Guidelines of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: an overview and quality appraisal using AGREE II

To appraise the quality of guidelines developed by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) between 2001 and 2015. Cross-sectional. 2 authors independently assessed the quality of IFRC guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMJ open 2016-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e011744-e011744
Hauptverfasser: Vande Veegaete, Axel, Borra, Vere, De Buck, Emmy, Vandekerckhove, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e011744
container_issue 9
container_start_page e011744
container_title BMJ open
container_volume 6
creator Vande Veegaete, Axel
Borra, Vere
De Buck, Emmy
Vandekerckhove, Philippe
description To appraise the quality of guidelines developed by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) between 2001 and 2015. Cross-sectional. 2 authors independently assessed the quality of IFRC guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Average domain scores were calculated and overall quality scores and recommendation for use were determined. Out of 77 identified guidelines, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed. The domains with the highest average scores across guidelines were 'scope and purpose', 'clarity of presentation' and 'applicability'. The lowest scoring domains were 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. No guideline can be 'recommended for immediate use', 23 guidelines are 'recommended with modifications' and 4 guidelines are 'not recommended'. The IFRC produces guidelines that should be adhered to by millions of staff and volunteers in 190 countries. These guidelines should therefore be of high quality. Up until now, the IFRC had no uniform guideline development process. The results of the AGREE II appraisal indicate that the quality of the guidelines needs to be improved.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011744
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5051453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835529807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-573d3b0dd13920158540772dca4f1cf60a2fea3a8f3c998ad7147aee9650cc3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUcFq3DAQFaWlCWm-oFAEufTiVrIky84hEJbNZiFQSNuz0ErjRItXciR7w97z4ZWzm5BUl9Hw3jzmzUPoKyU_KGXVz9VmHXrwRUloVRBKJecf0HFJOC8qIsTHN_8jdJrSmuTHRSNE-RkdlbKStWD8GD0tRmehcx4SDi0e7gEv_QDR68EFrzt8BRbiczPht2DxLIaUsPb20EEy4Af8OxgHg4N0njEcthC3Dh6feQ-j7tyww7rvo3Ypq47J-Tt8ubidz_Fy-QV9anWX4PRQT9Dfq_mf2XVx82uxnF3eFIYzNhRCMstWxFrKmuxb1IITKUtrNG-paSuiyxY003XLTNPU2krKpQZoKkGMYYadoIu9bj-uNmCntaPuVB_dRsedCtqp94h39-oubJUggnLBssD3g0AMDyOkQW1cdt912kMYk6I1ywduaiIz9ew_6jqM-axdUmVVMcE5JWVmsT3LTEeN0L4uQ4maglaHoNUUtNoHnae-vfXxOvMSK_sHNIum6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2663544102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Guidelines of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: an overview and quality appraisal using AGREE II</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vande Veegaete, Axel ; Borra, Vere ; De Buck, Emmy ; Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creator><creatorcontrib>Vande Veegaete, Axel ; Borra, Vere ; De Buck, Emmy ; Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creatorcontrib><description>To appraise the quality of guidelines developed by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) between 2001 and 2015. Cross-sectional. 2 authors independently assessed the quality of IFRC guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Average domain scores were calculated and overall quality scores and recommendation for use were determined. Out of 77 identified guidelines, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed. The domains with the highest average scores across guidelines were 'scope and purpose', 'clarity of presentation' and 'applicability'. The lowest scoring domains were 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. No guideline can be 'recommended for immediate use', 23 guidelines are 'recommended with modifications' and 4 guidelines are 'not recommended'. The IFRC produces guidelines that should be adhered to by millions of staff and volunteers in 190 countries. These guidelines should therefore be of high quality. Up until now, the IFRC had no uniform guideline development process. The results of the AGREE II appraisal indicate that the quality of the guidelines needs to be improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011744</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27678534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Clinical medicine ; Cooperation ; Evidence-based practice ; Humanitarianism ; Library catalogs ; Likert scale ; Public Health</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2016-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e011744-e011744</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-573d3b0dd13920158540772dca4f1cf60a2fea3a8f3c998ad7147aee9650cc3c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-573d3b0dd13920158540772dca4f1cf60a2fea3a8f3c998ad7147aee9650cc3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051453/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5051453/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vande Veegaete, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borra, Vere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buck, Emmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creatorcontrib><title>Guidelines of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: an overview and quality appraisal using AGREE II</title><title>BMJ open</title><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><description>To appraise the quality of guidelines developed by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) between 2001 and 2015. Cross-sectional. 