How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer imaging 2016-07, Vol.16 (1), p.17-17, Article 17 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 17 |
container_title | Cancer imaging |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Vinnicombe, Sarah |
description | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impact on patient-related outcomes.This has been attributed previously to the low specificity that might be expected with such a sensitive modality, but with modern techniques and protocols, the specificity and positive predictive value for malignancy can exceed that of breast ultrasound and mammography. A more likely explanation is that historically, clinicians have acted on MRI findings and altered surgical plans without prior histological confirmation. Furthermore, modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer has improved so much that it has become a very tall order to show a an improvement in outcomes such as local recurrence rates.In order to obtain clinically useful information, it is necessary to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the technique and the physiological processes reflected in breast MRI. An appropriate indication for the scan, proper patient preparation and good scan technique, with rigorous quality assurance, are all essential prerequisites for a diagnostically relevant study.The use of recognised descriptors from a standardised lexicon is helpful, since assessment can then dictate subsequent recommendations for management, as in the American College of Radiology BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon (Morris et al., ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2013). It also enables audit of the service. However, perhaps the most critical factor in the generation of a meaningful report is for the reporting radiologist to have a thorough understanding of the clinical question and of the findings that will influence management. This has never been more important than at present, when we are in the throes of a remarkable paradigm shift in the treatment of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4960688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A461635829</galeid><sourcerecordid>A461635829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-4f12c63f7888fef4eefca68b1542bf1fceb69724d9f8bb5ffb40a874ac74eb113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1vFCEUhonR2A_9Ad6YSUxMb6YCwwBzY9I0aps06U29lQBz2KWZhRUYjf9exm3rrjFcAOc878tHXoTeEHxOiOQfMsOcsRYT3mIsZIufoWPCBG5F1-Hne-sjdJLzPcZ0kIN4iY6oYD3HHTlG367iz-a6SbCNqTQmgc6l2ehVgOJtLecYdLDQ-FrzYdXkMo8ecuNieqTtAqTa2RE6jE22CSDU3Sv0wukpw-uH-RR9_fzp7vKqvbn9cn15cdPanvalZY5QyzsnpJQOHANwVnNpSM-occRZMHwQlI2Dk8b0zhmGtRRMW8HAENKdoo873-1sNjBaCCXpSW1TvXf6paL26rAT_Fqt4g_FBo65lNXg7MEgxe8z5KI2PluYJh0gzlkRiQUVPRWiou_-Qe_jnEJ93h9q6LsBD3-plZ5A-eBiPdcupuqCccK7XtKFOv8PVccIG29jAOdr_UDwfk-wBj2VdY7TXHwM-RAkO9CmmHMC9_QZBKslPWqXHlXTo5b0KFw1b_d_8UnxGJfuNzZuv9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807953909</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Vinnicombe, Sarah</creator><creatorcontrib>Vinnicombe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impact on patient-related outcomes.This has been attributed previously to the low specificity that might be expected with such a sensitive modality, but with modern techniques and protocols, the specificity and positive predictive value for malignancy can exceed that of breast ultrasound and mammography. A more likely explanation is that historically, clinicians have acted on MRI findings and altered surgical plans without prior histological confirmation. Furthermore, modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer has improved so much that it has become a very tall order to show a an improvement in outcomes such as local recurrence rates.In order to obtain clinically useful information, it is necessary to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the technique and the physiological processes reflected in breast MRI. An appropriate indication for the scan, proper patient preparation and good scan technique, with rigorous quality assurance, are all essential prerequisites for a diagnostically relevant study.The use of recognised descriptors from a standardised lexicon is helpful, since assessment can then dictate subsequent recommendations for management, as in the American College of Radiology BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon (Morris et al., ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2013). It also enables audit of the service. However, perhaps the most critical factor in the generation of a meaningful report is for the reporting radiologist to have a thorough understanding of the clinical question and of the findings that will influence management. This has never been more important than at present, when we are in the throes of a remarkable paradigm shift in the treatment of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1740-5025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27456031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Care and treatment ; Diagnosis ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards ; Mammography - methods ; Mammography - standards ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Neoplasm Staging - standards ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Review ; Terminology as Topic ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods ; Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards</subject><ispartof>Cancer imaging, 2016-07, Vol.16 (1), p.17-17, Article 17</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-4f12c63f7888fef4eefca68b1542bf1fceb69724d9f8bb5ffb40a874ac74eb113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-4f12c63f7888fef4eefca68b1542bf1fceb69724d9f8bb5ffb40a874ac74eb113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960688/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960688/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,862,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27456031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vinnicombe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><title>How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening</title><title>Cancer imaging</title><addtitle>Cancer Imaging</addtitle><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impact on patient-related outcomes.This has been attributed previously to the low specificity that might be expected with such a sensitive modality, but with modern techniques and protocols, the