Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature

Objective In spite of efforts to guarantee patients are adequately informed about their risk of fertility loss and offered treatment for fertility preservation (FP), previous studies have reported that this topic is not routinely discussed with patients, especially with younger patient populations....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England) England), 2017-01, Vol.26 (1), p.4-14
Hauptverfasser: Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia, Dyer, Karen E., Cyrus, John, Lubker, Irene Machowa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 4
container_title Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)
container_volume 26
creator Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia
Dyer, Karen E.
Cyrus, John
Lubker, Irene Machowa
description Objective In spite of efforts to guarantee patients are adequately informed about their risk of fertility loss and offered treatment for fertility preservation (FP), previous studies have reported that this topic is not routinely discussed with patients, especially with younger patient populations. A mixed method systematic review was undertaken to explore the factors shaping the discussion of FP with children (0–15 years) and adolescents/young adults (16–24 years) with cancer. Methods Six databases were searched independently using a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary/subject headings relating to cancer and fertility. Inclusion criteria consisted of: (a) being published in a peer‐reviewed journal, (b) a focus on healthcare professionals' (HCPs') beliefs, attitudes, or practices regarding fertility issues in cancer patients, (c) primary data collection from HCPs, and (d) a focus on HCPs who provide services to young patients. Of the 6276 articles identified in the search, 16 articles presenting the results of 14 studies were included in the final review. Results Common themes reported across studies indicate that five main factors influence HCPs' discussion of FP with young cancer patients: (a) HCPs' knowledge, (b) HCPs' sense of comfort, (c) patient factors (i.e., sexual maturity, prognosis, partnership status, and whether or not they initiate the conversation), (d) parent factors (i.e., HCPs' perception of the extent of their involvement), and (e) availability of educational materials. Conclusions Future work should ensure that HCPs possess knowledge of cancer‐related FP and that they receive adequate training on how to consent and discuss information with young patients and their parents.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pon.4092
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5025377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1875835918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4382-333568360f591f3bb548025ae29975753b826d76a3420f4a73435787342b2aff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEoqUg8QTIEgvYpPgndmwWlVAFFKmiLGBtOcmkcZXEF9u5lzwHL8xELRWwYjWWz6czRzNTFM8ZPWWU8je7MJ9W1PAHxTGjxpRMMfZwe8u6NLwyR8WTlG4oRdiox8URV9pQzulx8fMC3JiH1kUguxh6SMmH2Y3pFdl7OCQSZtL51C74P1-THmL2o88rwpAg7l1GnBx8HsgaFiRaN7cQyQ4FmHN6SxyZ_A_oyAR5CB1Ja8owodqSCFsLEnqSByDoCtHlJcLT4lGPCeDZXT0pvn14__X8ory8-vjp_N1l2VZC81IIIZUWivbSsF40jaw05dIBN6aWtRSN5qqrlRMVp33lalEJWWssvOGu78VJcXbru1uaCboW80Y32l30k4urDc7bv5XZD_Y67K3ENqKu0eD1nUEM3xdI2U44KhhHN0NYkmW6llpgOv0fKFdKMlNTRF_-g96EJW47QUpqKRWrBFIv_gx_n_r3ahEob4GDH2G91xm128lYPBm7nYz9cvV5q-IXEEK1cA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1858556143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia ; Dyer, Karen E. ; Cyrus, John ; Lubker, Irene Machowa</creator><creatorcontrib>Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia ; Dyer, Karen E. ; Cyrus, John ; Lubker, Irene Machowa</creatorcontrib><description>Objective In spite of efforts to guarantee patients are adequately informed about their risk of fertility loss and offered treatment for fertility preservation (FP), previous studies have reported that this topic is not routinely discussed with patients, especially with younger patient populations. A mixed method systematic review was undertaken to explore the factors shaping the discussion of FP with children (0–15 years) and adolescents/young adults (16–24 years) with cancer. Methods Six databases were searched independently using a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary/subject headings relating to cancer and fertility. Inclusion criteria consisted of: (a) being published in a peer‐reviewed journal, (b) a focus on healthcare professionals' (HCPs') beliefs, attitudes, or practices regarding fertility issues in cancer patients, (c) primary data collection from HCPs, and (d) a focus on HCPs who provide services to young patients. Of the 6276 articles identified in the search, 16 articles presenting the results of 14 studies were included in the final review. Results Common themes reported across studies indicate that five main factors influence HCPs' discussion of FP with young cancer patients: (a) HCPs' knowledge, (b) HCPs' sense of comfort, (c) patient factors (i.e., sexual maturity, prognosis, partnership status, and whether or not they initiate the conversation), (d) parent factors (i.e., HCPs' perception of the extent of their involvement), and (e) availability of educational materials. Conclusions Future work should ensure that HCPs possess knowledge of cancer‐related FP and that they receive adequate training on how to consent and discuss information with young patients and their parents.