Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia
This study evaluated spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Ratios of county mammography centers to women age 45 and older, driving time to nearest mammography facility, and various 2SFCA app...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Health services and outcomes research methodology 2016-06, Vol.16 (1-2), p.22-40 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 40 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 22 |
| container_title | Health services and outcomes research methodology |
| container_volume | 16 |
| creator | Donohoe, Joseph Marshall, Vincent Tan, Xi Camacho, Fabian T. Anderson, Roger Balkrishnan, Rajesh |
| description | This study evaluated spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Ratios of county mammography centers to women age 45 and older, driving time to nearest mammography facility, and various 2SFCA approaches were compared throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. Closest travel time measures favored urban areas. The 2SFCA method produced varied results depending on the parameters chosen. Appalachia areas had greater travel times to their closest mammography center. Appalachia areas in OH and NC had worse 2SFCA scores than non-Appalachia areas of the same states. A relative 2SFCA approach, the spatial access ratio method, was recommended because it helped minimize the differences between various 2SFCA approaches. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4945133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835680318</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-be1f8e4dcfca2a54b5a9a2849b8ae25b19ca72e71986de40302bc2d045ba607d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVoyccmP6CXIuglF6ejD1vypRBCmgQCvbRnMZblXS-25Uh2YP995G66JIUcxMxI77ya4SHkC4MrBqC-RwZK8gxYkY4U2e6InLJc8ayUAJ9SLrTKhJLshJzFuAXgHAp9TE64kjIvRHlKqttn7Gac2mFNcaip9f2IYal6N218HWnjQ8oxzn9v45i02FG01sVIJ0977Hu_DjhudtS6YXIh0nag1-OIHdpNi-fkc4NddBevcUX-_Lz9fXOfPf66e7i5fsysVDBllWONdrK2jUWOuaxyLJFrWVYaHc8rVlpU3ClW6qJ2EgTwyvIaZF5hAaoWK_Jj7zvOVe_qZZaAnRlD22PYGY-tef8ytBuz9s9GljJnQiSDy1eD4J9mFyfTt9G6rsPB-TkapkVeaBAprsi3_6RbP4chrWeY0lozwYRMKrZX2eBjDK45DMPALATNnqBJBM1C0OxSz9e3Wxw6_iFLAr4XxHEh4sKbrz90fQGLF6l-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788813134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Donohoe, Joseph ; Marshall, Vincent ; Tan, Xi ; Camacho, Fabian T. ; Anderson, Roger ; Balkrishnan, Rajesh</creator><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Joseph ; Marshall, Vincent ; Tan, Xi ; Camacho, Fabian T. ; Anderson, Roger ; Balkrishnan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Ratios of county mammography centers to women age 45 and older, driving time to nearest mammography facility, and various 2SFCA approaches were compared throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. Closest travel time measures favored urban areas. The 2SFCA method produced varied results depending on the parameters chosen. Appalachia areas had greater travel times to their closest mammography center. Appalachia areas in OH and NC had worse 2SFCA scores than non-Appalachia areas of the same states. A relative 2SFCA approach, the spatial access ratio method, was recommended because it helped minimize the differences between various 2SFCA approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3741</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27445639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Commuting ; Comparative analysis ; Economics ; Geographic information systems ; Health Administration ; Health care access ; Health facilities ; Mammography ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Methods ; Pharmacy ; Public Health ; Ratios ; Researchers ; Rural areas ; Statistical analysis ; Statistics</subject><ispartof>Health services and outcomes research methodology, 2016-06, Vol.16 (1-2), p.22-40</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-be1f8e4dcfca2a54b5a9a2849b8ae25b19ca72e71986de40302bc2d045ba607d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-be1f8e4dcfca2a54b5a9a2849b8ae25b19ca72e71986de40302bc2d045ba607d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445639$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camacho, Fabian T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balkrishnan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia</title><title>Health services and outcomes research methodology</title><addtitle>Health Serv Outcomes Res Method</addtitle><addtitle>Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol</addtitle><description>This study evaluated spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Ratios of county mammography centers to women age 45 and older, driving time to nearest mammography facility, and various 2SFCA approaches were compared throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. Closest travel time measures favored urban areas. The 2SFCA method produced varied results depending on the parameters chosen. Appalachia areas had greater travel times to their closest mammography center. Appalachia areas in OH and NC had worse 2SFCA scores than non-Appalachia areas of the same states. A relative 2SFCA approach, the spatial access ratio method, was recommended because it helped minimize the differences between various 2SFCA approaches.