Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts
The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Rou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of surgery 2016-08, Vol.78 (4), p.259-264 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 264 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 259 |
container_title | Indian journal of surgery |
container_volume | 78 |
creator | Tang, Yingming Li, Fei He, Guoqing |
description | The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age (
P
= 0.697) and sex distribution (
P
= 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min,
P
= 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml,
P
= 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days,
P
= 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days,
P
= 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days,
P
= 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4987549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470441875</galeid><sourcerecordid>A470441875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEohd4ADYoEhs2Lr7GyQapigqtNBISlwUry3HsGY8SO8RJaZ6CV-ZMpy1TBPLCPvZ3fvsc_1n2iuAzgrF8lwilBUWYCEQYL9HyJDvGlWSokhV7erumiOKiPMpOUtpiTHnB2PPsiEohOePkOPtVx37Qo08x5NHlX3xYdxZdBeOThy0d2ryO4dqGCULd5SsNdEwmDt7k9ZKm_OLmgP0c5xtkA_qeX9pBT97Erd3OIaYp9kvu4pjXG9-1ow35Tz9tIIqdbaPZgPROLb3InjndJfvybj7Nvn24-FpfotWnj1f1-QoZweSEaNtobEppGuoEdpbgghLMCmcK4YgoTNMyJi1pXKWpIw2x2jHDiCSat0Jrdpq93-sOc9Pb1kCBo-7UMPpej4uK2qvHJ8Fv1DpeK16VUvAKBN7eCYzxx2zTpHqfjO06HWyckyIlPKPEQu7QN3-h2ziP0M1biggG31H-oda6s8oHF-FesxNV51xizglcDNTZPygYre2h28E6D_uPEsg-wcC3pdG6hxoJVjsXqb2LFLhI7VykFsh5fdich4x72wBA90CCo7C240FF_1X9Dc4U1YY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811532758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tang, Yingming ; Li, Fei ; He, Guoqing</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yingming ; Li, Fei ; He, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age (
P
= 0.697) and sex distribution (
P
= 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min,
P
= 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml,
P
= 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days,
P
= 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days,
P
= 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days,
P
= 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-2068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-9793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27574341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Birth defects ; Cardiac Surgery ; Cysts ; Laparoscopy ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Original ; Original Article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Plastic Surgery ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical techniques ; Thoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgery, 2016-08, Vol.78 (4), p.259-264</ispartof><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987549/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987549/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</title><title>Indian journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age (
P
= 0.697) and sex distribution (
P
= 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min,
P
= 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml,
P
= 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days,
P
= 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days,
P
= 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days,
P
= 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><issn>0972-2068</issn><issn>0973-9793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEohd4ADYoEhs2Lr7GyQapigqtNBISlwUry3HsGY8SO8RJaZ6CV-ZMpy1TBPLCPvZ3fvsc_1n2iuAzgrF8lwilBUWYCEQYL9HyJDvGlWSokhV7erumiOKiPMpOUtpiTHnB2PPsiEohOePkOPtVx37Qo08x5NHlX3xYdxZdBeOThy0d2ryO4dqGCULd5SsNdEwmDt7k9ZKm_OLmgP0c5xtkA_qeX9pBT97Erd3OIaYp9kvu4pjXG9-1ow35Tz9tIIqdbaPZgPROLb3InjndJfvybj7Nvn24-FpfotWnj1f1-QoZweSEaNtobEppGuoEdpbgghLMCmcK4YgoTNMyJi1pXKWpIw2x2jHDiCSat0Jrdpq93-sOc9Pb1kCBo-7UMPpej4uK2qvHJ8Fv1DpeK16VUvAKBN7eCYzxx2zTpHqfjO06HWyckyIlPKPEQu7QN3-h2ziP0M1biggG31H-oda6s8oHF-FesxNV51xizglcDNTZPygYre2h28E6D_uPEsg-wcC3pdG6hxoJVjsXqb2LFLhI7VykFsh5fdich4x72wBA90CCo7C240FF_1X9Dc4U1YY</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Tang, Yingming</creator><creator>Li, Fei</creator><creator>He, Guoqing</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</title><author>Tang, Yingming ; Li, Fei ; He, Guoqing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Health & Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Yingming</au><au>Li, Fei</au><au>He, Guoqing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Surg</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>259-264</pages><issn>0972-2068</issn><eissn>0973-9793</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age (
P
= 0.697) and sex distribution (
P
= 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min,
P
= 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml,
P
= 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days,
P
= 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days,
P
= 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days,
P
= 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>27574341</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0972-2068 |
ispartof | Indian journal of surgery, 2016-08, Vol.78 (4), p.259-264 |
issn | 0972-2068 0973-9793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4987549 |
source | PMC (PubMed Central); SpringerLink Journals (MCLS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Analysis Birth defects Cardiac Surgery Cysts Laparoscopy Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neurosurgery Original Original Article Pediatric Surgery Plastic Surgery Surgeons Surgery Surgical techniques Thoracic Surgery |
title | Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A26%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Single-Incision%20and%20Conventional%20Laparoscopic%20Cyst%20Excision%20and%20Roux-en-Y%20Hepaticojejunostomy%20for%20Children%20with%20Choledochal%20Cysts&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Tang,%20Yingming&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=259-264&rft.issn=0972-2068&rft.eissn=0973-9793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA470441875%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811532758&rft_id=info:pmid/27574341&rft_galeid=A470441875&rfr_iscdi=true |