Results from Screening Polyurethane Foam Based Consumer Products for Flame Retardant Chemicals: Assessing Impacts on the Change in the Furniture Flammability Standards

Flame retardant (FR) chemicals have often been added to polyurethane foam to meet required state and federal flammability standards. However, some FRs (e.g., PBDEs and TDCIPP) are associated with health hazards and are now restricted from use in some regions. In addition, California’s residential fu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2016-10, Vol.50 (19), p.10653-10660
Hauptverfasser: Cooper, Ellen M, Kroeger, Gretchen, Davis, Katherine, Clark, Charlotte R, Ferguson, P. Lee, Stapleton, Heather M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10660
container_issue 19
container_start_page 10653
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 50
creator Cooper, Ellen M
Kroeger, Gretchen
Davis, Katherine
Clark, Charlotte R
Ferguson, P. Lee
Stapleton, Heather M
description Flame retardant (FR) chemicals have often been added to polyurethane foam to meet required state and federal flammability standards. However, some FRs (e.g., PBDEs and TDCIPP) are associated with health hazards and are now restricted from use in some regions. In addition, California’s residential furniture flammability standard (TB-117) has undergone significant amendments over the past few years, and TDCIPP has been added to California’s Proposition 65 list. These events have likely led to shifts in the types of FRs used, and the products to which they are applied. To provide more information on the use of FRs in products containing polyurethane foam (PUF), we established a screening service for the general public. Participants residing in the US were allowed to submit up to 5 samples from their household for analysis, free of charge, and supplied information on the product category, labeling, and year and state of purchase. Between February 2014 and June 2016, we received 1141 PUF samples for analysis from various products including sofas, chairs, mattresses, car seats and pillows. Of these samples tested, 52% contained a FR at levels greater than 1% by weight. Tris­(1,3-dichloroisopropyl)­phosphate (TDCIPP) was the most common FR detected in PUF samples, and was the most common FR detected in all product categories. Analysis of the data by purchasing date suggests that the use of TDCIPP decreased in recent years, paralleled with an increase in the use of TCIPP and a nonhalogenated aryl phosphate mixture we call “TBPP.” In addition, we observed significant decreases in FR applications in furniture products and child car seats, suggesting the use of additive FRs in PUF may be declining, perhaps as a reflection of recent changes to TB-117 and Proposition 65. More studies are needed to determine how these changes in FR use relate to changes in exposure among the general population.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.est.6b01602
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5052662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835382090</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a593t-c0d35d0f888a70cbe27f42606ac5f64bd302022567f66a9c4c962a67684d091d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh67Z0EvBGksydJk7ZeCOvg6MKCy66CdyFN0pkubTImqTC_yL9p6ozrBwhehZDnfZKccxB6SmBJgJIzpePSxrQULRAB9B5aEE6h4DUn99ECgLCiYeLzCXoU4y0AUAb1Q3RCK84pp80Cfbu2cRpSxF3wI77RwVrXuw2-8sN-CjZtlbN47dWI36hoDV55F6fRBnwVvJn0HPQBrwc1WnxtkwpGuYRXWzv2Wg3xFT6P0cY4Ky_GnZoD3uG0tZlRbmNxf9itp-D6lG_84RpV2w992uObpJzJ0vgYPeiyzz45rqfo0_rtx9X74vLDu4vV-WWheMNSocEwbqCr61pVoFtLq66kAoTSvBNlaxhQoJSLqhNCNbrUjaBKVKIuDTTEsFP0-uDdTe1ojbYuBTXIXehHFfbSq17-eeL6rdz4r5IDp0LQLHhxFAT_Zcq9kWMftR2GXEg_RUlqVjFKa1L-D8pZTaGBjD7_C731uWK5EpmilZj7yjN1dqB08DEG2929m4Cc50XmeZFz-jgvOfHs9-_e8T8HJAMvD8Cc_HXnP3TfAa_2zhY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1827623085</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results from Screening Polyurethane Foam Based Consumer Products for Flame Retardant Chemicals: Assessing Impacts on the Change in the Furniture Flammability Standards</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Cooper, Ellen M ; Kroeger, Gretchen ; Davis, Katherine ; Clark, Charlotte R ; Ferguson, P. Lee ; Stapleton, Heather M</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Ellen M ; Kroeger, Gretchen ; Davis, Katherine ; Clark, Charlotte R ; Ferguson, P. Lee ; Stapleton, Heather M</creatorcontrib><description>Flame retardant (FR) chemicals have often been added to polyurethane foam to meet required state and federal flammability standards. However, some FRs (e.g., PBDEs and TDCIPP) are associated with health hazards and are now restricted from use in some regions. In addition, California’s residential furniture flammability standard (TB-117) has undergone significant amendments over the past few years, and TDCIPP has been added to California’s Proposition 65 list. These events have likely led to shifts in the types of FRs used, and the products to which they are applied. To provide more information on the use of FRs in products containing polyurethane foam (PUF), we established a screening service for the general public. Participants residing in the US were allowed to submit up to 5 samples from their household for analysis, free of charge, and supplied information on