Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania

Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating "eave tubes"-a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Malaria journal 2016-09, Vol.15 (1), p.447-447, Article 447
Hauptverfasser: Sternberg, Eleanore D, Ng'habi, Kija R, Lyimo, Issa N, Kessy, Stella T, Farenhorst, Marit, Thomas, Matthew B, Knols, Bart G J, Mnyone, Ladslaus L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 447
container_issue 1
container_start_page 447
container_title Malaria journal
container_volume 15
creator Sternberg, Eleanore D
Ng'habi, Kija R
Lyimo, Issa N
Kessy, Stella T
Farenhorst, Marit
Thomas, Matthew B
Knols, Bart G J
Mnyone, Ladslaus L
description Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating "eave tubes"-a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in a screened compartment containing a hut and human sleeper. Recapture numbers were used as a proxy for overnight survival. These trials tested physical characteristics of the eave tubes (height, diameter, angle), and different active ingredients (bendiocarb, LLIN material, fungus). Eave tubes in a hut with closed eaves were also compared to an LLIN protecting a sleeper in a hut with open eaves. Eave tubes were then evaluated in a larger compartment containing a self-replicating mosquito population, vegetation, and multiple houses and cattle sheds. In this "model village", LLINs were introduced first, followed by eave tubes and associated house modifications. Initial testing suggested that tubes placed horizontally and at eave height had the biggest impact on mosquito recapture relative to respective controls. Comparison of active ingredients suggested roughly equivalent effects from bendiocarb, LLIN material, and fungal spores (although speed of kill was slower for fungus). The impact of treated netting on recapture rates ranged from 50 to 70 % reduction relative to controls. In subsequent experiments comparing bendiocarb-treated netting in eave tubes against a standard LLIN, the effect size was smaller but the eave tubes with closed eaves performed at least as well as the LLIN with open eaves. In the model village, introducing LLINs led to an approximate 60 % reduction in larval densities and 85 % reduction in indoor catches of host-seeking mosquitoes relative to pre-intervention values. Installing eave tubes and screening further reduced larval density (93 % relative to pre intervention values) and virtually eliminated indoor host-seeking mosquitoes. When the eave tubes and screening were removed, larval and adult catches recovered to pre-eave tube levels. These trials suggest that the "eave tube" package can impact overnight survival of host-seeking mosquitoes and can suppress mosquito populations, even in a complex environment. Further testing is now required to evaluate the robustness of these findings and demonstrate impact under field conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5009540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A466569016</galeid><sourcerecordid>A466569016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-17b092fbbb80e90ad74d1a36eb3992bf1f843a25915feeb6174f7013f409ede53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU9rFTEUxYeitLX6AdxIwE03U5PJ5J8L4VFaKxTc1HW4M3NTI5nkmcw8sJ_ePF4tLUgWudz8zuHmnqZ5z-gFY1p-KqwzXLaUyZb1xrT6qDllvRJtp5V49aw-ad6U8otSprTqjpuTTgktqRCnzXQFOyTLOmAhLmUyQ4DsgYwpLjkF4iPZuOxH-FxLv3gIZMIdhrSdMS4E4kQKzr51HsNEcAdhhcWnWPbKO4gPED28bV47CAXfPd5nzY_rq7vLm_b2-9dvl5vbduRGLi1TAzWdG4ZBUzQUJtVPDLjEgRvTDY453XPohGHCIQ6Sqd4pyrjrqcEJBT9rvhx8t-sw4zTWCTMEu81-hvzHJvD25Uv0P-192llBqRE9rQbnjwY5_V6xLHb2ZcQQIGJai2WaScmV6GRFPx7QewhofXSpOo573G56KYU0NZZKXfyHqmeqS6s7Rudr_4WAHQRjTqVkdE_TM2r3odtD6LbCdh-61VXz4fm3nxT_UuZ_AYL0qGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1816637526</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Sternberg, Eleanore D ; Ng'habi, Kija R ; Lyimo, Issa N ; Kessy, Stella T ; Farenhorst, Marit ; Thomas, Matthew B ; Knols, Bart G J ; Mnyone, Ladslaus L</creator><creatorcontrib>Sternberg, Eleanore D ; Ng'habi, Kija R ; Lyimo, Issa N ; Kessy, Stella T ; Farenhorst, Marit ; Thomas, Matthew B ; Knols, Bart G J ; Mnyone, Ladslaus L</creatorcontrib><description>Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating "eave tubes"-a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in a screened compartment containing a hut and human sleeper. Recapture numbers were used as a proxy for overnight survival. These trials tested physical characteristics of the eave tubes (height, diameter, angle), and different active ingredients (bendiocarb, LLIN material, fungus). Eave tubes in a hut with closed eaves were also compared to an LLIN protecting a sleeper in a hut with open eaves. Eave tubes were then evaluated in a larger compartment containing a self-replicating mosquito population, vegetation, and multiple houses and cattle sheds. In this "model village", LLINs were introduced first, followed by eave tubes and associated house modifications. Initial testing suggested that tubes placed horizontally and at eave height had the biggest impact on mosquito recapture relative to respective controls. Comparison of active ingredients suggested roughly equivalent effects from bendiocarb, LLIN material, and fungal spores (although speed of kill was slower for fungus). The impact of treated netting on recapture rates ranged from 50 to 70 % reduction relative to controls. In subsequent experiments comparing bendiocarb-treated netting in eave tubes against a standard LLIN, the effect size was smaller but the eave tubes with closed eaves performed at least