Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants
Summary Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies. Increased use of pesticides has cause...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Functional ecology 2016-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1132-1139 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1139 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1132 |
container_title | Functional ecology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Stanley, Dara A. Raine, Nigel E. |
description | Summary
Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies.
Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers.
We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena.
We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit.
Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning.
Lay Summary |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2435.12644 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4950133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48582208</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48582208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9vFCEcxUmjabfVsycNiRcv0_J7mIuJ2bTVpIkXPROG-Y7LZhZWYFr738u67UZ7qByAfPm8F14eQm8oOad1XVCuZMMEl-eUKSGO0OIweYEWhKmu0ULxE3Sa85oQ0knGjtEJayVlTNAFWi1XKQbvMPzaxjwnwCViiwPshrH4EP2At5CLd34AbKcCKeOyAuxDvVpXfAwZ91DuAALu500_QQ-QsQ0DvvNTVU82lPwKvRztlOH1w3mGvl9dflt-bm6-Xn9ZfrppnJRENCCdgBYI6yQH2ik3aiGlHEZCektHqjuh6q7A2kESQqkFNio7ENu1MNKRn6GPe9_t3G9gcBBKspPZJr-x6d5E682_L8GvzI94a0QnCeW8Gnx4MEjx51yTm43PDqaaAuKcDdVEt1Qy3VX0_RN0HecUajzDeCuJ6gRvn6OqF9dMKC0qdbGnXIo5JxgPX6bE7Lo2u2bNrlnzp-uqePd30gP_WG4F5B6oNcD9__zM1eXy0fjtXrfOJaaDTmipGSOa_wbb_r4s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1803824684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Stanley, Dara A. ; Raine, Nigel E.</creator><contributor>Ayasse, Manfred</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Dara A. ; Raine, Nigel E. ; Ayasse, Manfred</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies.
Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers.
We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena.
We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit.
Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning.
Lay Summary</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-8463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2435</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12644</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27512241</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECOE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley</publisher><subject>Bees ; Bombus ; bumble bee Bombus terrestris ; Bumblebees ; Chronic exposure ; Colonies ; ecotoxicology ; Exposure ; flower visitation ; Flowers ; Flowers & plants ; Foraging behavior ; foraging behaviour ; insecticide ; Insecticides ; Insects ; Learning ; Lotus corniculatus ; Pesticides ; Plant reproduction ; Plant-animal interactions ; Plants (botany) ; Pollen ; Pollination ; pollinator declines ; Pollinators ; Standard Paper ; Sublethal effects ; Thiamethoxam ; Trifolium repens ; Water pollution effects</subject><ispartof>Functional ecology, 2016-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1132-1139</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><rights>2016 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Functional Ecology © 2016 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48582208$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48582208$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,1416,1432,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46831,58015,58248</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ayasse, Manfred</contributor><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Dara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Nigel E.</creatorcontrib><title>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</title><title>Functional ecology</title><addtitle>Funct Ecol</addtitle><description>Summary
Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies.
Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers.
We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena.
We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit.
Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning.
Lay Summary</description><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Bombus</subject><subject>bumble bee Bombus terrestris</subject><subject>Bumblebees</subject><subject>Chronic exposure</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>flower visitation</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>foraging behaviour</subject><subject>insecticide</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Lotus corniculatus</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plant-animal interactions</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>pollinator declines</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Standard Paper</subject><subject>Sublethal effects</subject><subject>Thiamethoxam</subject><subject>Trifolium repens</subject><subject>Water pollution effects</subject><issn>0269-8463</issn><issn>1365-2435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9vFCEcxUmjabfVsycNiRcv0_J7mIuJ2bTVpIkXPROG-Y7LZhZWYFr738u67UZ7qByAfPm8F14eQm8oOad1XVCuZMMEl-eUKSGO0OIweYEWhKmu0ULxE3Sa85oQ0knGjtEJayVlTNAFWi1XKQbvMPzaxjwnwCViiwPshrH4EP2At5CLd34AbKcCKeOyAuxDvVpXfAwZ91DuAALu500_QQ-QsQ0DvvNTVU82lPwKvRztlOH1w3mGvl9dflt-bm6-Xn9ZfrppnJRENCCdgBYI6yQH2ik3aiGlHEZCektHqjuh6q7A2kESQqkFNio7ENu1MNKRn6GPe9_t3G9gcBBKspPZJr-x6d5E682_L8GvzI94a0QnCeW8Gnx4MEjx51yTm43PDqaaAuKcDdVEt1Qy3VX0_RN0HecUajzDeCuJ6gRvn6OqF9dMKC0qdbGnXIo5JxgPX6bE7Lo2u2bNrlnzp-uqePd30gP_WG4F5B6oNcD9__zM1eXy0fjtXrfOJaaDTmipGSOa_wbb_r4s</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Stanley, Dara A.