Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids
Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2016-10, Vol.41 (11), p.2772-2781 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2781 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2772 |
container_title | Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Tanda, Gianluigi Mereu, Maddalena Hiranita, Takato Quarterman, Juliana C Coggiano, Mark Katz, Jonathan L |
description | Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/npp.2016.91 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5026747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1827889217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1rFDEYh4Modls9eZcBL5Uya74myVwEWaoWlhb8gN5CNvOmmzqTTJOZxZ79x51pt0U9eQr83oeHvMkPoVcELwlm6l3o-yXFRCxr8gQtiOS4FIxfPkULrGpWEsYuD9BhztcYk0oK9RwdUElrQSqyQL_Wxv4ooiu-9mC987Y4C7vY7qCDMMz58cnb8ty08WcMUJjQPARDgrsohmLYQvEFfHAxWR-u7qhzGFO0W-i8NW1x6hzYIc--VbTG71UXvY--yS_QM2faDC_35xH6_vH02-pzub74dLb6sC4t53QoN8oJIJw3FVe8aUwFTCqqhIJGUUocJ4IJx7iSVoGb5g2TlZMbx4Sw0nF2hN7fe_tx00Fjpw2TaXWffGfSrY7G678nwW_1VdzpClMhuZwEx3tBijcj5EF3PltoWxMgjlkTRaVSNSX_gxLFmKpYNaFv_kGv45jC9BIzJZWQiomJOrmnbIo5J3CP9yZYzz3QUw_03ANdk4l-_eeqj-zDx7PfCqyuIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817867836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tanda, Gianluigi ; Mereu, Maddalena ; Hiranita, Takato ; Quarterman, Juliana C ; Coggiano, Mark ; Katz, Jonathan L</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanda, Gianluigi ; Mereu, Maddalena ; Hiranita, Takato ; Quarterman, Juliana C ; Coggiano, Mark ; Katz, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><description>Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-133X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-634X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.91</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27296151</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEROEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology ; Anesthetics - pharmacology ; Animals ; Brain - drug effects ; Brain - metabolism ; Cocaine ; Cocaine - pharmacology ; Conditioning, Operant - drug effects ; Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects ; Dopamine ; Dopamine - metabolism ; Drug abuse ; Drug dosages ; Drug use ; Extinction, Psychological - drug effects ; Heroin ; Male ; Microdialysis ; Morphine ; Naloxone - pharmacology ; Naltrexone - pharmacology ; Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology ; Narcotics ; Original ; Piperidines - pharmacology ; Proteins ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Self Administration ; Substance use disorder ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2016-10, Vol.41 (11), p.2772-2781</ispartof><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2016 American College of Neuropsychopharmacology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9526-9878</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026747/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5026747/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27296151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanda, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mereu, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiranita, Takato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quarterman, Juliana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coggiano, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</title><title>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><description>Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists.</description><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anesthetics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brain - drug effects</subject><subject>Brain - metabolism</subject><subject>Cocaine</subject><subject>Cocaine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Conditioning, Operant - drug effects</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Dopamine - metabolism</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Extinction, Psychological - drug effects</subject><subject>Heroin</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microdialysis</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Naloxone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Naltrexone - pharmacology</subject><subject>Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Piperidines - pharmacology</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Self Administration</subject><subject>Substance use disorder</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0893-133X</issn><issn>1740-634X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1rFDEYh4Modls9eZcBL5Uya74myVwEWaoWlhb8gN5CNvOmmzqTTJOZxZ79x51pt0U9eQr83oeHvMkPoVcELwlm6l3o-yXFRCxr8gQtiOS4FIxfPkULrGpWEsYuD9BhztcYk0oK9RwdUElrQSqyQL_Wxv4ooiu-9mC987Y4C7vY7qCDMMz58cnb8ty08WcMUJjQPARDgrsohmLYQvEFfHAxWR-u7qhzGFO0W-i8NW1x6hzYIc--VbTG71UXvY--yS_QM2faDC_35xH6_vH02-pzub74dLb6sC4t53QoN8oJIJw3FVe8aUwFTCqqhIJGUUocJ4IJx7iSVoGb5g2TlZMbx4Sw0nF2hN7fe_tx00Fjpw2TaXWffGfSrY7G678nwW_1VdzpClMhuZwEx3tBijcj5EF3PltoWxMgjlkTRaVSNSX_gxLFmKpYNaFv_kGv45jC9BIzJZWQiomJOrmnbIo5J3CP9yZYzz3QUw_03ANdk4l-_eeqj-zDx7PfCqyuIA</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Tanda, Gianluigi</creator><creator>Mereu, Maddalena</creator><creator>Hiranita, Takato</creator><creator>Quarterman, Juliana C</creator><creator>Coggiano, Mark</creator><creator>Katz, Jonathan L</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-9878</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</title><author>Tanda, Gianluigi ; Mereu, Maddalena ; Hiranita, Takato ; Quarterman, Juliana C ; Coggiano, Mark ; Katz, Jonathan L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b8f6e144d5484dda5e3782868ed8221f41636f3487c8efda5d375f7bf366c7f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anesthetics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brain - drug effects</topic><topic>Brain - metabolism</topic><topic>Cocaine</topic><topic>Cocaine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Conditioning, Operant - drug effects</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Dopamine - metabolism</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Extinction, Psychological - drug effects</topic><topic>Heroin</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microdialysis</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Naloxone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Naltrexone - pharmacology</topic><topic>Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Piperidines - pharmacology</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Self Administration</topic><topic>Substance use disorder</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanda, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mereu, Maddalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiranita, Takato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quarterman, Juliana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coggiano, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Jonathan L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanda, Gianluigi</au><au>Mereu, Maddalena</au><au>Hiranita, Takato</au><au>Quarterman, Juliana C</au><au>Coggiano, Mark</au><au>Katz, Jonathan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychopharmacology</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2772</spage><epage>2781</epage><pages>2772-2781</pages><issn>0893-133X</issn><eissn>1740-634X</eissn><coden>NEROEW</coden><abstract>Effective medications for drug abuse remain a largely unmet goal in biomedical science. Recently, the (+)-enantiomers of naloxone and naltrexone, TLR4 antagonists, have been reported to attenuate preclinical indicators of both opioid and stimulant abuse. To further examine the potential of these compounds as drug-abuse treatments, we extended the previous assessments to include a wider range of doses and procedures. We report the assessment of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone on the acute dopaminergic effects of cocaine and heroin determined by in vivo microdialysis, on the reinforcing effects of cocaine and the opioid agonist, remifentanil, tested under intravenous self-administration procedures, as well as the subjective effects of cocaine determined by discriminative-stimulus effects in rats. Pretreatments with (+)-naloxone or (+)-naltrexone did not attenuate, and under certain conditions enhanced the stimulation of dopamine levels produced by cocaine or heroin in the nucleus accumbens shell. Furthermore, although an attenuation of either cocaine or remifentanil self-administration was obtained at the highest doses of (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, those doses also attenuated rates of food-maintained behaviors, indicating a lack of selectivity of TLR4 antagonist effects for behaviors reinforced with drug injections. Drug-discrimination studies failed to demonstrate a significant interaction of (+)-naloxone with subjective effects of cocaine. The present studies demonstrate that under a wide range of doses and experimental conditions, the TLR4 antagonists, (+)-naloxone and (+)-naltrexone, did not specifically block neurochemical or behavioral abuse-related effects of cocaine or opioid agonists.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><pmid>27296151</pmid><doi>10.1038/npp.2016.91</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9526-9878</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-133X |
ispartof | Neuropsychopharmacology (New York, N.Y.), 2016-10, Vol.41 (11), p.2772-2781 |
issn | 0893-133X 1740-634X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5026747 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology Anesthetics - pharmacology Animals Brain - drug effects Brain - metabolism Cocaine Cocaine - pharmacology Conditioning, Operant - drug effects Discrimination (Psychology) - drug effects Dopamine Dopamine - metabolism Drug abuse Drug dosages Drug use Extinction, Psychological - drug effects Heroin Male Microdialysis Morphine Naloxone - pharmacology Naltrexone - pharmacology Narcotic Antagonists - pharmacology Narcotics Original Piperidines - pharmacology Proteins Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Reinforcement (Psychology) Self Administration Substance use disorder Time Factors |
title | Lack of Specific Involvement of (+)-Naloxone and (+)-Naltrexone on the Reinforcing and Neurochemical Effects of Cocaine and Opioids |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20Specific%20Involvement%20of%20(+)-Naloxone%20and%20(+)-Naltrexone%20on%20the%20Reinforcing%20and%20Neurochemical%20Effects%20of%20Cocaine%20and%20Opioids&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychopharmacology%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Tanda,%20Gianluigi&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2772&rft.epage=2781&rft.pages=2772-2781&rft.issn=0893-133X&rft.eissn=1740-634X&rft.coden=NEROEW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/npp.2016.91&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1827889217%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817867836&rft_id=info:pmid/27296151&rfr_iscdi=true |