3A30IXh-C14fgC_vmqdFH8nfMBbg8Aj_8gPt_K-nVciV-Sf4EwjK5Sg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2035628688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putting the behavior into animal movement modeling: Improved activity budgets from use of ancillary tag information</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bestley, Sophie ; Jonsen, Ian ; Harcourt, Robert G. ; Hindell, Mark A. ; Gales, Nicholas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bestley, Sophie ; Jonsen, Ian ; Harcourt, Robert G. ; Hindell, Mark A. ; Gales, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><description>Animal movement research relies on biotelemetry, and telemetry‐based locations are increasingly augmented with ancillary information. This presents an underutilized opportunity to enhance movement process models. Given tags designed to record specific behaviors, efforts are increasing to update movement models beyond reliance solely upon horizontal movement information to improve inference of space use and activity budgets. We present two state‐space models adapted to incorporate ancillary data to inform three discrete movement states: directed, resident, and an activity state. These were developed for two case studies: (1) a “haulout” model for Weddell seals, and (2) an “activity” model for Antarctic fur seals which intersperse periods of diving activity and inactivity. The methodology is easily implementable with any ancillary data that can be expressed as a proportion (or binary) indicator. A comparison of the models augmented with ancillary information and unaugmented models confirmed that many behavioral states appeared mischaracterized in the latter. Important changes in subsequent activity budgets occurred. Haulout accounted for 0.17 of the overall Weddell seal time budget, with the estimated proportion of time spent in a resident state reduced from a posterior median of 0.69 (0.65–0.73; 95% HPDI) to 0.54 (0.50–0.58 HPDI). The drop was more dramatic in the Antarctic fur seal case, from 0.57 (0.52–0.63 HPDI) to 0.22 (0.20–0.25 HPDI), with 0.35 (0.31–0.39 HPDI) of time spent in the inactive (nondiving) state. These findings reinforce previously raised contentions about the drawbacks of behavioral states inferred solely from horizontal movements. Our findings have implications for assessing habitat requirements; estimating energetics and consumption; and management efforts such as mitigating fisheries interactions. Combining multiple sources of information within integrated frameworks should improve inference of relationships between movement decisions and fitness, the interplay between resource and habitat dependencies, and their changes at the population and landscape level. We present two state‐space models for animal movement that each differently incorporates ancillary telemetry data to inform three distinct movement states. These are applied to two case studies: for Weddell seals that haulout on ice and for Antarctic fur seals that rest at sea. Provision of an array of model structures can improve inference about animal space use and behaviour and give the biotelemetry community greater flexibility in appropriately addressing the movement ecology of their study species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-7758</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2530</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27878092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>ancillary information ; Animal behavior ; animal movement ; Antarctic seals ; behavioral switching ; Biotelemetry ; Budgeting ; Budgets ; Case studies ; Diving ; Fisheries ; Fitness ; foraging behavior ; Inference ; Integrated Marine Observing System ; Landscape ; Marine mammals ; marine predators ; Original Research ; Polar environments ; satellite tracking ; Seals ; State space models ; state‐space model ; Telemetry</subject><ispartof>Ecology and evolution, 2016-11, Vol.6 (22), p.8243-8255</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-8b488c788c2d7edcd2980037cb99c8eca05dd3f2da2cd2c3a12971408d16ee7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-8b488c788c2d7edcd2980037cb99c8eca05dd3f2da2cd2c3a12971408d16ee7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108274/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5108274/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27878092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bestley, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonsen, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindell, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gales, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><title>Putting the behavior into animal movement modeling: Improved activity budgets from use of ancillary tag information</title><title>Ecology and evolution</title><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Animal movement research relies on biotelemetry, and telemetry‐based locations are increasingly augmented with ancillary information. This presents an