Substantial Effects of Luseogliflozin Revealed by Analyzing Responses to Postprandial Hyperglycemia: Post Hoc Subanalyses of a Randomized Controlled Study

Introduction In our previous study investigating effects of luseogliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on 24-h glycemic variability by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), luseogliflozin elicited parallel downward shifts in fasting and postprandial glucose levels. However, further r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2016-07, Vol.33 (7), p.1215-1230
Hauptverfasser: Samukawa, Yoshishige, Omiya, Hirohisa, Watase, Hirotaka, Nozaki, Kazunari, Sakai, Soichi, Nishimura, Rimei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1230
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1215
container_title Advances in therapy
container_volume 33
creator Samukawa, Yoshishige
Omiya, Hirohisa
Watase, Hirotaka
Nozaki, Kazunari
Sakai, Soichi
Nishimura, Rimei
description Introduction In our previous study investigating effects of luseogliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on 24-h glycemic variability by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), luseogliflozin elicited parallel downward shifts in fasting and postprandial glucose levels. However, further review of individual patients’ data revealed that postprandial hyperglycemia was not reduced in some patients, while preprandial glucose was ameliorated in most patients. Therefore, we divided patients into two groups according to their postprandial glucose responses and conducted a post hoc subanalyses to elucidate which factors contributed to the differential effects of luseogliflozin. Methods Thirty-four Japanese type 2 diabetic patients in our previous randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study with 7-day luseogliflozin administration were divided into postprandial glucose responders (PGR, n  = 23, ameliorated peak glucose) and postprandial glucose non-responders (PGNR; n  = 11, non-ameliorated peak glucose). Baseline characteristics, variations in CGM-measured 24-h glucose levels, and other pharmacodynamic variabilities were compared. Results Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Placebo-subtracted peak glucose was significantly lowered in PGR and significantly increased in PGNR (−43.8 and 17.9 mg/dL; both p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12325-016-0350-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4939154</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27255763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c28b05d5b533897069b69a67b912a18a5e122ce081ca64ea94130e63d54e1de93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhUVIaKZJHyCboBdwqx_LP1kEwpBmCgMt-YHsxLV87TpoLCPZAedR8rSVM21oN10IwT33fEfoEHLG2WfOWP4lcCGFShjPEiYVS9QBWfEiU0k84pCsWJ7yRMji8Zh8DOGJMcFyVXwgxyIXSuWZXJHXu6kKI_RjB5ZeNw2aMVDX0O0U0LW2a6x76Xp6i88IFmtazfSqBzvHYRunYXB9wEBHR3-4MA4e-nohbeYBfWtng7sOLt40unGGxjRY7IsnpgC9jQa3614ieu360Tu7pNyNUz2fkqMGbMBPv-8T8vD1-n69Sbbfb76tr7aJUawYEyOKiqlaVUrKosxZVlZZCVlelVwAL0AhF8IgK7iBLEUoUy4ZZrJWKfIaS3lCLvfcYap2WBuMzwCrB9_twM_aQaf_Vfrup27ds05LWXKVRgDfA4x3IXhs3r2c6aUovS9Kx6L0UpRW0XP-d-i7408zcUHsF0KU-ha9fnKTj38X_kP9BTAdow4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Substantial Effects of Luseogliflozin Revealed by Analyzing Responses to Postprandial Hyperglycemia: Post Hoc Subanalyses of a Randomized Controlled Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Samukawa, Yoshishige ; Omiya, Hirohisa ; Watase, Hirotaka ; Nozaki, Kazunari ; Sakai, Soichi ; Nishimura, Rimei</creator><creatorcontrib>Samukawa, Yoshishige ; Omiya, Hirohisa ; Watase, Hirotaka ; Nozaki, Kazunari ; Sakai, Soichi ; Nishimura, Rimei</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction In our previous study investigating effects of luseogliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on 24-h glycemic variability by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), luseogliflozin elicited parallel downward shifts in fasting and postprandial glucose levels. However, further review of individual patients’ data revealed that postprandial hyperglycemia was not reduced in some patients, while preprandial glucose was ameliorated in most patients. Therefore, we divided patients into two groups according to their postprandial glucose responses and conducted a post hoc subanalyses to elucidate which factors contributed to the differential effects of luseogliflozin. Methods Thirty-four Japanese type 2 diabetic patients in our previous randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study with 7-day luseogliflozin administration were divided into postprandial glucose responders (PGR, n  = 23, ameliorated peak glucose) and postprandial glucose non-responders (PGNR; n  = 11, non-ameliorated peak glucose). Baseline characteristics, variations in CGM-measured 24-h glucose levels, and other pharmacodynamic variabilities were compared. Results Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Placebo-subtracted peak glucose was significantly lowered in PGR and significantly increased in PGNR (−43.8 and 17.9 mg/dL; both p  &lt; 0.05). Luseogliflozin significantly lowered “lowest glucose” (defined as the lowest level measured throughout a 24-h period) similarly in PGR and PGNR (−19.2 and −24.0 mg/dL; both p  &lt; 0.05), significantly reduced the mean amplitude of glucose excursions in PGR (−15.50 mg/dL; p  &lt; 0.05), and increased the area under the curve for plasma glucagon over 24 h in PGNR (median difference vs. placebo: 240 pg/mL h; p  &lt; 0.05). Luseogliflozin increased urinary glucose excretion (UGE) and decreased serum insulin by similar magnitudes in both groups. Conclusions Luseogliflozin diminished glucose fluctuations in most patients by lowering peak glucose to a greater extent than lowest glucose. Luseogliflozin may also lower lowest glucose in patients whose peak glucose was not ameliorated despite increasing UGE. The glucagon increase in PGNR might explain its hypoglycemic effect on postprandial glucose. Funding Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. Trial Registration JapicCTI-142548.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-238X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-8652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0350-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27255763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cheshire: Springer Healthcare</publisher><subject>Aged ; Blood Glucose - drug effects ; Cardiology ; Cross-Over Studies ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperglycemia - drug therapy ; Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use ; Internal Medicine ; Japan ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Oncology ; Original Research ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Postprandial Period - drug effects ; Rheumatology ; Sorbitol - administration &amp; dosage ; Sorbitol - adverse effects ; Sorbitol - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Sorbitol - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>Advances in therapy, 2016-07, Vol.33 (7), p.1215-1230</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c28b05d5b533897069b69a67b912a18a5e122ce081ca64ea94130e63d54e1de93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c28b05d5b533897069b69a67b912a18a5e122ce081ca64ea94130e63d54e1de93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-016-0350-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12325-016-0350-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927,41490,42559,51321</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samukawa, Yoshishige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omiya, Hirohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watase, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozaki, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Soichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Rimei</creatorcontrib><title>Substantial Effects of Luseogliflozin Revealed by Analyzing Responses to Postprandial Hyperglycemia: Post Hoc Subanalyses of a Randomized Controlled Study</title><title>Advances in therapy</title><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction In our previous study investigating effects of luseogliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on 24-h glycemic variability by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), luseogliflozin elicited parallel downward shifts in fasting and postprandial glucose levels. However, further review of individual patients’ data revealed that postprandial hyperglycemia was not reduced in some patients, while preprandial glucose was ameliorated in most patients. Therefore, we divided patients into two groups according to their postprandial glucose responses and conducted a post hoc subanalyses to elucidate which factors contributed to the differential effects of luseogliflozin. Methods Thirty-four Japanese type 2 diabetic patients in our previous randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study