Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Age and Gender: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
We evaluated whether age- and gender-based colorectal cancer screening is cost-effective.Recent studies in the United States identified age and gender as 2 important variables predicting advanced proximal neoplasia, and that women aged
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2016-03, Vol.95 (10), p.e2739-e2739 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e2739 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | e2739 |
| container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
| container_volume | 95 |
| creator | Wong, Martin C.S. Ching, Jessica Y.L. Chan, Victor C.W. Lam, Thomas Y.T. Luk, Arthur K.C. Wong, Sunny H. Ng, Siew C. Ng, Simon S.M. Wu, Justin C.Y. Chan, Francis K.L. Sung, Joseph J.Y. |
| description | We evaluated whether age- and gender-based colorectal cancer screening is cost-effective.Recent studies in the United States identified age and gender as 2 important variables predicting advanced proximal neoplasia, and that women aged |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000002739 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4998853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1772832259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-ebb67be347bfc7dcc174ccccc5531e4e6951debe40673c7756bdc2641469be4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctOHDEQtCJQWCBfECnykcuA317nEGkZHkECRQJytjyent1JvDbYsyD-nlmWIEhdWqquqm51I_SVkkNKjD66Ojkk78A0N5_QhEquKmmU2EKTkZSVNlrsoN1S_hBCuWbiM9phyiimNZug6zqFlMEPLuDaRQ8Z3_gMEPs4x8euQItTxLM5YBdbfA6xhfwdz3CdylCddt3o7B8gQil4Fl14Kn3ZR9udCwW-vNY99Pvs9Lb-WV3-Or-oZ5eV51KaCppG6Qa40E3ndes91cKvISWnIEAZSVtoQBCluddaqqb1TAkqlBnZlu-hH5vcu1WzhNZDHLIL9i73S5efbHK9_diJ_cLO04MVxkynko8BB68BOd2voAx22RcPIbgIaVUsHS805YxJM0r5RupzKiVD9zaGErv-hr06sf9_Y3R9e7_hm-ff-UeB2AgeUxggl79h9QjZLsCFYfGSJ7VhFSNUEU6mpFpThj8DP2-Vgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772832259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Age and Gender: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wong, Martin C.S. ; Ching, Jessica Y.L. ; Chan, Victor C.W. ; Lam, Thomas Y.T. ; Luk, Arthur K.C. ; Wong, Sunny H. ; Ng, Siew C. ; Ng, Simon S.M. ; Wu, Justin C.Y. ; Chan, Francis K.L. ; Sung, Joseph J.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, Martin C.S. ; Ching, Jessica Y.L. ; Chan, Victor C.W. ; Lam, Thomas Y.T. ; Luk, Arthur K.C. ; Wong, Sunny H. ; Ng, Siew C. ; Ng, Simon S.M. ; Wu, Justin C.Y. ; Chan, Francis K.L. ; Sung, Joseph J.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated whether age- and gender-based colorectal cancer screening is cost-effective.Recent studies in the United States identified age and gender as 2 important variables predicting advanced proximal neoplasia, and that women aged <60 to 70 years were more suited for sigmoidoscopy screening due to their low risk of proximal neoplasia. Yet, quantitative assessment of the incremental benefits, risks, and cost remains to be performed.Primary care screening practice (2008-2015).A Markov modeling was constructed using data from a screening cohort. The following strategies were compared according to the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for 1 life-year saved: flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) 5 yearly; colonoscopy 10 yearly; FS for each woman at 50- and 55-year old followed by colonoscopy at 60- and 70-year old; FS for each woman at 50-, 55-, 60-, and 65-year old followed by colonoscopy at 70-year old; FS for each woman at 50-, 55-, 60-, 65-, and 70-year old. All male subjects received colonoscopy at 50-, 60-, and 70-year old under strategies 3 to 5.From a hypothetical population of 100,000 asymptomatic subjects, strategy 2 could save the largest number of life-years (4226 vs 2268 to 3841 by other strategies). When compared with no screening, strategy 5 had the lowest ICER (US$42,515), followed by strategy 3 (US$43,517), strategy 2 (US$43,739), strategy 4 (US$47,710), and strategy 1 (US$56,510). Strategy 2 leads to the highest number of bleeding and perforations, and required a prohibitive number of colonoscopy procedures. Strategy 5 remains the most cost-effective when assessed with a wide range of deterministic sensitivity analyses around the base case.From the cost effectiveness analysis, FS for women and colonoscopy for men represent an economically favorable screening strategy. These findings could inform physicians and policy-makers in triaging eligible subjects for risk-based screening, especially in countries with limited colonoscopic resources. Future research should study the acceptability, feasibility, and feasibility of this risk-based strategy in different populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002739</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26962772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Colonoscopy - methods ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Colorectal Neoplasms - economics ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Early Detection of Cancer - economics ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Economic Evaluation Study ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Patient Selection ; Sex Factors ; Sigmoidoscopy - methods ; Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2016-03, Vol.95 (10), p.e2739-e2739</ispartof><rights>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-ebb67be347bfc7dcc174ccccc5531e4e6951debe40673c7756bdc2641469be4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998853/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4998853/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, Martin C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ching, Jessica Y.