Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study

Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery. in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global journal of health science 2016-09, Vol.8 (9), p.53531-53531
Hauptverfasser: Rahmani, Nasrin, Gholipour Baradari, Afshin, Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad, Firouzian, Abolfazl, Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas, Fazli, Mehran, Sadeghian, Iman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 53531
container_issue 9
container_start_page 53531
container_title Global journal of health science
container_volume 8
creator Rahmani, Nasrin
Gholipour Baradari, Afshin
Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad
Firouzian, Abolfazl
Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas
Fazli, Mehran
Sadeghian, Iman
description Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery. in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences. there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P
doi_str_mv 10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5064075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1787938750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1935-58588cbebaadebbd75eb95f6e73672a5fa4adacfed2374734a8b0a70e0c779093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9LwzAcxYMobk6PXqVHL51J2zSNB2EMncJgA7dzSNtvt4wumUk72H9vyn6gpyR8P-_l-3gIPRI8pDTmL6vN2g33mea7COMr1CecpCFnSXJ9ucdpD905t8E4TSmht6gXMUIZSWkfmbmqjValrINvpVsXzHZgZaOMdsEcbGXsFspgqUuwwdQUHhtpcM0anJLBHqzzEv8KJqC97u_0NRjXSqtOsrCq82_a8nCPbipZO3g4nQO0_HhfjD_D6WzyNR5Nw4LwmIY0o1lW5JBLWUKel4xCzmmVgg_DIkkrmchSFhWUUcwSFicyy7FkGHDBGMc8HqC3o--uzX2CAnTj1xM7q7bSHoSRSvyfaLUWK7MXFKcJZtQbPJ8MrPlpfSixVa6AupYaTOsEYRnjccYo9mh4RAtrnLNQXb4hWHQlia4kcS7J809_d7vQ51biXzJCkrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1787938750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rahmani, Nasrin ; Gholipour Baradari, Afshin ; Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad ; Firouzian, Abolfazl ; Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas ; Fazli, Mehran ; Sadeghian, Iman</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Nasrin ; Gholipour Baradari, Afshin ; Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad ; Firouzian, Abolfazl ; Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas ; Fazli, Mehran ; Sadeghian, Iman</creatorcontrib><description>Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery. in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences. there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P&lt;0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay. this investigation revealed that local anesthesia has decreased pain during 48 hours after the surgery, shorter recovery time, and the less consumption of painkillers. So, we concluded that we can consider local anesthesia as a good alternative for the general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-9736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-9744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27157165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Canadian Center of Science and Education</publisher><ispartof>Global journal of health science, 2016-09, Vol.8 (9), p.53531-53531</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © Canadian Center of Science and Education 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1935-58588cbebaadebbd75eb95f6e73672a5fa4adacfed2374734a8b0a70e0c779093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064075/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064075/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,27929,27930,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27157165$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Nasrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firouzian, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazli, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghian, Iman</creatorcontrib><title>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</title><title>Global journal of health science</title><addtitle>Glob J Health Sci</addtitle><description>Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery. in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences. there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P&lt;0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay. this investigation revealed that local anesthesia has decreased pain during 48 hours after the surgery, shorter recovery time, and the less consumption of painkillers. So, we concluded that we can consider local anesthesia as a good alternative for the general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.