with 7-day luseogliflozin administration were divided into postprandial glucose responders (PGR, n  = 23, ameliorated peak glucose) and postprandial glucose non-responders (PGNR; n  = 11, non-ameliorated peak glucose). Baseline characteristics, variations in CGM-measured 24-h glucose levels, and other pharmacodynamic variabilities were compared. Results Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Placebo-subtracted peak glucose was significantly lowered in PGR and significantly increased in PGNR (−43.8 and 17.9 mg/dL; both p  &lt; 0.05). Luseogliflozin significantly lowered “lowest glucose” (defined as the lowest level measured throughout a 24-h period) similarly in PGR and PGNR (−19.2 and −24.0 mg/dL; both p  &lt; 0.05), significantly reduced the mean amplitude of glucose excursions in PGR (−15.50 mg/dL; p  &lt; 0.05), and increased the area under the curve for plasma glucagon over 24 h in PGNR (median difference vs. placebo: 240 pg/mL h; p  &lt; 0.05). Luseogliflozin increased urinary glucose excretion (UGE) and decreased serum insulin by similar magnitudes in both groups. Conclusions Luseogliflozin diminished glucose fluctuations in most patients by lowering peak glucose to a greater extent than lowest glucose. Luseogliflozin may also lower lowest glucose in patients whose peak glucose was not ameliorated despite increasing UGE. The glucagon increase in PGNR might explain its hypoglycemic effect on postprandial glucose. Funding Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. Trial Registration JapicCTI-142548.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Blood Glucose - drug effects</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Postprandial Period - drug effects</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Sorbitol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Sorbitol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sorbitol - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Sorbitol - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0741-238X</issn><issn>1865-8652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3DAUhUVIaKZJHyCboBdwqx_LP1kEwpBmCgMt-YHsxLV87TpoLCPZAedR8rSVM21oN10IwT33fEfoEHLG2WfOWP4lcCGFShjPEiYVS9QBWfEiU0k84pCsWJ7yRMji8Zh8DOGJMcFyVXwgxyIXSuWZXJHXu6kKI_RjB5ZeNw2aMVDX0O0U0LW2a6x76Xp6i88IFmtazfSqBzvHYRunYXB9wEBHR3-4MA4e-nohbeYBfWtng7sOLt40unGGxjRY7IsnpgC9jQa3614ieu360Tu7pNyNUz2fkqMGbMBPv-8T8vD1-n69Sbbfb76tr7aJUawYEyOKiqlaVUrKosxZVlZZCVlelVwAL0AhF8IgK7iBLEUoUy4ZZrJWKfIaS3lCLvfcYap2WBuMzwCrB9_twM_aQaf_Vfrup27ds05LWXKVRgDfA4x3IXhs3r2c6aUovS9Kx6L0UpRW0XP-d-i7408zcUHsF0KU-ha9fnKTj38X_kP9BTAdow4</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Samukawa, Yoshishige</creator><creator>Omiya, Hirohisa</creator><creator>Watase, Hirotaka</creator><creator>Nozaki, Kazunari</creator><creator>Sakai, Soichi</creator><creator>Nishimura, Rimei</creator><general>Springer Healthcare</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Substantial Effects of Luseogliflozin Revealed by Analyzing Responses to Postprandial Hyperglycemia: Post Hoc Subanalyses of a Randomized Controlled Study</title><author>Samukawa, Yoshishige ; Omiya, Hirohisa ; Watase, Hirotaka ; Nozaki, Kazunari ; Sakai, Soichi ; Nishimura, Rimei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-c28b05d5b533897069b69a67b912a18a5e122ce081ca64ea94130e63d54e1de93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Blood Glucose - drug effects</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Postprandial Period - drug effects</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Sorbitol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Sorbitol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sorbitol - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Sorbitol - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samukawa, Yoshishige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omiya, Hirohisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watase, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nozaki, Kazunari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Soichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Rimei</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samukawa, Yoshishige</au><au>Omiya, Hirohisa</au><au>Watase, Hirotaka</au><au>Nozaki, Kazunari</au><au>Sakai, Soichi</au><au>Nishimura, Rimei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Substantial Effects of Luseogliflozin Revealed by Analyzing Responses to Postprandial Hyperglycemia: Post Hoc Subanalyses of a