Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses

Many animals partition resources to avoid competition and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly un...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-07, Vol.6 (1), p.29932-29932, Article 29932
Hauptverfasser: Clay, Thomas A., Manica, Andrea, Ryan, Peter G., Silk, Janet R. D., Croxall, John P., Ireland, Louise, Phillips, Richard A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29932
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29932
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 6
creator Clay, Thomas A.
Manica, Andrea
Ryan, Peter G.
Silk, Janet R. D.
Croxall, John P.
Ireland, Louise
Phillips, Richard A.
description Many animals partition resources to avoid competition and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/srep29932
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4956756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1806437055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-22a8aac9c3deec0532d5d1f59f1fa8a8e2ff79f8fa4253d2346c6926ebc1ce273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMoKuse_APSowrVfLbNRZD1Exb0oOeQppNa6SY16Yr-eyO7LgrOZQbeh3dmXoQOCT4jmFXnMcBApWR0C-1TzEVOGaXbv-Y9NI3xFacSVHIid9EeLTlnVVnuo6vH4D-6hR4ha0L3DiFm3mZx0GOn-yxCG6BNs3dZ5zLnXV4HgKZzbab7Wo_BxwjxAO1Y3UeYrvsEPd9cP83u8vnD7f3scp4bTvCYU6orrY00rAEwWDDaiIZYIS2xSamAWltKW1nNqWANZbwwhaQF1IYYoCWboIuV77CsF9AYcGPQvRpCeiB8Kq879Vdx3Ytq_bviUhSlKJLB8dog-LclxFEtumig77UDv4yKVLjgrMRCJPRkhZrvHwPYzRqC1XfwahN8Yo9-37Uhf2JOwOkKiElyLQT16pfBpaz-cfsC-YSPLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806437055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Clay, Thomas A. ; Manica, Andrea ; Ryan, Peter G. ; Silk, Janet R. D. ; Croxall, John P. ; Ireland, Louise ; Phillips, Richard A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clay, Thomas A. ; Manica, Andrea ; Ryan, Peter G. ; Silk, Janet R. D. ; Croxall, John P. ; Ireland, Louise ; Phillips, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><description>Many animals partition resources to avoid competition and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep29932</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27443877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158/2039 ; 631/158/852 ; 631/601/18 ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; Science</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2016-07, Vol.6 (1), p.29932-29932, Article 29932</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-22a8aac9c3deec0532d5d1f59f1fa8a8e2ff79f8fa4253d2346c6926ebc1ce273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-22a8aac9c3deec0532d5d1f59f1fa8a8e2ff79f8fa4253d2346c6926ebc1ce273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956756/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956756/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clay, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manica, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silk, Janet R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croxall, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><title>Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Many animals partition resources to avoid competition and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection.</description><subject>631/158/2039</subject><subject>631/158/852</subject><subject>631/601/18</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMoKuse_APSowrVfLbNRZD1Exb0oOeQppNa6SY16Yr-eyO7LgrOZQbeh3dmXoQOCT4jmFXnMcBApWR0C-1TzEVOGaXbv-Y9NI3xFacSVHIid9EeLTlnVVnuo6vH4D-6hR4ha0L3DiFm3mZx0GOn-yxCG6BNs3dZ5zLnXV4HgKZzbab7Wo_BxwjxAO1Y3UeYrvsEPd9cP83u8vnD7f3scp4bTvCYU6orrY00rAEwWDDaiIZYIS2xSamAWltKW1nNqWANZbwwhaQF1IYYoCWboIuV77CsF9AYcGPQvRpCeiB8Kq879Vdx3Ytq_bviUhSlKJLB8dog-LclxFEtumig77UDv4yKVLjgrMRCJPRkhZrvHwPYzRqC1XfwahN8Yo9-37Uhf2JOwOkKiElyLQT16pfBpaz-cfsC-YSPLw</recordid><startdate>20160721</startdate><enddate>20160721</enddate><creator>Clay, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Manica, Andrea</creator><creator>Ryan, Peter G.</creator><creator>Silk, Janet R. D.</creator><creator>Croxall, John P.</creator><creator>Ireland, Louise</creator><creator>Phillips, Richard A.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160721</creationdate><title>Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses</title><author>Clay, Thomas A. ; Manica, Andrea ; Ryan, Peter G. ; Silk, Janet R. D. ; Croxall, John P. ; Ireland, Louise ; Phillips, Richard A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-22a8aac9c3deec0532d5d1f59f1fa8a8e2ff79f8fa4253d2346c6926ebc1ce273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>631/158/2039</topic><topic>631/158/852</topic><topic>631/601/18</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clay, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manica, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silk, Janet R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croxall, John P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clay, Thomas A.</au><au>Manica, Andrea</au><au>Ryan, Peter G.</au><au>Silk, Janet R. D.</au><au>Croxall, John P.</au><au>Ireland, Louise</au><au>Phillips, Richard A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2016-07-21</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29932</spage><epage>29932</epage><pages>29932-29932</pages><artnum>29932</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Many animals partition resources to avoid competition and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27443877</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep29932</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2016-07, Vol.6 (1), p.29932-29932, Article 29932
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4956756
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects 631/158/2039
631/158/852
631/601/18
Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
Science
title Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A15%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proximate%20drivers%20of%20spatial%20segregation%20in%20non-breeding%20albatrosses&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Clay,%20Thomas%20A.&rft.date=2016-07-21&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29932&rft.epage=29932&rft.pages=29932-29932&rft.artnum=29932&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep29932&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1806437055%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806437055&rft_id=info:pmid/27443877&rfr_iscdi=true