Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial

Objective To compare outcomes at 3 months post partum for women randomised to give birth by planned caesarean section (CS) or by planned vaginal birth (VB) in the Twin Birth Study (TBS). Design We invited women in the TBS to complete a 3‐month follow‐up questionnaire. Setting Two thousand and eight...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2015-11, Vol.122 (12), p.1653-1662
Hauptverfasser: Hutton, EK, Hannah, ME, Ross, S, Joseph, KS, Ohlsson, A, Asztalos, EV, Willan, AR, Allen, AC, Armson, BA, Gafni, A, Mangoff, K, Sanchez, JJ, Barrett, JF
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1662
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1653
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 122
creator Hutton, EK
Hannah, ME
Ross, S
Joseph, KS
Ohlsson, A
Asztalos, EV
Willan, AR
Allen, AC
Armson, BA
Gafni, A
Mangoff, K
Sanchez, JJ
Barrett, JF
description Objective To compare outcomes at 3 months post partum for women randomised to give birth by planned caesarean section (CS) or by planned vaginal birth (VB) in the Twin Birth Study (TBS). Design We invited women in the TBS to complete a 3‐month follow‐up questionnaire. Setting Two thousand and eight hundred and four women from 25 countries. Population Two thousand and five hundred and seventy women (92% response rate). Methods Women randomised between 13 December 2003 and 4 April 2011 in the TBS completed a questionnaire and outcomes were compared using an intention‐to‐treat approach. Main outcome and measures Breastfeeding, quality of life, depression, fatigue and urinary incontinence. Results We found no clinically important differences between groups in any outcome. In the planned CS versus planned VB groups, breastfeeding at any time after birth was reported by 84.4% versus 86.4% (P = 0.13); the mean physical and mental Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF‐36) quality of life scores were 51.8 versus 51.6 (P = 0.65) and 46.7 versus 46.0 (P = 0.09), respectively; the mean Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue score was 20.3 versus 20.8 (P = 0.14); the frequency of probable depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was 14.0% versus 14.8% (P = 0.57); the rate of problematic urinary incontinence was 5.5% versus 6.4% (P = 0.31); and the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire‐7 score was 20.5 versus 20.4 (P = 0.99). Partner relationships, including painful intercourse, were similar between the groups. Conclusion For women with twin pregnancies randomised to planned CS compared with planned VB, outcomes at 3 months post partum did not differ. The mode of birth was not associated with problematic urinary incontinence or urinary incontinence that affected the quality of life. Contrary to previous studies, breastfeeding at 3 months was not increased with planned VB. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1471-0528.13597
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5014197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3846547981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4527-70e1d54e8702bb6d8305dbdee87013341dee9d6d02054aa549dfd091d05624263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks9vFCEUx4nR2Fo9ezMkXrxMCwwMOx5M2safqenBeibM8GaXhoEVmG32v_Hm_-FfJrNbN-pFLjze-_AF3heEnlNySss4o1zSigi2OKW1aOUDdHzIPNzFpCI1WxyhJyndEkIbRurH6Ig1JSlYc4x-fNYZotcOhyn3YYSEdcb1z-9j8HlVFkMp47XT3oPBvYakI2iPE_TZBo83ENOUDsBGL-0s1tmYV3gIEec76_E6wtJr39siX5Z5Bfhmzl_ssC95MtvXWOOovQmjTfNJ5fgYnCthjla7p-jRoF2CZ_fzCfr67u3N5Yfq6vr9x8vzq6rngslKEqBGcFhIwrquMYuaCNMZmBO0rjktYWsaQxgRXGvBWzMY0lJDRMN4acsJerPXXU_dCKaHcg3t1DraUcetCtqqvyvertQybJQglNNWFoFX9wIxfJsgZVUe1IMrDYIwJUUlk23LhCAFffkPehum2Ysd1TRS1Lwt1Nme6mNIKcJwuAwlav4EarZczZar3ScoO178-YYD_9v1Aog9cGcdbP-npy4-Xe-FfwFyHr_9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1726675349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hutton, EK ; Hannah, ME ; Ross, S ; Joseph, KS ; Ohlsson, A ; Asztalos, EV ; Willan, AR ; Allen, AC ; Armson, BA ; Gafni, A ; Mangoff, K ; Sanchez, JJ ; Barrett, JF</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutton, EK ; Hannah, ME ; Ross, S ; Joseph, KS ; Ohlsson, A ; Asztalos, EV ; Willan, AR ; Allen, AC ; Armson, BA ; Gafni, A ; Mangoff, K ; Sanchez, JJ ; Barrett, JF ; Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group ; the Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare outcomes at 3 months post partum for women randomised to give birth by planned caesarean section (CS) or by planned vaginal birth (VB) in the Twin Birth Study (TBS). Design We invited women in the TBS to complete a 3‐month follow‐up questionnaire. Setting Two thousand and eight hundred and four women from 25 countries. Population Two thousand and five hundred and seventy women (92% response rate). Methods Women randomised between 13 December 2003 and 4 April 2011 in the TBS completed a questionnaire and outcomes were compared