Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory

We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification. Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2016-03, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253
Hauptverfasser: Payne, Brennan R, Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 2
container_start_page 243
container_title The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences
container_volume 71
creator Payne, Brennan R
Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L
description We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification. Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64). Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall. Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/geronb/gbu103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5014242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3961833111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9rFTEQx4Mo9ocevUrAi5e1mc1ms3sRylPrgxZFCx5DNjvZpu4mzyRb6H9vHq8WdS4zMB--zHe-hLwC9g5Yz88mjMEPZ9OwAuNPyDFI0VWCt93TMjPZV4JBc0ROUrplpUA2z8lRLaBnNeuPyfrNpZ_Uhkiv3DzSTZi8y-4O6XbZaRcX9JluEz1PKRinM470h8s39Dsu2mdn6NZnnKLOLnj6Aa0zLifqfAHKwhukX2MwmJLzE9V-pFe4hHj_gjyzek748qGfkutPH683n6vLLxfbzfllZRoQubJ9zYRpsZM1yn7gPcORg2DcghVGDmbgnUUtrR2HkXUDmpbDWHPeNggM-Sl5f5DdrcOCoyk3RT2rXXSLjvcqaKf-3Xh3o6Zwp_Y_q5u6CLx9EIjh14opq8Ulg_OsPYY1KZCtAJBMNAV98x96G9boi7s9Jduu5rCnqgNlYkgpon08Bpja56kOeapDnoV__beDR_pPgPw32S2gHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1767682314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Payne, Brennan R ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Brennan R ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification. Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64). Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall. Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25190209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Classification ; Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology ; Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology ; Cognitive impairment ; Female ; Gerontology ; Humans ; Information processing ; Language ; Male ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - complications ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Older people ; Original Research Report ; Quantitative psychology ; Risk assessment ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2016-03, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Mar 2016</rights><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27907,27908,30982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190209$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Brennan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creatorcontrib><title>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><description>We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification. Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64). Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall. Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original Research Report</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1079-5014</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9rFTEQx4Mo9ocevUrAi5e1mc1ms3sRylPrgxZFCx5DNjvZpu4mzyRb6H9vHq8WdS4zMB--zHe-hLwC9g5Yz88mjMEPZ9OwAuNPyDFI0VWCt93TMjPZV4JBc0ROUrplpUA2z8lRLaBnNeuPyfrNpZ_Uhkiv3DzSTZi8y-4O6XbZaRcX9JluEz1PKRinM470h8s39Dsu2mdn6NZnnKLOLnj6Aa0zLifqfAHKwhukX2MwmJLzE9V-pFe4hHj_gjyzek748qGfkutPH683n6vLLxfbzfllZRoQubJ9zYRpsZM1yn7gPcORg2DcghVGDmbgnUUtrR2HkXUDmpbDWHPeNggM-Sl5f5DdrcOCoyk3RT2rXXSLjvcqaKf-3Xh3o6Zwp_Y_q5u6CLx9EIjh14opq8Ulg_OsPYY1KZCtAJBMNAV98x96G9boi7s9Jduu5rCnqgNlYkgpon08Bpja56kOeapDnoV__beDR_pPgPw32S2gHA</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Payne, Brennan R</creator><creator>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</title><author>Payne, Brennan R ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original Research Report</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Brennan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Brennan R</au><au>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>243-253</pages><issn>1079-5014</issn><eissn>1758-5368</eissn><abstract>We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification. Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64). Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall. Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>25190209</pmid><doi>10.1093/geronb/gbu103</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1079-5014
ispartof The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2016-03, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253
issn 1079-5014
1758-5368
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5014242
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Classification
Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology
Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology
Cognitive impairment
Female
Gerontology
Humans
Information processing
Language
Male
Memory
Memory Disorders - complications
Neuropsychological Tests
Older people
Original Research Report
Quantitative psychology
Risk assessment
Risk Factors
title Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A15%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20for%20Mild%20Cognitive%20Impairment%20Is%20Associated%20With%20Semantic%20Integration%20Deficits%20in%20Sentence%20Processing%20and%20Memory&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20B,%20Psychological%20sciences%20and%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Payne,%20Brennan%20R&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=243-253&rft.issn=1079-5014&rft.eissn=1758-5368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbu103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3961833111%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1767682314&rft_id=info:pmid/25190209&rfr_iscdi=true