Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy
Background Stillbirth, among the most distressing experiences an adult may face, is also a time when parents must decide whether an autopsy or other post‐mortem examinations will be performed on their infant. Autopsies can reveal information that might help explain stillbirth, yet little is known a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy 2014-08, Vol.17 (4), p.534-544 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 544 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 534 |
container_title | Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Horey, Dell Flenady, Vicki Conway, Liz McLeod, Emma Yee Khong, Teck |
description | Background Stillbirth, among the most distressing experiences an adult may face, is also a time when parents must decide whether an autopsy or other post‐mortem examinations will be performed on their infant. Autopsies can reveal information that might help explain stillbirth, yet little is known about how people make this difficult decision.
Objectives This study examines the influences on decisions about autopsy after stillbirth among Australian parents.
Design The study involved secondary analysis of transcripts of three focus groups using qualitative content analysis.
Participants and setting Seventeen parents of 14 stillborn babies participated in consultations around the revision of a perinatal mortality audit guideline.
Results Parents shared the decision making. Four decision drivers were identified: parents’ preparedness or readiness to make decisions; parental responsibility; concern for possible consequences of an autopsy and the role of health professionals. Each decision driver involved reasons both for and against autopsy. Two decision aftermath were also present: some parents who agreed to an autopsy were dissatisfied with the way the autopsy results were given to them and some parents who did not have an autopsy for their infant expressed some form of regret or uncertainty about the choice they made.
Conclusions To make decisions about autopsy after stillbirth, parents need factual information about autopsy procedures, recognition that there might be fear of blame, an environment of trust, and health services and professionals prepared and skilled for difficult conversations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00782.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5060741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1622063334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5722-1f1f9206ec582f404f473d5886a023df10c10d998450a9c6cd1cab039f34b6c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1P4zAQhq3VouXzL6xy5LANYzv-QiskKJ8SEheQuFmuY29dpUmxE6D_noSWij2BLx5pnnk1owehDEOO-3c0yzHlaiQ4YTkBTHIAIUn--gPtbBo_1zVnmG6j3ZRmAFhQKX6hbUIESM7UDjo7dzak0NRZqH3Vudq6lJm6zIxvXZybdnqcLUx0dZv-ZKkNVTUJsZ2ukK5tFmm5j7a8qZI7WP976OHy4n58Pbq9u7oZn96OLBOEjLDHXhHgzjJJfAGFLwQtmZTcAKGlx2AxlErJgoFRltsSWzMBqjwtJtxiuodOVrmLbjJ3pe13iqbSixjmJi51Y4L-v1OHqf7XPGsGHEQxBByuA2Lz1LnU6nlI1lWVqV3TJY056fejlBZfo4xJJQUB9Q20EIzwHu5RuUJtbFKKzm-Wx6AHsXqmB2d68KcHsfpdrH7tR39_Pn4z-GGyB_6ugJdQueW3g_X1xWNf0Df6ZbEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1547526872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Horey, Dell ; Flenady, Vicki ; Conway, Liz ; McLeod, Emma ; Yee Khong, Teck</creator><creatorcontrib>Horey, Dell ; Flenady, Vicki ; Conway, Liz ; McLeod, Emma ; Yee Khong, Teck</creatorcontrib><description>Background Stillbirth, among the most distressing experiences an adult may face, is also a time when parents must decide whether an autopsy or other post‐mortem examinations will be performed on their infant. Autopsies can reveal information that might help explain stillbirth, yet little is known about how people make this difficult decision.
Objectives This study examines the influences on decisions about autopsy after stillbirth among Australian parents.
Design The study involved secondary analysis of transcripts of three focus groups using qualitative content analysis.
Participants and setting Seventeen parents of 14 stillborn babies participated in consultations around the revision of a perinatal mortality audit guideline.
Results Parents shared the decision making. Four decision drivers were identified: parents’ preparedness or readiness to make decisions; parental responsibility; concern for possible consequences of an autopsy and the role of health professionals. Each decision driver involved reasons both for and against autopsy. Two decision aftermath were also present: some parents who agreed to an autopsy were dissatisfied with the way the autopsy results were given to them and some parents who did not have an autopsy for their infant expressed some form of regret or uncertainty about the choice they made.
Conclusions To make decisions about autopsy after stillbirth, parents need factual information about autopsy procedures, recognition that there might be fear of blame, an environment of trust, and health services and professionals prepared and skilled for difficult conversations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1369-6513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1369-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00782.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22708659</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HEHPFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aftermath ; Australia ; Autopsy ; Decision Making ; Drivers ; Female ; fetal death ; Focus Groups ; Gestational Age ; health decision ; Humans ; Infants ; Male ; Original Research Papers ; Parents ; Parents - psychology ; Professional Role ; stillbirth ; Stillbirth - psychology ; Stillbirths</subject><ispartof>Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2014-08, Vol.17 (4), p.534-544</ispartof><rights>2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5722-1f1f9206ec582f404f473d5886a023df10c10d998450a9c6cd1cab039f34b6c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5722-1f1f9206ec582f404f473d5886a023df10c10d998450a9c6cd1cab039f34b6c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5060741/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5060741/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,31000,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1369-7625.2012.00782.x$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22708659$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horey, Dell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flenady, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee Khong, Teck</creatorcontrib><title>Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy</title><title>Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy</title><addtitle>Health Expect</addtitle><description>Background Stillbirth, among the most distressing experiences an adult may face, is also a time when parents must decide whether an autopsy or other post‐mortem examinations will be performed on their infant. Autopsies can reveal information that might help explain stillbirth, yet little is known about how people make this difficult decision.