specificity and positive predictive value for malignancy can exceed that of breast ultrasound and mammography. A more likely explanation is that historically, clinicians have acted on MRI findings and altered surgical plans without prior histological confirmation. Furthermore, modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer has improved so much that it has become a very tall order to show a an improvement in outcomes such as local recurrence rates.In order to obtain clinically useful information, it is necessary to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the technique and the physiological processes reflected in breast MRI. An appropriate indication for the scan, proper patient preparation and good scan technique, with rigorous quality assurance, are all essential prerequisites for a diagnostically relevant study.The use of recognised descriptors from a standardised lexicon is helpful, since assessment can then dictate subsequent recommendations for management, as in the American College of Radiology BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon (Morris et al., ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2013). It also enables audit of the service. However, perhaps the most critical factor in the generation of a meaningful report is for the reporting radiologist to have a thorough understanding of the clinical question and of the findings that will influence management. This has never been more important than at present, when we are in the throes of a remarkable paradigm shift in the treatment of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - standards</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards</subject><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><issn>1470-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1vFCEUhonR2A_9Ad6YSUxMb6YCwwBzY9I0aps06U29lQBz2KWZhRUYjf9exm3rrjFcAOc878tHXoTeEHxOiOQfMsOcsRYT3mIsZIufoWPCBG5F1-Hne-sjdJLzPcZ0kIN4iY6oYD3HHTlG367iz-a6SbCNqTQmgc6l2ehVgOJtLecYdLDQ-FrzYdXkMo8ecuNieqTtAqTa2RE6jE22CSDU3Sv0wukpw-uH-RR9_fzp7vKqvbn9cn15cdPanvalZY5QyzsnpJQOHANwVnNpSM-occRZMHwQlI2Dk8b0zhmGtRRMW8HAENKdoo873-1sNjBaCCXpSW1TvXf6paL26rAT_Fqt4g_FBo65lNXg7MEgxe8z5KI2PluYJh0gzlkRiQUVPRWiou_-Qe_jnEJ93h9q6LsBD3-plZ5A-eBiPdcupuqCccK7XtKFOv8PVccIG29jAOdr_UDwfk-wBj2VdY7TXHwM-RAkO9CmmHMC9_QZBKslPWqXHlXTo5b0KFw1b_d_8UnxGJfuNzZuv9Q</recordid><startdate>20160725</startdate><enddate>20160725</enddate><creator>Vinnicombe, Sarah</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160725</creationdate><title>How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening</title><author>Vinnicombe, Sarah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-4f12c63f7888fef4eefca68b1542bf1fceb69724d9f8bb5ffb40a874ac74eb113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - standards</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vinnicombe, Sarah</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vinnicombe, Sarah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening</atitle><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Imaging</addtitle><date>2016-07-25</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>17</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>17-17</pages><artnum>17</artnum><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><eissn>1470-7330</eissn><abstract>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impact on patient-related outcomes.This has been attributed previously to the low specificity that might be expected with such a sensitive modality, but with modern techniques and protocols, the specificity and positive predictive value for malignancy can exceed that of breast ultrasound and mammography. A more likely explanation is that historically, clinicians have acted on MRI findings and altered surgical plans without prior histological confirmation. Furthermore, modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer has improved so much that it has become a very tall order to show a an improvement in outcomes such as local recurrence rates.In order to obtain clinically useful information, it is necessary to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the technique and the physiological processes reflected in breast MRI. An appropriate indication for the scan, proper patient preparation and good scan technique, with rigorous quality assurance, are all essential prerequisites for a diagnostically relevant study.The use of recognised descriptors from a standardised lexicon is helpful, since assessment can then dictate subsequent recommendations for management, as in the American College of Radiology BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon (Morris et al., ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2013). It also enables audit of the service. However, perhaps the most critical factor in the generation of a meaningful report is for the reporting radiologist to have a thorough understanding of the clinical question and of the findings that will influence management. This has never been more important than at present, when we are in the throes of a remarkable paradigm shift in the treatment of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27456031</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-7330 |
ispartof | Cancer imaging, 2016-07, Vol.16 (1), p.17-17, Article 17 |
issn | 1470-7330 1740-5025 1470-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4960688 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Care and treatment Diagnosis Evaluation Female Humans Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Magnetic Resonance Imaging - standards Mammography - methods Mammography - standards Neoplasm Staging - methods Neoplasm Staging - standards Practice guidelines (Medicine) Review Terminology as Topic Ultrasonography, Mammary - methods Ultrasonography, Mammary - standards |
title | How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T14%3A42%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20I%20report%20breast%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20studies%20for%20breast%20cancer%20staging%20and%20screening&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20imaging&rft.au=Vinnicombe,%20Sarah&rft.date=2016-07-25&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=17&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=17-17&rft.artnum=17&rft.issn=1470-7330&rft.eissn=1470-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA461635829%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807953909&rft_id=info:pmid/27456031&rft_galeid=A461635829&rfr_iscdi=true |