using an intention‐to‐treat approach. Main outcome and measures Breastfeeding, quality of life, depression, fatigue and urinary incontinence. Results We found no clinically important differences between groups in any outcome. In the planned CS versus planned VB groups, breastfeeding at any time after birth was reported by 84.4% versus 86.4% (P = 0.13); the mean physical and mental Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF‐36) quality of life scores were 51.8 versus 51.6 (P = 0.65) and 46.7 versus 46.0 (P = 0.09), respectively; the mean Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue score was 20.3 versus 20.8 (P = 0.14); the frequency of probable depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was 14.0% versus 14.8% (P = 0.57); the rate of problematic urinary incontinence was 5.5% versus 6.4% (P = 0.31); and the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire‐7 score was 20.5 versus 20.4 (P = 0.99). Partner relationships, including painful intercourse, were similar between the groups. Conclusion For women with twin pregnancies randomised to planned CS compared with planned VB, outcomes at 3 months post partum did not differ. The mode of birth was not associated with problematic urinary incontinence or urinary incontinence that affected the quality of life. Contrary to previous studies, breastfeeding at 3 months was not increased with planned VB. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13597</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26328526</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Breast Feeding - psychology ; Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data ; Breastfeeding ; Cesarean section ; Cesarean Section - psychology ; Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data ; Childbirth & labor ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Delivery, Obstetric - psychology ; Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data ; Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology ; Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data ; Fatigue - epidemiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; General Obstetrics ; Humans ; incontinence ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Maternal & child health ; Maternal Behavior - psychology ; maternal outcomes ; Mother-Child Relations ; Patient Satisfaction ; postpartum depression ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy, Twin ; Prospective Studies ; Puerperal Disorders - epidemiology ; Sexual Behavior - psychology ; Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data ; Siblings ; twin pregnancy ; Twins ; Urinary Incontinence - epidemiology]]></subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2015-11, Vol.122 (12), p.1653-1662</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>2015 The Authors. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4527-70e1d54e8702bb6d8305dbdee87013341dee9d6d02054aa549dfd091d05624263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4527-70e1d54e8702bb6d8305dbdee87013341dee9d6d02054aa549dfd091d05624263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1471-0528.13597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1471-0528.13597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutton, EK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, ME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, KS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohlsson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asztalos, EV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willan, AR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, AC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armson, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gafni, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangoff, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><title>Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objective To compare outcomes at 3 months post partum for women randomised to give birth by planned caesarean section (CS) or by planned vaginal birth (VB) in the Twin Birth Study (TBS). Design We invited women in the TBS to complete a 3‐month follow‐up questionnaire. Setting Two thousand and eight hundred and four women from 25 countries. Population Two thousand and five hundred and seventy women (92% response rate). Methods Women randomised between 13 December 2003 and 4 April 2011 in the TBS completed a questionnaire and outcomes were compared using an intention‐to‐treat approach. Main outcome and measures Breastfeeding, quality of life, depression, fatigue and urinary incontinence. Results We found no clinically important differences between groups in any outcome. In the planned CS versus planned VB groups, breastfeeding at any time after birth was reported by 84.4% versus 86.4% (P = 0.13); the mean physical and mental Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF‐36) quality of life scores were 51.8 versus 