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Commuting</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Health Administration</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><issn>1387-3741</issn><issn>1572-9400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVoyccmP6CXIuglF6ejD1vypRBCmgQCvbRnMZblXS-25Uh2YP995G66JIUcxMxI77ya4SHkC4MrBqC-RwZK8gxYkY4U2e6InLJc8ayUAJ9SLrTKhJLshJzFuAXgHAp9TE64kjIvRHlKqttn7Gac2mFNcaip9f2IYal6N218HWnjQ8oxzn9v45i02FG01sVIJ0977Hu_DjhudtS6YXIh0nag1-OIHdpNi-fkc4NddBevcUX-_Lz9fXOfPf66e7i5fsysVDBllWONdrK2jUWOuaxyLJFrWVYaHc8rVlpU3ClW6qJ2EgTwyvIaZF5hAaoWK_Jj7zvOVe_qZZaAnRlD22PYGY-tef8ytBuz9s9GljJnQiSDy1eD4J9mFyfTt9G6rsPB-TkapkVeaBAprsi3_6RbP4chrWeY0lozwYRMKrZX2eBjDK45DMPALATNnqBJBM1C0OxSz9e3Wxw6_iFLAr4XxHEh4sKbrz90fQGLF6l-</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Donohoe, Joseph</creator><creator>Marshall, Vincent</creator><creator>Tan, Xi</creator><creator>Camacho, Fabian T.</creator><creator>Anderson, Roger</creator><creator>Balkrishnan, Rajesh</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia</title><author>Donohoe, Joseph ; Marshall, Vincent ; Tan, Xi ; Camacho, Fabian T. ; Anderson, Roger ; Balkrishnan, Rajesh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-be1f8e4dcfca2a54b5a9a2849b8ae25b19ca72e71986de40302bc2d045ba607d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Commuting</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Health Administration</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donohoe, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camacho, Fabian T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balkrishnan, Rajesh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services and outcomes research methodology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donohoe, Joseph</au><au>Marshall, Vincent</au><au>Tan, Xi</au><au>Camacho, Fabian T.</au><au>Anderson, Roger</au><au>Balkrishnan, Rajesh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia</atitle><jtitle>Health services and outcomes research methodology</jtitle><stitle>Health Serv Outcomes Res Method</stitle><addtitle>Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>22-40</pages><issn>1387-3741</issn><eissn>1572-9400</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia using both traditional access measures and the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. Ratios of county mammography centers to women age 45 and older, driving time to nearest mammography facility, and various 2SFCA approaches were compared throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, and North Carolina. Closest travel time measures favored urban areas. The 2SFCA method produced varied results depending on the parameters chosen. Appalachia areas had greater travel times to their closest mammography center. Appalachia areas in OH and NC had worse 2SFCA scores than non-Appalachia areas of the same states. A relative 2SFCA approach, the spatial access ratio method, was recommended because it helped minimize the differences between various 2SFCA approaches.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>27445639</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1387-3741 |
| ispartof | Health services and outcomes research methodology, 2016-06, Vol.16 (1-2), p.22-40 |
| issn | 1387-3741 1572-9400 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4945133 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Cancer Commuting Comparative analysis Economics Geographic information systems Health Administration Health care access Health facilities Mammography Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methodology of the Social Sciences Methods Pharmacy Public Health Ratios Researchers Rural areas Statistical analysis Statistics |
| title | Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20and%20comparing%20methods%20for%20measuring%20spatial%20access%20to%20mammography%20centers%20in%20Appalachia&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20and%20outcomes%20research%20methodology&rft.au=Donohoe,%20Joseph&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=22-40&rft.issn=1387-3741&rft.eissn=1572-9400&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10742-016-0143-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835680318%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788813134&rft_id=info:pmid/27445639&rfr_iscdi=true |