The relationship between endogenous thymidine concentrations and [18F]FLT uptake in a range of preclinical tumour models

Background Recent studies have shown that 3′-deoxy-3′-[ 18 F] fluorothymidine ([ 18 F]FLT)) uptake depends on endogenous tumour thymidine concentration. The purpose of this study was to investigate tumour thymidine concentrations and whether they correlated with [ 18 F]FLT uptake across a broad spec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:EJNMMI research 2016-12, Vol.6 (1), p.63-10, Article 63
Hauptverfasser: Heinzmann, Kathrin, Honess, Davina Jean, Lewis, David Yestin, Smith, Donna-Michelle, Cawthorne, Christopher, Keen, Heather, Heskamp, Sandra, Schelhaas, Sonja, Witney, Timothy Howard, Soloviev, Dmitry, Williams, Kaye Janine, Jacobs, Andreas Hans, Aboagye, Eric Ofori, Griffiths, John Richard, Brindle, Kevin Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title EJNMMI research
container_volume 6
creator Heinzmann, Kathrin
Honess, Davina Jean
Lewis, David Yestin
Smith, Donna-Michelle
Cawthorne, Christopher
Keen, Heather
Heskamp, Sandra
Schelhaas, Sonja
Witney, Timothy Howard
Soloviev, Dmitry
Williams, Kaye Janine
Jacobs, Andreas Hans
Aboagye, Eric Ofori
Griffiths, John Richard
Brindle, Kevin Michael
description Background Recent studies have shown that 3′-deoxy-3′-[ 18 F] fluorothymidine ([ 18 F]FLT)) uptake depends on endogenous tumour thymidine concentration. The purpose of this study was to investigate tumour thymidine concentrations and whether they correlated with [ 18 F]FLT uptake across a broad spectrum of murine cancer models. A modified liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine endogenous thymidine concentrations in plasma and tissues of tumour-bearing and non-tumour bearing mice and rats. Thymidine concentrations were determined in 22 tumour models, including xenografts, syngeneic and spontaneous tumours, from six research centres, and a subset was compared for [ 18 F]FLT uptake, described by the maximum and mean tumour-to-liver uptake ratio (TTL) and SUV. Results The LC-MS/MS method used to measure thymidine in plasma and tissue was modified to improve sensitivity and reproducibility. Thymidine concentrations determined in the plasma of 7 murine strains and one rat strain were between 0.61 ± 0.12 μM and 2.04 ± 0.64 μM, while the concentrations in 22 tumour models ranged from 0.54 ± 0.17 μM to 20.65 ± 3.65 μM. TTL at 60 min after [ 18 F]FLT injection, determined in 14 of the 22 tumour models, ranged from 1.07 ± 0.16 to 5.22 ± 0.83 for the maximum and 0.67 ± 0.17 to 2.10 ± 0.18 for the mean uptake. TTL did not correlate with tumour thymidine concentrations. Conclusions Endogenous tumour thymidine concentrations alone are not predictive of [ 18 F]FLT uptake in murine cancer models.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13550-016-0218-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4980847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1815709676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-33adc6e5cb83186773b66eedf81b6806f66172dbeababe191adcd6158a39245f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rLuD_BGAt54U02a5qM3giw7Kgx4M4IgEtLkdCZrm9SkVfffm6HrMgqCuUgOnOe8OV8IPaXkJaVKvMqUcU4qQkVFaqoq9gCd17SlVbk-PTyxz9BlzjekHE55y9RjdFbLYjaNOEc_dwfACQYz-xjywU-4g_kHQMAQXNxDiEvG8-F29M4HwDYGC2FOK45NcPgzVZsvm-0OL9NsvgL2ARucTNgDjj2eEtjBB2_NgOdljEvCY3Qw5CfoUW-GDJd37wX6uLneXb2rth_evr96s60sJ2yuGDPOCuC2U6xULSXrhABwvaKdUET0QlBZuw5MZzooJRfcCcqVYW3d8J5doNer7rR0I7g1-0FPyY8m3epovP7TE_xB7-N33bSKqEYWgRd3Ail-WyDPevTZwjCYAKU5mirKJWmFFP-DUkZII4-qz_9Cb0pvQulEoQSvmazrplB0pWyKOSfo7_OmRB-3QK9boMsW6OMWaFZinp0WfB_xe-YFqFcgF1cZUzr5-p-qvwDDH78F</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1865237224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationship between endogenous thymidine concentrations and [18F]FLT uptake in a range of preclinical tumour models</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Heinzmann, Kathrin ; Honess, Davina Jean ; Lewis, David Yestin ; Smith, Donna-Michelle ; Cawthorne, Christopher ; Keen, Heather ; Heskamp, Sandra ; Schelhaas, Sonja ; Witney, Timothy Howard ; Soloviev, Dmitry ; Williams, Kaye Janine ; Jacobs, Andreas Hans ; Aboagye, Eric Ofori ; Griffiths, John Richard ; Brindle, Kevin Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Heinzmann, Kathrin ; Honess, Davina Jean ; Lewis, David Yestin ; Smith, Donna-Michelle ; Cawthorne, Christopher ; Keen, Heather ; Heskamp, Sandra ; Schelhaas, Sonja ; Witney, Timothy Howard ; Soloviev, Dmitry ; Williams, Kaye Janine ; Jacobs, Andreas Hans ; Aboagye, Eric Ofori ; Griffiths, John Richard ; Brindle, Kevin Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Background Recent studies have shown that 3′-deoxy-3′-[ 18 F] fluorothymidine ([ 18 F]FLT)) uptake depends on endogenous tumour thymidine concentration. The purpose of this study was to investigate tumour thymidine concentrations and whether they correlated with [ 18 F]FLT uptake across a broad spectrum of murine cancer models. A modified liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine endogenous thymidine concentrations in plasma and tissues of tumour-bearing and non-tumour bearing mice and rats. Thymidine concentrations were determined in 22 tumour models, including xenografts, syngeneic and spontaneous tumours, from six research centres, and a subset was compared for [ 18 F]FLT uptake, described by the maximum and mean tumour-to-liver uptake ratio (TTL) and SUV. Results The LC-MS/MS method used to measure thymidine in plasma and tissue was modified to improve sensitivity and reproducibility. Thymidine concentrations determined in the plasma of 7 murine strains and one rat strain were between 0.61 ± 0.12 μM and 2.04 ± 0.64 μM, while the concentrations in 22 tumour models ranged from 0.54 ± 0.17 μM to 20.65 ± 3.65 μM. TTL at 60 min after [ 18 F]FLT injection, determined in 14 of the 22 tumour models, ranged from 1.07 ± 0.16 to 5.22 ± 0.83 for the maximum and 0.67 ± 0.17 to 2.10 ± 0.18 for the mean uptake. TTL did not correlate with tumour thymidine concentrations. Conclusions Endogenous tumour thymidine concentrations alone are not predictive of [ 18 F]FLT uptake in murine cancer models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2191-219X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2191-219X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0218-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27515446</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cardiac Imaging ; Imaging ; Liquid chromatography ; Liver ; Mass spectrometry ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Orthopedics ; Radiology ; Rats ; Reproducibility ; Research facilities ; Thymidine</subject><ispartof>EJNMMI research, 2016-12, Vol.6 (1), p.63-10, Article 63</ispartof><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><rights>EJNMMI Research is a copyright of Springer, (2016). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-33adc6e5cb83186773b66eedf81b6806f66172dbeababe191adcd6158a39245f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-33adc6e5cb83186773b66eedf81b6806f66172dbeababe191adcd6158a39245f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4980847/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4980847/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,41488,42189,42557,51319,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27515446$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heinzmann, Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honess, Davina Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, David Yestin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Donna-Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawthorne, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keen, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heskamp, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelhaas, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witney, Timothy Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soloviev, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kaye Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Andreas Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboagye, Eric Ofori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, John Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Kevin Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The relationship between endogenous thymidine concentrations and [18F]FLT uptake in a range of preclinical tumour models</title><title>EJNMMI