Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography

The importance to restore the hand function following an injury/disease of the nervous system led to the development of novel rehabilitation interventions. Surface electromyography can be used to create a user-driven control of a rehabilitation robot, in which the subject needs to engage actively, b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2016-08, Vol.13 (1), p.73-73, Article 73
Hauptverfasser: Celadon, Nicolò, Došen, Strahinja, Binder, Iris, Ariano, Paolo, Farina, Dario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 1
container_start_page 73
container_title Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
container_volume 13
creator Celadon, Nicolò
Došen, Strahinja
Binder, Iris
Ariano, Paolo
Farina, Dario
description The importance to restore the hand function following an injury/disease of the nervous system led to the development of novel rehabilitation interventions. Surface electromyography can be used to create a user-driven control of a rehabilitation robot, in which the subject needs to engage actively, by using spared voluntary activation to trigger the assistance of the robot. The study investigated methods for the selective estimation of individual finger movements from high-density surface electromyographic signals (HD-sEMG) with minimal interference between movements of other fingers. Regression was evaluated in online and offline control tests with nine healthy subjects (per test) using a linear discriminant analysis classifier (LDA), a common spatial patterns proportional estimator (CSP-PE), and a thresholding (THR) algorithm. In all tests, the subjects performed an isometric force tracking task guided by a moving visual marker indicating the contraction type (flexion/extension), desired activation level and the finger that should be moved. The outcome measures were mean square error (nMSE) between the reference and generated trajectories normalized to the peak-to-peak value of the reference, the classification accuracy (CA), the mean amplitude of the false activations (MAFA) and, in the offline tests only, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCORR). The offline tests demonstrated that, for the reduced number of electrodes (≤24), the CSP-PE outperformed the LDA with higher precision of proportional estimation and less crosstalk between the movement classes (e.g., 8 electrodes, median MAFA ~ 0.6 vs. 1.1 %, median nMSE ~ 4.3 vs. 5.5 %). The LDA and the CSP-PE performed similarly in the online tests (median nMSE 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12984-016-0172-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4973079</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A469182155</galeid><sourcerecordid>A469182155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-fe77e5137a7a28c36ea07f2a8cc8f1c807e72d7dfbd97ae65e6a74c9bd24cb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1r3DAQFaUhSdP-gF6KoZdcnOjLknwphCVtAoHkEHIVWnnk1WJbW8kO7L-PzG6TTQlCaKR570kzegh9J_iCECUuE6G14iUmIk9JS_YJnRLJWYkxZp8P4hP0JaV1Djiu-DE6oZIrRSU-RU8PMWxCHH0YTFdAGn1v5k0RXOH80EIs-vAMPQxjKlwMfbHy7apsYEh-3BZpis5YKKADO-bsNrTRbFbbr-jImS7Bt_16hh5_Xz8ubsq7-z-3i6u70lYCj6UDKaEiTBppqLJMgMHSUaOsVY5YhSVI2sjGLZtaGhAVCCO5rZcN5Xap2Bn6tZPdTMseGptfGU2nNzFXEbc6GK_fZwa_0m141ryWDMs6C5zvBWL4O-Xyde-Tha4zA4QpaaJwLbDI3c7Qn_9B12GKuWsziogac6z4G6o1HWg_uJDvtbOovuKiJoqSqsqoiw9QeTTQexsGcD6fvyOQHcHGkFIE91ojwXr2gt55QWcv6NkLmmXOj8PmvDL-fT57AXpCsPk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1816904084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Celadon, Nicolò ; Došen, Strahinja ; Binder, Iris ; Ariano, Paolo ; Farina, Dario</creator><creatorcontrib>Celadon, Nicolò ; Došen, Strahinja ; Binder, Iris ; Ariano, Paolo ; Farina, Dario</creatorcontrib><description>The importance to restore the hand function following an injury/disease of the nervous system led to the development of novel rehabilitation interventions. Surface electromyography can be used to create a user-driven control of a rehabilitation robot, in which the subject needs to engage actively, by using spared voluntary activation to trigger the assistance of the robot. The study investigated methods for the selective estimation of individual finger movements from high-density surface electromyographic signals (HD-sEMG) with minimal interference between movements of other fingers. Regression was evaluated in online and offline control tests with nine healthy subjects (per test) using a linear discriminant analysis classifier (LDA), a common spatial patterns proportional estimator (CSP-PE), and a thresholding (THR) algorithm. In all tests, the subjects performed an isometric force tracking task guided by a moving visual marker indicating the contraction type (flexion/extension), desired activation level and the finger that should be moved. The outcome measures were mean square error (nMSE) between the reference and generated trajectories normalized to the peak-to-peak value of the reference, the classification accuracy (CA), the mean amplitude of the false activations (MAFA) and, in the offline tests only, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCORR). The offline tests demonstrated that, for the reduced number of electrodes (≤24), the CSP-PE outperformed the LDA with higher precision of proportional estimation and less crosstalk between the movement classes (e.g., 8 electrodes, median MAFA ~ 0.6 vs. 1.1 %, median nMSE ~ 4.3 vs. 5.5 %). The LDA and the CSP-PE performed similarly in the online tests (median nMSE &lt; 3.6 %, median MAFA &lt; 0.7 %), but the CSP-PE provided a more stable performance across the tested conditions (less improvement between different sessions). Furthermore, THR, exploiting topographical information about the single finger activity from HD-sEMG, provided in many cases a regression accuracy similar to that of the pattern recognition techniques, but the performance was not consistent across subjects and fingers. The CSP-PE is a method of choice for selective individual finger control with the limited