Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Rou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of surgery 2016-08, Vol.78 (4), p.259-264
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Yingming, Li, Fei, He, Guoqing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 264
container_issue 4
container_start_page 259
container_title Indian journal of surgery
container_volume 78
creator Tang, Yingming
Li, Fei
He, Guoqing
description The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age ( P  = 0.697) and sex distribution ( P  = 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min, P  = 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml, P  = 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days, P  = 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days, P  = 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days, P  = 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4987549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A470441875</galeid><sourcerecordid>A470441875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEohd4ADYoEhs2Lr7GyQapigqtNBISlwUry3HsGY8SO8RJaZ6CV-ZMpy1TBPLCPvZ3fvsc_1n2iuAzgrF8lwilBUWYCEQYL9HyJDvGlWSokhV7erumiOKiPMpOUtpiTHnB2PPsiEohOePkOPtVx37Qo08x5NHlX3xYdxZdBeOThy0d2ryO4dqGCULd5SsNdEwmDt7k9ZKm_OLmgP0c5xtkA_qeX9pBT97Erd3OIaYp9kvu4pjXG9-1ow35Tz9tIIqdbaPZgPROLb3InjndJfvybj7Nvn24-FpfotWnj1f1-QoZweSEaNtobEppGuoEdpbgghLMCmcK4YgoTNMyJi1pXKWpIw2x2jHDiCSat0Jrdpq93-sOc9Pb1kCBo-7UMPpej4uK2qvHJ8Fv1DpeK16VUvAKBN7eCYzxx2zTpHqfjO06HWyckyIlPKPEQu7QN3-h2ziP0M1biggG31H-oda6s8oHF-FesxNV51xizglcDNTZPygYre2h28E6D_uPEsg-wcC3pdG6hxoJVjsXqb2LFLhI7VykFsh5fdich4x72wBA90CCo7C240FF_1X9Dc4U1YY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811532758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Tang, Yingming ; Li, Fei ; He, Guoqing</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yingming ; Li, Fei ; He, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age ( P  = 0.697) and sex distribution ( P  = 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min, P  = 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml, P  = 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days, P  = 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days, P  = 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days, P  = 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-2068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-9793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27574341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Birth defects ; Cardiac Surgery ; Cysts ; Laparoscopy ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurosurgery ; Original ; Original Article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Plastic Surgery ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical techniques ; Thoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgery, 2016-08, Vol.78 (4), p.259-264</ispartof><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2015</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Springer</rights><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987549/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987549/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</title><title>Indian journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age ( P  = 0.697) and sex distribution ( P  = 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min, P  = 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml, P  = 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days, P  = 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days, P  = 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days, P  = 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Birth defects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><issn>0972-2068</issn><issn>0973-9793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kstu1DAUhiMEohd4ADYoEhs2Lr7GyQapigqtNBISlwUry3HsGY8SO8RJaZ6CV-ZMpy1TBPLCPvZ3fvsc_1n2iuAzgrF8lwilBUWYCEQYL9HyJDvGlWSokhV7erumiOKiPMpOUtpiTHnB2PPsiEohOePkOPtVx37Qo08x5NHlX3xYdxZdBeOThy0d2ryO4dqGCULd5SsNdEwmDt7k9ZKm_OLmgP0c5xtkA_qeX9pBT97Erd3OIaYp9kvu4pjXG9-1ow35Tz9tIIqdbaPZgPROLb3InjndJfvybj7Nvn24-FpfotWnj1f1-QoZweSEaNtobEppGuoEdpbgghLMCmcK4YgoTNMyJi1pXKWpIw2x2jHDiCSat0Jrdpq93-sOc9Pb1kCBo-7UMPpej4uK2qvHJ8Fv1DpeK16VUvAKBN7eCYzxx2zTpHqfjO06HWyckyIlPKPEQu7QN3-h2ziP0M1biggG31H-oda6s8oHF-FesxNV51xizglcDNTZPygYre2h28E6D_uPEsg-wcC3pdG6hxoJVjsXqb2LFLhI7VykFsh5fdich4x72wBA90CCo7C240FF_1X9Dc4U1YY</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Tang, Yingming</creator><creator>Li, Fei</creator><creator>He, Guoqing</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</title><author>Tang, Yingming ; Li, Fei ; He, Guoqing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c537t-2dba0c87cb2f50fe10621036fc65f156cbd337e1bf9a2f1b1eaf3c3171a4d5aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Birth defects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yingming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Guoqing</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Health &amp; Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Yingming</au><au>Li, Fei</au><au>He, Guoqing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Surg</stitle><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>264</epage><pages>259-264</pages><issn>0972-2068</issn><eissn>0973-9793</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the potential benefits of single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy comparing the conventional laparoscopic procedures. From January 2013 to July 2013, 17 consecutive children with choledochal cysts received single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomies by a single surgeon at our institution. Seventeen standard laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomies of consecutive children with choledochal cysts from July 2012 to December 2012 were employed as control. Demographic and perioperative information was identified retrospectively using clinic and hospital records including gender, age, total operating time, estimated blood loss, time to oral intake, drainage removal time, postoperative complications, and postoperative hospital stay. One patient was converted to open surgery and another 8-year-old boy conversed to conventional four-port laparoscopic procedure. There were no significant differences between the conventional laparoscopic group and the single-incision laparoscopic group with regard to preoperative variables including age ( P  = 0.697) and sex distribution ( P  = 1.000). For mean operative time (209.9 ± 7.5 vs 204.1 ± 6.9 min, P  = 0.951), estimated blood loss (10.7 ± 1.1 vs 13.4 ± 1.7 ml, P  = 0.103), time to oral intake (3.73 ± 0.21 vs 3.77 ± 0.20 days, P  = 0.889), drainage removal time (4.20 ± 0.45 vs 4.06 ± 0.23 days, P  = 0.067), and postoperative hospital stay (7.60 ± 0.25 vs 7.41 ± 0.21 days, P  = 0.627), the differences were also nonsignificant. Nevertheless, this technique demonstrated improved cosmetic outcomes comparing with the conventional laparoscopic group. The results showed better cosmetic results and comparable postoperative outcomes. However, well-designed prospective studies are warranted to better address this issue.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><pmid>27574341</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-2068
ispartof Indian journal of surgery, 2016-08, Vol.78 (4), p.259-264
issn 0972-2068
0973-9793
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4987549
source PMC (PubMed Central); SpringerLink Journals (MCLS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Analysis
Birth defects
Cardiac Surgery
Cysts
Laparoscopy
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurosurgery
Original
Original Article
Pediatric Surgery
Plastic Surgery
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical techniques
Thoracic Surgery
title Comparison of Single-Incision and Conventional Laparoscopic Cyst Excision and Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Children with Choledochal Cysts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A26%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Single-Incision%20and%20Conventional%20Laparoscopic%20Cyst%20Excision%20and%20Roux-en-Y%20Hepaticojejunostomy%20for%20Children%20with%20Choledochal%20Cysts&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Tang,%20Yingming&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=264&rft.pages=259-264&rft.issn=0972-2068&rft.eissn=0973-9793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12262-015-1348-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA470441875%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811532758&rft_id=info:pmid/27574341&rft_galeid=A470441875&rfr_iscdi=true