the product category, labeling, and year and state of purchase. Between February 2014 and June 2016, we received 1141 PUF samples for analysis from various products including sofas, chairs, mattresses, car seats and pillows. Of these samples tested, 52% contained a FR at levels greater than 1% by weight. Tris­(1,3-dichloroisopropyl)­phosphate (TDCIPP) was the most common FR detected in PUF samples, and was the most common FR detected in all product categories. Analysis of the data by purchasing date suggests that the use of TDCIPP decreased in recent years, paralleled with an increase in the use of TCIPP and a nonhalogenated aryl phosphate mixture we call “TBPP.” In addition, we observed significant decreases in FR applications in furniture products and child car seats, suggesting the use of additive FRs in PUF may be declining, perhaps as a reflection of recent changes to TB-117 and Proposition 65. More studies are needed to determine how these changes in FR use relate to changes in exposure among the general population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b01602</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27552529</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Chemicals ; Dust ; Flame Retardants ; Furniture ; Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers ; Housing ; Humans ; Interior Design and Furnishings ; Polyurethane</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2016-10, Vol.50 (19), p.10653-10660</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Oct 4, 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a593t-c0d35d0f888a70cbe27f42606ac5f64bd302022567f66a9c4c962a67684d091d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a593t-c0d35d0f888a70cbe27f42606ac5f64bd302022567f66a9c4c962a67684d091d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.6b01602$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b01602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,2767,27083,27931,27932,56745,56795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27552529$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Ellen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroeger, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Charlotte R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, P. Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stapleton, Heather M</creatorcontrib><title>Results from Screening Polyurethane Foam Based Consumer Products for Flame Retardant Chemicals: Assessing Impacts on the Change in the Furniture Flammability Standards</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Flame retardant (FR) chemicals have often been added to polyurethane foam to meet required state and federal flammability standards. However, some FRs (e.g., PBDEs and TDCIPP) are associated with health hazards and are now restricted from use in some regions. In addition, California’s residential furniture flammability standard (TB-117) has undergone significant amendments over the past few years, and TDCIPP has been added to California’s Proposition 65 list. These events have likely led to shifts in the types of FRs used, and the products to which they are applied. To provide more information on the use of FRs in products containing polyurethane foam (PUF), we established a screening service for the general public. Participants residing in the US were allowed to submit up to 5 samples from their household for analysis, free of charge, and supplied information on the product category, labeling, and year and state of purchase. Between February 2014 and June 2016, we received 1141 PUF samples for analysis from various products including sofas, chairs, mattresses, car seats and pillows. Of these samples tested, 52% contained a FR at levels greater than 1% by weight. Tris­(1,3-dichloroisopropyl)­phosphate (TDCIPP) was the most common FR detected in PUF samples, and was the most common FR detected in all product categories. Analysis of the data by purchasing date suggests that the use of TDCIPP decreased in recent years, paralleled with an increase in the use of TCIPP and a nonhalogenated aryl phosphate mixture we call “TBPP.” In addition, we observed significant decreases in FR applications in furniture products and child car seats, suggesting the use of additive FRs in PUF may be declining, perhaps as a reflection of recent changes to TB-117 and Proposition 65. More studies are needed to determine how these changes in FR use relate to changes in exposure among the general population.</description><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Dust</subject><subject>Flame Retardants</subject><subject>Furniture</subject><subject>Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interior Design and Furnishings</subject><subject>Polyurethane</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rh67Z0EvBGksydJk7ZeCOvg6MKCy66CdyFN0pkubTImqTC_yL9p6ozrBwhehZDnfZKccxB6SmBJgJIzpePSxrQULRAB9B5aEE6h4DUn99ECgLCiYeLzCXoU4y0AUAb1Q3RCK84pp80Cfbu2cRpSxF3wI77RwVrXuw2-8sN-CjZtlbN47dWI36hoDV55F6fRBnwVvJn0HPQBrwc1WnxtkwpGuYRXWzv2Wg3xFT6P0cY4Ky_GnZoD3uG0tZlRbmNxf9itp-D6lG_84RpV2w992uObpJzJ0vgYPeiyzz45rqfo0_rtx9X74vLDu4vV-WWheMNSocEwbqCr61pVoFtLq66kAoTSvBNlaxhQoJSLqhNCNbrUjaBKVKIuDTTEsFP0-uDdTe1ojbYuBTXIXehHFfbSq17-eeL6rdz4r5IDp0LQLHhxFAT_Zcq9kWMftR2GXEg_RUlqVjFKa1L-D8pZTaGBjD7_C731uWK5EpmilZj7yjN1dqB08DEG2929m4Cc50XmeZFz-jgvOfHs9-_e8T8HJAMvD8Cc_HXnP3TfAa_2zhY</recordid><startdate>20161004</startdate><enddate>20161004</enddate><creator>Cooper, Ellen