as well as the LLIN with open eaves. In the model village, introducing LLINs led to an approximate 60 % reduction in larval densities and 85 % reduction in indoor catches of host-seeking mosquitoes relative to pre-intervention values. Installing eave tubes and screening further reduced larval density (93 % relative to pre intervention values) and virtually eliminated indoor host-seeking mosquitoes. When the eave tubes and screening were removed, larval and adult catches recovered to pre-eave tube levels. These trials suggest that the "eave tube" package can impact overnight survival of host-seeking mosquitoes and can suppress mosquito populations, even in a complex environment. Further testing is now required to evaluate the robustness of these findings and demonstrate impact under field conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-2875</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2875</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27586055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Control ; Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention &amp; control ; Female ; Health aspects ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Insecticides ; Malaria ; Malaria - prevention &amp; control ; Mosquito Control - methods ; Mosquitoes ; Prevention ; Tanzania</subject><ispartof>Malaria journal, 2016-09, Vol.15 (1), p.447-447, Article 447</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-17b092fbbb80e90ad74d1a36eb3992bf1f843a25915feeb6174f7013f409ede53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-17b092fbbb80e90ad74d1a36eb3992bf1f843a25915feeb6174f7013f409ede53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009540/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5009540/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53768,53770</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27586055$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sternberg, Eleanore D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng'habi, Kija R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyimo, Issa N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessy, Stella T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farenhorst, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knols, Bart G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mnyone, Ladslaus L</creatorcontrib><title>Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania</title><title>Malaria journal</title><addtitle>Malar J</addtitle><description>Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating "eave tubes"-a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in a screened compartment containing a hut and human sleeper. Recapture numbers were used as a proxy for overnight survival. These trials tested physical characteristics of the eave tubes (height, diameter, angle), and different active ingredients (bendiocarb, LLIN material, fungus). Eave tubes in a hut with closed eaves were also compared to an LLIN protecting a sleeper in a hut with open eaves. Eave tubes were then evaluated in a larger compartment containing a self-replicating mosquito population, vegetation, and multiple houses and cattle sheds. In this "model village", LLINs were introduced first, followed by eave tubes and associated house modifications. Initial testing suggested that tubes placed horizontally and at eave height had the biggest impact on mosquito recapture relative to respective controls. Comparison of active ingredients suggested roughly equivalent effects from bendiocarb, LLIN material, and fungal spores (although speed of kill was slower for fungus). The impact of treated netting on recapture rates ranged from 50 to 70 % reduction relative to controls. In subsequent experiments comparing bendiocarb-treated netting in eave tubes against a standard LLIN, the effect size was smaller but the eave tubes with closed eaves performed at least as well as the LLIN with open eaves. In the model village, introducing LLINs led to an approximate 60 % reduction in larval densities and 85 % reduction in indoor catches of host-seeking mosquitoes relative to pre-intervention values. Installing eave tubes and screening further reduced larval density (93 % relative to pre intervention values) and virtually eliminated indoor host-seeking mosquitoes. When the eave tubes and screening were removed, larval and adult catches recovered to pre-eave tube levels. These trials suggest that the "eave tube" package can impact overnight survival of host-seeking mosquitoes and can suppress mosquito populations, even in a complex environment. Further testing is now required to evaluate the robustness of these findings and demonstrate impact under field conditions.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Malaria - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Mosquito Control - methods</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Tanzania</subject><issn>1475-2875</issn><issn>1475-2875</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU9rFTEUxYeitLX6AdxIwE03U5PJ5J8L4VFaKxTc1HW4M3NTI5nkmcw8sJ_ePF4tLUgWudz8zuHmnqZ5z-gFY1p-KqwzXLaUyZb1xrT6qDllvRJtp5V49aw-ad6U8otSprTqjpuTTgktqRCnzXQFOyTLOmAhLmUyQ4DsgYwpLjkF4iPZuOxH-FxLv3gIZMIdhrSdMS4E4kQKzr51HsNEcAdhhcWnWPbKO4gPED28bV47CAXfPd5nzY_rq7vLm_b2-9dvl5vbduRGLi1TAzWdG4ZBUzQUJtVPDLjEgRvTDY453XPohGHCIQ6Sqd4pyrjrqcEJBT9rvhx8t-sw4zTWCTMEu81-hvzHJvD25Uv0P-192llBqRE9rQbnjwY5_V6xLHb2ZcQQIGJai2WaScmV6GRFPx7QewhofXSpOo573G56KYU0NZZKXfyHqmeqS6s7Rudr_4WAHQRjTqVkdE_TM2r3odtD6LbCdh-61VXz4fm3nxT_UuZ_AYL0qGo</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Sternberg, Eleanore D</creator><creator>Ng'habi, Kija