Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing

As the population grows older, the incidence and prevalence of conditions that lead to a predisposition for poor wound healing also increase. Ultimately, this increase in nonhealing wounds has led to significant morbidity and mortality with subsequent huge economic ramifications. Therefore, understa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2016-09, Vol.138 (3S), p.18S-28S
Hauptverfasser: Lindley, Linsey E., Stojadinovic, Olivera, Pastar, Irena, Tomic-Canic, Marjana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28S
container_issue 3S
container_start_page 18S
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 138
creator Lindley, Linsey E.
Stojadinovic, Olivera
Pastar, Irena
Tomic-Canic, Marjana
description As the population grows older, the incidence and prevalence of conditions that lead to a predisposition for poor wound healing also increase. Ultimately, this increase in nonhealing wounds has led to significant morbidity and mortality with subsequent huge economic ramifications. Therefore, understanding specific molecular mechanisms underlying aberrant wound healing is of great importance. It has and will continue to be the leading pathway to the discovery of therapeutic targets, as well as diagnostic molecular biomarkers. Biomarkers may help identify and stratify subsets of nonhealing patients for whom biomarker-guided approaches may aid in healing. A series of literature searches were performed using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Internet searches. Currently, biomarkers are being identified using biomaterials sourced locally from human wounds and/or systemically using high-throughput "omics" modalities (genomic, proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic analysis). In this review, we highlight the current status of clinically applicable biomarkers and propose multiple steps in validation and implementation spectrum, including those measured in tissue specimens, for example, β-catenin and c-myc, wound fluid, matrix metalloproteinases and interleukins, swabs, wound microbiota, and serum, for example, procalcitonin and matrix metalloproteinases. Identification of numerous potential biomarkers using different avenues of sample collection and molecular approaches is currently underway. A focus on simplicity and consistent implementation of these biomarkers, as well as an emphasis on efficacious follow-up therapeutics, is necessary for transition of this technology to clinically feasible point-of-care applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002682
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4998971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1814662881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5195-5f85ce242ca768add894e75873d5fb35223ee9563da4e74941915204afde0db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtPAjEUhRujEUT_gTEs2Qz2_diYKFExIdEoicumzHRgZJhiOyPh31sEFe2mzbn3nnvyFYBzBPsIKnH59PzSh3sHc4kPQBsxrBKKKT4EbQgJThBkuAVOQniDEAnC2TFoYcEYFxy2Qe-mcKWbrrumyrrxvTB-bn3o5s53X10TxaE1ZVFNT8FRbspgz3Z3B4zvbseDYTJ6vH8YXI-SlCHFEpZLltq4PjWCS5NlUlErmBQkY_mEMIyJtYpxkpmoU0WRiokhNXlmYTYhHXC1tV02k4XNUlvV3pR66YuYbK2dKfTfSlXM9NR9aKqUVAJFg97OwLv3xoZaL4qQ2rI0lXVN0EgiyjmWctNKt62pdyF4m_-sQVBvGOvIWP9nHMcu9iP-DH1D_fVdubKOMOdls7JezyLIevblxxmhCYaIQxU_JdlIjHwCZKiGGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1814662881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Lindley, Linsey E. ; Stojadinovic, Olivera ; Pastar, Irena ; Tomic-Canic, Marjana</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Linsey E. ; Stojadinovic, Olivera ; Pastar, Irena ; Tomic-Canic, Marjana</creatorcontrib><description>As the population grows older, the incidence and prevalence of conditions that lead to a predisposition for poor wound healing also increase. Ultimately, this increase in nonhealing wounds has led to significant morbidity and mortality with subsequent huge economic ramifications. Therefore, understanding specific molecular mechanisms underlying aberrant wound healing is of great importance. It has and will continue to be the leading pathway to the discovery of therapeutic targets, as well as diagnostic molecular biomarkers. Biomarkers may help identify and stratify subsets of nonhealing patients for whom biomarker-guided approaches may aid in healing. A series of literature searches were performed using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Internet searches. Currently, biomarkers are being identified using biomaterials sourced locally from human wounds and/or systemically using high-throughput "omics" modalities (genomic, proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic analysis). In this review, we highlight the current status of clinically applicable biomarkers and propose multiple steps in validation and implementation spectrum, including those measured in tissue specimens, for example, β-catenin and c-myc, wound fluid, matrix metalloproteinases and interleukins, swabs, wound microbiota, and serum, for example, procalcitonin and matrix metalloproteinases. Identification of numerous potential biomarkers using different avenues of sample collection and molecular approaches is currently underway. A focus on simplicity and consistent implementation of these biomarkers, as well as an emphasis on efficacious follow-up therapeutics, is necessary for transition of this technology to clinically feasible point-of-care applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002682</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27556760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Biomarkers - metabolism ; Chronic Disease ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis ; Postoperative Complications - metabolism ; Postoperative Complications - microbiology ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Surgical Wound - diagnosis ; Surgical Wound - metabolism ; Surgical Wound - microbiology ; Surgical Wound - physiopathology ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2016-09, Vol.138 (3S), p.18S-28S</ispartof><rights>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5195-5f85ce242ca768add894e75873d5fb35223ee9563da4e74941915204afde0db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5195-5f85ce242ca768add894e75873d5fb35223ee9563da4e74941915204afde0db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Linsey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stojadinovic, Olivera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastar, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomic-Canic, Marjana</creatorcontrib><title>Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>As the population grows older, the incidence and prevalence of conditions that lead to a predisposition for poor wound healing also increase. Ultimately, this increase in nonhealing wounds has led to significant morbidity and mortality with subsequent huge economic ramifications. Therefore, understanding