51.6 (P = 0.65) and 46.7 versus 46.0 (P = 0.09), respectively; the mean Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue score was 20.3 versus 20.8 (P = 0.14); the frequency of probable depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was 14.0% versus 14.8% (P = 0.57); the rate of problematic urinary incontinence was 5.5% versus 6.4% (P = 0.31); and the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire‐7 score was 20.5 versus 20.4 (P = 0.99). Partner relationships, including painful intercourse, were similar between the groups. Conclusion For women with twin pregnancies randomised to planned CS compared with planned VB, outcomes at 3 months post partum did not differ. The mode of birth was not associated with problematic urinary incontinence or urinary incontinence that affected the quality of life. Contrary to previous studies, breastfeeding at 3 months was not increased with planned VB. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - psychology</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Breastfeeding</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - psychology</subject><subject>Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - psychology</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Fatigue - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>General Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>incontinence</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Maternal Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>maternal outcomes</subject><subject>Mother-Child Relations</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>postpartum depression</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Twin</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Puerperal Disorders - epidemiology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Siblings</subject><subject>twin pregnancy</subject><subject>Twins</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - epidemiology</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks9vFCEUx4nR2Fo9ezMkXrxMCwwMOx5M2safqenBeibM8GaXhoEVmG32v_Hm_-FfJrNbN-pFLjze-_AF3heEnlNySss4o1zSigi2OKW1aOUDdHzIPNzFpCI1WxyhJyndEkIbRurH6Ig1JSlYc4x-fNYZotcOhyn3YYSEdcb1z-9j8HlVFkMp47XT3oPBvYakI2iPE_TZBo83ENOUDsBGL-0s1tmYV3gIEec76_E6wtJr39siX5Z5Bfhmzl_ssC95MtvXWOOovQmjTfNJ5fgYnCthjla7p-jRoF2CZ_fzCfr67u3N5Yfq6vr9x8vzq6rngslKEqBGcFhIwrquMYuaCNMZmBO0rjktYWsaQxgRXGvBWzMY0lJDRMN4acsJerPXXU_dCKaHcg3t1DraUcetCtqqvyvertQybJQglNNWFoFX9wIxfJsgZVUe1IMrDYIwJUUlk23LhCAFffkPehum2Ysd1TRS1Lwt1Nme6mNIKcJwuAwlav4EarZczZar3ScoO178-YYD_9v1Aog9cGcdbP-npy4-Xe-FfwFyHr_9</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Hutton, EK</creator><creator>Hannah, ME</creator><creator>Ross, S</creator><creator>Joseph, KS</creator><creator>Ohlsson, A</creator><creator>Asztalos, EV</creator><creator>Willan, AR</creator><creator>Allen, AC</creator><creator>Armson, BA</creator><creator>Gafni, A</creator><creator>Mangoff, K</creator><creator>Sanchez, JJ</creator><creator>Barrett, JF</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial</title><author>Hutton, EK ; Hannah, ME ; Ross, S ; Joseph, KS ; Ohlsson, A ; Asztalos, EV ; Willan, AR ; Allen, AC ; Armson, BA ; Gafni, A ; Mangoff, K ; Sanchez, JJ ; Barrett, JF</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4527-70e1d54e8702bb6d8305dbdee87013341dee9d6d02054aa549dfd091d05624263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - psychology</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Breastfeeding</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - psychology</topic><topic>Cesarean Section - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - psychology</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Fatigue - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>General Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>incontinence</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Maternal Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>maternal outcomes</topic><topic>Mother-Child Relations</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>postpartum depression</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Twin</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Puerperal Disorders - epidemiology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Siblings</topic><topic>twin pregnancy</topic><topic>Twins</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutton, EK</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannah, ME</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joseph, KS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohlsson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asztalos, EV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willan, AR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, AC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armson, BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gafni, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangoff, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, JJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, JF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutton, EK</au><au>Hannah, ME</au><au>Ross, S</au><au>Joseph, KS</au><au>Ohlsson, A</au><au>Asztalos, EV</au><au>Willan, AR</au><au>Allen, AC</au><au>Armson, BA</au><au>Gafni, A</au><au>Mangoff, K</au><au>Sanchez, JJ</au><au>Barrett, JF</au><aucorp>Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</aucorp><aucorp>the Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1653</spage><epage>1662</epage><pages>1653-1662</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objective