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Victor C.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Thomas Y.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luk, Arthur K.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sunny H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Siew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Simon S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Justin C.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Francis K.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Joseph J.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Age and Gender: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>We evaluated whether age- and gender-based colorectal cancer screening is cost-effective.Recent studies in the United States identified age and gender as 2 important variables predicting advanced proximal neoplasia, and that women aged <60 to 70 years were more suited for sigmoidoscopy screening due to their low risk of proximal neoplasia. Yet, quantitative assessment of the incremental benefits, risks, and cost remains to be performed.Primary care screening practice (2008-2015).A Markov modeling was constructed using data from a screening cohort. The following strategies were compared according to the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for 1 life-year saved: flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) 5 yearly; colonoscopy 10 yearly; FS for each woman at 50- and 55-year old followed by colonoscopy at 60- and 70-year old; FS for each woman at 50-, 55-, 60-, and 65-year old followed by colonoscopy at 70-year old; FS for each woman at 50-, 55-, 60-, 65-, and 70-year old. All male subjects received colonoscopy at 50-, 60-, and 70-year old under strategies 3 to 5.From a hypothetical population of 100,000 asymptomatic subjects, strategy 2 could save the largest number of life-years (4226 vs 2268 to 3841 by other strategies). When compared with no screening, strategy 5 had the lowest ICER (US$42,515), followed by strategy 3 (US$43,517), strategy 2 (US$43,739), strategy 4 (US$47,710), and strategy 1 (US$56,510). Strategy 2 leads to the highest number of bleeding and perforations, and required a prohibitive number of colonoscopy procedures. Strategy 5 remains the most cost-effective when assessed with a wide range of deterministic sensitivity analyses around the base case.From the cost effectiveness analysis, FS for women and colonoscopy for men represent an economically favorable screening strategy. These findings could inform physicians and policy-makers in triaging eligible subjects for risk-based screening, especially in countries with limited colonoscopic resources. Future research should study the acceptability, feasibility, and feasibility of this risk-based strategy in different populations.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - economics</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Economic Evaluation Study</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctOHDEQtCJQWCBfECnykcuA317nEGkZHkECRQJytjyent1JvDbYsyD-nlmWIEhdWqquqm51I_SVkkNKjD66Ojkk78A0N5_QhEquKmmU2EKTkZSVNlrsoN1S_hBCuWbiM9phyiimNZug6zqFlMEPLuDaRQ8Z3_gMEPs4x8euQItTxLM5YBdbfA6xhfwdz3CdylCddt3o7B8gQil4Fl14Kn3ZR9udCwW-vNY99Pvs9Lb-WV3-Or-oZ5eV51KaCppG6Qa40E3ndes91cKvISWnIEAZSVtoQBCluddaqqb1TAkqlBnZlu-hH5vcu1WzhNZDHLIL9i73S5efbHK9_diJ_cLO04MVxkynko8BB68BOd2voAx22RcPIbgIaVUsHS805YxJM0r5RupzKiVD9zaGErv-hr06sf9_Y3R9e7_hm-ff-UeB2AgeUxggl79h9QjZLsCFYfGSJ7VhFSNUEU6mpFpThj8DP2-Vgw</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Wong, Martin C.S.</creator><creator>Ching, Jessica Y.L.</creator><creator>Chan, Victor C.W.</creator><creator>Lam, Thomas Y.T.</creator><creator>Luk, Arthur K.C.</creator><creator>Wong, Sunny H.</creator><creator>Ng, Siew C.</creator><creator>Ng, Simon S.M.</creator><creator>Wu, Justin C.Y.</creator><creator>Chan, Francis K.L.</creator><creator>Sung, Joseph J.Y.</creator><general>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Age and Gender: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</title><author>Wong, Martin C.S. ; Ching, Jessica Y.L. ; Chan, Victor C.W. ; Lam, Thomas Y.T. ; Luk, Arthur K.C. ; Wong, Sunny H. ; Ng, Siew C. ; Ng, Simon S.M. ; Wu, Justin C.Y. ; Chan, Francis K.L. ; Sung, Joseph J.