underutilized opportunity to enhance movement process models. Given tags designed to record specific behaviors, efforts are increasing to update movement models beyond reliance solely upon horizontal movement information to improve inference of space use and activity budgets. We present two state‐space models adapted to incorporate ancillary data to inform three discrete movement states: directed, resident, and an activity state. These were developed for two case studies: (1) a “haulout” model for Weddell seals, and (2) an “activity” model for Antarctic fur seals which intersperse periods of diving activity and inactivity. The methodology is easily implementable with any ancillary data that can be expressed as a proportion (or binary) indicator. A comparison of the models augmented with ancillary information and unaugmented models confirmed that many behavioral states appeared mischaracterized in the latter. Important changes in subsequent activity budgets occurred. Haulout accounted for 0.17 of the overall Weddell seal time budget, with the estimated proportion of time spent in a resident state reduced from a posterior median of 0.69 (0.65–0.73; 95% HPDI) to 0.54 (0.50–0.58 HPDI). The drop was more dramatic in the Antarctic fur seal case, from 0.57 (0.52–0.63 HPDI) to 0.22 (0.20–0.25 HPDI), with 0.35 (0.31–0.39 HPDI) of time spent in the inactive (nondiving) state. These findings reinforce previously raised contentions about the drawbacks of behavioral states inferred solely from horizontal movements. Our findings have implications for assessing habitat requirements; estimating energetics and consumption; and management efforts such as mitigating fisheries interactions. Combining multiple sources of information within integrated frameworks should improve inference of relationships between movement decisions and fitness, the interplay between resource and habitat dependencies, and their changes at the population and landscape level. We present two state‐space models for animal movement that each differently incorporates ancillary telemetry data to inform three distinct movement states. These are applied to two case studies: for Weddell seals that haulout on ice and for Antarctic fur seals that rest at sea. Provision of an array of model structures can improve inference about animal space use and behaviour and give the biotelemetry community greater flexibility in appropriately addressing the movement ecology of their study species.</description><subject>ancillary information</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>animal movement</subject><subject>Antarctic seals</subject><subject>behavioral switching</subject><subject>Biotelemetry</subject><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Diving</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>foraging behavior</subject><subject>Inference</subject><subject>Integrated Marine Observing System</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>marine predators</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Polar environments</subject><subject>satellite tracking</subject><subject>Seals</subject><subject>State space models</subject><subject>state‐space model</subject><subject>Telemetry</subject><issn>2045-7758</issn><issn>2045-7758</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkVFrFDEUhYMottQ--Ack4Is-bHuTzEwyPghl2dZCQR_0OWSSO7spM5M1yazsvzfr1lIFwUDIJfe7h5wcQl4zuGAA_BItigteC3hGTjlU9ULKWj1_Up-Q85TuoawGeAXyJTnhUkkFLT8l6cucs5_WNG-QdrgxOx8i9VMO1Ex-NAMdww5HnHIpHA4F_UBvx20st44am_3O5z3tZrfGnGgfw0jnhDT0Zd76YTBxT7NZF8k-xNFkH6ZX5EVvhoTnD-cZ-Xa9-rr8tLj7fHO7vLpb2Eo2sFBdpZSVZXMn0VnHWwUgpO3a1iq0BmrnRM-d4aVnhWG8lawC5ViDKHtxRj4edbdzNxaBYiKaQW9j8RX3Ohiv_-xMfqPXYadrBorLqgi8exCI4fuMKevRJ4vF1IRhTpqpGmTTqlr8B1qJlnHeQEHf_oXehzlO5Sc0B1E3XDVKFer9kbIxpBSxf3w3A30IXh-C14fgC_vmqdFH8nfMBbg8Aj_8gPt_K-nVciV-Sf4EwjK5Sg</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Bestley, Sophie</creator><creator>Jonsen, Ian</creator><creator>Harcourt, Robert G.</creator><creator>Hindell, Mark A.</creator><creator>Gales, Nicholas J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Putting the behavior into animal movement modeling: Improved activity budgets from use of ancillary tag information</title><author>Bestley, Sophie ; Jonsen, Ian ; Harcourt, Robert G. ; Hindell, Mark A. ; Gales, Nicholas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-8b488c788c2d7edcd2980037cb99c8eca05dd3f2da2cd2c3a12971408d16ee7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ancillary information</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>animal movement</topic><topic>Antarctic seals</topic><topic>behavioral switching</topic><topic>Biotelemetry</topic><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Diving</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>foraging behavior</topic><topic>Inference</topic><topic>Integrated Marine Observing System</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>marine predators</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Polar environments</topic><topic>satellite tracking</topic><topic>Seals</topic><topic>State space models</topic><topic>state‐space model</topic><topic>Telemetry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bestley, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonsen, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harcourt, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindell, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gales, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bestley, Sophie</au><au>Jonsen, Ian</au><au>Harcourt, Robert G.