Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT

Abstract Aim To evaluate the deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT in order to calculate appropriate margins to create the PTV. Background Defining inappropriate margins can lead to underdosing in target volumes and also overdosing in healthy tissues, increasing morbidity. Material...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy 2016-05, Vol.21 (3), p.266-270
Hauptverfasser: Sá, Ana Cravo, Peres, Ana, Pereira, Mónica, Coelho, Carina Marques, Monsanto, Fátima, Macedo, Ana, Lamas, Adrian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 270
container_issue 3
container_start_page 266
container_title Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy
container_volume 21
creator Sá, Ana Cravo
Peres, Ana
Pereira, Mónica
Coelho, Carina Marques
Monsanto, Fátima
Macedo, Ana
Lamas, Adrian
description Abstract Aim To evaluate the deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT in order to calculate appropriate margins to create the PTV. Background Defining inappropriate margins can lead to underdosing in target volumes and also overdosing in healthy tissues, increasing morbidity. Material and methods 223 CBCT images used for alignment with the CT planning scan based on bony anatomy were analyzed in 12 patients treated with IMRT following prostatectomy. Shifts of CBCT images were recorded in three directions to calculate the required margin to create PTV. Results and discussion The mean and standard deviation (SD) values in millimetres were −0.05 ± 1.35 in the LR direction, −0.03 ± 0.65 in the SI direction and −0.02 ± 2.05 the AP direction. The systematic error measured in the LR, SI and AP direction were 1.35 mm, 0.65 mm, and 2.05 mm with a random error of 2.07 mm; 1.45 mm and 3.16 mm, resulting in a PTV margin of 4.82 mm; 2.64 mm, and 7.33 mm, respectively. Conclusion With IGRT we suggest a margin of 5 mm, 3 mm and 8 mm in the LR, SI and AP direction, respectively, to PTV1 and PTV2. Therefore, this study supports an anisotropic margin expansion to the PTV being the largest expansion in the AP direction and lower in SI.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5002028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1507136715001595</els_id><sourcerecordid>1817853378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ed8a5ef9c80b0fc6e3875a620a8b7e8000d46ff0b3082f4f07dd8a121ba34783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhi0EoqvSF-CAcuSSMLaT2CuhSlVVSqUiJNqeR44zab1k42Ani_bt67ClAg74MpZn_n9G35ixtxwKDrz-sCnC6EMhgFcF5wVA-YKtBGiZl3UJL9mKV6ByLmt1xE5i3MByFIhKvWZHQtXA1zWs2NnFzvSzmdxwn7W0c-nmh5i5IRuDj5OZyE5-u8_GlKBhitkUKD222U83PWRXX77dvmGvOtNHOnmKx-zu08Xt-ef8-uvl1fnZdW5LvZ5ySa02FXVrq6GBztYktapMLcDoRpFO07Vl3XXQSNCiKztQbVJwwRsjS6XlMTs9-I5zs6XWpmmC6XEMbmvCHr1x-HdmcA9473dYAQgQi8H7J4Pgf8wUJ9y6aKnvzUB-jsg1V7qS8lcvcSi1CUIM1D234YALftzggh8X_Mg5JvxJ9O7PAZ8lv2Gngo-HAkqYdo4CRpugWmpdSJix9e7__qf_yG3vBmdN_532FDd-DkNaAHKMAgFvlg-w7D_F5LKu5COyxKxz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1817853378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sá, Ana Cravo ; Peres, Ana ; Pereira, Mónica ; Coelho, Carina Marques ; Monsanto, Fátima ; Macedo, Ana ; Lamas, Adrian</creator><creatorcontrib>Sá, Ana Cravo ; Peres, Ana ; Pereira, Mónica ; Coelho, Carina Marques ; Monsanto, Fátima ; Macedo, Ana ; Lamas, Adrian</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Aim To evaluate the deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT in order to calculate appropriate margins to create the PTV. Background Defining inappropriate margins can lead to underdosing in target volumes and also overdosing in healthy tissues, increasing morbidity. Material and methods 223 CBCT images used for alignment with the CT planning scan based on bony anatomy were analyzed in 12 patients treated with IMRT following prostatectomy. Shifts of CBCT images were recorded in three directions to calculate the required margin to create PTV. Results and discussion The mean and standard deviation (SD) values in millimetres were −0.05 ± 1.35 in the LR direction, −0.03 ± 0.65 in the SI direction and −0.02 ± 2.05 the AP direction. The systematic error measured in the LR, SI and AP direction were 1.35 mm, 0.65 mm, and 2.05 mm