Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study
Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery. in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global journal of health science 2016-09, Vol.8 (9), p.53531-53531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 53531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 53531 |
container_title | Global journal of health science |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Rahmani, Nasrin Gholipour Baradari, Afshin Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad Firouzian, Abolfazl Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas Fazli, Mehran Sadeghian, Iman |
description | Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.
in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences.
there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5064075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787938750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1935-58588cbebaadebbd75eb95f6e73672a5fa4adacfed2374734a8b0a70e0c779093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9LwzAcxYMobk6PXqVHL51J2zSNB2EMncJgA7dzSNtvt4wumUk72H9vyn6gpyR8P-_l-3gIPRI8pDTmL6vN2g33mea7COMr1CecpCFnSXJ9ucdpD905t8E4TSmht6gXMUIZSWkfmbmqjValrINvpVsXzHZgZaOMdsEcbGXsFspgqUuwwdQUHhtpcM0anJLBHqzzEv8KJqC97u_0NRjXSqtOsrCq82_a8nCPbipZO3g4nQO0_HhfjD_D6WzyNR5Nw4LwmIY0o1lW5JBLWUKel4xCzmmVgg_DIkkrmchSFhWUUcwSFicyy7FkGHDBGMc8HqC3o--uzX2CAnTj1xM7q7bSHoSRSvyfaLUWK7MXFKcJZtQbPJ8MrPlpfSixVa6AupYaTOsEYRnjccYo9mh4RAtrnLNQXb4hWHQlia4kcS7J809_d7vQ51biXzJCkrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787938750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rahmani, Nasrin ; Gholipour Baradari, Afshin ; Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad ; Firouzian, Abolfazl ; Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas ; Fazli, Mehran ; Sadeghian, Iman</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Nasrin ; Gholipour Baradari, Afshin ; Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad ; Firouzian, Abolfazl ; Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas ; Fazli, Mehran ; Sadeghian, Iman</creatorcontrib><description>Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.
in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences.
there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay.
this investigation revealed that local anesthesia has decreased pain during 48 hours after the surgery, shorter recovery time, and the less consumption of painkillers. So, we concluded that we can consider local anesthesia as a good alternative for the general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-9736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-9744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27157165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Center of Science and Education</publisher><ispartof>Global journal of health science, 2016-09, Vol.8 (9), p.53531-53531</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1935-58588cbebaadebbd75eb95f6e73672a5fa4adacfed2374734a8b0a70e0c779093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064075/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064075/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27157165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Nasrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firouzian, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazli, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghian, Iman</creatorcontrib><title>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</title><title>Global journal of health science</title><addtitle>Glob J Health Sci</addtitle><description>Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.
in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences.
there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay.
this investigation revealed that local anesthesia has decreased pain during 48 hours after the surgery, shorter recovery time, and the less consumption of painkillers. So, we concluded that we can consider local anesthesia as a good alternative for the general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.</description><issn>1916-9736</issn><issn>1916-9744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9LwzAcxYMobk6PXqVHL51J2zSNB2EMncJgA7dzSNtvt4wumUk72H9vyn6gpyR8P-_l-3gIPRI8pDTmL6vN2g33mea7COMr1CecpCFnSXJ9ucdpD905t8E4TSmht6gXMUIZSWkfmbmqjValrINvpVsXzHZgZaOMdsEcbGXsFspgqUuwwdQUHhtpcM0anJLBHqzzEv8KJqC97u_0NRjXSqtOsrCq82_a8nCPbipZO3g4nQO0_HhfjD_D6WzyNR5Nw4LwmIY0o1lW5JBLWUKel4xCzmmVgg_DIkkrmchSFhWUUcwSFicyy7FkGHDBGMc8HqC3o--uzX2CAnTj1xM7q7bSHoSRSvyfaLUWK7MXFKcJZtQbPJ8MrPlpfSixVa6AupYaTOsEYRnjccYo9mh4RAtrnLNQXb4hWHQlia4kcS7J809_d7vQ51biXzJCkrY</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Rahmani, Nasrin</creator><creator>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</creator><creator>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</creator><creator>Firouzian, Abolfazl</creator><creator>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</creator><creator>Fazli, Mehran</creator><creator>Sadeghian, Iman</creator><general>Canadian Center of Science and Education</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</title><author>Rahmani, Nasrin ; Gholipour Baradari, Afshin ; Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad ; Firouzian, Abolfazl ; Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas ; Fazli, Mehran ; Sadeghian, Iman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1935-58588cbebaadebbd75eb95f6e73672a5fa4adacfed2374734a8b0a70e0c779093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Nasrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firouzian, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazli, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghian, Iman</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global journal of health science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahmani, Nasrin</au><au>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</au><au>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</au><au>Firouzian, Abolfazl</au><au>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</au><au>Fazli, Mehran</au><au>Sadeghian, Iman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</atitle><jtitle>Global journal of health science</jtitle><addtitle>Glob J Health Sci</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>53531</spage><epage>53531</epage><pages>53531-53531</pages><issn>1916-9736</issn><eissn>1916-9744</eissn><abstract>Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.
in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences.
there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P<0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay.
this investigation revealed that local anesthesia has decreased pain during 48 hours after the surgery, shorter recovery time, and the less consumption of painkillers. So, we concluded that we can consider local anesthesia as a good alternative for the general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Center of Science and Education</pub><pmid>27157165</pmid><doi>10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1916-9736 |
ispartof | Global journal of health science, 2016-09, Vol.8 (9), p.53531-53531 |
issn | 1916-9736 1916-9744 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5064075 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
title | Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T06%3A46%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pilonidal%20Sinus%20Operations%20Performed%20Under%20Local%20Anesthesia%20versus%20the%20General%20Anesthesia:%20Clinical%20Trial%20Study&rft.jtitle=Global%20journal%20of%20health%20science&rft.au=Rahmani,%20Nasrin&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=53531&rft.epage=53531&rft.pages=53531-53531&rft.issn=1916-9736&rft.eissn=1916-9744&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1787938750%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787938750&rft_id=info:pmid/27157165&rfr_iscdi=true |