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3559-ebb67be347bfc7dcc174ccccc5531e4e6951debe40673c7756bdc2641469be4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - economics</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Economic Evaluation Study</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, Martin C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ching, Jessica Y.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Victor C.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Thomas Y.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luk, Arthur K.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Sunny H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Siew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Simon S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Justin C.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Francis K.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung, Joseph J.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, Martin C.S.</au><au>Ching, Jessica Y.L.</au><au>Chan, Victor C.W.</au><au>Lam, Thomas Y.T.</au><au>Luk, Arthur K.C.</au><au>Wong, Sunny H.</au><au>Ng, Siew C.</au><au>Ng, Simon S.M.</au><au>Wu, Justin C.Y.</au><au>Chan, Francis K.L.</au><au>Sung, Joseph J.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Age and Gender: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e2739</spage><epage>e2739</epage><pages>e2739-e2739</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>We evaluated whether age- and gender-based colorectal cancer screening is cost-effective.Recent studies in the United States identified age and gender as 2 important variables predicting advanced proximal neoplasia, and that women aged <60 to 70 years were more suited for sigmoidoscopy screening due to their low risk of proximal neoplasia. Yet, quantitative assessment of the incremental benefits, risks, and cost remains to be performed.Primary care screening practice (2008-2015).A Markov modeling was constructed using data from a screening cohort. The following strategies were compared according to the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) for 1 life-year saved: flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) 5 yearly; colonoscopy 10 yearly; FS for each woman at 50- and 55-year old followed by colonoscopy at 60- and 70-year old; FS for each woman at 50-, 55-, 60-, and 65-year old followed by colonoscopy at 70-year old; FS for each woman at 50-, 55-, 60-, 65-, and 70-year old. All male subjects received colonoscopy at 50-, 60-, and 70-year old under strategies 3 to 5.From a hypothetical population of 100,000 asymptomatic subjects, strategy 2 could save the largest number of life-years (4226 vs 2268 to 3841 by other strategies). When compared with no screening, strategy 5 had the lowest ICER (US$42,515), followed by strategy 3 (US$43,517), strategy 2 (US$43,739), strategy 4 (US$47,710), and strategy 1 (US$56,510). Strategy 2 leads to the highest number of bleeding and perforations, and required a prohibitive number of colonoscopy procedures. Strategy 5 remains the most cost-effective when assessed with a wide range of deterministic sensitivity analyses around the base case.From the cost effectiveness analysis, FS for women and colonoscopy for men represent an economically favorable screening strategy. These findings could inform physicians and policy-makers in triaging eligible subjects for risk-based screening, especially in countries with limited colonoscopic resources. Future research should study the acceptability, feasibility, and feasibility of this risk-based strategy in different populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26962772</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000002739</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
| ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2016-03, Vol.95 (10), p.e2739-e2739 |
| issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4998853 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wolters Kluwer Open Health; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Age Factors Aged Colonoscopy - methods Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Colorectal Neoplasms - economics Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Cost-Benefit Analysis Early Detection of Cancer - economics Early Detection of Cancer - methods Economic Evaluation Study Female Humans Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Staging Patient Selection Sex Factors Sigmoidoscopy - methods Sigmoidoscopy - statistics & numerical data United States - epidemiology |
| title | Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Age and Gender: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T04%3A37%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colorectal%20Cancer%20Screening%20Based%20on%20Age%20and%20Gender:%20A%20Cost-Effectiveness%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Wong,%20Martin%20C.S.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e2739&rft.epage=e2739&rft.pages=e2739-e2739&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000002739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1772832259%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772832259&rft_id=info:pmid/26962772&rfr_iscdi=true |