To compare outcomes at 3 months post partum for women randomised to give birth by planned caesarean section (CS) or by planned vaginal birth (VB) in the Twin Birth Study (TBS). Design We invited women in the TBS to complete a 3‐month follow‐up questionnaire. Setting Two thousand and eight hundred and four women from 25 countries. Population Two thousand and five hundred and seventy women (92% response rate). Methods Women randomised between 13 December 2003 and 4 April 2011 in the TBS completed a questionnaire and outcomes were compared using an intention‐to‐treat approach. Main outcome and measures Breastfeeding, quality of life, depression, fatigue and urinary incontinence. Results We found no clinically important differences between groups in any outcome. In the planned CS versus planned VB groups, breastfeeding at any time after birth was reported by 84.4% versus 86.4% (P = 0.13); the mean physical and mental Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF‐36) quality of life scores were 51.8 versus 51.6 (P = 0.65) and 46.7 versus 46.0 (P = 0.09), respectively; the mean Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue score was 20.3 versus 20.8 (P = 0.14); the frequency of probable depression on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was 14.0% versus 14.8% (P = 0.57); the rate of problematic urinary incontinence was 5.5% versus 6.4% (P = 0.31); and the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire‐7 score was 20.5 versus 20.4 (P = 0.99). Partner relationships, including painful intercourse, were similar between the groups. Conclusion For women with twin pregnancies randomised to planned CS compared with planned VB, outcomes at 3 months post partum did not differ. The mode of birth was not associated with problematic urinary incontinence or urinary incontinence that affected the quality of life. Contrary to previous studies, breastfeeding at 3 months was not increased with planned VB. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding. Tweetable Planned mode of birth for twins doesn't affect maternal depression, wellbeing, incontinence or breastfeeding.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>26328526</pmid><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.13597</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2015-11, Vol.122 (12), p.1653-1662
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5014197
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Breast Feeding - psychology
Breast Feeding - statistics & numerical data
Breastfeeding
Cesarean section
Cesarean Section - psychology
Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data
Childbirth & labor
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
Delivery, Obstetric - psychology
Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data
Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology
Elective Surgical Procedures - statistics & numerical data
Fatigue - epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
General Obstetrics
Humans
incontinence
Infant, Newborn
Male
Maternal & child health
Maternal Behavior - psychology
maternal outcomes
Mother-Child Relations
Patient Satisfaction
postpartum depression
Postpartum Period
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy, Twin
Prospective Studies
Puerperal Disorders - epidemiology
Sexual Behavior - psychology
Sexual Behavior - statistics & numerical data
Siblings
twin pregnancy
Twins
Urinary Incontinence - epidemiology
title Maternal outcomes at 3 months after planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for twin pregnancies in the Twin Birth Study: a randomised controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T15%3A43%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternal%20outcomes%20at%203%C2%A0months%20after%20planned%20caesarean%20section%20versus%20planned%20vaginal%20birth%20for%20twin%20pregnancies%20in%20the%20Twin%20Birth%20Study:%20a%20randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Hutton,%20EK&rft.aucorp=Twin%20Birth%20Study%20Collaborative%20Group&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1653&rft.epage=1662&rft.pages=1653-1662&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3846547981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1726675349&rft_id=info:pmid/26328526&rfr_iscdi=true