</description><issn>1916-9736</issn><issn>1916-9744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9LwzAcxYMobk6PXqVHL51J2zSNB2EMncJgA7dzSNtvt4wumUk72H9vyn6gpyR8P-_l-3gIPRI8pDTmL6vN2g33mea7COMr1CecpCFnSXJ9ucdpD905t8E4TSmht6gXMUIZSWkfmbmqjValrINvpVsXzHZgZaOMdsEcbGXsFspgqUuwwdQUHhtpcM0anJLBHqzzEv8KJqC97u_0NRjXSqtOsrCq82_a8nCPbipZO3g4nQO0_HhfjD_D6WzyNR5Nw4LwmIY0o1lW5JBLWUKel4xCzmmVgg_DIkkrmchSFhWUUcwSFicyy7FkGHDBGMc8HqC3o--uzX2CAnTj1xM7q7bSHoSRSvyfaLUWK7MXFKcJZtQbPJ8MrPlpfSixVa6AupYaTOsEYRnjccYo9mh4RAtrnLNQXb4hWHQlia4kcS7J809_d7vQ51biXzJCkrY</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Rahmani, Nasrin</creator><creator>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</creator><creator>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</creator><creator>Firouzian, Abolfazl</creator><creator>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</creator><creator>Fazli, Mehran</creator><creator>Sadeghian, Iman</creator><general>Canadian Center of Science and Education</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</title><author>Rahmani, Nasrin ; Gholipour Baradari, Afshin ; Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad ; Firouzian, Abolfazl ; Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas ; Fazli, Mehran ; Sadeghian, Iman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1935-58588cbebaadebbd75eb95f6e73672a5fa4adacfed2374734a8b0a70e0c779093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Nasrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Firouzian, Abolfazl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fazli, Mehran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghian, Iman</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global journal of health science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahmani, Nasrin</au><au>Gholipour Baradari, Afshin</au><au>Heydari Yazdi, Seyed Mohammad-Javad</au><au>Firouzian, Abolfazl</au><au>Hashemi, Seyyed Abbas</au><au>Fazli, Mehran</au><au>Sadeghian, Iman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study</atitle><jtitle>Global journal of health science</jtitle><addtitle>Glob J Health Sci</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>53531</spage><epage>53531</epage><pages>53531-53531</pages><issn>1916-9736</issn><eissn>1916-9744</eissn><abstract>Various methods were defined to prepare patients for the pilonidal sinus surgery including local, spinal, and general anesthesia. But there is no powerful evidence to differ these procedures. Therefore, in the current study, we compared local and general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery. in this clinical trial (IRCT201312031786N5) study 60 patients with the pilonidal sinus disease divided to two groups of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia. For local anesthesia we used 6ml of 2% lidocaine with an epinephrine (1:200,000), 6ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1ml fentanyl (50μg/ml), 1ml clonidine (75μg/ml) and for general anesthesia fentanyl 1.5 μg.kg-1, thiopental 3-5 mg.kg-1, followed by the trachea intubation facilitated by atracurim 0.5 mg.kg-1 with maintenance of isoflurane 1-3% in nitrous oxygen 70% and oxygen 30%. The student t-test and Chi-square test were applied to evaluate the differences. there were 30 patients with the mean age of 27.43±8.42 years in local anesthesia group and 30 cases with the mean age of 27.5±8.44 years underwent general anesthesia. The recovery time was significantly lower in the local anesthesia group (P=0.000). The oxygen saturation of the general anesthesia group was significantly higher at 1 and 20 minutes after the operation. The average of pain score was significantly higher in general anesthesia group at 3h and 6h after surgery (P&lt;0.001). There were no significant differences in post-operative complications and hospital length of stay. this investigation revealed that local anesthesia has decreased pain during 48 hours after the surgery, shorter recovery time, and the less consumption of painkillers. So, we concluded that we can consider local anesthesia as a good alternative for the general anesthesia in the pilonidal sinus surgery.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Canadian Center of Science and Education</pub><pmid>27157165</pmid><doi>10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1916-9736
ispartof Global journal of health science, 2016-09, Vol.8 (9), p.53531-53531
issn 1916-9736
1916-9744
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5064075
source PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title Pilonidal Sinus Operations Performed Under Local Anesthesia versus the General Anesthesia: Clinical Trial Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T06%3A46%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pilonidal%20Sinus%20Operations%20Performed%20Under%20Local%20Anesthesia%20versus%20the%20General%20Anesthesia:%20Clinical%20Trial%20Study&rft.jtitle=Global%20journal%20of%20health%20science&rft.au=Rahmani,%20Nasrin&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=53531&rft.epage=53531&rft.pages=53531-53531&rft.issn=1916-9736&rft.eissn=1916-9744&rft_id=info:doi/10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1787938750%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1787938750&rft_id=info:pmid/27157165&rfr_iscdi=true