Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss
The multi-fixation glaucoma screening chart, which uses the oculokinetic perimetry (OKP) technique, is a hand-held tangent screen with a central black test stimulus on a white background and a series of 26 numbered fixation targets arranged around the stimulus at various locations. When the numbers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of ophthalmology 1993-06, Vol.77 (6), p.332-338 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 338 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 332 |
container_title | British journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Mutlukan, E Damato, B E Jay, J L |
description | The multi-fixation glaucoma screening chart, which uses the oculokinetic perimetry (OKP) technique, is a hand-held tangent screen with a central black test stimulus on a white background and a series of 26 numbered fixation targets arranged around the stimulus at various locations. When the numbers on the chart are read by the patient from 40 cm distance, the test stimulus passes through the relevant parts of the central visual field which are most vulnerable to glaucomatous damage. The test is positive (that is, abnormal) if at least one fixation number is associated with consistent disappearance of the stimulus. The OKP test was performed in 222 eyes of 126 glaucoma patients (aged 16-91 years) and 186 right eyes of 186 normal individuals (aged 19-86 years) using a 1.5 mm diameter stimulus. A further 144 eyes of 88 glaucoma patients (aged 60-85 years) and 31 right eyes of 31 normal individuals (aged 60-85 years) were tested with a 3 mm diameter stimulus. All eyes were also tested with conventional perimetry and the results of the conventional perimetry were categorised according to the Aulhorn-Karmeyer classification by four ophthalmologists without any knowledge of the OKP results. When the 1.5 mm stimulus was used, a true positive OKP result was obtained in 45% of eyes with relative scotomas, 81% of eyes with small absolute scotomas separate from the blind spot and 100% of eyes with more severe visual field defects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bjo.77.6.332 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_504525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75803770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-bc1e84fc3d349847da7303040eda2ed9e0e2528b7516decf9adcc69864b606173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS0EKkvhxhUpEgguZLHjr-TAAUUUKpUiIT6OluOMWy9OvLWTVfvf4yrLquXAyRq_34zezEPoOcFrQqh4123CWsq1WFNaPUArwkRdVlg2D9EKYyxLQgR5jJ6ktMllJYg8Qkc1JTWT9QrZ1rvRGe0L2Gk_68mFsQi20MUw-8mV1l0vf0YPWzfABLGwIRbTJRR9rszfhguvZxMGPYU5FTuX5jzSOvB94UNKT9Ejq32CZ_v3GP04-fi9_Vyeff102n44KzuO-VR2hkDNrKE9ZU022GtJMcUMQ68r6BvAUPGq7iQnogdjG90bI5pasE7gvBk9Ru-Xudu5G6A3ME5Re7WNbtDxRgXt1H1ldJfqIuwUx4xXPPe_3vfHcDVDmtTgkgHv9Qh5MSV5jamUOIMv_wE3YY5j3k2RrGMqKnk77u1CmZiPEMEenBCsbsNTOTwlpRIqh5fxF3fdH-B9Wll_tdd1ypHZqEfj0gFjssGsaTJWLphLE1wfZB1_KyGp5Or8Z6vYefvtC21O1K_Mv1n4btj83-AfzwG_7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770036275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mutlukan, E ; Damato, B E ; Jay, J L</creator><creatorcontrib>Mutlukan, E ; Damato, B E ; Jay, J L</creatorcontrib><description>The multi-fixation glaucoma screening chart, which uses the oculokinetic perimetry (OKP) technique, is a hand-held tangent screen with a central black test stimulus on a white background and a series of 26 numbered fixation targets arranged around the stimulus at various locations. When the numbers on the chart are read by the patient from 40 cm distance, the test stimulus passes through the relevant parts of the central visual field which are most vulnerable to glaucomatous damage. The test is positive (that is, abnormal) if at least one fixation number is associated with consistent disappearance of the stimulus. The OKP test was performed in 222 eyes of 126 glaucoma patients (aged 16-91 years) and 186 right eyes of 186 normal individuals (aged 19-86 years) using a 1.5 mm diameter stimulus. A further 144 eyes of 88 glaucoma patients (aged 60-85 years) and 31 right eyes of 31 normal individuals (aged 60-85 years) were tested with a 3 mm diameter stimulus. All eyes were also tested with conventional perimetry and the results of the conventional perimetry were categorised according to the Aulhorn-Karmeyer classification by four ophthalmologists without any knowledge of the OKP results. When the 1.5 mm stimulus was used, a true positive OKP result was obtained in 45% of eyes with relative scotomas, 81% of eyes with small absolute scotomas separate from the blind spot and 100% of eyes with more severe visual field defects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bjo.77.6.332</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8318478</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJOPAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; False Positive Reactions ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Glaucoma - physiopathology ; Glaucoma - prevention & control ; Humans ; Investigative techniques of ocular function and vision ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Mass Screening - methods ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Visual Field Tests - methods ; Visual Fields - physiology</subject><ispartof>British journal of ophthalmology, 1993-06, Vol.77 (6), p.332-338</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Jun 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-bc1e84fc3d349847da7303040eda2ed9e0e2528b7516decf9adcc69864b606173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-bc1e84fc3d349847da7303040eda2ed9e0e2528b7516decf9adcc69864b606173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC504525/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC504525/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4790499$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8318478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mutlukan, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damato, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jay, J L</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss</title><title>British journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>The multi-fixation glaucoma screening chart, which uses the oculokinetic perimetry (OKP) technique, is a hand-held tangent screen with a central black test stimulus on a white background and a series of 