specific molecular mechanisms underlying aberrant wound healing is of great importance. It has and will continue to be the leading pathway to the discovery of therapeutic targets, as well as diagnostic molecular biomarkers. Biomarkers may help identify and stratify subsets of nonhealing patients for whom biomarker-guided approaches may aid in healing. A series of literature searches were performed using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Internet searches. Currently, biomarkers are being identified using biomaterials sourced locally from human wounds and/or systemically using high-throughput "omics" modalities (genomic, proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic analysis). In this review, we highlight the current status of clinically applicable biomarkers and propose multiple steps in validation and implementation spectrum, including those measured in tissue specimens, for example, β-catenin and c-myc, wound fluid, matrix metalloproteinases and interleukins, swabs, wound microbiota, and serum, for example, procalcitonin and matrix metalloproteinases. Identification of numerous potential biomarkers using different avenues of sample collection and molecular approaches is currently underway. A focus on simplicity and consistent implementation of these biomarkers, as well as an emphasis on efficacious follow-up therapeutics, is necessary for transition of this technology to clinically feasible point-of-care applications.</description><subject>Biomarkers - metabolism</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - metabolism</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - microbiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgical Wound - diagnosis</subject><subject>Surgical Wound - metabolism</subject><subject>Surgical Wound - microbiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound - physiopathology</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtPAjEUhRujEUT_gTEs2Qz2_diYKFExIdEoicumzHRgZJhiOyPh31sEFe2mzbn3nnvyFYBzBPsIKnH59PzSh3sHc4kPQBsxrBKKKT4EbQgJThBkuAVOQniDEAnC2TFoYcEYFxy2Qe-mcKWbrrumyrrxvTB-bn3o5s53X10TxaE1ZVFNT8FRbspgz3Z3B4zvbseDYTJ6vH8YXI-SlCHFEpZLltq4PjWCS5NlUlErmBQkY_mEMIyJtYpxkpmoU0WRiokhNXlmYTYhHXC1tV02k4XNUlvV3pR66YuYbK2dKfTfSlXM9NR9aKqUVAJFg97OwLv3xoZaL4qQ2rI0lXVN0EgiyjmWctNKt62pdyF4m_-sQVBvGOvIWP9nHMcu9iP-DH1D_fVdubKOMOdls7JezyLIevblxxmhCYaIQxU_JdlIjHwCZKiGGw</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Lindley, Linsey E.</creator><creator>Stojadinovic, Olivera</creator><creator>Pastar, Irena</creator><creator>Tomic-Canic, Marjana</creator><general>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing</title><author>Lindley, Linsey E. ; Stojadinovic, Olivera ; Pastar, Irena ; Tomic-Canic, Marjana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5195-5f85ce242ca768add894e75873d5fb35223ee9563da4e74941915204afde0db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers - metabolism</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - metabolism</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - microbiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgical Wound - diagnosis</topic><topic>Surgical Wound - metabolism</topic><topic>Surgical Wound - microbiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound - physiopathology</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindley, Linsey E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stojadinovic, Olivera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastar, Irena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomic-Canic, Marjana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindley, Linsey E.</au><au>Stojadinovic, Olivera</au><au>Pastar, Irena</au><au>Tomic-Canic, Marjana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>138</volume><issue>3S</issue><spage>18S</spage><epage>28S</epage><pages>18S-28S</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>As the population grows older, the incidence and prevalence of conditions that lead to a predisposition for poor wound healing also increase. Ultimately, this increase in nonhealing wounds has led to significant morbidity and mortality with subsequent huge economic ramifications. Therefore, understanding specific molecular mechanisms underlying aberrant wound healing is of great importance. It has and will continue to be the leading pathway to the discovery of therapeutic targets, as well as diagnostic molecular biomarkers. Biomarkers may help identify and stratify subsets of nonhealing patients for whom biomarker-guided approaches may aid in healing. A series of literature searches were performed using Medline, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Internet searches. Currently, biomarkers are being identified using biomaterials sourced locally from human wounds and/or systemically using high-throughput "omics" modalities (genomic, proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic analysis). In this review, we highlight the current status of clinically applicable biomarkers and propose multiple steps in validation and implementation spectrum, including those measured in tissue specimens, for example, β-catenin and c-myc, wound fluid, matrix metalloproteinases and interleukins, swabs, wound microbiota, and serum, for example, procalcitonin and matrix metalloproteinases. Identification of numerous potential biomarkers using different avenues of sample collection and molecular approaches is currently underway. A focus on simplicity and consistent implementation of these biomarkers, as well as an emphasis on efficacious follow-up therapeutics, is necessary for transition of this technology to clinically feasible point-of-care applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>27556760</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000002682</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2016-09, Vol.138 (3S), p.18S-28S
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4998971
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Biomarkers - metabolism
Chronic Disease
Humans
Postoperative Complications - diagnosis
Postoperative Complications - metabolism
Postoperative Complications - microbiology
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Surgical Wound - diagnosis
Surgical Wound - metabolism
Surgical Wound - microbiology
Surgical Wound - physiopathology
Wound Healing - physiology
title Biology and Biomarkers for Wound Healing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A05%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biology%20and%20Biomarkers%20for%20Wound%20Healing&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Lindley,%20Linsey%20E.&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=138&rft.issue=3S&rft.spage=18S&rft.epage=28S&rft.pages=18S-28S&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002682&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1814662881%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1814662881&rft_id=info:pmid/27556760&rfr_iscdi=true