2 authors independently assessed the quality of IFRC guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Average domain scores were calculated and overall quality scores and recommendation for use were determined. Out of 77 identified guidelines, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed. The domains with the highest average scores across guidelines were 'scope and purpose', 'clarity of presentation' and 'applicability'. The lowest scoring domains were 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. No guideline can be 'recommended for immediate use', 23 guidelines are 'recommended with modifications' and 4 guidelines are 'not recommended'. The IFRC produces guidelines that should be adhered to by millions of staff and volunteers in 190 countries. These guidelines should therefore be of high quality. Up until now, the IFRC had no uniform guideline development process. The results of the AGREE II appraisal indicate that the quality of the guidelines needs to be improved.</description><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>Library catalogs</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUcFq3DAQFaWlCWm-oFAEufTiVrIky84hEJbNZiFQSNuz0ErjRItXciR7w97z4ZWzm5BUl9Hw3jzmzUPoKyU_KGXVz9VmHXrwRUloVRBKJecf0HFJOC8qIsTHN_8jdJrSmuTHRSNE-RkdlbKStWD8GD0tRmehcx4SDi0e7gEv_QDR68EFrzt8BRbiczPht2DxLIaUsPb20EEy4Af8OxgHg4N0njEcthC3Dh6feQ-j7tyww7rvo3Ypq47J-Tt8ubidz_Fy-QV9anWX4PRQT9Dfq_mf2XVx82uxnF3eFIYzNhRCMstWxFrKmuxb1IITKUtrNG-paSuiyxY003XLTNPU2krKpQZoKkGMYYadoIu9bj-uNmCntaPuVB_dRsedCtqp94h39-oubJUggnLBssD3g0AMDyOkQW1cdt912kMYk6I1ywduaiIz9ew_6jqM-axdUmVVMcE5JWVmsT3LTEeN0L4uQ4maglaHoNUUtNoHnae-vfXxOvMSK_sHNIum6A</recordid><startdate>20160927</startdate><enddate>20160927</enddate><creator>Vande Veegaete, Axel</creator><creator>Borra, Vere</creator><creator>De Buck, Emmy</creator><creator>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160927</creationdate><title>Guidelines of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: an overview and quality appraisal using AGREE II</title><author>Vande Veegaete, Axel ; Borra, Vere ; De Buck, Emmy ; Vandekerckhove, Philippe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-573d3b0dd13920158540772dca4f1cf60a2fea3a8f3c998ad7147aee9650cc3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>Library catalogs</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vande Veegaete, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borra, Vere</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Buck, Emmy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vande Veegaete, Axel</au><au>Borra, Vere</au><au>De Buck, Emmy</au><au>Vandekerckhove, Philippe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Guidelines of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: an overview and quality appraisal using AGREE II</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ Open</addtitle><date>2016-09-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e011744</spage><epage>e011744</epage><pages>e011744-e011744</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>To appraise the quality of guidelines developed by the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) between 2001 and 2015. Cross-sectional. 2 authors independently assessed the quality of IFRC guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Average domain scores were calculated and overall quality scores and recommendation for use were determined. Out of 77 identified guidelines, 27 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed. The domains with the highest average scores across guidelines were 'scope and purpose', 'clarity of presentation' and 'applicability'. The lowest scoring domains were 'rigour of development' and 'editorial independence'. No guideline can be 'recommended for immediate use', 23 guidelines are 'recommended with modifications' and 4 guidelines are 'not recommended'. The IFRC produces guidelines that should be adhered to by millions of staff and volunteers in 190 countries. These guidelines should therefore be of high quality. Up until now, the IFRC had no uniform guideline development process. The results of the AGREE II appraisal indicate that the quality of the guidelines needs to be improved.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>27678534</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011744</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2044-6055
ispartof BMJ open, 2016-09, Vol.6 (9), p.e011744-e011744
issn 2044-6055
2044-6055
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5051453
source BMJ Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Clinical medicine
Cooperation
Evidence-based practice
Humanitarianism
Library catalogs
Likert scale
Public Health
title Guidelines of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies: an overview and quality appraisal using AGREE II
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A43%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Guidelines%20of%20the%20International%20Federation%20of%20Red%20Cross%20and%20Red%20Crescent%20Societies:%20an%20overview%20and%20quality%20appraisal%20using%20AGREE%20II&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Vande%20Veegaete,%20Axel&rft.date=2016-09-27&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e011744&rft.epage=e011744&rft.pages=e011744-e011744&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011744&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835529807%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2663544102&rft_id=info:pmid/27678534&rfr_iscdi=true