Implementation of NICE clinical guideline 95 on chest pain of recent onset: experience in a district general hospital

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CG95 clinical guideline on chest pain of recent onset was published in 2010. There is debate over whether the proposed strategy improves patient care and its implications on service costs. Following a six-month pilot, 472 consecutive patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical medicine (London, England) England), 2015-06, Vol.15 (3), p.225-228
Hauptverfasser: Ormerod, Julian OM, Wretham, Caroline, Beale, Andy, Haynes, Douglas, Harries, Iwan, Ramcharitar, Steve, Foley, Paul W, McCrea, William A, Chandrasekaran, Badri, Barnes, Edward
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 228
container_issue 3
container_start_page 225
container_title Clinical medicine (London, England)
container_volume 15
creator Ormerod, Julian OM
Wretham, Caroline
Beale, Andy
Haynes, Douglas
Harries, Iwan
Ramcharitar, Steve
Foley, Paul W
McCrea, William A
Chandrasekaran, Badri
Barnes, Edward
description The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CG95 clinical guideline on chest pain of recent onset was published in 2010. There is debate over whether the proposed strategy improves patient care and its implications on service costs. Following a six-month pilot, 472 consecutive patient records were audited for pre-test probability of significant coronary artery disease, investigations performed and outcomes. Low- and moderate-risk patients had an unexpectedly low rate of coronary disease and revascularisation. Computerised tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and stress echocardiography performed similarly, though the latter was more resource intensive. High-/very high-risk patients frequently required revascularisation and greater than 10% of each group had prognostically significant disease, going against the recommendation that very high risk patients do not undergo angiography. There were frequent protocol deviations and training clinic staff in the new approach was challenging. In conclusion, implementing NICE CG95 is feasible but presents challenges. Staff require training to follow the protocol consistently. Functional testing had no benefits over anatomical testing with CTCA, which may allow cost savings in some departments.
doi_str_mv 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-225
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4953103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S147021182401546X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1685750773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-6493498b153a13979ed6917730abfb054f98c4c18ca8eedbd6644d90da93b9b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEog_4CSBLbNik2ONHYhZUaFRgpKpsYG059s2MqyQOdlLBv-_NTKnabrry4373-FyfonjH6FlVK_bJdWHowQcXBjhjsuTlaiVfFMdMVLwUteYv93tarhirj4qTnK8pZVJo9bo4WinKmVb6uJg3_dhBD8NkpxAHEltytVlfkEU-ONuR7Rw84AGIlgQBt4M8kdGGPZvAYSveZ5g-E_g7QgowOCBYtsSHPKXgJrKFARKK7WIew2S7N8Wr1nYZ3t6tp8Xvbxe_1j_Ky5_fN-uvl6WTSk6lEpoLXTdMcsu4rjR4pVlVcWqbtqFStLp2wrHa2RrAN14pIbym3mre6Ibz0-LLQXecG_ysxSvaMGMKvU3_TLTBPK4MYWe28cYILTmji8DHO4EU_8w4uelDdtB1doA4Z8NULStJ0RKiH56g13FOA463UJWuK3SHlDxQLsWcE7T3Zhg1S7DmYbCGScMNBot97x9Oct_1P0kEzg8A4H_eBEgmu30UPmBIk_ExPPPELQDXuoA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1687987664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of NICE clinical guideline 95 on chest pain of recent onset: experience in a district general hospital</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ormerod, Julian OM ; Wretham, Caroline ; Beale, Andy ; Haynes, Douglas ; Harries, Iwan ; Ramcharitar, Steve ; Foley, Paul W ; McCrea, William A ; Chandrasekaran, Badri ; Barnes, Edward</creator><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Julian OM ; Wretham, Caroline ; Beale, Andy ; Haynes, Douglas ; Harries, Iwan ; Ramcharitar, Steve ; Foley, Paul W ; McCrea, William A ; Chandrasekaran, Badri ; Barnes, Edward</creatorcontrib><description>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CG95 clinical guideline on chest pain of recent onset was published in 2010. There is debate over whether the proposed strategy improves patient care and its implications on service costs. Following a six-month pilot, 472 consecutive patient records were audited for pre-test probability of significant coronary artery disease, investigations performed and outcomes. Low- and moderate-risk patients had an unexpectedly low rate of coronary disease and revascularisation. Computerised tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and stress echocardiography performed similarly, though the latter was more resource intensive. High-/very high-risk patients frequently required revascularisation and greater than 10% of each group had prognostically significant disease, going against the recommendation that very high risk patients do not undergo angiography. There were frequent protocol deviations and training clinic staff in the new approach was challenging. In conclusion, implementing NICE CG95 is feasible but presents challenges. Staff require training to