</creator><creator>Raine, Nigel E.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</title><author>Stanley, Dara A. ; Raine, Nigel E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5504-e5c4e7e02953e196cf84555df00ba1f18946f186eaad50011ae2f6ad0a97ef1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Bombus</topic><topic>bumble bee Bombus terrestris</topic><topic>Bumblebees</topic><topic>Chronic exposure</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>flower visitation</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>foraging behaviour</topic><topic>insecticide</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Lotus corniculatus</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plant-animal interactions</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>pollinator declines</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Standard Paper</topic><topic>Sublethal effects</topic><topic>Thiamethoxam</topic><topic>Trifolium repens</topic><topic>Water pollution effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanley, Dara A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raine, Nigel E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanley, Dara A.</au><au>Raine, Nigel E.</au><au>Ayasse, Manfred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants</atitle><jtitle>Functional ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Funct Ecol</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1132</spage><epage>1139</epage><pages>1132-1139</pages><issn>0269-8463</issn><eissn>1365-2435</eissn><coden>FECOE5</coden><abstract>Summary
Insect pollinators are essential for both the production of a large proportion of world crops and the health of natural ecosystems. As important pollinators, bumblebees must learn to forage on flowers to feed both themselves and provision their colonies.
Increased use of pesticides has caused concern over sublethal effects on bees, such as impacts on reproduction or learning ability. However, little is known about how sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide might affect the ability of bees to visit and manipulate flowers.
We observed the behaviour of individual bumblebees from colonies chronically exposed to a neonicotinoid pesticide (10 ppb thiamethoxam) or control solutions foraging for the first time on an array of morphologically complex wildflowers (Lotus corniculatus and Trifolium repens) in an outdoor flight arena.
We found that more bees released from pesticide‐treated colonies became foragers, and that they visited more L. corniculatus flowers than controls. Interestingly, bees exposed to pesticide collected pollen more often than controls, but control bees learnt to handle flowers efficiently after fewer learning visits than bees exposed to pesticide. There were also different initial floral preferences of our treatment groups; control bees visited a higher proportion of T. repens flowers, and bees exposed to pesticide were more likely to choose L. corniculatus on their first visit.
Our results suggest that the foraging behaviour of bumblebees on real flowers can be altered by sublethal exposure to field‐realistic levels of pesticide. This has implications for the foraging success and persistence of bumblebee colonies, but perhaps more importantly for the interactions between wild plants and flower‐visiting insects and ability of bees to deliver the crucial pollination services to plants necessary for ecosystem functioning.
Lay Summary</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>27512241</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2435.12644</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-8463 |
ispartof | Functional ecology, 2016-07, Vol.30 (7), p.1132-1139 |
issn | 0269-8463 1365-2435 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4950133 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Bees Bombus bumble bee Bombus terrestris Bumblebees Chronic exposure Colonies ecotoxicology Exposure flower visitation Flowers Flowers & plants Foraging behavior foraging behaviour insecticide Insecticides Insects Learning Lotus corniculatus Pesticides Plant reproduction Plant-animal interactions Plants (botany) Pollen Pollination pollinator declines Pollinators Standard Paper Sublethal effects Thiamethoxam Trifolium repens Water pollution effects |
title | Chronic exposure to a neonicotinoid pesticide alters the interactions between bumblebees and wild plants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A15%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chronic%20exposure%20to%20a%20neonicotinoid%20pesticide%20alters%20the%20interactions%20between%20bumblebees%20and%20wild%20plants&rft.jtitle=Functional%20ecology&rft.au=Stanley,%20Dara%20A.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1132&rft.epage=1139&rft.pages=1132-1139&rft.issn=0269-8463&rft.eissn=1365-2435&rft.coden=FECOE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12644&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E48582208%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1803824684&rft_id=info:pmid/27512241&rft_jstor_id=48582208&rfr_iscdi=true |