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-9249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pon.4092</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26890220</identifier><identifier>CODEN: POJCEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Cancer ; Child ; Children &amp; youth ; Educational materials ; Female ; Fertility ; Fertility Preservation - methods ; Health Education - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health Personnel ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Maturity ; Medical personnel ; Medical prognosis ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Preservation ; Professional attitudes ; Professional knowledge ; Professional-Patient Relations ; Prognosis ; Subject headings ; Systematic review ; Vocabulary ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2017-01, Vol.26 (1), p.4-14</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4382-333568360f591f3bb548025ae29975753b826d76a3420f4a73435787342b2aff3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpon.4092$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpon.4092$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27922,27923,30997,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26890220$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cyrus, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubker, Irene Machowa</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature</title><title>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</title><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><description>Objective In spite of efforts to guarantee patients are adequately informed about their risk of fertility loss and offered treatment for fertility preservation (FP), previous studies have reported that this topic is not routinely discussed with patients, especially with younger patient populations. A mixed method systematic review was undertaken to explore the factors shaping the discussion of FP with children (0–15 years) and adolescents/young adults (16–24 years) with cancer. Methods Six databases were searched independently using a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary/subject headings relating to cancer and fertility. Inclusion criteria consisted of: (a) being published in a peer‐reviewed journal, (b) a focus on healthcare professionals' (HCPs') beliefs, attitudes, or practices regarding fertility issues in cancer patients, (c) primary data collection from HCPs, and (d) a focus on HCPs who provide services to young patients. Of the 6276 articles identified in the search, 16 articles presenting the results of 14 studies were included in the final review. Results Common themes reported across studies indicate that five main factors influence HCPs' discussion of FP with young cancer patients: (a) HCPs' knowledge, (b) HCPs' sense of comfort, (c) patient factors (i.e., sexual maturity, prognosis, partnership status, and whether or not they initiate the conversation), (d) parent factors (i.e., HCPs' perception of the extent of their involvement), and (e) availability of educational materials. Conclusions Future work should ensure that HCPs possess knowledge of cancer‐related FP and that they receive adequate training on how to consent and discuss information with young patients and their parents.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Health Education - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Maturity</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Professional attitudes</subject><subject>Professional knowledge</subject><subject>Professional-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Subject headings</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>1057-9249</issn><issn>1099-1611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1TAQhSMEoqUg8QTIEgvYpPgndmwWlVAFFKmiLGBtOcmkcZXEF9u5lzwHL8xELRWwYjWWz6czRzNTFM8ZPWWU8je7MJ9W1PAHxTGjxpRMMfZwe8u6NLwyR8WTlG4oRdiox8URV9pQzulx8fMC3JiH1kUguxh6SMmH2Y3pFdl7OCQSZtL51C74P1-THmL2o88rwpAg7l1GnBx8HsgaFiRaN7cQyQ4FmHN6SxyZ_A_oyAR5CB1Ja8owodqSCFsLEnqSByDoCtHlJcLT4lGPCeDZXT0pvn14__X8ory8-vjp_N1l2VZC81IIIZUWivbSsF40jaw05dIBN6aWtRSN5qqrlRMVp33lalEJWWssvOGu78VJcXbru1uaCboW80Y32l30k4urDc7bv5XZD_Y67K3ENqKu0eD1nUEM3xdI2U44KhhHN0NYkmW6llpgOv0fKFdKMlNTRF_-g96EJW47QUpqKRWrBFIv_gx_n_r3ahEob4GDH2G91xm128lYPBm7nYz9cvV5q-IXEEK1cA</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia</creator><creator>Dyer, Karen E.