Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory
We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification. Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2016-03, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 243 |
container_title | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Payne, Brennan R Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L |
description | We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification.
Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64).
Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall.
Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/geronb/gbu103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5014242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3961833111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9rFTEQx4Mo9ocevUrAi5e1mc1ms3sRylPrgxZFCx5DNjvZpu4mzyRb6H9vHq8WdS4zMB--zHe-hLwC9g5Yz88mjMEPZ9OwAuNPyDFI0VWCt93TMjPZV4JBc0ROUrplpUA2z8lRLaBnNeuPyfrNpZ_Uhkiv3DzSTZi8y-4O6XbZaRcX9JluEz1PKRinM470h8s39Dsu2mdn6NZnnKLOLnj6Aa0zLifqfAHKwhukX2MwmJLzE9V-pFe4hHj_gjyzek748qGfkutPH683n6vLLxfbzfllZRoQubJ9zYRpsZM1yn7gPcORg2DcghVGDmbgnUUtrR2HkXUDmpbDWHPeNggM-Sl5f5DdrcOCoyk3RT2rXXSLjvcqaKf-3Xh3o6Zwp_Y_q5u6CLx9EIjh14opq8Ulg_OsPYY1KZCtAJBMNAV98x96G9boi7s9Jduu5rCnqgNlYkgpon08Bpja56kOeapDnoV__beDR_pPgPw32S2gHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1767682314</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Payne, Brennan R ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creator><creatorcontrib>Payne, Brennan R ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creatorcontrib><description>We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification.
Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64).
Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall.
Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1079-5014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25190209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Classification ; Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology ; Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology ; Cognitive impairment ; Female ; Gerontology ; Humans ; Information processing ; Language ; Male ; Memory ; Memory Disorders - complications ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Older people ; Original Research Report ; Quantitative psychology ; Risk assessment ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2016-03, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Mar 2016</rights><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,27907,27908,30982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190209$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Payne, Brennan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creatorcontrib><title>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</title><title>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</title><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><description>We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification.
Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64).
Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall.
Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gerontology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - complications</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Original Research Report</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1079-5014</issn><issn>1758-5368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9rFTEQx4Mo9ocevUrAi5e1mc1ms3sRylPrgxZFCx5DNjvZpu4mzyRb6H9vHq8WdS4zMB--zHe-hLwC9g5Yz88mjMEPZ9OwAuNPyDFI0VWCt93TMjPZV4JBc0ROUrplpUA2z8lRLaBnNeuPyfrNpZ_Uhkiv3DzSTZi8y-4O6XbZaRcX9JluEz1PKRinM470h8s39Dsu2mdn6NZnnKLOLnj6Aa0zLifqfAHKwhukX2MwmJLzE9V-pFe4hHj_gjyzek748qGfkutPH683n6vLLxfbzfllZRoQubJ9zYRpsZM1yn7gPcORg2DcghVGDmbgnUUtrR2HkXUDmpbDWHPeNggM-Sl5f5DdrcOCoyk3RT2rXXSLjvcqaKf-3Xh3o6Zwp_Y_q5u6CLx9EIjh14opq8Ulg_OsPYY1KZCtAJBMNAV98x96G9boi7s9Jduu5rCnqgNlYkgpon08Bpja56kOeapDnoV__beDR_pPgPw32S2gHA</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Payne, Brennan R</creator><creator>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</title><author>Payne, Brennan R ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-f9205c6e872e79b390ed31503f1f5c7bcb38fea7ffdbd08bec631d23364e10e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gerontology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - complications</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Original Research Report</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Payne, Brennan R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Payne, Brennan R</au><au>Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory</atitle><jtitle>The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>243-253</pages><issn>1079-5014</issn><eissn>1758-5368</eissn><abstract>We examined the degree to which online sentence processing and offline sentence memory differed among older adults who showed risk for amnestic and nonamnestic varieties of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), based on psychometric classification.
Participants (N = 439) read a series of sentences in a self-paced word-by-word reading paradigm for subsequent recall and completed a standardized cognitive test battery. Participants were classified into 3 groups: unimpaired controls (N = 281), amnestic MCI (N = 94), or nonamnestic MCI (N = 64).
Relative to controls, both MCI groups had poorer sentence memory and showed reduced sentence wrap-up effects, indicating reduced allocation to semantic integration processes. Wrap-up effects predicted subsequent recall in the control and nonamnestic groups. The amnestic MCI group showed poorer recall than the nonamnestic MCI group, and only the amnestic MCI group showed no relationship between sentence wrap-up and recall.
Our findings suggest that psychometrically defined sub-types of MCI are associated with unique deficits in sentence processing and can differentiate between the engagement of attentional resources during reading and the effectiveness of engaging attentional resources in producing improved memory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>25190209</pmid><doi>10.1093/geronb/gbu103</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1079-5014 |
ispartof | The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2016-03, Vol.71 (2), p.243-253 |
issn | 1079-5014 1758-5368 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5014242 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Classification Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology Cognitive Dysfunction - etiology Cognitive impairment Female Gerontology Humans Information processing Language Male Memory Memory Disorders - complications Neuropsychological Tests Older people Original Research Report Quantitative psychology Risk assessment Risk Factors |
title | Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment Is Associated With Semantic Integration Deficits in Sentence Processing and Memory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T08%3A15%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20for%20Mild%20Cognitive%20Impairment%20Is%20Associated%20With%20Semantic%20Integration%20Deficits%20in%20Sentence%20Processing%20and%20Memory&rft.jtitle=The%20journals%20of%20gerontology.%20Series%20B,%20Psychological%20sciences%20and%20social%20sciences&rft.au=Payne,%20Brennan%20R&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=243-253&rft.issn=1079-5014&rft.eissn=1758-5368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/geronb/gbu103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3961833111%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1767682314&rft_id=info:pmid/25190209&rfr_iscdi=true |