number of electrodes (&lt;24), whereas for the higher resolution of the recording, either method (CPS-PA or LDA) can be used with a similar performance. Despite the abundance of detection points, the simple THR showed to be significantly worse compared to both pattern recognition/regression methods. Nevertheless, THR is a simple method to apply (no training), and it could still give satisfactory performance in some subjects and/or simpler scenarios (e.g., control of selected fingers). These conclusions are important for guiding future developments towards the clinical application of the methods for individual finger control in rehabilitation robotics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12984-016-0172-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27488270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Algorithms ; Analysis ; Electrodes ; Electromyography ; Electromyography - methods ; Female ; Fingers - physiology ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction ; Machine Learning ; Male ; Movement - physiology ; Online Systems ; Psychomotor Performance ; Robotics ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Stroke Rehabilitation - instrumentation ; Stroke Rehabilitation - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2016-08, Vol.13 (1), p.73-73, Article 73</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-fe77e5137a7a28c36ea07f2a8cc8f1c807e72d7dfbd97ae65e6a74c9bd24cb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-fe77e5137a7a28c36ea07f2a8cc8f1c807e72d7dfbd97ae65e6a74c9bd24cb83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973079/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973079/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27488270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celadon, Nicolò</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Došen, Strahinja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariano, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farina, Dario</creatorcontrib><title>Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography</title><title>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><description>The importance to restore the hand function following an injury/disease of the nervous system led to the development of novel rehabilitation interventions. Surface electromyography can be used to create a user-driven control of a rehabilitation robot, in which the subject needs to engage actively, by using spared voluntary activation to trigger the assistance of the robot. The study investigated methods for the selective estimation of individual finger movements from high-density surface electromyographic signals (HD-sEMG) with minimal interference between movements of other fingers. Regression was evaluated in online and offline control tests with nine healthy subjects (per test) using a linear discriminant analysis classifier (LDA), a common spatial patterns proportional estimator (CSP-PE), and a thresholding (THR) algorithm. In all tests, the subjects performed an isometric force tracking task guided by a moving visual marker indicating the contraction type (flexion/extension), desired activation level and the finger that should be moved. The outcome measures were mean square error (nMSE) between the reference and generated trajectories normalized to the peak-to-peak value of the reference, the classification accuracy (CA), the mean amplitude of the false activations (MAFA) and, in the offline tests only, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCORR). The offline tests demonstrated that, for the reduced number of electrodes (≤24), the CSP-PE outperformed the LDA with higher precision of proportional estimation and less crosstalk between the movement classes (e.g., 8 electrodes, median MAFA ~ 0.6 vs. 1.1 %, median nMSE ~ 4.3 vs. 5.5 %). The LDA and the CSP-PE performed similarly in the online tests (median nMSE &lt; 3.6 %, median MAFA &lt; 0.7 %), but the CSP-PE provided a more stable performance across the tested conditions (less improvement between different sessions). Furthermore, THR, exploiting topographical information about the single finger activity from HD-sEMG, provided in many cases a regression accuracy similar to that of the pattern recognition techniques, but the performance was not consistent across subjects and fingers. The CSP-PE is a method of choice for selective individual finger control with the limited number of electrodes (&lt;24), whereas for the higher resolution of the recording, either method (CPS-PA or LDA) can be used with a similar performance. Despite the abundance of detection points, the simple THR showed to be significantly worse compared to both pattern recognition/regression methods. Nevertheless, THR is a simple method to apply (no training), and it could still give satisfactory performance in some subjects and/or simpler scenarios (e.g., control of selected fingers). These conclusions are important for guiding future developments towards the clinical application of the methods for individual finger control in rehabilitation robotics.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Electromyography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers - physiology</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Online Systems</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Stroke Rehabilitation - methods</subject><issn>1743-0003</issn><issn>1743-0003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1r3DAQFaUhSdP-gF6KoZdcnOjLknwphCVtAoHkEHIVWnnk1WJbW8kO7L-PzG6TTQlCaKR570kzegh9J_iCECUuE6G14iUmIk9JS_YJnRLJWYkxZp8P4hP0JaV1Djiu-DE6oZIrRSU-RU8PMWxCHH0YTFdAGn1v5k0RXOH80EIs-vAMPQxjKlwMfbHy7apsYEh-3BZpis5YKKADO-bsNrTRbFbbr-jImS7Bt_16hh5_Xz8ubsq7-z-3i6u70lYCj6UDKaEiTBppqLJMgMHSUaOsVY5YhSVI2sjGLZtaGhAVCCO5rZcN5Xap2Bn6tZPdTMseGptfGU2nNzFXEbc6GK_fZwa_0m141ryWDMs6C5zvBWL4O-Xyde-Tha4zA4QpaaJwLbDI3c7Qn_9B12GKuWsziogac6z4G6o1HWg_uJDvtbOovuKiJoqSqsqoiw9QeTTQexsGcD6fvyOQHcHGkFIE91ojwXr2gt55QWcv6NkLmmXOj8PmvDL-fT57AXpCsPk</recordid><startdate>20160804</startdate><enddate>20160804</enddate><creator>Celadon, Nicolò</creator><creator>Došen, Strahinja</creator><creator>Binder, Iris</creator><creator>Ariano, Paolo</creator><creator>Farina, Dario</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160804</creationdate><title>Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography</title><author>Celadon, Nicolò ; Došen, Strahinja ; Binder, Iris ; Ariano, Paolo ; Farina, Dario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-fe77e5137a7a28c36ea07f2a8cc8f1c807e72d7dfbd97ae65e6a74c9bd24cb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Electromyography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers - physiology</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Online Systems</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Stroke Rehabilitation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celadon, Nicolò</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Došen, Strahinja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binder, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariano, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farina, Dario</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celadon, Nicolò</au><au>Došen, Strahinja</au><au>Binder, Iris</au><au>Ariano, Paolo</au><au>Farina, Dario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><date>2016-08-04</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>73-73</pages><artnum>73</artnum><issn>1743-0003</issn><eissn>1743-0003</eissn><abstract>The importance to restore the hand function following an injury/disease of the nervous system led to the development of novel rehabilitation interventions. Surface electromyography can be used to create a user-driven control of a rehabilitation robot, in which the subject needs to engage actively, by using spared voluntary activation to trigger the assistance of the robot. The study investigated methods for the selective estimation of individual finger movements from high-density surface electromyographic signals (HD-sEMG) with minimal interference between movements of other fingers. Regression was evaluated in online and offline control tests with nine healthy subjects (per test) using a linear discriminant analysis classifier (LDA), a common spatial patterns proportional estimator (CSP-PE), and a thresholding (THR) algorithm. In all tests, the subjects performed an isometric force tracking task guided by a moving visual marker indicating the contraction type (flexion/extension), desired activation level and the finger that should be moved. The outcome measures were mean square error (nMSE) between the reference and generated trajectories normalized to the peak-to-peak value of the reference, the classification accuracy (CA), the mean amplitude of the false activations (MAFA) and, in the offline tests only, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCORR). The offline tests demonstrated that, for the reduced number of electrodes (≤24), the CSP-PE outperformed the LDA with higher precision of proportional estimation and less crosstalk between the movement classes (e.g., 8 electrodes, median MAFA ~ 0.6 vs. 1.1 %, median nMSE ~ 4.3 vs. 5.5 %). The LDA and the CSP-PE performed similarly in the online tests (median nMSE &lt; 3.6 %, median MAFA &lt; 0.7 %), but the CSP-PE provided a more stable performance across the tested conditions (less improvement between different sessions). Furthermore, THR, exploiting topographical information about the single finger activity from HD-sEMG, provided in many cases a regression accuracy similar to that of the pattern recognition techniques, but the performance was not consistent across subjects and fingers. The CSP-PE is a method of choice for selective individual finger control with the limited number of electrodes (&lt;24), whereas for the higher resolution of the recording, either method (CPS-PA or LDA) can be used with a similar performance. Despite the abundance of detection points, the simple THR showed to be significantly worse compared to both pattern recognition/regression methods. Nevertheless, THR is a simple method to apply (no training), and it could still give satisfactory performance in some subjects and/or simpler scenarios (e.g., control of selected fingers). These conclusions are important for guiding future developments towards the clinical application of the methods for individual finger control in rehabilitation robotics.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27488270</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12984-016-0172-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-0003
ispartof Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2016-08, Vol.13 (1), p.73-73, Article 73
issn 1743-0003
1743-0003
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4973079
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
subjects Adult
Algorithms
Analysis
Electrodes
Electromyography
Electromyography - methods
Female
Fingers - physiology
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Isometric Contraction
Machine Learning
Male
Movement - physiology
Online Systems
Psychomotor Performance
Robotics
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Stroke Rehabilitation - instrumentation
Stroke Rehabilitation - methods
title Proportional estimation of finger movements from high-density surface electromyography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T10%3A36%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proportional%20estimation%20of%20finger%20movements%20from%20high-density%20surface%20electromyography&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroengineering%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Celadon,%20Nicol%C3%B2&rft.date=2016-08-04&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=73-73&rft.artnum=73&rft.issn=1743-0003&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12984-016-0172-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA469182155%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1816904084&rft_id=info:pmid/27488270&rft_galeid=A469182155&rfr_iscdi=true