follow the protocol consistently. Functional testing had no benefits over anatomical testing with CTCA, which may allow cost savings in some departments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2118</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-225</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26031969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; CG95 ; chest pain ; Chest Pain - diagnosis ; Clinical Practice ; Coronary Artery Disease ; Echocardiography, Stress ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health Status Indicators ; Hospitals, General - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; NICE ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Retrospective Studies ; United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical medicine (London, England), 2015-06, Vol.15 (3), p.225-228</ispartof><rights>2015 © 2015 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Limited on behalf of the Royal College of Physicians.</rights><rights>Royal College of Physicians 2015. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Royal College of Physicians Jun 2015</rights><rights>Royal College of Physicians 2015. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-6493498b153a13979ed6917730abfb054f98c4c18ca8eedbd6644d90da93b9b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-6493498b153a13979ed6917730abfb054f98c4c18ca8eedbd6644d90da93b9b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4953103/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4953103/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26031969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Julian OM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wretham, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beale, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harries, Iwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramcharitar, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrea, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Badri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Edward</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of NICE clinical guideline 95 on chest pain of recent onset: experience in a district general hospital</title><title>Clinical medicine (London, England)</title><addtitle>Clin Med (Lond)</addtitle><description>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CG95 clinical guideline on chest pain of recent onset was published in 2010. There is debate over whether the proposed strategy improves patient care and its implications on service costs. Following a six-month pilot, 472 consecutive patient records were audited for pre-test probability of significant coronary artery disease, investigations performed and outcomes. Low- and moderate-risk patients had an unexpectedly low rate of coronary disease and revascularisation. Computerised tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and stress echocardiography performed similarly, though the latter was more resource intensive. High-/very high-risk patients frequently required revascularisation and greater than 10% of each group had prognostically significant disease, going against the recommendation that very high risk patients do not undergo angiography. There were frequent protocol deviations and training clinic staff in the new approach was challenging. In conclusion, implementing NICE CG95 is feasible but presents challenges. Staff require training to follow the protocol consistently. Functional testing had no benefits over anatomical testing with CTCA, which may allow cost savings in some departments.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>CG95</subject><subject>chest pain</subject><subject>Chest Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Practice</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Stress</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Hospitals, General - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>NICE</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United Kingdom - epidemiology</subject><issn>1470-2118</issn><issn>1473-4893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhSMEog_4CSBLbNik2ONHYhZUaFRgpKpsYG059s2MqyQOdlLBv-_NTKnabrry4373-FyfonjH6FlVK_bJdWHowQcXBjhjsuTlaiVfFMdMVLwUteYv93tarhirj4qTnK8pZVJo9bo4WinKmVb6uJg3_dhBD8NkpxAHEltytVlfkEU-ONuR7Rw84AGIlgQBt4M8kdGGPZvAYSveZ5g-E_g7QgowOCBYtsSHPKXgJrKFARKK7WIew2S7N8Wr1nYZ3t6tp8Xvbxe_1j_Ky5_fN-uvl6WTSk6lEpoLXTdMcsu4rjR4pVlVcWqbtqFStLp2wrHa2RrAN14pIbym3mre6Ibz0-LLQXecG_ysxSvaMGMKvU3_TLTBPK4MYWe28cYILTmji8DHO4EU_8w4uelDdtB1doA4Z8NULStJ0RKiH56g13FOA463UJWuK3SHlDxQLsWcE7T3Zhg1S7DmYbCGScMNBot97x9Oct_1P0kEzg8A4H_eBEgmu30UPmBIk_ExPPPELQDXuoA</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Ormerod, Julian OM</creator><creator>Wretham, Caroline</creator><creator>Beale, Andy</creator><creator>Haynes, Douglas</creator><creator>Harries, Iwan</creator><creator>Ramcharitar, Steve</creator><creator>Foley, Paul W</creator><creator>McCrea, William A</creator><creator>Chandrasekaran, Badri</creator><creator>Barnes, Edward</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Royal College of