Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting
Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback 2016-09, Vol.41 (3), p.349-362 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 362 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 349 |
| container_title | Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback |
| container_volume | 41 |
| creator | Ströfer, Sabine Ufkes, Elze G. Noordzij, Matthijs L. Giebels, Ellen |
| description | Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4992020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712209699</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712209699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-1aea4dc49d01f190a1e17a8a128e66a0ef30f89e90ffc820657a51a7b86a44123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwA7igSFx6SZlxEn9wQFotX5UqgQQ9W15nsusq6yy2d1H_PQ4ppUUgIR888jzzamb8FsVzhDMEEK8iQiObCpBXqq5VJR8Ux9iKuqqZgIc5BgUVtJIfFU9ivAIAxRU-Lo6YQFVjzY6L1dIku3F-XZryLVlyBwql82XaULmw6XX5OYyWYqRYXvqOwnA9sRO5S270E2p8ee4TBWNTrp7jg6Pv5RdKKdNPi0e9GSI9u7lPisv3774uP1YXnz6cLxcXlW0FpAoNmaazjeoAe1RgkFAYaZBJ4twA9TX0UpGCvreSAW-FadGIleSmaZDVJ8WbWXe3X22ps-RTMIPeBbc14VqPxun7Ge82ej0edKMUAwZZ4PRGIIzf9hST3rpoaRiMp3EfNUpsuVItyv9BmcxNijqjL_9Ar8Z98HkTPykONRfsN7U2A2nn-zG3aCdRvRDI2PRzKlNnf6Hy6Wjr7Oipd_n9XgHOBTaMMQbqb9eBoCcP6dlDOntITx7S02wv7u7xtuKXaTLAZiDmlF9TuDPRP1V_AIOjz-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1812603672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Complete Journals</source><creator>Ströfer, Sabine ; Ufkes, Elze G. ; Noordzij, Matthijs L. ; Giebels, Ellen</creator><creatorcontrib>Ströfer, Sabine ; Ufkes, Elze G. ; Noordzij, Matthijs L. ; Giebels, Ellen</creatorcontrib><description>Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-0586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27193132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biofeedback ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognitive load ; Cues ; Deception ; Female ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Intention ; Interviews ; Interviews as Topic ; Lying ; Male ; Nervous system ; Physiology ; Psychology ; Psychotherapy and Counseling ; Public Health ; Self report ; Sympathetic Nervous System - physiology</subject><ispartof>Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2016-09, Vol.41 (3), p.349-362</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-1aea4dc49d01f190a1e17a8a128e66a0ef30f89e90ffc820657a51a7b86a44123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-1aea4dc49d01f190a1e17a8a128e66a0ef30f89e90ffc820657a51a7b86a44123</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ströfer, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ufkes, Elze G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noordzij, Matthijs L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giebels, Ellen</creatorcontrib><title>Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting</title><title>Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback</title><addtitle>Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback</addtitle><addtitle>Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback</addtitle><description>Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biofeedback</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive load</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Lying</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychotherapy and Counseling</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiology</subject><issn>1090-0586</issn><issn>1573-3270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwA7igSFx6SZlxEn9wQFotX5UqgQQ9W15nsusq6yy2d1H_PQ4ppUUgIR888jzzamb8FsVzhDMEEK8iQiObCpBXqq5VJR8Ux9iKuqqZgIc5BgUVtJIfFU9ivAIAxRU-Lo6YQFVjzY6L1dIku3F-XZryLVlyBwql82XaULmw6XX5OYyWYqRYXvqOwnA9sRO5S270E2p8ee4TBWNTrp7jg6Pv5RdKKdNPi0e9GSI9u7lPisv3774uP1YXnz6cLxcXlW0FpAoNmaazjeoAe1RgkFAYaZBJ4twA9TX0UpGCvreSAW-FadGIleSmaZDVJ8WbWXe3X22ps-RTMIPeBbc14VqPxun7Ge82ej0edKMUAwZZ4PRGIIzf9hST3rpoaRiMp3EfNUpsuVItyv9BmcxNijqjL_9Ar8Z98HkTPykONRfsN7U2A2nn-zG3aCdRvRDI2PRzKlNnf6Hy6Wjr7Oipd_n9XgHOBTaMMQbqb9eBoCcP6dlDOntITx7S02wv7u7xtuKXaTLAZiDmlF9TuDPRP1V_AIOjz-c</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Ströfer, Sabine</creator><creator>Ufkes, Elze G.</creator><creator>Noordzij, Matthijs L.</creator><creator>Giebels, Ellen</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting</title><author>Ströfer, Sabine ; Ufkes, Elze G. ; Noordzij, Matthijs L. ; Giebels, Ellen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c570t-1aea4dc49d01f190a1e17a8a128e66a0ef30f89e90ffc820657a51a7b86a44123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biofeedback</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive load</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Lying</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychotherapy and Counseling</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ströfer, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ufkes, Elze G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noordzij, Matthijs L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giebels, Ellen</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ströfer, Sabine</au><au>Ufkes, Elze G.</au><au>Noordzij, Matthijs L.</au><au>Giebels, Ellen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting</atitle><jtitle>Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback</jtitle><stitle>Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback</stitle><addtitle>Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>349-362</pages><issn>1090-0586</issn><eissn>1573-3270</eissn><abstract>Lying is known to evoke stress and cognitive load. Both form cues to deception and lead to an increase in sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity. But in reality, deceivers stick to the truth most the time and only lie occasionally. The present study therefore examined in an interactive suspect interview setting, whether deceivers still have clearly diverging cognitive and emotional processes from truth tellers when only having the intention to lie incidentally. We found that deceivers who lied constantly diverge from truth tellers in SNS activity, self-reported cognitive load and stress. Across all interviews, SNS activity correlated stronger with self-reports of cognitive load than stress, which supports the cognitive load approach. Furthermore, deceivers who told the truth and lied on only one crucial question, particularly diverged in self-reported stress from truth-tellers. In terms of SNS activity and self-reported cognitive load, no differences were found. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27193132</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1090-0586 |
| ispartof | Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2016-09, Vol.41 (3), p.349-362 |
| issn | 1090-0586 1573-3270 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4992020 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Complete Journals |
| subjects | Adult Behavioral Science and Psychology Biofeedback Cognition & reasoning Cognition - physiology Cognitive load Cues Deception Female Health Psychology Humans Intention Interviews Interviews as Topic Lying Male Nervous system Physiology Psychology Psychotherapy and Counseling Public Health Self report Sympathetic Nervous System - physiology |
| title | Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A02%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catching%20a%20Deceiver%20in%20the%20Act:%20Processes%20Underlying%20Deception%20in%20an%20Interactive%20Interview%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Applied%20psychophysiology%20and%20biofeedback&rft.au=Str%C3%B6fer,%20Sabine&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=349-362&rft.issn=1090-0586&rft.eissn=1573-3270&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10484-016-9339-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA712209699%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1812603672&rft_id=info:pmid/27193132&rft_galeid=A712209699&rfr_iscdi=true |