with a random error of 2.07 mm; 1.45 mm and 3.16 mm, resulting in a PTV margin of 4.82 mm; 2.64 mm, and 7.33 mm, respectively. Conclusion With IGRT we suggest a margin of 5 mm, 3 mm and 8 mm in the LR, SI and AP direction, respectively, to PTV1 and PTV2. Therefore, this study supports an anisotropic margin expansion to the PTV being the largest expansion in the AP direction and lower in SI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1507-1367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2083-4640</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27601960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Urban &amp; Partner Sp. z o.o</publisher><subject>Cone beam computed tomography ; Geometric uncertainty ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Intensity modulated radiotherapy ; Original ; Planning target volume margin ; Prostate tumour ; Radiology</subject><ispartof>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy, 2016-05, Vol.21 (3), p.266-270</ispartof><rights>Greater Poland Cancer Centre</rights><rights>2015 Greater Poland Cancer Centre</rights><rights>2015 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. 2015 Greater Poland Cancer Centre</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ed8a5ef9c80b0fc6e3875a620a8b7e8000d46ff0b3082f4f07dd8a121ba34783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5002028/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1507136715001595$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,3536,27903,27904,53769,53771,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27601960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sá, Ana Cravo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Carina Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsanto, Fátima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamas, Adrian</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT</title><title>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy</title><addtitle>Rep Pract Oncol Radiother</addtitle><description>Abstract Aim To evaluate the deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT in order to calculate appropriate margins to create the PTV. Background Defining inappropriate margins can lead to underdosing in target volumes and also overdosing in healthy tissues, increasing morbidity. Material and methods 223 CBCT images used for alignment with the CT planning scan based on bony anatomy were analyzed in 12 patients treated with IMRT following prostatectomy. Shifts of CBCT images were recorded in three directions to calculate the required margin to create PTV. Results and discussion The mean and standard deviation (SD) values in millimetres were −0.05 ± 1.35 in the LR direction, −0.03 ± 0.65 in the SI direction and −0.02 ± 2.05 the AP direction. The systematic error measured in the LR, SI and AP direction were 1.35 mm, 0.65 mm, and 2.05 mm with a random error of 2.07 mm; 1.45 mm and 3.16 mm, resulting in a PTV margin of 4.82 mm; 2.64 mm, and 7.33 mm, respectively. Conclusion With IGRT we suggest a margin of 5 mm, 3 mm and 8 mm in the LR, SI and AP direction, respectively, to PTV1 and PTV2. Therefore, this study supports an anisotropic margin expansion to the PTV being the largest expansion in the AP direction and lower in SI.</description><subject>Cone beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Geometric uncertainty</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiotherapy</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Planning target volume margin</subject><subject>Prostate tumour</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><issn>1507-1367</issn><issn>2083-4640</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhi0EoqvSF-CAcuSSMLaT2CuhSlVVSqUiJNqeR44zab1k42Ani_bt67ClAg74MpZn_n9G35ixtxwKDrz-sCnC6EMhgFcF5wVA-YKtBGiZl3UJL9mKV6ByLmt1xE5i3MByFIhKvWZHQtXA1zWs2NnFzvSzmdxwn7W0c-nmh5i5IRuDj5OZyE5-u8_GlKBhitkUKD222U83PWRXX77dvmGvOtNHOnmKx-zu08Xt-ef8-uvl1fnZdW5LvZ5ySa02FXVrq6GBztYktapMLcDoRpFO07Vl3XXQSNCiKztQbVJwwRsjS6XlMTs9-I5zs6XWpmmC6XEMbmvCHr1x-HdmcA9473dYAQgQi8H7J4Pgf8wUJ9y6aKnvzUB-jsg1V7qS8lcvcSi1CUIM1D234YALftzggh8X_Mg5JvxJ9O7PAZ8lv2Gngo-HAkqYdo4CRpugWmpdSJix9e7__qf_yG3vBmdN_532FDd-DkNaAHKMAgFvlg-w7D_F5LKu5COyxKxz</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Sá, Ana