Objectives This study examines the influences on decisions about autopsy after stillbirth among Australian parents.
Design The study involved secondary analysis of transcripts of three focus groups using qualitative content analysis.
Participants and setting Seventeen parents of 14 stillborn babies participated in consultations around the revision of a perinatal mortality audit guideline.
Results Parents shared the decision making. Four decision drivers were identified: parents’ preparedness or readiness to make decisions; parental responsibility; concern for possible consequences of an autopsy and the role of health professionals. Each decision driver involved reasons both for and against autopsy. Two decision aftermath were also present: some parents who agreed to an autopsy were dissatisfied with the way the autopsy results were given to them and some parents who did not have an autopsy for their infant expressed some form of regret or uncertainty about the choice they made.
Conclusions To make decisions about autopsy after stillbirth, parents need factual information about autopsy procedures, recognition that there might be fear of blame, an environment of trust, and health services and professionals prepared and skilled for difficult conversations.</description><subject>Aftermath</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Autopsy</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Drivers</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fetal death</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>health decision</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Research Papers</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Professional Role</subject><subject>stillbirth</subject><subject>Stillbirth - psychology</subject><subject>Stillbirths</subject><issn>1369-6513</issn><issn>1369-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1P4zAQhq3VouXzL6xy5LANYzv-QiskKJ8SEheQuFmuY29dpUmxE6D_noSWij2BLx5pnnk1owehDEOO-3c0yzHlaiQ4YTkBTHIAIUn--gPtbBo_1zVnmG6j3ZRmAFhQKX6hbUIESM7UDjo7dzak0NRZqH3Vudq6lJm6zIxvXZybdnqcLUx0dZv-ZKkNVTUJsZ2ukK5tFmm5j7a8qZI7WP976OHy4n58Pbq9u7oZn96OLBOEjLDHXhHgzjJJfAGFLwQtmZTcAKGlx2AxlErJgoFRltsSWzMBqjwtJtxiuodOVrmLbjJ3pe13iqbSixjmJi51Y4L-v1OHqf7XPGsGHEQxBByuA2Lz1LnU6nlI1lWVqV3TJY056fejlBZfo4xJJQUB9Q20EIzwHu5RuUJtbFKKzm-Wx6AHsXqmB2d68KcHsfpdrH7tR39_Pn4z-GGyB_6ugJdQueW3g_X1xWNf0Df6ZbEE</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Horey, Dell</creator><creator>Flenady, Vicki</creator><creator>Conway, Liz</creator><creator>McLeod, Emma</creator><creator>Yee Khong, Teck</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy</title><author>Horey, Dell ; Flenady, Vicki ; Conway, Liz ; McLeod, Emma ; Yee Khong, Teck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5722-1f1f9206ec582f404f473d5886a023df10c10d998450a9c6cd1cab039f34b6c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aftermath</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Autopsy</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Drivers</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fetal death</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>health decision</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Research Papers</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Professional Role</topic><topic>stillbirth</topic><topic>Stillbirth - psychology</topic><topic>Stillbirths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horey, Dell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flenady, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conway, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLeod, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee Khong, Teck</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horey, Dell</au><au>Flenady, Vicki</au><au>Conway, Liz</au><au>McLeod, Emma</au><au>Yee Khong, Teck</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy</atitle><jtitle>Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy</jtitle><addtitle>Health Expect</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>534-544</pages><issn>1369-6513</issn><eissn>1369-7625</eissn><coden>HEHPFM</coden><abstract>Background Stillbirth, among the most distressing experiences an adult may face, is also a time when parents must decide whether an autopsy or other post‐mortem examinations will be performed on their infant. Autopsies can reveal information that might help explain stillbirth, yet little is known about how people make this difficult decision.
Objectives This study examines the influences on decisions about autopsy after stillbirth among Australian parents.
Design The study involved secondary analysis of transcripts of three focus groups using qualitative content analysis.
Participants and setting Seventeen parents of 14 stillborn babies participated in consultations around the revision of a perinatal mortality audit guideline.
Results Parents shared the decision making. Four decision drivers were identified: parents’ preparedness or readiness to make decisions; parental responsibility; concern for possible consequences of an autopsy and the role of health professionals. Each decision driver involved reasons both for and against autopsy. Two decision aftermath were also present: some parents who agreed to an autopsy were dissatisfied with the way the autopsy results were given to them and some parents who did not have an autopsy for their infant expressed some form of regret or uncertainty about the choice they made.
Conclusions To make decisions about autopsy after stillbirth, parents need factual information about autopsy procedures, recognition that there might be fear of blame, an environment of trust, and health services and professionals prepared and skilled for difficult conversations.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>22708659</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00782.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1369-6513 |
ispartof | Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2014-08, Vol.17 (4), p.534-544 |
issn | 1369-6513 1369-7625 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5060741 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access |
subjects | Aftermath Australia Autopsy Decision Making Drivers Female fetal death Focus Groups Gestational Age health decision Humans Infants Male Original Research Papers Parents Parents - psychology Professional Role stillbirth Stillbirth - psychology Stillbirths |
title | Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T09%3A06%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision%20influences%20and%20aftermath:%20parents,%20stillbirth%20and%20autopsy&rft.jtitle=Health%20expectations%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20public%20participation%20in%20health%20care%20and%20health%20policy&rft.au=Horey,%20Dell&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=534-544&rft.issn=1369-6513&rft.eissn=1369-7625&rft.coden=HEHPFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00782.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E1622063334%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1547526872&rft_id=info:pmid/22708659&rfr_iscdi=true |