A new look at the LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome

LTR retrotransposons contribute approximately 10 % of the mammalian genome, but it has been previously reported that there is a deficit of these elements in the chicken relative to both mammals and other birds. A novel LTR retrotransposon classification pipeline, LocaTR, was developed and subsequent...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC genomics 2016-08, Vol.17 (1), p.688-688, Article 688
Hauptverfasser: Mason, Andrew S, Fulton, Janet E, Hocking, Paul M, Burt, David W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 688
container_issue 1
container_start_page 688
container_title BMC genomics
container_volume 17
creator Mason, Andrew S
Fulton, Janet E
Hocking, Paul M
Burt, David W
description LTR retrotransposons contribute approximately 10 % of the mammalian genome, but it has been previously reported that there is a deficit of these elements in the chicken relative to both mammals and other birds. A novel LTR retrotransposon classification pipeline, LocaTR, was developed and subsequently utilised to re-examine the chicken LTR retrotransposon annotation, and determine if the proposed chicken deficit is biologically accurate or simply a technical artefact. Using LocaTR 3.01 % of the chicken galGal4 genome assembly was annotated as LTR retrotransposon-derived elements (nearly double the previous annotation), including 1,073 that were structurally intact. Element distribution is significantly correlated with chromosome size and is non-random within each chromosome. Elements are significantly depleted within coding regions and enriched in gene sparse areas of the genome. Over 40 % of intact elements are found in clusters, unrelated by age or genera, generally in poorly recombining regions. The transcription of most LTR retrotransposons were suppressed or incomplete, but individual domain and full length retroviral transcripts were produced in some cases, although mostly with regularly interspersed stop codons in all reading frames. Furthermore, RNAseq data from 23 diverse tissues enabled greater characterisation of the co-opted endogenous retrovirus Ovex1. This gene was shown to be expressed ubiquitously but at variable levels across different tissues. LTR retrotransposon content was found to be very variable across the avian lineage and did not correlate with either genome size or phylogenetic position. However, the extent of previous, species-specific LTR retrotransposon annotation appears to be a confounding factor. Use of the novel LocaTR pipeline has nearly doubled the annotated LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome compared to previous estimates. Further analysis has described element distribution, clustering patterns and degree of expression in a variety of adult tissues, as well as in three embryonic stages. This study also enabled better characterisation of the co-opted gamma retroviral envelope gene Ovex1. Additionally, this work suggests that there is no deficit of LTR retrotransposons within the Galliformes relative to other birds, or to mammalian genomes when scaled for the three-fold difference in genome size.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12864-016-3043-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5006616</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A468876159</galeid><sourcerecordid>A468876159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-57146fe6d592ceba68234e8ca4a5008538d4461e7911ae2a2a20219a18ddfc553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV9rFDEUxYNYbG39AL5IoC_6MDV3Jv_2pbAsVQsLQlufQ5q5szt2JlmTrNpvb6bbli7IfUhIfueQnEPIe2BnAFp-TlBrySsGsmoYbyp4RY6AK6hqkPz1i_0heZvST8ZA6Vq8IYe1EkoJro_IYk49_qFDCHfUZprXSJc3VzRijiFH69MmpOCpCz6jzzR0D4hb9-4OPV2hDyOekIPODgnfPa7H5MeXi5vFt2r5_evlYr6snJAyV0IBlx3KVsxqh7dW6rrhqJ3lVjCmRaNbziWgmgFYrG0ZVsPMgm7bzgnRHJPzne9mezti68qDoh3MJvajjfcm2N7s3_h-bVbhtyn2UoIsBh8fDWL4tcWUzdgnh8NgPYZtMqBBzJRo-ISe7tCVHdD0vpvScBNu5lxqrWRBC3X2H6pMi2NfMsOuL-d7gk97godc_-aV3aZkLq-v9lnYsS6GlCJ2zz8FZqb-za5_U_o3U_8GiubDy4ieFU-FN_8AvLKo1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815975346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new look at the LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mason, Andrew S ; Fulton, Janet E ; Hocking, Paul M ; Burt, David W</creator><creatorcontrib>Mason, Andrew S ; Fulton, Janet E ; Hocking, Paul M ; Burt, David W</creatorcontrib><description>LTR retrotransposons contribute approximately 10 % of the mammalian genome, but it has been previously reported that there is a deficit of these elements in the chicken relative to both mammals and other birds. A novel LTR retrotransposon classification pipeline, LocaTR, was developed and subsequently utilised to re-examine the chicken LTR retrotransposon annotation, and determine if the proposed chicken deficit is biologically accurate or simply a technical artefact. Using LocaTR 3.01 % of the chicken galGal4 genome assembly was annotated as LTR retrotransposon-derived elements (nearly double the previous annotation), including 1,073 that were structurally intact. Element distribution is significantly correlated with chromosome size and is non-random within each chromosome. Elements are significantly depleted within coding regions and enriched in gene sparse areas of the genome. Over 40 % of intact elements are found in clusters, unrelated by age or genera, generally in poorly recombining regions. The transcription of most LTR retrotransposons were suppressed or incomplete, but individual domain and full length retroviral transcripts were produced in some cases, although mostly with regularly interspersed stop codons in all reading frames. Furthermore, RNAseq