Cravo</creator><creator>Peres, Ana</creator><creator>Pereira, Mónica</creator><creator>Coelho, Carina Marques</creator><creator>Monsanto, Fátima</creator><creator>Macedo, Ana</creator><creator>Lamas, Adrian</creator><general>Elsevier Urban &amp; Partner Sp. z o.o</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT</title><author>Sá, Ana Cravo ; Peres, Ana ; Pereira, Mónica ; Coelho, Carina Marques ; Monsanto, Fátima ; Macedo, Ana ; Lamas, Adrian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3ed8a5ef9c80b0fc6e3875a620a8b7e8000d46ff0b3082f4f07dd8a121ba34783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cone beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Geometric uncertainty</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiotherapy</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Planning target volume margin</topic><topic>Prostate tumour</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sá, Ana Cravo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peres, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Carina Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monsanto, Fátima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamas, Adrian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sá, Ana Cravo</au><au>Peres, Ana</au><au>Pereira, Mónica</au><au>Coelho, Carina Marques</au><au>Monsanto, Fátima</au><au>Macedo, Ana</au><au>Lamas, Adrian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT</atitle><jtitle>Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Rep Pract Oncol Radiother</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>266-270</pages><issn>1507-1367</issn><eissn>2083-4640</eissn><abstract>Abstract Aim To evaluate the deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT in order to calculate appropriate margins to create the PTV. Background Defining inappropriate margins can lead to underdosing in target volumes and also overdosing in healthy tissues, increasing morbidity. Material and methods 223 CBCT images used for alignment with the CT planning scan based on bony anatomy were analyzed in 12 patients treated with IMRT following prostatectomy. Shifts of CBCT images were recorded in three directions to calculate the required margin to create PTV. Results and discussion The mean and standard deviation (SD) values in millimetres were −0.05 ± 1.35 in the LR direction, −0.03 ± 0.65 in the SI direction and −0.02 ± 2.05 the AP direction. The systematic error measured in the LR, SI and AP direction were 1.35 mm, 0.65 mm, and 2.05 mm with a random error of 2.07 mm; 1.45 mm and 3.16 mm, resulting in a PTV margin of 4.82 mm; 2.64 mm, and 7.33 mm, respectively. Conclusion With IGRT we suggest a margin of 5 mm, 3 mm and 8 mm in the LR, SI and AP direction, respectively, to PTV1 and PTV2. Therefore, this study supports an anisotropic margin expansion to the PTV being the largest expansion in the AP direction and lower in SI.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Urban &amp; Partner Sp. z o.o</pub><pmid>27601960</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1507-1367
ispartof Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy, 2016-05, Vol.21 (3), p.266-270
issn 1507-1367
2083-4640
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5002028
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Cone beam computed tomography
Geometric uncertainty
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Intensity modulated radiotherapy
Original
Planning target volume margin
Prostate tumour
Radiology
title Evaluating deviations in prostatectomy patients treated with IMRT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T14%3A43%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20deviations%20in%20prostatectomy%20patients%20treated%20with%20IMRT&rft.jtitle=Reports%20of%20practical%20oncology%20and%20radiotherapy&rft.au=S%C3%A1,%20Ana%20Cravo&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=266-270&rft.issn=1507-1367&rft.eissn=2083-4640&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1817853378%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1817853378&rft_id=info:pmid/27601960&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1507136715001595&rfr_iscdi=true