Randomized Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>Advances in therapy</jtitle><stitle>Adv Ther</stitle><addtitle>Adv Ther</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1215</spage><epage>1230</epage><pages>1215-1230</pages><issn>0741-238X</issn><eissn>1865-8652</eissn><abstract>Introduction In our previous study investigating effects of luseogliflozin, a sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on 24-h glycemic variability by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), luseogliflozin elicited parallel downward shifts in fasting and postprandial glucose levels. However, further review of individual patients’ data revealed that postprandial hyperglycemia was not reduced in some patients, while preprandial glucose was ameliorated in most patients. Therefore, we divided patients into two groups according to their postprandial glucose responses and conducted a post hoc subanalyses to elucidate which factors contributed to the differential effects of luseogliflozin. Methods Thirty-four Japanese type 2 diabetic patients in our previous randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study with 7-day luseogliflozin administration were divided into postprandial glucose responders (PGR, n  = 23, ameliorated peak glucose) and postprandial glucose non-responders (PGNR; n  = 11, non-ameliorated peak glucose). Baseline characteristics, variations in CGM-measured 24-h glucose levels, and other pharmacodynamic variabilities were compared. Results Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups. Placebo-subtracted peak glucose was significantly lowered in PGR and significantly increased in PGNR (−43.8 and 17.9 mg/dL; both p  &lt; 0.05). Luseogliflozin significantly lowered “lowest glucose” (defined as the lowest level measured throughout a 24-h period) similarly in PGR and PGNR (−19.2 and −24.0 mg/dL; both p  &lt; 0.05), significantly reduced the mean amplitude of glucose excursions in PGR (−15.50 mg/dL; p  &lt; 0.05), and increased the area under the curve for plasma glucagon over 24 h in PGNR (median difference vs. placebo: 240 pg/mL h; p  &lt; 0.05). Luseogliflozin increased urinary glucose excretion (UGE) and decreased serum insulin by similar magnitudes in both groups. Conclusions Luseogliflozin diminished glucose fluctuations in most patients by lowering peak glucose to a greater extent than lowest glucose. Luseogliflozin may also lower lowest glucose in patients whose peak glucose was not ameliorated despite increasing UGE. The glucagon increase in PGNR might explain its hypoglycemic effect on postprandial glucose. Funding Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. Trial Registration JapicCTI-142548.</abstract><cop>Cheshire</cop><pub>Springer Healthcare</pub><pmid>27255763</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12325-016-0350-5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0741-238X
ispartof Advances in therapy, 2016-07, Vol.33 (7), p.1215-1230
issn 0741-238X
1865-8652
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4939154
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aged
Blood Glucose - drug effects
Cardiology
Cross-Over Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - drug therapy
Double-Blind Method
Endocrinology
Female
Humans
Hyperglycemia - drug therapy
Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use
Internal Medicine
Japan
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Oncology
Original Research
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Postprandial Period - drug effects
Rheumatology
Sorbitol - administration & dosage
Sorbitol - adverse effects
Sorbitol - analogs & derivatives
Sorbitol - therapeutic use
title Substantial Effects of Luseogliflozin Revealed by Analyzing Responses to Postprandial Hyperglycemia: Post Hoc Subanalyses of a Randomized Controlled Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A54%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Substantial%20Effects%20of%20Luseogliflozin%20Revealed%20by%20Analyzing%20Responses%20to%20Postprandial%20Hyperglycemia:%20Post%20Hoc%20Subanalyses%20of%20a%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20therapy&rft.au=Samukawa,%20Yoshishige&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1215&rft.epage=1230&rft.pages=1215-1230&rft.issn=0741-238X&rft.eissn=1865-8652&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12325-016-0350-5&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E27255763%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/27255763&rfr_iscdi=true