The use of machine learning for the identification of peripheral artery disease and future mortality risk

Objective A key aspect of the precision medicine effort is the development of informatics tools that can analyze and interpret “big data” sets in an automated and adaptive fashion while providing accurate and actionable clinical information. The aims of this study were to develop machine learning al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery 2016-11, Vol.64 (5), p.1515-1522.e3
Hauptverfasser: Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc, Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD, Dalman, Ronald L., MD, Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil, Cooke, John P., MD, PhD, Leeper, Nicholas J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1522.e3
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1515
container_title Journal of vascular surgery
container_volume 64
creator Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc
Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD
Dalman, Ronald L., MD
Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil
Cooke, John P., MD, PhD
Leeper, Nicholas J., MD
description Objective A key aspect of the precision medicine effort is the development of informatics tools that can analyze and interpret “big data” sets in an automated and adaptive fashion while providing accurate and actionable clinical information. The aims of this study were to develop machine learning algorithms for the identification of disease and the prognostication of mortality risk and to determine whether such models perform better than classical statistical analyses. Methods Focusing on peripheral artery disease (PAD), patient data were derived from a prospective, observational study of 1755 patients who presented for elective coronary angiography. We employed multiple supervised machine learning algorithms and used diverse clinical, demographic, imaging, and genomic information in a hypothesis-free manner to build models that could identify patients with PAD and predict future mortality. Comparison was made to standard stepwise linear regression models. Results Our machine-learned models outperformed stepwise logistic regression models both for the identification of patients with PAD (area under the curve, 0.87 vs 0.76, respectively; P  = .03) and for the prediction of future mortality (area under the curve, 0.76 vs 0.65, respectively; P  = .10). Both machine-learned models were markedly better calibrated than the stepwise logistic regression models, thus providing more accurate disease and mortality risk estimates. Conclusions Machine learning approaches can produce more accurate disease classification and prediction models. These tools may prove clinically useful for the automated identification of patients with highly morbid diseases for which aggressive risk factor management can improve outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.026
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5079774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0741521416301665</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826694000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-53b5921120c94ae5c73819e595fa22f55377febd2ee823473eb509b88532ff833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2L1TAUDaI4z9Ef4EaydNOaj6ZpEAZk8AsGXDiuQ5rezEunTZ5J--D9e1PeOKgLV7lwzzk5nHMRek1JTQlt3431eMw1K2NNmpqw9gnaUaJk1XZEPUU7IhtaCUabC_Qi55EQSkUnn6MLJlnbCtXskL_dA14z4OjwbOzeB8ATmBR8uMMuJryUvR8gLN55axYfwwY9QPKHPSQzYZMWSCc8-Aym6JgwYLcuawI8x7SYyS8nnHy-f4meOTNlePXwXqIfnz7eXn-pbr59_nr94aaygrRLJXgvFKOUEasaA8JK3lEFQglnGHNCcCkd9AMD6BhvJIdeENV3neDMuY7zS3R11j2s_QyDLdaLTX1IfjbppKPx-u9N8Ht9F49aEKmkbIrA2weBFH-ukBc9-2xhmkyAuGZNuxKeagghBUrPUJtizgnc4zeU6K0iPepSkd4q0qTRpaLCefOnv0fG704K4P0ZACWlo4eks_UQLAw-gV30EP1_5a_-YdvJh1LddA8nyGNcUyjxa6oz00R_325kOxHa8qLSCv4LecO4pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826694000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of machine learning for the identification of peripheral artery disease and future mortality risk</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc ; Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD ; Dalman, Ronald L., MD ; Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil ; Cooke, John P., MD, PhD ; Leeper, Nicholas J., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc ; Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD ; Dalman, Ronald L., MD ; Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil ; Cooke, John P., MD, PhD ; Leeper, Nicholas J., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective A key aspect of the precision medicine effort is the development of informatics tools that can analyze and interpret “big data” sets in an automated and adaptive fashion while providing accurate and actionable clinical information. The aims of this study were to develop machine learning algorithms for the identification of disease and the prognostication of mortality risk and to determine whether such models perform better than classical statistical analyses. Methods Focusing on peripheral artery disease (PAD), patient data were derived from a prospective, observational study of 1755 patients who presented for elective coronary angiography. We employed multiple supervised machine learning algorithms and used diverse clinical, demographic, imaging, and genomic information in a hypothesis-free manner