Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite
To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulk fill flowable material (SDR) and a traditional resin composite. Thirty maxillary and 30 mandibular first molars were selected based on similar dimensions. After cleaning, shaping and filling of the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annali di stomatologia 2016-01, Vol.7 (1-2), p.4-4 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 4 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 4 |
| container_title | Annali di stomatologia |
| container_volume | 7 |
| creator | Isufi, Almira Plotino, Gianluca Grande, Nicola Maria Ioppolo, Pietro Testarelli, Luca Bedini, Rossella Al-Sudani, Dina Gambarini, Gianluca |
| description | To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulk fill flowable material (SDR) and a traditional resin composite.
Thirty maxillary and 30 mandibular first molars were selected based on similar dimensions. After cleaning, shaping and filling of the root canals and adhesive procedures, specimens were assigned to 3 subgroups for each tooth type (n=10): Group A: control group, including intact teeth; Group B: access cavities were restored with a traditional resin composite (EsthetX; Dentsply-Italy, Rome, Italy); Group C: access cavities were restored with a bulk fill flowable composite (SDR; Dentsply-Italy), except 1.5 mm layer of the occlusal surface that was restored with the same resin composite as Group B. The specimens were subjected to compressive force in a material static-testing machine until fracture occurred, the maximum fracture load of the specimens was measured (N) and the type of fracture was recorded as favorable or unfavorable. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni tests (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.11138/ads/2016.7.1.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4955920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4135554371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-982854c8767bc2d62695d0efd0f73e595345f295daed6f615d7b870e08c5e2513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9LHjEQxpfSUsX6AbyUQC-97Gv-J3spFNEqCF70HLLJbI3Nbt4m2YrfvnnVStuTuUwm85uHzPB03RHBG0II08fWl2OKidyoDdlgzN90-2RQpCeck7ftrinvsRZ0rzss5Q63I7HgVL7v9qjiWgos9rt6lq2rawaUoYRS7eIApQnB4pNPSw3OxviAagZbwaMKUG93aE25pfehZRaNa_wxhRjRFNO9HSOgudE52Ijs4huw016QS_M2lVDhQ_dusrHA4XM86G7OTq9PzvvLq28XJ18ve8cpq_2gqRbcaSXV6KiXVA7CY5g8nhQDMQjGxUTbmwUvJ0mEV6NWGLB2Aqgg7KD78qS7XccZvIOlZhvNNofZ5geTbDD_VpZwa76nX4YPQgwUN4HPzwI5_Vzb1GYOxUGMdoG0FkM0E7KhXL4CJURrJTh7BYoH3L4wDA399B96l9a8tKXtKM0oY4-C5IlyOZWSYXoZkWDzaBbTzGJ2ZjHKENPM0no-_r2bl44_1mC_AZAtu-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808323343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Isufi, Almira ; Plotino, Gianluca ; Grande, Nicola Maria ; Ioppolo, Pietro ; Testarelli, Luca ; Bedini, Rossella ; Al-Sudani, Dina ; Gambarini, Gianluca</creator><creatorcontrib>Isufi, Almira ; Plotino, Gianluca ; Grande, Nicola Maria ; Ioppolo, Pietro ; Testarelli, Luca ; Bedini, Rossella ; Al-Sudani, Dina ; Gambarini, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><description>To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulk fill flowable material (SDR) and a traditional resin composite.
Thirty maxillary and 30 mandibular first molars were selected based on similar dimensions. After cleaning, shaping and filling of the root canals and adhesive procedures, specimens were assigned to 3 subgroups for each tooth type (n=10): Group A: control group, including intact teeth; Group B: access cavities were restored with a traditional resin composite (EsthetX; Dentsply-Italy, Rome, Italy); Group C: access cavities were restored with a bulk fill flowable composite (SDR; Dentsply-Italy), except 1.5 mm layer of the occlusal surface that was restored with the same resin composite as Group B. The specimens were subjected to compressive force in a material static-testing machine until fracture occurred, the maximum fracture load of the specimens was measured (N) and the type of fracture was recorded as favorable or unfavorable. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni tests (P<0.05).