26 numbered fixation targets arranged around the stimulus at various locations. When the numbers on the chart are read by the patient from 40 cm distance, the test stimulus passes through the relevant parts of the central visual field which are most vulnerable to glaucomatous damage. The test is positive (that is, abnormal) if at least one fixation number is associated with consistent disappearance of the stimulus. The OKP test was performed in 222 eyes of 126 glaucoma patients (aged 16-91 years) and 186 right eyes of 186 normal individuals (aged 19-86 years) using a 1.5 mm diameter stimulus. A further 144 eyes of 88 glaucoma patients (aged 60-85 years) and 31 right eyes of 31 normal individuals (aged 60-85 years) were tested with a 3 mm diameter stimulus. All eyes were also tested with conventional perimetry and the results of the conventional perimetry were categorised according to the Aulhorn-Karmeyer classification by four ophthalmologists without any knowledge of the OKP results. When the 1.5 mm stimulus was used, a true positive OKP result was obtained in 45% of eyes with relative scotomas, 81% of eyes with small absolute scotomas separate from the blind spot and 100% of eyes with more severe visual field defects.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glaucoma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Glaucoma - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques of ocular function and vision</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Visual Field Tests - methods</subject><subject>Visual Fields - physiology</subject><issn>0007-1161</issn><issn>1468-2079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1v1DAQxS0EKkvhxhUpEgguZLHjr-TAAUUUKpUiIT6OluOMWy9OvLWTVfvf4yrLquXAyRq_34zezEPoOcFrQqh4123CWsq1WFNaPUArwkRdVlg2D9EKYyxLQgR5jJ6ktMllJYg8Qkc1JTWT9QrZ1rvRGe0L2Gk_68mFsQi20MUw-8mV1l0vf0YPWzfABLGwIRbTJRR9rszfhguvZxMGPYU5FTuX5jzSOvB94UNKT9Ejq32CZ_v3GP04-fi9_Vyeff102n44KzuO-VR2hkDNrKE9ZU022GtJMcUMQ68r6BvAUPGq7iQnogdjG90bI5pasE7gvBk9Ru-Xudu5G6A3ME5Re7WNbtDxRgXt1H1ldJfqIuwUx4xXPPe_3vfHcDVDmtTgkgHv9Qh5MSV5jamUOIMv_wE3YY5j3k2RrGMqKnk77u1CmZiPEMEenBCsbsNTOTwlpRIqh5fxF3fdH-B9Wll_tdd1ypHZqEfj0gFjssGsaTJWLphLE1wfZB1_KyGp5Or8Z6vYefvtC21O1K_Mv1n4btj83-AfzwG_7A</recordid><startdate>19930601</startdate><enddate>19930601</enddate><creator>Mutlukan, E</creator><creator>Damato, B E</creator><creator>Jay, J L</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930601</creationdate><title>Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss</title><author>Mutlukan, E ; Damato, B E ; Jay, J L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b505t-bc1e84fc3d349847da7303040eda2ed9e0e2528b7516decf9adcc69864b606173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glaucoma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Glaucoma - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques of ocular function and vision</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Visual Field Tests - methods</topic><topic>Visual Fields - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mutlukan, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damato, B E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jay, J L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mutlukan, E</au><au>Damato, B E</au><au>Jay, J L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss</atitle><jtitle>British journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>1993-06-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>338</epage><pages>332-338</pages><issn>0007-1161</issn><eissn>1468-2079</eissn><coden>BJOPAL</coden><abstract>The multi-fixation glaucoma screening chart, which uses the oculokinetic perimetry (OKP) technique, is a hand-held tangent screen with a central black test stimulus on a white background and a series of 26 numbered fixation targets arranged around the stimulus at various locations. When the numbers on the chart are read by the patient from 40 cm distance, the test stimulus passes through the relevant parts of the central visual field which are most vulnerable to glaucomatous damage. The test is positive (that is, abnormal) if at least one fixation number is associated with consistent disappearance of the stimulus. The OKP test was performed in 222 eyes of 126 glaucoma patients (aged 16-91 years) and 186 right eyes of 186 normal individuals (aged 19-86 years) using a 1.5 mm diameter stimulus. A further 144 eyes of 88 glaucoma patients (aged 60-85 years) and 31 right eyes of 31 normal individuals (aged 60-85 years) were tested with a 3 mm diameter stimulus. All eyes were also tested with conventional perimetry and the results of the conventional perimetry were categorised according to the Aulhorn-Karmeyer classification by four ophthalmologists without any knowledge of the OKP results. When the 1.5 mm stimulus was used, a true positive OKP result was obtained in 45% of eyes with relative scotomas, 81% of eyes with small absolute scotomas separate from the blind spot and 100% of eyes with more severe visual field defects.</abstract><cop>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>8318478</pmid><doi>10.1136/bjo.77.6.332</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1161 |
ispartof | British journal of ophthalmology, 1993-06, Vol.77 (6), p.332-338 |
issn | 0007-1161 1468-2079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_504525 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences False Positive Reactions Glaucoma - diagnosis Glaucoma - physiopathology Glaucoma - prevention & control Humans Investigative techniques of ocular function and vision Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Mass Screening - methods Medical sciences Middle Aged Sensitivity and Specificity Visual Field Tests - methods Visual Fields - physiology |
title | Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A07%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20evaluation%20of%20a%20multi-fixation%20campimeter%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20glaucomatous%20visual%20field%20loss&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Mutlukan,%20E&rft.date=1993-06-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=338&rft.pages=332-338&rft.issn=0007-1161&rft.eissn=1468-2079&rft.coden=BJOPAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bjo.77.6.332&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E75803770%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770036275&rft_id=info:pmid/8318478&rfr_iscdi=true |