R</creator><creator>Lyimo, Issa N</creator><creator>Kessy, Stella T</creator><creator>Farenhorst, Marit</creator><creator>Thomas, Matthew B</creator><creator>Knols, Bart G J</creator><creator>Mnyone, Ladslaus L</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania</title><author>Sternberg, Eleanore D ; Ng'habi, Kija R ; Lyimo, Issa N ; Kessy, Stella T ; Farenhorst, Marit ; Thomas, Matthew B ; Knols, Bart G J ; Mnyone, Ladslaus L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-17b092fbbb80e90ad74d1a36eb3992bf1f843a25915feeb6174f7013f409ede53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Malaria - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Mosquito Control - methods</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Tanzania</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sternberg, Eleanore D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng'habi, Kija R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyimo, Issa N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessy, Stella T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farenhorst, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Matthew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knols, Bart G J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mnyone, Ladslaus L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Malaria journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sternberg, Eleanore D</au><au>Ng'habi, Kija R</au><au>Lyimo, Issa N</au><au>Kessy, Stella T</au><au>Farenhorst, Marit</au><au>Thomas, Matthew B</au><au>Knols, Bart G J</au><au>Mnyone, Ladslaus L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania</atitle><jtitle>Malaria journal</jtitle><addtitle>Malar J</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>447-447</pages><artnum>447</artnum><issn>1475-2875</issn><eissn>1475-2875</eissn><abstract>Presented here are a series of preliminary experiments evaluating "eave tubes"-a technology that combines house screening with a novel method of delivering insecticides for control of malaria mosquitoes. Eave tubes were first evaluated with overnight release and recapture of mosquitoes in a screened compartment containing a hut and human sleeper. Recapture numbers were used as a proxy for overnight survival. These trials tested physical characteristics of the eave tubes (height, diameter, angle), and different active ingredients (bendiocarb, LLIN material, fungus). Eave tubes in a hut with closed eaves were also compared to an LLIN protecting a sleeper in a hut with open eaves. Eave tubes were then evaluated in a larger compartment containing a self-replicating mosquito population, vegetation, and multiple houses and cattle sheds. In this "model village", LLINs were introduced first, followed by eave tubes and associated house modifications. Initial testing suggested that tubes placed horizontally and at eave height had the biggest impact on mosquito recapture relative to respective controls. Comparison of active ingredients suggested roughly equivalent effects from bendiocarb, LLIN material, and fungal spores (although speed of kill was slower for fungus). The impact of treated netting on recapture rates ranged from 50 to 70 % reduction relative to controls. In subsequent experiments comparing bendiocarb-treated netting in eave tubes against a standard LLIN, the effect size was smaller but the eave tubes with closed eaves performed at least as well as the LLIN with open eaves. In the model village, introducing LLINs led to an approximate 60 % reduction in larval densities and 85 % reduction in indoor catches of host-seeking mosquitoes relative to pre-intervention values. Installing eave tubes and screening further reduced larval density (93 % relative to pre intervention values) and virtually eliminated indoor host-seeking mosquitoes. When the eave tubes and screening were removed, larval and adult catches recovered to pre-eave tube levels. These trials suggest that the "eave tube" package can impact overnight survival of host-seeking mosquitoes and can suppress mosquito populations, even in a complex environment. Further testing is now required to evaluate the robustness of these findings and demonstrate impact under field conditions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27586055</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-2875
ispartof Malaria journal, 2016-09, Vol.15 (1), p.447-447, Article 447
issn 1475-2875
1475-2875
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5009540
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Animals
Control
Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention & control
Female
Health aspects
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Insecticides
Malaria
Malaria - prevention & control
Mosquito Control - methods
Mosquitoes
Prevention
Tanzania
title Eave tubes for malaria control in Africa: initial development and semi-field evaluations in Tanzania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A27%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Eave%20tubes%20for%20malaria%20control%20in%20Africa:%20initial%20development%20and%20semi-field%20evaluations%20in%20Tanzania&rft.jtitle=Malaria%20journal&rft.au=Sternberg,%20Eleanore%20D&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=447-447&rft.artnum=447&rft.issn=1475-2875&rft.eissn=1475-2875&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12936-016-1499-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA466569016%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1816637526&rft_id=info:pmid/27586055&rft_galeid=A466569016&rfr_iscdi=true