Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants

Summary Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies. Increased use of pesticides has cause...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Functional ecology 2016-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1132-1139
Hauptverfasser: Stanley, Dara A., Raine, Nigel E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1139
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1132
container_title Functional ecology
container_volume 30
creator Stanley, Dara A.
Raine, Nigel E.
description Summary Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies. Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers. We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena. We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit. Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning. Lay Summary
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2435.12644
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4950133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48582208</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48582208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9vFCEcxUmjabfVsycNiRcv0_J7mIuJ2bTVpIkXPROG-Y7LZhZWYFr738u67UZ7qByAfPm8F14eQm8oOad1XVCuZMMEl-eUKSGO0OIweYEWhKmu0ULxE3Sa85oQ0knGjtEJayVlTNAFWi1XKQbvMPzaxjwnwCViiwPshrH4EP2At5CLd34AbKcCKeOyAuxDvVpXfAwZ91DuAALu500_QQ-QsQ0DvvNTVU82lPwKvRztlOH1w3mGvl9dflt-bm6-Xn9ZfrppnJRENCCdgBYI6yQH2ik3aiGlHEZCektHqjuh6q7A2kESQqkFNio7ENu1MNKRn6GPe9_t3G9gcBBKspPZJr-x6d5E682_L8GvzI94a0QnCeW8Gnx4MEjx51yTm43PDqaaAuKcDdVEt1Qy3VX0_RN0HecUajzDeCuJ6gRvn6OqF9dMKC0qdbGnXIo5JxgPX6bE7Lo2u2bNrlnzp-uqePd30gP_WG4F5B6oNcD9__zM1eXy0fjtXrfOJaaDTmipGSOa_wbb_r4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1803824684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Stanley, Dara A. ; Raine, Nigel E.</creator><contributor>Ayasse, Manfred</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Dara A. ; Raine, Nigel E. ; Ayasse, Manfred</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies. Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers. We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena. We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit. Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning. Lay Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12644</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27512241</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECOE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley</publisher><subject>Bees ; Bombus ; bumble bee Bombus terrestris ; Bumblebees ; Chronic exposure ; Colonies ; ecotoxicology ; Exposure ; flower visitation ; Flowers ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Foraging behavior ; foraging behaviour ; insecticide ; Insecticides ; Insects ; Learning ; Lotus corniculatus ; Pesticides ; Plant reproduction ; Plant-animal interactions ; Plants (botany) ; Pollen ; Pollination ; pollinator declines ; Pollinators ; Standard Paper ; Sublethal effects ; Thiamethoxam ; Trifolium repens ; Water pollution effects</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2016-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1132-1139</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48582208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48582208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ayasse, Manfred</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Dara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Nigel E.</creatorcontrib><title>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</title><title>Functional ecology</title><addtitle>Funct Ecol</addtitle><description>Summary Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies. Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers. We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena. We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit. Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning. Lay Summary</description><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>bumble bee Bombus terrestris</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>Chronic exposure</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>flower visitation</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>foraging behaviour</subject><subject>insecticide</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Lotus corniculatus</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plant-animal interactions</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>pollinator declines</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Standard Paper</subject><subject>Sublethal effects</subject><subject>Thiamethoxam</subject><subject>Trifolium repens</subject><subject>Water pollution effects</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9vFCEcxUmjabfVsycNiRcv0_J7mIuJ2bTVpIkXPROG-Y7LZhZWYFr738u67UZ7qByAfPm8F14eQm8oOad1XVCuZMMEl-eUKSGO0OIweYEWhKmu0ULxE3Sa85oQ0knGjtEJayVlTNAFWi1XKQbvMPzaxjwnwCViiwPshrH4EP2At5CLd34AbKcCKeOyAuxDvVpXfAwZ91DuAALu500_QQ-QsQ0DvvNTVU82lPwKvRztlOH1w3mGvl9dflt-bm6-Xn9ZfrppnJRENCCdgBYI6yQH2ik3aiGlHEZCektHqjuh6q7A2kESQqkFNio7ENu1MNKRn6GPe9_t3G9gcBBKspPZJr-x6d5E682_L8GvzI94a0QnCeW8Gnx4MEjx51yTm43PDqaaAuKcDdVEt1Qy3VX0_RN0HecUajzDeCuJ6gRvn6OqF9dMKC0qdbGnXIo5JxgPX6bE7Lo2u2bNrlnzp-uqePd30gP_WG4F5B6oNcD9__zM1eXy0fjtXrfOJaaDTmipGSOa_wbb_r4s</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Stanley, Dara A.</creator><creator>Raine, Nigel E.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</title><author>Stanley, Dara A. ; Raine, Nigel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>bumble bee Bombus terrestris</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>Chronic exposure</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>flower visitation</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>foraging behaviour</topic><topic>insecticide</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Lotus corniculatus</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plant-animal interactions</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>pollinator declines</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Standard Paper</topic><topic>Sublethal effects</topic><topic>Thiamethoxam</topic><topic>Trifolium repens</topic><topic>Water pollution effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Dara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Nigel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanley, Dara A.</au><au>Raine, Nigel E.</au><au>Ayasse, Manfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Funct Ecol</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1132</spage><epage>1139</epage><pages>1132-1139</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><coden>FECOE5</coden><abstract>Summary Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies. Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers. We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena. We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit. Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning. Lay Summary</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>27512241</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12644</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-8463
ispartof Functional ecology, 2016-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1132-1139
issn 0269-8463
1365-2435
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4950133
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Bees
Bombus
bumble bee Bombus terrestris
Bumblebees
Chronic exposure
Colonies
ecotoxicology
Exposure
flower visitation
Flowers
Flowers & plants
Foraging behavior
foraging behaviour
insecticide
Insecticides
Insects
Learning
Lotus corniculatus
Pesticides
Plant reproduction
Plant-animal interactions
Plants (botany)
Pollen
Pollination
pollinator declines
Pollinators
Standard Paper
Sublethal effects
Thiamethoxam
Trifolium repens
Water pollution effects
title Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A15%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic%20exposure%20to%20a%20neonicotinoid%20pesticide%20alters%20the%20interactions%20between%20bumblebees%20and%20wild%20plants&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Stanley,%20Dara%20A.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1132&rft.epage=1139&rft.pages=1132-1139&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft.coden=FECOE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12644&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48582208%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1803824684&rft_id=info:pmid/27512241&rft_jstor_id=48582208&rfr_iscdi=true