</au><au>Hindell, Mark A.</au><au>Gales, Nicholas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Putting the behavior into animal movement modeling: Improved activity budgets from use of ancillary tag information</atitle><jtitle>Ecology and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>8243</spage><epage>8255</epage><pages>8243-8255</pages><issn>2045-7758</issn><eissn>2045-7758</eissn><abstract>Animal movement research relies on biotelemetry, and telemetry‐based locations are increasingly augmented with ancillary information. This presents an underutilized opportunity to enhance movement process models. Given tags designed to record specific behaviors, efforts are increasing to update movement models beyond reliance solely upon horizontal movement information to improve inference of space use and activity budgets. We present two state‐space models adapted to incorporate ancillary data to inform three discrete movement states: directed, resident, and an activity state. These were developed for two case studies: (1) a “haulout” model for Weddell seals, and (2) an “activity” model for Antarctic fur seals which intersperse periods of diving activity and inactivity. The methodology is easily implementable with any ancillary data that can be expressed as a proportion (or binary) indicator. A comparison of the models augmented with ancillary information and unaugmented models confirmed that many behavioral states appeared mischaracterized in the latter. Important changes in subsequent activity budgets occurred. Haulout accounted for 0.17 of the overall Weddell seal time budget, with the estimated proportion of time spent in a resident state reduced from a posterior median of 0.69 (0.65–0.73; 95% HPDI) to 0.54 (0.50–0.58 HPDI). The drop was more dramatic in the Antarctic fur seal case, from 0.57 (0.52–0.63 HPDI) to 0.22 (0.20–0.25 HPDI), with 0.35 (0.31–0.39 HPDI) of time spent in the inactive (nondiving) state. These findings reinforce previously raised contentions about the drawbacks of behavioral states inferred solely from horizontal movements. Our findings have implications for assessing habitat requirements; estimating energetics and consumption; and management efforts such as mitigating fisheries interactions. Combining multiple sources of information within integrated frameworks should improve inference of relationships between movement decisions and fitness, the interplay between resource and habitat dependencies, and their changes at the population and landscape level. We present two state‐space models for animal movement that each differently incorporates ancillary telemetry data to inform three distinct movement states. These are applied to two case studies: for Weddell seals that haulout on ice and for Antarctic fur seals that rest at sea. Provision of an array of model structures can improve inference about animal space use and behaviour and give the biotelemetry community greater flexibility in appropriately addressing the movement ecology of their study species.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>27878092</pmid><doi>10.1002/ece3.2530</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-7758
ispartof Ecology and evolution, 2016-11, Vol.6 (22), p.8243-8255
issn 2045-7758
2045-7758
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5108274
source Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects ancillary information
Animal behavior
animal movement
Antarctic seals
behavioral switching
Biotelemetry
Budgeting
Budgets
Case studies
Diving
Fisheries
Fitness
foraging behavior
Inference
Integrated Marine Observing System
Landscape
Marine mammals
marine predators
Original Research
Polar environments
satellite tracking
Seals
State space models
state‐space model
Telemetry
title Putting the behavior into animal movement modeling: Improved activity budgets from use of ancillary tag information
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A02%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putting%20the%20behavior%20into%20animal%20movement%20modeling:%20Improved%20activity%20budgets%20from%20use%20of%20ancillary%20tag%20information&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Bestley,%20Sophie&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=8243&rft.epage=8255&rft.pages=8243-8255&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ece3.2530&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1843912260%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2035628688&rft_id=info:pmid/27878092&rfr_iscdi=true