No statistically significant differences were found among groups (P<0.05). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a traditional resin composite and with a bulk fill flowable composite (SDR) was similar in both maxillary and mandibular molars and showed no significant decrease in fracture resistance compared to intact specimens.
No significant difference was observed in the mechanical fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with traditional resin composite restorations compared to bulk fill flowable composite restorations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1824-0852</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1971-1441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1971-1441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11138/ads/2016.7.1.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27486505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: CIC Edizioni Internazionali</publisher><subject>Analysis of variance ; Composite materials ; Dentin ; Failure ; Fracture mechanics ; Fracture toughness ; Fractures ; Holes ; Odontology ; Original ; Polymer matrix composites ; Polymerization ; Polymers ; Resins ; Studies ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Annali di stomatologia, 2016-01, Vol.7 (1-2), p.4-4</ispartof><rights>Copyright CIC Edizioni Internatzionali Jan-Aug 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, CIC Edizioni Internazionali 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-982854c8767bc2d62695d0efd0f73e595345f295daed6f615d7b870e08c5e2513</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955920/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955920/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486505$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Isufi, Almira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotino, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Nicola Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioppolo, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testarelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedini, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Sudani, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambarini, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><title>Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite</title><title>Annali di stomatologia</title><addtitle>Ann Stomatol (Roma)</addtitle><description>To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulk fill flowable material (SDR) and a traditional resin composite.
Thirty maxillary and 30 mandibular first molars were selected based on similar dimensions. After cleaning, shaping and filling of the root canals and adhesive procedures, specimens were assigned to 3 subgroups for each tooth type (n=10): Group A: control group, including intact teeth; Group B: access cavities were restored with a traditional resin composite (EsthetX; Dentsply-Italy, Rome, Italy); Group C: access cavities were restored with a bulk fill flowable composite (SDR; Dentsply-Italy), except 1.5 mm layer of the occlusal surface that was restored with the same resin composite as Group B. The specimens were subjected to compressive force in a material static-testing machine until fracture occurred, the maximum fracture load of the specimens was measured (N) and the type of fracture was recorded as favorable or unfavorable. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni tests (P<0.05).
No statistically significant differences were found among groups (P<0.05). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a traditional resin composite and with a bulk fill flowable composite (SDR) was similar in both maxillary and mandibular molars and showed no significant decrease in fracture resistance compared to intact specimens.
No significant difference was observed in the mechanical fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with traditional resin composite restorations compared to bulk fill flowable composite restorations.</description><subject>Analysis of variance</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Fracture toughness</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Holes</subject><subject>Odontology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Polymer matrix composites</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>1824-0852</issn><issn>1971-1441</issn><issn>1971-1441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk9LHjEQxpfSUsX6AbyUQC-97Gv-J3spFNEqCF70HLLJbI3Nbt4m2YrfvnnVStuTuUwm85uHzPB03RHBG0II08fWl2OKidyoDdlgzN90-2RQpCeck7ftrinvsRZ0rzss5Q63I7HgVL7v9qjiWgos9rt6lq2rawaUoYRS7eIApQnB4pNPSw3OxviAagZbwaMKUG93aE25pfehZRaNa_wxhRjRFNO9HSOgudE52Ijs4huw016QS_M2lVDhQ_dusrHA4XM86G7OTq9PzvvLq28XJ18ve8cpq_2gqRbcaSXV6KiXVA7CY5g8nhQDMQjGxUTbmwUvJ0mEV6NWGLB2Aqgg7KD78qS7XccZvIOlZhvNNofZ5geTbDD_VpZwa76nX4YPQgwUN4HPzwI5_Vzb1GYOxUGMdoG0FkM0E7KhXL4CJURrJTh7BYoH3L4wDA399B96l9a8tKXtKM0oY4-C5IlyOZWSYXoZkWDzaBbTzGJ2ZjHKENPM0no-_r2bl44_1mC_AZAtu-o</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Isufi, Almira</creator><creator>Plotino, Gianluca</creator><creator>Grande, Nicola