M</creator><creator>Kroeger, Gretchen</creator><creator>Davis, Katherine</creator><creator>Clark, Charlotte R</creator><creator>Ferguson, P. Lee</creator><creator>Stapleton, Heather M</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161004</creationdate><title>Results from Screening Polyurethane Foam Based Consumer Products for Flame Retardant Chemicals: Assessing Impacts on the Change in the Furniture Flammability Standards</title><author>Cooper, Ellen M ; Kroeger, Gretchen ; Davis, Katherine ; Clark, Charlotte R ; Ferguson, P. Lee ; Stapleton, Heather M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a593t-c0d35d0f888a70cbe27f42606ac5f64bd302022567f66a9c4c962a67684d091d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Dust</topic><topic>Flame Retardants</topic><topic>Furniture</topic><topic>Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interior Design and Furnishings</topic><topic>Polyurethane</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Ellen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroeger, Gretchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Charlotte R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, P. Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stapleton, Heather M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooper, Ellen M</au><au>Kroeger, Gretchen</au><au>Davis, Katherine</au><au>Clark, Charlotte R</au><au>Ferguson, P. Lee</au><au>Stapleton, Heather M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results from Screening Polyurethane Foam Based Consumer Products for Flame Retardant Chemicals: Assessing Impacts on the Change in the Furniture Flammability Standards</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2016-10-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>10653</spage><epage>10660</epage><pages>10653-10660</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Flame retardant (FR) chemicals have often been added to polyurethane foam to meet required state and federal flammability standards. However, some FRs (e.g., PBDEs and TDCIPP) are associated with health hazards and are now restricted from use in some regions. In addition, California’s residential furniture flammability standard (TB-117) has undergone significant amendments over the past few years, and TDCIPP has been added to California’s Proposition 65 list. These events have likely led to shifts in the types of FRs used, and the products to which they are applied. To provide more information on the use of FRs in products containing polyurethane foam (PUF), we established a screening service for the general public. Participants residing in the US were allowed to submit up to 5 samples from their household for analysis, free of charge, and supplied information on the product category, labeling, and year and state of purchase. Between February 2014 and June 2016, we received 1141 PUF samples for analysis from various products including sofas, chairs, mattresses, car seats and pillows. Of these samples tested, 52% contained a FR at levels greater than 1% by weight. Tris­(1,3-dichloroisopropyl)­phosphate (TDCIPP) was the most common FR detected in PUF samples, and was the most common FR detected in all product categories. Analysis of the data by purchasing date suggests that the use of TDCIPP decreased in recent years, paralleled with an increase in the use of TCIPP and a nonhalogenated aryl phosphate mixture we call “TBPP.” In addition, we observed significant decreases in FR applications in furniture products and child car seats, suggesting the use of additive FRs in PUF may be declining, perhaps as a reflection of recent changes to TB-117 and Proposition 65. More studies are needed to determine how these changes in FR use relate to changes in exposure among the general population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>27552529</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.est.6b01602</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2016-10, Vol.50 (19), p.10653-10660
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5052662
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Chemicals
Dust
Flame Retardants
Furniture
Halogenated Diphenyl Ethers
Housing
Humans
Interior Design and Furnishings
Polyurethane
title Results from Screening Polyurethane Foam Based Consumer Products for Flame Retardant Chemicals: Assessing Impacts on the Change in the Furniture Flammability Standards
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-09T12%3A20%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20from%20Screening%20Polyurethane%20Foam%20Based%20Consumer%20Products%20for%20Flame%20Retardant%20Chemicals:%20Assessing%20Impacts%20on%20the%20Change%20in%20the%20Furniture%20Flammability%20Standards&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Cooper,%20Ellen%20M&rft.date=2016-10-04&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=10653&rft.epage=10660&rft.pages=10653-10660&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.est.6b01602&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835382090%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1827623085&rft_id=info:pmid/27552529&rfr_iscdi=true