to build models that could identify patients with PAD and predict future mortality. Comparison was made to standard stepwise linear regression models. Results Our machine-learned models outperformed stepwise logistic regression models both for the identification of patients with PAD (area under the curve, 0.87 vs 0.76, respectively; P  = .03) and for the prediction of future mortality (area under the curve, 0.76 vs 0.65, respectively; P  = .10). Both machine-learned models were markedly better calibrated than the stepwise logistic regression models, thus providing more accurate disease and mortality risk estimates. Conclusions Machine learning approaches can produce more accurate disease classification and prediction models. These tools may prove clinically useful for the automated identification of patients with highly morbid diseases for which aggressive risk factor management can improve outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-5214</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6809</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27266594</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Ankle Brachial Index ; Area Under Curve ; Coronary Angiography ; Data Mining ; Databases, Factual ; Decision Support Techniques ; Female ; Genomics ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Logistic Models ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - classification ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - genetics ; Peripheral Arterial Disease - mortality ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prognosis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; ROC Curve ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery, 2016-11, Vol.64 (5), p.1515-1522.e3</ispartof><rights>Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>2016 Society for Vascular Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-53b5921120c94ae5c73819e595fa22f55377febd2ee823473eb509b88532ff833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-53b5921120c94ae5c73819e595fa22f55377febd2ee823473eb509b88532ff833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521416301665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266594$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalman, Ronald L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, John P., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeper, Nicholas J., MD</creatorcontrib><title>The use of machine learning for the identification of peripheral artery disease and future mortality risk</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objective A key aspect of the precision medicine effort is the development of informatics tools that can analyze and interpret “big data” sets in an automated and adaptive fashion while providing accurate and actionable clinical information. The aims of this study were to develop machine learning algorithms for the identification of disease and the prognostication of mortality risk and to determine whether such models perform better than classical statistical analyses. Methods Focusing on peripheral artery disease (PAD), patient data were derived from a prospective, observational study of 1755 patients who presented for elective coronary angiography. We employed multiple supervised machine learning algorithms and used diverse clinical, demographic, imaging, and genomic information in a hypothesis-free manner to build models that could identify patients with PAD and predict future mortality. Comparison was made to standard stepwise linear regression models. Results Our machine-learned models outperformed stepwise logistic regression models both for the identification of patients with PAD (area under the curve, 0.87 vs 0.76, respectively; P  = .03) and for the prediction of future mortality (area under the curve, 0.76 vs 0.65, respectively; P  = .10). Both machine-learned models were markedly better calibrated than the stepwise logistic regression models, thus providing more accurate disease and mortality risk estimates. Conclusions Machine learning approaches can produce more accurate disease classification and prediction models. These tools may prove clinically useful for the automated identification of patients with highly morbid diseases for which aggressive risk factor management can improve outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Ankle Brachial Index</subject><subject>Area Under Curve</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Data Mining</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genomics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - classification</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - genetics</subject><subject>Peripheral Arterial Disease - mortality</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0741-5214</issn><issn>1097-6809</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2L1TAUDaI4z9Ef4EaydNOaj6ZpEAZk8AsGXDiuQ5rezEunTZ5J--D9e1PeOKgLV7lwzzk5nHMRek1JTQlt3431eMw1K2NNmpqw9gnaUaJk1XZEPUU7IhtaCUabC_Qi55EQSkUnn6MLJlnbCtXskL_dA14z4OjwbOzeB8ATmBR8uMMuJryUvR8gLN55axYfwwY9QPKHPSQzYZMWSCc8-Aym6JgwYLcuawI8x7SYyS8nnHy-f4meOTNlePXwXqIfnz7eXn-pbr59_nr94aaygrRLJXgvFKOUEasaA8JK3lEFQglnGHNCcCkd9AMD6BhvJIdeENV3neDMuY7zS3R11j2s_QyDLdaLTX1IfjbppKPx-u9N8Ht9F49aEKmkbIrA2weBFH-ukBc9-2xhmkyAuGZNuxKeagghBUrPUJtizgnc4zeU6K0iPepSkd4q0qTRpaLCefOnv0fG704K4P0ZACWlo4eks_UQLAw-gV30EP1_5a_-YdvJh1LddA8nyGNcUyjxa6oz00R_325kOxHa8qLSCv4LecO4pw</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc</creator><creator>Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD</creator><creator>Dalman, Ronald