data from 23 diverse tissues enabled greater characterisation of the co-opted endogenous retrovirus Ovex1. This gene was shown to be expressed ubiquitously but at variable levels across different tissues. LTR retrotransposon content was found to be very variable across the avian lineage and did not correlate with either genome size or phylogenetic position. However, the extent of previous, species-specific LTR retrotransposon annotation appears to be a confounding factor. Use of the novel LocaTR pipeline has nearly doubled the annotated LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome compared to previous estimates. Further analysis has described element distribution, clustering patterns and degree of expression in a variety of adult tissues, as well as in three embryonic stages. This study also enabled better characterisation of the co-opted gamma retroviral envelope gene Ovex1. Additionally, this work suggests that there is no deficit of LTR retrotransposons within the Galliformes relative to other birds, or to mammalian genomes when scaled for the three-fold difference in genome size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2164</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2164</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3043-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27577548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Amino Acid Sequence - genetics ; Animals ; Chickens ; Chickens - genetics ; Genetic aspects ; Genome ; Phylogeny ; Retroelements - genetics ; Retrotransposons ; Sequence Analysis, DNA ; Terminal Repeat Sequences - genetics</subject><ispartof>BMC genomics, 2016-08, Vol.17 (1), p.688-688, Article 688</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-57146fe6d592ceba68234e8ca4a5008538d4461e7911ae2a2a20219a18ddfc553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-57146fe6d592ceba68234e8ca4a5008538d4461e7911ae2a2a20219a18ddfc553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006616/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5006616/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27577548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mason, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Janet E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocking, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, David W</creatorcontrib><title>A new look at the LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome</title><title>BMC genomics</title><addtitle>BMC Genomics</addtitle><description>LTR retrotransposons contribute approximately 10 % of the mammalian genome, but it has been previously reported that there is a deficit of these elements in the chicken relative to both mammals and other birds. A novel LTR retrotransposon classification pipeline, LocaTR, was developed and subsequently utilised to re-examine the chicken LTR retrotransposon annotation, and determine if the proposed chicken deficit is biologically accurate or simply a technical artefact. Using LocaTR 3.01 % of the chicken galGal4 genome assembly was annotated as LTR retrotransposon-derived elements (nearly double the previous annotation), including 1,073 that were structurally intact. Element distribution is significantly correlated with chromosome size and is non-random within each chromosome. Elements are significantly depleted within coding regions and enriched in gene sparse areas of the genome. Over 40 % of intact elements are found in clusters, unrelated by age or genera, generally in poorly recombining regions. The transcription of most LTR retrotransposons were suppressed or incomplete, but individual domain and full length retroviral transcripts were produced in some cases, although mostly with regularly interspersed stop codons in all reading frames. Furthermore, RNAseq data from 23 diverse tissues enabled greater characterisation of the co-opted endogenous retrovirus Ovex1. This gene was shown to be expressed ubiquitously but at variable levels across different tissues. LTR retrotransposon content was found to be very variable across the avian lineage and did not correlate with either genome size or phylogenetic position. However, the extent of previous, species-specific LTR retrotransposon annotation appears to be a confounding factor. Use of the novel LocaTR pipeline has nearly doubled the annotated LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome compared to previous estimates. Further analysis has described element distribution, clustering patterns and degree of expression in a variety of adult tissues, as well as in three embryonic stages. This study also enabled better characterisation of the co-opted gamma retroviral envelope gene Ovex1. Additionally, this work suggests that there is no deficit of LTR retrotransposons within the Galliformes relative to other birds, or to mammalian genomes when scaled for the three-fold difference in genome size.