</creator><creator>Cyrus, John</creator><creator>Lubker, Irene Machowa</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature</title><author>Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia ; Dyer, Karen E. ; Cyrus, John ; Lubker, Irene Machowa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4382-333568360f591f3bb548025ae29975753b826d76a3420f4a73435787342b2aff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Health Education - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Maturity</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Professional attitudes</topic><topic>Professional knowledge</topic><topic>Professional-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Subject headings</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyer, Karen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cyrus, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lubker, Irene Machowa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia</au><au>Dyer, Karen E.</au><au>Cyrus, John</au><au>Lubker, Irene Machowa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Psychooncology</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>4-14</pages><issn>1057-9249</issn><eissn>1099-1611</eissn><coden>POJCEE</coden><abstract>Objective In spite of efforts to guarantee patients are adequately informed about their risk of fertility loss and offered treatment for fertility preservation (FP), previous studies have reported that this topic is not routinely discussed with patients, especially with younger patient populations. A mixed method systematic review was undertaken to explore the factors shaping the discussion of FP with children (0–15 years) and adolescents/young adults (16–24 years) with cancer. Methods Six databases were searched independently using a combination of keywords and controlled vocabulary/subject headings relating to cancer and fertility. Inclusion criteria consisted of: (a) being published in a peer‐reviewed journal, (b) a focus on healthcare professionals' (HCPs') beliefs, attitudes, or practices regarding fertility issues in cancer patients, (c) primary data collection from HCPs, and (d) a focus on HCPs who provide services to young patients. Of the 6276 articles identified in the search, 16 articles presenting the results of 14 studies were included in the final review. Results Common themes reported across studies indicate that five main factors influence HCPs' discussion of FP with young cancer patients: (a) HCPs' knowledge, (b) HCPs' sense of comfort, (c) patient factors (i.e., sexual maturity, prognosis, partnership status, and whether or not they initiate the conversation), (d) parent factors (i.e., HCPs' perception of the extent of their involvement), and (e) availability of educational materials. Conclusions Future work should ensure that HCPs possess knowledge of cancer‐related FP and that they receive adequate training on how to consent and discuss information with young patients and their parents.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>26890220</pmid><doi>10.1002/pon.4092</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-9249
ispartof Psycho-oncology (Chichester, England), 2017-01, Vol.26 (1), p.4-14
issn 1057-9249
1099-1611
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5025377
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Adolescent
Attitude of Health Personnel
Cancer
Child
Children & youth
Educational materials
Female
Fertility
Fertility Preservation - methods
Health Education - statistics & numerical data
Health Personnel
Humans
Literature reviews
Maturity
Medical personnel
Medical prognosis
Neoplasms - psychology
Neoplasms - therapy
Preservation
Professional attitudes
Professional knowledge
Professional-Patient Relations
Prognosis
Subject headings
Systematic review
Vocabulary
Young Adult
Young adults
title Healthcare professionals' views on discussing fertility preservation with young cancer patients: a mixed method systematic review of the literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T16%3A36%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20professionals'%20views%20on%20discussing%20fertility%20preservation%20with%20young%20cancer%20patients:%20a%20mixed%20method%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Psycho-oncology%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Vindrola%E2%80%90Padros,%20Cecilia&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=4-14&rft.issn=1057-9249&rft.eissn=1099-1611&rft.coden=POJCEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pon.4092&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1875835918%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1858556143&rft_id=info:pmid/26890220&rfr_iscdi=true