research</title><addtitle>EJNMMI Res</addtitle><addtitle>EJNMMI Res</addtitle><description>Background Recent studies have shown that 3′-deoxy-3′-[ 18 F] fluorothymidine ([ 18 F]FLT)) uptake depends on endogenous tumour thymidine concentration. The purpose of this study was to investigate tumour thymidine concentrations and whether they correlated with [ 18 F]FLT uptake across a broad spectrum of murine cancer models. A modified liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine endogenous thymidine concentrations in plasma and tissues of tumour-bearing and non-tumour bearing mice and rats. Thymidine concentrations were determined in 22 tumour models, including xenografts, syngeneic and spontaneous tumours, from six research centres, and a subset was compared for [ 18 F]FLT uptake, described by the maximum and mean tumour-to-liver uptake ratio (TTL) and SUV. Results The LC-MS/MS method used to measure thymidine in plasma and tissue was modified to improve sensitivity and reproducibility. Thymidine concentrations determined in the plasma of 7 murine strains and one rat strain were between 0.61 ± 0.12 μM and 2.04 ± 0.64 μM, while the concentrations in 22 tumour models ranged from 0.54 ± 0.17 μM to 20.65 ± 3.65 μM. TTL at 60 min after [ 18 F]FLT injection, determined in 14 of the 22 tumour models, ranged from 1.07 ± 0.16 to 5.22 ± 0.83 for the maximum and 0.67 ± 0.17 to 2.10 ± 0.18 for the mean uptake. TTL did not correlate with tumour thymidine concentrations. Conclusions Endogenous tumour thymidine concentrations alone are not predictive of [ 18 F]FLT uptake in murine cancer models.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cardiac Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Thymidine</subject><issn>2191-219X</issn><issn>2191-219X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoMo7rLuD_BGAt54U02a5qM3giw7Kgx4M4IgEtLkdCZrm9SkVfffm6HrMgqCuUgOnOe8OV8IPaXkJaVKvMqUcU4qQkVFaqoq9gCd17SlVbk-PTyxz9BlzjekHE55y9RjdFbLYjaNOEc_dwfACQYz-xjywU-4g_kHQMAQXNxDiEvG8-F29M4HwDYGC2FOK45NcPgzVZsvm-0OL9NsvgL2ARucTNgDjj2eEtjBB2_NgOdljEvCY3Qw5CfoUW-GDJd37wX6uLneXb2rth_evr96s60sJ2yuGDPOCuC2U6xULSXrhABwvaKdUET0QlBZuw5MZzooJRfcCcqVYW3d8J5doNer7rR0I7g1-0FPyY8m3epovP7TE_xB7-N33bSKqEYWgRd3Ail-WyDPevTZwjCYAKU5mirKJWmFFP-DUkZII4-qz_9Cb0pvQulEoQSvmazrplB0pWyKOSfo7_OmRB-3QK9boMsW6OMWaFZinp0WfB_xe-YFqFcgF1cZUzr5-p-qvwDDH78F</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Heinzmann, Kathrin</creator><creator>Honess, Davina Jean</creator><creator>Lewis, David Yestin</creator><creator>Smith, Donna-Michelle</creator><creator>Cawthorne, Christopher</creator><creator>Keen, Heather</creator><creator>Heskamp, Sandra</creator><creator>Schelhaas, Sonja</creator><creator>Witney, Timothy Howard</creator><creator>Soloviev, Dmitry</creator><creator>Williams, Kaye Janine</creator><creator>Jacobs, Andreas Hans</creator><creator>Aboagye, Eric Ofori</creator><creator>Griffiths, John Richard</creator><creator>Brindle, Kevin Michael</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>The relationship between endogenous thymidine concentrations and [18F]FLT uptake in a range of preclinical tumour models</title><author>Heinzmann, Kathrin ; Honess, Davina Jean ; Lewis, David Yestin ; Smith, Donna-Michelle ; Cawthorne, Christopher ; Keen, Heather ; Heskamp, Sandra ; Schelhaas, Sonja ; Witney, Timothy Howard ; Soloviev, Dmitry ; Williams, Kaye Janine ; Jacobs, Andreas Hans ; Aboagye, Eric Ofori ; Griffiths, John Richard ; Brindle, Kevin Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-33adc6e5cb83186773b66eedf81b6806f66172dbeababe191adcd6158a39245f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cardiac Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Thymidine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heinzmann, Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honess, Davina Jean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, David Yestin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Donna-Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawthorne, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keen, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heskamp, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelhaas, Sonja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witney, Timothy