Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids

Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2016-10, Vol.41 (11), p.2772-2781
Hauptverfasser: Tanda, Gianluigi, Mereu, Maddalena, Hiranita, Takato, Quarterman, Juliana C, Coggiano, Mark, Katz, Jonathan L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2781
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2772
container_title Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 41
creator Tanda, Gianluigi
Mereu, Maddalena
Hiranita, Takato
Quarterman, Juliana C
Coggiano, Mark
Katz, Jonathan L
description Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/npp.2016.91
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5026747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827889217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1rFDEYh4Modls9eZcBL5Uya74myVwEWaoWlhb8gN5CNvOmmzqTTJOZxZ79x51pt0U9eQr83oeHvMkPoVcELwlm6l3o-yXFRCxr8gQtiOS4FIxfPkULrGpWEsYuD9BhztcYk0oK9RwdUElrQSqyQL_Wxv4ooiu-9mC987Y4C7vY7qCDMMz58cnb8ty08WcMUJjQPARDgrsohmLYQvEFfHAxWR-u7qhzGFO0W-i8NW1x6hzYIc--VbTG71UXvY--yS_QM2faDC_35xH6_vH02-pzub74dLb6sC4t53QoN8oJIJw3FVe8aUwFTCqqhIJGUUocJ4IJx7iSVoGb5g2TlZMbx4Sw0nF2hN7fe_tx00Fjpw2TaXWffGfSrY7G678nwW_1VdzpClMhuZwEx3tBijcj5EF3PltoWxMgjlkTRaVSNSX_gxLFmKpYNaFv_kGv45jC9BIzJZWQiomJOrmnbIo5J3CP9yZYzz3QUw_03ANdk4l-_eeqj-zDx7PfCqyuIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817867836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tanda, Gianluigi ; Mereu, Maddalena ; Hiranita, Takato ; Quarterman, Juliana C ; Coggiano, Mark ; Katz, Jonathan L</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanda, Gianluigi ; Mereu, Maddalena ; Hiranita, Takato ; Quarterman, Juliana C ; Coggiano, Mark ; Katz, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><description>Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-133X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-634X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.91</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27296151</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEROEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology ; Anesthetics - pharmacology ; Animals ; Brain - drug effects ; Brain - metabolism ; Cocaine ; Cocaine - pharmacology ; Conditioning, Operant - drug effects ; Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects ; Dopamine ; Dopamine - metabolism ; Drug abuse ; Drug dosages ; Drug use ; Extinction, Psychological - drug effects ; Heroin ; Male ; Microdialysis ; Morphine ; Naloxone - pharmacology ; Naltrexone - pharmacology ; Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology ; Narcotics ; Original ; Piperidines - pharmacology ; Proteins ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Self Administration ; Substance use disorder ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2016-10, Vol.41 (11), p.2772-2781</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2016 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9526-9878</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026747/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026747/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanda, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mereu, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiranita, Takato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quarterman, Juliana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coggiano, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</title><title>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><description>Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists.</description><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anesthetics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain - drug effects</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Cocaine</subject><subject>Cocaine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant - drug effects</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Dopamine - metabolism</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological - drug effects</subject><subject>Heroin</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microdialysis</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Naloxone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Naltrexone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Piperidines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Administration</subject><subject>Substance use disorder</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0893-133X</issn><issn>1740-634X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1rFDEYh4Modls9eZcBL5Uya74myVwEWaoWlhb8gN5CNvOmmzqTTJOZxZ79x51pt0U9eQr83oeHvMkPoVcELwlm6l3o-yXFRCxr8gQtiOS4FIxfPkULrGpWEsYuD9BhztcYk0oK9RwdUElrQSqyQL_Wxv4ooiu-9mC987Y4C7vY7qCDMMz58cnb8ty08WcMUJjQPARDgrsohmLYQvEFfHAxWR-u7qhzGFO0W-i8NW1x6hzYIc--VbTG71UXvY--yS_QM2faDC_35xH6_vH02-pzub74dLb6sC4t53QoN8oJIJw3FVe8aUwFTCqqhIJGUUocJ4IJx7iSVoGb5g2TlZMbx4Sw0nF2hN7fe_tx00Fjpw2TaXWffGfSrY7G678nwW_1VdzpClMhuZwEx3tBijcj5EF3PltoWxMgjlkTRaVSNSX_gxLFmKpYNaFv_kGv45jC9BIzJZWQiomJOrmnbIo5J3CP9yZYzz3QUw_03ANdk4l-_eeqj-zDx7PfCqyuIA</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Tanda, Gianluigi</creator><creator>Mereu, Maddalena</creator><creator>Hiranita, Takato</creator><creator>Quarterman, Juliana C</creator><creator>Coggiano, Mark</creator><creator>Katz, Jonathan L</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-9878</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</title><author>Tanda, Gianluigi ; Mereu, Maddalena ; Hiranita, Takato ; Quarterman, Juliana C ; Coggiano, Mark ; Katz, Jonathan L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anesthetics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain - drug effects</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Cocaine</topic><topic>Cocaine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant - drug effects</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Dopamine - metabolism</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological - drug effects</topic><topic>Heroin</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microdialysis</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Naloxone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Naltrexone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Piperidines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Administration</topic><topic>Substance use disorder</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanda, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mereu, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiranita, Takato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quarterman, Juliana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coggiano, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanda, Gianluigi</au><au>Mereu, Maddalena</au><au>Hiranita, Takato</au><au>Quarterman, Juliana C</au><au>Coggiano, Mark</au><au>Katz, Jonathan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2772</spage><epage>2781</epage><pages>2772-2781</pages><issn>0893-133X</issn><eissn>1740-634X</eissn><coden>NEROEW</coden><abstract>Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><pmid>27296151</pmid><doi>10.1038/npp.2016.91</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-9878</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-133X
ispartof Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2016-10, Vol.41 (11), p.2772-2781
issn 0893-133X
1740-634X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5026747
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology
Anesthetics - pharmacology
Animals
Brain - drug effects
Brain - metabolism
Cocaine
Cocaine - pharmacology
Conditioning, Operant - drug effects
Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects
Dopamine
Dopamine - metabolism
Drug abuse
Drug dosages
Drug use
Extinction, Psychological - drug effects
Heroin
Male
Microdialysis
Morphine
Naloxone - pharmacology
Naltrexone - pharmacology
Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology
Narcotics
Original
Piperidines - pharmacology
Proteins
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Self Administration
Substance use disorder
Time Factors
title Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20Specific%20Involvement%20of%20(+)-Naloxone%20and%20(+)-Naltrexone%20on%20the%20Reinforcing%20and%20Neurochemical%20Effects%20of%20Cocaine%20and%20Opioids&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychopharmacology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Tanda,%20Gianluigi&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2772&rft.epage=2781&rft.pages=2772-2781&rft.issn=0893-133X&rft.eissn=1740-634X&rft.coden=NEROEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/npp.2016.91&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1827889217%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817867836&rft_id=info:pmid/27296151&rfr_iscdi=true