Knowledge translation of an online tool to determine candidacy for epilepsy surgery evaluation
Guidelines recommend that surgery be considered in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, yet delays to epilepsy surgery still exist. A Web-based, evidence-informed clinical decision tool (www.toolsforepilepsy.com) was developed to help physicians determine which patients are appropriate for an epil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurology. Clinical practice 2016-08, Vol.6 (4), p.304-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 314 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 304 |
container_title | Neurology. Clinical practice |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Sauro, Khara M Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Wiebe, Samuel Quan, Hude Cooke, Lara Cross, J Helen Mathern, Gary W Armson, Heather Stromer, Julie Jetté, Nathalie |
description | Guidelines recommend that surgery be considered in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, yet delays to epilepsy surgery still exist. A Web-based, evidence-informed clinical decision tool (www.toolsforepilepsy.com) was developed to help physicians determine which patients are appropriate for an epilepsy surgery evaluation. We evaluated the usability and feasibility of the tool with the intended end users in order to improve implementation into practice.
Usability testing was conducted with relevant end users. After the tool was modified based on usability results, another group of end users trialed the tool in their clinical practice. This latter group of end users then participated in focus groups and semi-structured interviews to address barriers and facilitators to tool implementation. Finally, a stakeholder meeting was held with domain experts and end users to discuss further changes to the tool and implementation strategies.
Six overall themes were identified through usability testing, and an additional 11 themes were identified through the focus groups and interviews. The tool was modified based on these findings, which were then presented at the stakeholder meeting of experts and end users for further refinement. The findings were also used to guide discussions of potential implementation strategies at the meeting.
This study provides guidance on how to improve the usability of clinical decision tools by engaging end users, experts, and other key stakeholders. The modifications to the tool should facilitate its implementation in clinical practice and ultimately enhance the quality of care persons with epilepsy receive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000250 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4987121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1859739222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fe566dc56b00b0c27dc160e3bfc7eaf2f734b067b64db24e27ea4a98697ced863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1PAyEQJUajpvoPjNmjl1YWWNi9mJjG7yZ60KuEhdm6hkKF3Zr-e6nWpsphmMy892DmIXSS41FOcnI-frof4e1DCryDDknO6RBXlO7-5gyTA3Qc4_sKxHFOSbWPDogoBCt4dYheH5z_tGCmkHVBuWhV13qX-SZTKTrbutTw3qaQGeggzFYVrZxpjdLLrPEhg3lrYR6XWezDFMIyg4Wy_bfQEdprlI1wvL4H6OX66nl8O5w83tyNLydDzXDZDRsoODe64DXGNdZEGJ1zDLRutADVkEZQVmMuas5MTRiQVGWqKnklNJiS0wG6-NGd9_UMjAaXprFyHtqZCkvpVSv_dlz7Jqd-IVlVirTRJHC2Fgj-o4fYyVkbNVirHPg-yrwsKkErQkiCsh-oDj7GAM3mmRzLlTsyuSP_u5Nop9tf3JB-vaBfxOWNgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1859739222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge translation of an online tool to determine candidacy for epilepsy surgery evaluation</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Sauro, Khara M ; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna ; Wiebe, Samuel ; Quan, Hude ; Cooke, Lara ; Cross, J Helen ; Mathern, Gary W ; Armson, Heather ; Stromer, Julie ; Jetté, Nathalie</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauro, Khara M ; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna ; Wiebe, Samuel ; Quan, Hude ; Cooke, Lara ; Cross, J Helen ; Mathern, Gary W ; Armson, Heather ; Stromer, Julie ; Jetté, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><description>Guidelines recommend that surgery be considered in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, yet delays to epilepsy surgery still exist. A Web-based, evidence-informed clinical decision tool (www.toolsforepilepsy.com) was developed to help physicians determine which patients are appropriate for an epilepsy surgery evaluation. We evaluated the usability and feasibility of the tool with the intended end users in order to improve implementation into practice.
Usability testing was conducted with relevant end users. After the tool was modified based on usability results, another group of end users trialed the tool in their clinical practice. This latter group of end users then participated in focus groups and semi-structured interviews to address barriers and facilitators to tool implementation. Finally, a stakeholder meeting was held with domain experts and end users to discuss further changes to the tool and implementation strategies.
Six overall themes were identified through usability testing, and an additional 11 themes were identified through the focus groups and interviews. The tool was modified based on these findings, which were then presented at the stakeholder meeting of experts and end users for further refinement. The findings were also used to guide discussions of potential implementation strategies at the meeting.
This study provides guidance on how to improve the usability of clinical decision tools by engaging end users, experts, and other key stakeholders. The modifications to the tool should facilitate its implementation in clinical practice and ultimately enhance the quality of care persons with epilepsy receive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2163-0402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2163-0933</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000250</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27574569</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Neurology. Clinical practice, 2016-08, Vol.6 (4), p.304-314</ispartof><rights>2016 American Academy of Neurology 2016 American Academy of Neurology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fe566dc56b00b0c27dc160e3bfc7eaf2f734b067b64db24e27ea4a98697ced863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fe566dc56b00b0c27dc160e3bfc7eaf2f734b067b64db24e27ea4a98697ced863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987121/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987121/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27574569$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauro, Khara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, J Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathern, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armson, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromer, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jetté, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge translation of an online tool to determine candidacy for epilepsy surgery evaluation</title><title>Neurology. Clinical practice</title><addtitle>Neurol Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Guidelines recommend that surgery be considered in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, yet delays to epilepsy surgery still exist. A Web-based, evidence-informed clinical decision tool (www.toolsforepilepsy.com) was developed to help physicians determine which patients are appropriate for an epilepsy surgery evaluation. We evaluated the usability and feasibility of the tool with the intended end users in order to improve implementation into practice.