Howard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soloviev, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Kaye Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Andreas Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboagye, Eric Ofori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, John Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Kevin Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>EJNMMI research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heinzmann, Kathrin</au><au>Honess, Davina Jean</au><au>Lewis, David Yestin</au><au>Smith, Donna-Michelle</au><au>Cawthorne, Christopher</au><au>Keen, Heather</au><au>Heskamp, Sandra</au><au>Schelhaas, Sonja</au><au>Witney, Timothy Howard</au><au>Soloviev, Dmitry</au><au>Williams, Kaye Janine</au><au>Jacobs, Andreas Hans</au><au>Aboagye, Eric Ofori</au><au>Griffiths, John Richard</au><au>Brindle, Kevin Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationship between endogenous thymidine concentrations and [18F]FLT uptake in a range of preclinical tumour models</atitle><jtitle>EJNMMI research</jtitle><stitle>EJNMMI Res</stitle><addtitle>EJNMMI Res</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>63-10</pages><artnum>63</artnum><issn>2191-219X</issn><eissn>2191-219X</eissn><abstract>Background Recent studies have shown that 3′-deoxy-3′-[ 18 F] fluorothymidine ([ 18 F]FLT)) uptake depends on endogenous tumour thymidine concentration. The purpose of this study was to investigate tumour thymidine concentrations and whether they correlated with [ 18 F]FLT uptake across a broad spectrum of murine cancer models. A modified liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used to determine endogenous thymidine concentrations in plasma and tissues of tumour-bearing and non-tumour bearing mice and rats. Thymidine concentrations were determined in 22 tumour models, including xenografts, syngeneic and spontaneous tumours, from six research centres, and a subset was compared for [ 18 F]FLT uptake, described by the maximum and mean tumour-to-liver uptake ratio (TTL) and SUV. Results The LC-MS/MS method used to measure thymidine in plasma and tissue was modified to improve sensitivity and reproducibility. Thymidine concentrations determined in the plasma of 7 murine strains and one rat strain were between 0.61 ± 0.12 μM and 2.04 ± 0.64 μM, while the concentrations in 22 tumour models ranged from 0.54 ± 0.17 μM to 20.65 ± 3.65 μM. TTL at 60 min after [ 18 F]FLT injection, determined in 14 of the 22 tumour models, ranged from 1.07 ± 0.16 to 5.22 ± 0.83 for the maximum and 0.67 ± 0.17 to 2.10 ± 0.18 for the mean uptake. TTL did not correlate with tumour thymidine concentrations. Conclusions Endogenous tumour thymidine concentrations alone are not predictive of [ 18 F]FLT uptake in murine cancer models.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27515446</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13550-016-0218-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2191-219X
ispartof EJNMMI research, 2016-12, Vol.6 (1), p.63-10, Article 63
issn 2191-219X
2191-219X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4980847
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Cancer
Cardiac Imaging
Imaging
Liquid chromatography
Liver
Mass spectrometry
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Original Research
Orthopedics
Radiology
Rats
Reproducibility
Research facilities
Thymidine
title The relationship between endogenous thymidine concentrations and [18F]FLT uptake in a range of preclinical tumour models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T18%3A08%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationship%20between%20endogenous%20thymidine%20concentrations%20and%20%5B18F%5DFLT%20uptake%20in%20a%20range%20of%20preclinical%20tumour%20models&rft.jtitle=EJNMMI%20research&rft.au=Heinzmann,%20Kathrin&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=63-10&rft.artnum=63&rft.issn=2191-219X&rft.eissn=2191-219X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13550-016-0218-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1815709676%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1865237224&rft_id=info:pmid/27515446&rfr_iscdi=true