Maria</creator><creator>Ioppolo, Pietro</creator><creator>Testarelli, Luca</creator><creator>Bedini, Rossella</creator><creator>Al-Sudani, Dina</creator><creator>Gambarini, Gianluca</creator><general>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</general><general>CIC Edizioni Internationali</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite</title><author>Isufi, Almira ; Plotino, Gianluca ; Grande, Nicola Maria ; Ioppolo, Pietro ; Testarelli, Luca ; Bedini, Rossella ; Al-Sudani, Dina ; Gambarini, Gianluca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-982854c8767bc2d62695d0efd0f73e595345f295daed6f615d7b870e08c5e2513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis of variance</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Fracture toughness</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Holes</topic><topic>Odontology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Polymer matrix composites</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Isufi, Almira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotino, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Nicola Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ioppolo, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testarelli, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedini, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Sudani, Dina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gambarini, Gianluca</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annali di stomatologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Isufi, Almira</au><au>Plotino, Gianluca</au><au>Grande, Nicola Maria</au><au>Ioppolo, Pietro</au><au>Testarelli, Luca</au><au>Bedini, Rossella</au><au>Al-Sudani, Dina</au><au>Gambarini, Gianluca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite</atitle><jtitle>Annali di stomatologia</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Stomatol (Roma)</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>4-4</pages><issn>1824-0852</issn><issn>1971-1441</issn><eissn>1971-1441</eissn><abstract>To determine and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulk fill flowable material (SDR) and a traditional resin composite.
Thirty maxillary and 30 mandibular first molars were selected based on similar dimensions. After cleaning, shaping and filling of the root canals and adhesive procedures, specimens were assigned to 3 subgroups for each tooth type (n=10): Group A: control group, including intact teeth; Group B: access cavities were restored with a traditional resin composite (EsthetX; Dentsply-Italy, Rome, Italy); Group C: access cavities were restored with a bulk fill flowable composite (SDR; Dentsply-Italy), except 1.5 mm layer of the occlusal surface that was restored with the same resin composite as Group B. The specimens were subjected to compressive force in a material static-testing machine until fracture occurred, the maximum fracture load of the specimens was measured (N) and the type of fracture was recorded as favorable or unfavorable. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni tests (P<0.05).
No statistically significant differences were found among groups (P<0.05). Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a traditional resin composite and with a bulk fill flowable composite (SDR) was similar in both maxillary and mandibular molars and showed no significant decrease in fracture resistance compared to intact specimens.
No significant difference was observed in the mechanical fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with traditional resin composite restorations compared to bulk fill flowable composite restorations.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>CIC Edizioni Internazionali</pub><pmid>27486505</pmid><doi>10.11138/ads/2016.7.1.004</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1824-0852 |
| ispartof | Annali di stomatologia, 2016-01, Vol.7 (1-2), p.4-4 |
| issn | 1824-0852 1971-1441 1971-1441 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4955920 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Analysis of variance Composite materials Dentin Failure Fracture mechanics Fracture toughness Fractures Holes Odontology Original Polymer matrix composites Polymerization Polymers Resins Studies Teeth |
| title | Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with a bulkfill flowable material and a resin composite |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A33%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fracture%20resistance%20of%20endodontically%20treated%20teeth%20restored%20with%20a%20bulkfill%20flowable%20material%20and%20a%20resin%20composite&rft.jtitle=Annali%20di%20stomatologia&rft.au=Isufi,%20Almira&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=4-4&rft.issn=1824-0852&rft.eissn=1971-1441&rft_id=info:doi/10.11138/ads/2016.7.1.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4135554371%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808323343&rft_id=info:pmid/27486505&rfr_iscdi=true |