Physicians</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>Implementation of NICE clinical guideline 95 on chest pain of recent onset: experience in a district general hospital</title><author>Ormerod, Julian OM ; Wretham, Caroline ; Beale, Andy ; Haynes, Douglas ; Harries, Iwan ; Ramcharitar, Steve ; Foley, Paul W ; McCrea, William A ; Chandrasekaran, Badri ; Barnes, Edward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-6493498b153a13979ed6917730abfb054f98c4c18ca8eedbd6644d90da93b9b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>CG95</topic><topic>chest pain</topic><topic>Chest Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Practice</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Stress</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Hospitals, General - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>NICE</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United Kingdom - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ormerod, Julian OM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wretham, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beale, Andy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haynes, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harries, Iwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramcharitar, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foley, Paul W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrea, William A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrasekaran, Badri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Edward</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK &amp; Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ormerod, Julian OM</au><au>Wretham, Caroline</au><au>Beale, Andy</au><au>Haynes, Douglas</au><au>Harries, Iwan</au><au>Ramcharitar, Steve</au><au>Foley, Paul W</au><au>McCrea, William A</au><au>Chandrasekaran, Badri</au><au>Barnes, Edward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of NICE clinical guideline 95 on chest pain of recent onset: experience in a district general hospital</atitle><jtitle>Clinical medicine (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Med (Lond)</addtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>225-228</pages><issn>1470-2118</issn><eissn>1473-4893</eissn><abstract>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) CG95 clinical guideline on chest pain of recent onset was published in 2010. There is debate over whether the proposed strategy improves patient care and its implications on service costs. Following a six-month pilot, 472 consecutive patient records were audited for pre-test probability of significant coronary artery disease, investigations performed and outcomes. Low- and moderate-risk patients had an unexpectedly low rate of coronary disease and revascularisation. Computerised tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and stress echocardiography performed similarly, though the latter was more resource intensive. High-/very high-risk patients frequently required revascularisation and greater than 10% of each group had prognostically significant disease, going against the recommendation that very high risk patients do not undergo angiography. There were frequent protocol deviations and training clinic staff in the new approach was challenging. In conclusion, implementing NICE CG95 is feasible but presents challenges. Staff require training to follow the protocol consistently. Functional testing had no benefits over anatomical testing with CTCA, which may allow cost savings in some departments.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26031969</pmid><doi>10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-225</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-2118
ispartof Clinical medicine (London, England), 2015-06, Vol.15 (3), p.225-228
issn 1470-2118
1473-4893
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4953103
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
CG95
chest pain
Chest Pain - diagnosis
Clinical Practice
Coronary Artery Disease
Echocardiography, Stress
Female
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Health Status Indicators
Hospitals, General - standards
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
NICE
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Retrospective Studies
United Kingdom - epidemiology
title Implementation of NICE clinical guideline 95 on chest pain of recent onset: experience in a district general hospital
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T03%3A44%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20NICE%20clinical%20guideline%2095%20on%20chest%20pain%20of%20recent%20onset:%20experience%20in%20a%20district%20general%20hospital&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Ormerod,%20Julian%20OM&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=225-228&rft.issn=1470-2118&rft.eissn=1473-4893&rft_id=info:doi/10.7861/clinmedicine.15-3-225&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1685750773%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1687987664&rft_id=info:pmid/26031969&rft_els_id=S147021182401546X&rfr_iscdi=true