L., MD</creator><creator>Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil</creator><creator>Cooke, John P., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Leeper, Nicholas J., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>The use of machine learning for the identification of peripheral artery disease and future mortality risk</title><author>Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc ; Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD ; Dalman, Ronald L., MD ; Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil ; Cooke, John P., MD, PhD ; Leeper, Nicholas J., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-53b5921120c94ae5c73819e595fa22f55377febd2ee823473eb509b88532ff833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Ankle Brachial Index</topic><topic>Area Under Curve</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Data Mining</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genomics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - classification</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - genetics</topic><topic>Peripheral Arterial Disease - mortality</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalman, Ronald L., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, John P., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leeper, Nicholas J., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ross, Elsie Gyang, MD, MSc</au><au>Shah, Nigam H., MBBS, PhD</au><au>Dalman, Ronald L., MD</au><au>Nead, Kevin T., MD, MPhil</au><au>Cooke, John P., MD, PhD</au><au>Leeper, Nicholas J., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of machine learning for the identification of peripheral artery disease and future mortality risk</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1515</spage><epage>1522.e3</epage><pages>1515-1522.e3</pages><issn>0741-5214</issn><eissn>1097-6809</eissn><abstract>Objective A key aspect of the precision medicine effort is the development of informatics tools that can analyze and interpret “big data” sets in an automated and adaptive fashion while providing accurate and actionable clinical information. The aims of this study were to develop machine learning algorithms for the identification of disease and the prognostication of mortality risk and to determine whether such models perform better than classical statistical analyses. Methods Focusing on peripheral artery disease (PAD), patient data were derived from a prospective, observational study of 1755 patients who presented for elective coronary angiography. We employed multiple supervised machine learning algorithms and used diverse clinical, demographic, imaging, and genomic information in a hypothesis-free manner to build models that could identify patients with PAD and predict future mortality. Comparison was made to standard stepwise linear regression models. Results Our machine-learned models outperformed stepwise logistic regression models both for the identification of patients with PAD (area under the curve, 0.87 vs 0.76, respectively; P  = .03) and for the prediction of future mortality (area under the curve, 0.76 vs 0.65, respectively; P  = .10). Both machine-learned models were markedly better calibrated than the stepwise logistic regression models, thus providing more accurate disease and mortality risk estimates. Conclusions Machine learning approaches can produce more accurate disease classification and prediction models. These tools may prove clinically useful for the automated identification of patients with highly morbid diseases for which aggressive risk factor management can improve outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27266594</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.026</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-5214
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery, 2016-11, Vol.64 (5), p.1515-1522.e3
issn 0741-5214
1097-6809
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5079774
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Ankle Brachial Index
Area Under Curve
Coronary Angiography
Data Mining
Databases, Factual
Decision Support Techniques
Female
Genomics
Humans
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Machine Learning
Male
Middle Aged
Peripheral Arterial Disease - classification
Peripheral Arterial Disease - diagnosis
Peripheral Arterial Disease - genetics
Peripheral Arterial Disease - mortality
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
ROC Curve
Surgery
title The use of machine learning for the identification of peripheral artery disease and future mortality risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20machine%20learning%20for%20the%20identification%20of%20peripheral%20artery%20disease%20and%20future%20mortality%20risk&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery&rft.au=Ross,%20Elsie%20Gyang,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1515&rft.epage=1522.e3&rft.pages=1515-1522.e3&rft.issn=0741-5214&rft.eissn=1097-6809&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.04.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826694000%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826694000&rft_id=info:pmid/27266594&rft_els_id=S0741521416301665&rfr_iscdi=true