</description><subject>Amino Acid Sequence - genetics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Chickens - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Genome</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Retroelements - genetics</subject><subject>Retrotransposons</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><subject>Terminal Repeat Sequences - genetics</subject><issn>1471-2164</issn><issn>1471-2164</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV9rFDEUxYNYbG39AL5IoC_6MDV3Jv_2pbAsVQsLQlufQ5q5szt2JlmTrNpvb6bbli7IfUhIfueQnEPIe2BnAFp-TlBrySsGsmoYbyp4RY6AK6hqkPz1i_0heZvST8ZA6Vq8IYe1EkoJro_IYk49_qFDCHfUZprXSJc3VzRijiFH69MmpOCpCz6jzzR0D4hb9-4OPV2hDyOekIPODgnfPa7H5MeXi5vFt2r5_evlYr6snJAyV0IBlx3KVsxqh7dW6rrhqJ3lVjCmRaNbziWgmgFYrG0ZVsPMgm7bzgnRHJPzne9mezti68qDoh3MJvajjfcm2N7s3_h-bVbhtyn2UoIsBh8fDWL4tcWUzdgnh8NgPYZtMqBBzJRo-ISe7tCVHdD0vpvScBNu5lxqrWRBC3X2H6pMi2NfMsOuL-d7gk97godc_-aV3aZkLq-v9lnYsS6GlCJ2zz8FZqb-za5_U_o3U_8GiubDy4ieFU-FN_8AvLKo1g</recordid><startdate>20160830</startdate><enddate>20160830</enddate><creator>Mason, Andrew S</creator><creator>Fulton, Janet E</creator><creator>Hocking, Paul M</creator><creator>Burt, David W</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160830</creationdate><title>A new look at the LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome</title><author>Mason, Andrew S ; Fulton, Janet E ; Hocking, Paul M ; Burt, David W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c566t-57146fe6d592ceba68234e8ca4a5008538d4461e7911ae2a2a20219a18ddfc553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amino Acid Sequence - genetics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Chickens - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Genome</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Retroelements - genetics</topic><topic>Retrotransposons</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><topic>Terminal Repeat Sequences - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulton, Janet E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocking, Paul M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burt, David W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BMC genomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, Andrew S</au><au>Fulton, Janet E</au><au>Hocking, Paul M</au><au>Burt, David W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new look at the LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome</atitle><jtitle>BMC genomics</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Genomics</addtitle><date>2016-08-30</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>688</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>688-688</pages><artnum>688</artnum><issn>1471-2164</issn><eissn>1471-2164</eissn><abstract>LTR retrotransposons contribute approximately 10 % of the mammalian genome, but it has been previously reported that there is a deficit of these elements in the chicken relative to both mammals and other birds. A novel LTR retrotransposon classification pipeline, LocaTR, was developed and subsequently utilised to re-examine the chicken LTR retrotransposon annotation, and determine if the proposed chicken deficit is biologically accurate or simply a technical artefact. Using LocaTR 3.01 % of the chicken galGal4 genome assembly was annotated as LTR retrotransposon-derived elements (nearly double the previous annotation), including 1,073 that were structurally intact. Element distribution is significantly correlated with chromosome size and is non-random within each chromosome. Elements are significantly depleted within coding regions and enriched in gene sparse areas of the genome. Over 40 % of intact elements are found in clusters, unrelated by age or genera, generally in poorly recombining regions. The transcription of most LTR retrotransposons were suppressed or incomplete, but individual domain and full length retroviral transcripts were produced in some cases, although mostly with regularly interspersed stop codons in all reading frames. Furthermore, RNAseq data from 23 diverse tissues enabled greater characterisation of the co-opted endogenous retrovirus Ovex1. This gene was shown to be expressed ubiquitously but at variable levels across different tissues. LTR retrotransposon content was found to be very variable across the avian lineage and did not correlate with either genome size or phylogenetic position. However, the extent of previous, species-specific LTR retrotransposon annotation appears to be a confounding factor. Use of the novel LocaTR pipeline has nearly doubled the annotated LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome compared to previous estimates. Further analysis has described element distribution, clustering patterns and degree of expression in a variety of adult tissues, as well as in three embryonic stages. This study also enabled better characterisation of the co-opted gamma retroviral envelope gene Ovex1. Additionally, this work suggests that there is no deficit of LTR retrotransposons within the Galliformes relative to other birds, or to mammalian genomes when scaled for the three-fold difference in genome size.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27577548</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12864-016-3043-1</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2164
ispartof BMC genomics, 2016-08, Vol.17 (1), p.688-688, Article 688
issn 1471-2164
1471-2164
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5006616
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Amino Acid Sequence - genetics
Animals
Chickens
Chickens - genetics
Genetic aspects
Genome
Phylogeny
Retroelements - genetics
Retrotransposons
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Terminal Repeat Sequences - genetics
title A new look at the LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T15%3A40%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20look%20at%20the%20LTR%20retrotransposon%20content%20of%20the%20chicken%20genome&rft.jtitle=BMC%20genomics&rft.au=Mason,%20Andrew%20S&rft.date=2016-08-30&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=688&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=688-688&rft.artnum=688&rft.issn=1471-2164&rft.eissn=1471-2164&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12864-016-3043-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA468876159%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815975346&rft_id=info:pmid/27577548&rft_galeid=A468876159&rfr_iscdi=true