Usability testing was conducted with relevant end users. After the tool was modified based on usability results, another group of end users trialed the tool in their clinical practice. This latter group of end users then participated in focus groups and semi-structured interviews to address barriers and facilitators to tool implementation. Finally, a stakeholder meeting was held with domain experts and end users to discuss further changes to the tool and implementation strategies.
Six overall themes were identified through usability testing, and an additional 11 themes were identified through the focus groups and interviews. The tool was modified based on these findings, which were then presented at the stakeholder meeting of experts and end users for further refinement. The findings were also used to guide discussions of potential implementation strategies at the meeting.
This study provides guidance on how to improve the usability of clinical decision tools by engaging end users, experts, and other key stakeholders. The modifications to the tool should facilitate its implementation in clinical practice and ultimately enhance the quality of care persons with epilepsy receive.</description><issn>2163-0402</issn><issn>2163-0933</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUU1PAyEQJUajpvoPjNmjl1YWWNi9mJjG7yZ60KuEhdm6hkKF3Zr-e6nWpsphmMy892DmIXSS41FOcnI-frof4e1DCryDDknO6RBXlO7-5gyTA3Qc4_sKxHFOSbWPDogoBCt4dYheH5z_tGCmkHVBuWhV13qX-SZTKTrbutTw3qaQGeggzFYVrZxpjdLLrPEhg3lrYR6XWezDFMIyg4Wy_bfQEdprlI1wvL4H6OX66nl8O5w83tyNLydDzXDZDRsoODe64DXGNdZEGJ1zDLRutADVkEZQVmMuas5MTRiQVGWqKnklNJiS0wG6-NGd9_UMjAaXprFyHtqZCkvpVSv_dlz7Jqd-IVlVirTRJHC2Fgj-o4fYyVkbNVirHPg-yrwsKkErQkiCsh-oDj7GAM3mmRzLlTsyuSP_u5Nop9tf3JB-vaBfxOWNgA</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Sauro, Khara M</creator><creator>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</creator><creator>Wiebe, Samuel</creator><creator>Quan, Hude</creator><creator>Cooke, Lara</creator><creator>Cross, J Helen</creator><creator>Mathern, Gary W</creator><creator>Armson, Heather</creator><creator>Stromer, Julie</creator><creator>Jetté, Nathalie</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Knowledge translation of an online tool to determine candidacy for epilepsy surgery evaluation</title><author>Sauro, Khara M ; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna ; Wiebe, Samuel ; Quan, Hude ; Cooke, Lara ; Cross, J Helen ; Mathern, Gary W ; Armson, Heather ; Stromer, Julie ; Jetté, Nathalie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-fe566dc56b00b0c27dc160e3bfc7eaf2f734b067b64db24e27ea4a98697ced863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauro, Khara M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiebe, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, J Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathern, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armson, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stromer, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jetté, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurology. Clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauro, Khara M</au><au>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</au><au>Wiebe, Samuel</au><au>Quan, Hude</au><au>Cooke, Lara</au><au>Cross, J Helen</au><au>Mathern, Gary W</au><au>Armson, Heather</au><au>Stromer, Julie</au><au>Jetté, Nathalie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge translation of an online tool to determine candidacy for epilepsy surgery evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Neurology. Clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Neurol Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>304-314</pages><issn>2163-0402</issn><eissn>2163-0933</eissn><abstract>Guidelines recommend that surgery be considered in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, yet delays to epilepsy surgery still exist. A Web-based, evidence-informed clinical decision tool (www.toolsforepilepsy.com) was developed to help physicians determine which patients are appropriate for an epilepsy surgery evaluation. We evaluated the usability and feasibility of the tool with the intended end users in order to improve implementation into practice.
Usability testing was conducted with relevant end users. After the tool was modified based on usability results, another group of end users trialed the tool in their clinical practice. This latter group of end users then participated in focus groups and semi-structured interviews to address barriers and facilitators to tool implementation. Finally, a stakeholder meeting was held with domain experts and end users to discuss further changes to the tool and implementation strategies.
Six overall themes were identified through usability testing, and an additional 11 themes were identified through the focus groups and interviews. The tool was modified based on these findings, which were then presented at the stakeholder meeting of experts and end users for further refinement. The findings were also used to guide discussions of potential implementation strategies at the meeting.
This study provides guidance on how to improve the usability of clinical decision tools by engaging end users, experts, and other key stakeholders. The modifications to the tool should facilitate its implementation in clinical practice and ultimately enhance the quality of care persons with epilepsy receive.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>27574569</pmid><doi>10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000250</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2163-0402 |
ispartof | Neurology. Clinical practice, 2016-08, Vol.6 (4), p.304-314 |
issn | 2163-0402 2163-0933 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4987121 |
source | PMC (PubMed Central); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Journals@Ovid Complete |
title | Knowledge translation of an online tool to determine candidacy for epilepsy surgery evaluation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T07%3A56%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20translation%20of%20an%20online%20tool%20to%20determine%20candidacy%20for%20epilepsy%20surgery%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Neurology.%20Clinical%20practice&rft.au=Sauro,%20Khara%20M&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=304-314&rft.issn=2163-0402&rft.eissn=2163-0933&rft_id=info:doi/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1859739222%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1859739222&rft_id=info:pmid/27574569&rfr_iscdi=true |