Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study

Fortifying human milk contributes to the prevention of postnatal growth failure in preterm infants. Because of the natural variability of human milk, targeted fortification of human milk has been advocated. However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of prolonged targeted fortification are scarc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of translational medicine 2016-07, Vol.14 (1), p.195-195, Article 195
Hauptverfasser: Morlacchi, Laura, Mallardi, Domenica, Giannì, Maria Lorella, Roggero, Paola, Amato, Orsola, Piemontese, Pasqua, Consonni, Dario, Mosca, Fabio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 195
container_issue 1
container_start_page 195
container_title Journal of translational medicine
container_volume 14
creator Morlacchi, Laura
Mallardi, Domenica
Giannì, Maria Lorella
Roggero, Paola
Amato, Orsola
Piemontese, Pasqua
Consonni, Dario
Mosca, Fabio
description Fortifying human milk contributes to the prevention of postnatal growth failure in preterm infants. Because of the natural variability of human milk, targeted fortification of human milk has been advocated. However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of prolonged targeted fortification are scarce. We aimed to assess the safety of targeted fortification of human milk in preterm infants compared with standard fortification, as well as the effects on infant growth. We conducted an interventional study during hospital stay in healthy very low birth weight preterm infants who were exclusively fed human milk. Pools of human milk collected for 24 h were analysed using mid-infrared transmission spectroscopy. Targeted fortification of human milk was performed by adding macronutrients to native human milk to obtain optimal ratios of fat (4.4 g), carbohydrates (8.8 g), and protein (3 g) per 100 ml. The intervention period lasted 4-7 weeks. Weekly weight and daily growth rates were compared with those of a standardized fortification group of very low birth weight preterm infants who received standard fortified human milk (n = 10). The osmolality as well as the metabolic and gastrointestinal tolerance were monitored. Intergroup differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A total of 10 preterm infants (birth weight 1223 ± 195 g; gestational age 29.1 ± 1.03 weeks) were enrolled and 118 samples of pooled milk were analysed. On average, 1.4 ± 0.1 g of protein, 2.3 ± 0.5 g of carbohydrate, and 0.3 ± 0.1 g of fat per 100 ml were added to the milk. Osmolality values after target fortification were within recommended limits (376 ± 66 mOsml/kg). Weekly weight gain (205.5 g; 95 % CI 177-233 vs 155 g; 95 % CI 132-178; p = 0.025) and daily growth rates (15.7 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 14.5-16.9 vs 12.3 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 10.7-13.9; p = 0.005) were higher in infants receiving target fortification than in infants receiving standardized fortification. The infants receiving targeted fortified milk consumed similar volumes as infants in the standardized fortification group (148 ± 4.5 vs 146 ± 4 ml/kg/day). No signs of either gastrointestinal or metabolic intolerance were observed. Target fortification appears to promote growth in very low birth weight preterm infants without any detrimental effects. Trial registration NCT02716337.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12967-016-0957-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4930619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A461912659</galeid><sourcerecordid>A461912659</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-bbdd1a729a365072ab93fb67eef432e2bb28a31459529e809eff1ce1db366f043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstu1TAUtBAVfcAHsEGW2LBJ61eceAO6qqCtVIkNrC0nOb51SeyL7VTK3-P0lj4Q8sL28cwcn9Eg9J6SU0pbeZYoU7KpCJUVUXVTLa_QERWNquq2ka-fnQ_RcUq3hDBRC_UGHbKGN0QKdYSWq4SziVvIMGAbYnbW9Sa74HGw-GaejMddBJMyntz4C5dr2GU3mRH7OUd3j0w5mgzbZRXAu1i04oSdt8bn9AVvfDmX0h34FV2YKc_D8hYdWDMmePewn6Cf377-OL-srr9fXJ1vrqteKJGrrhsGahqmDJc1aZjpFLedbACs4AxY17HWcCpqVTMFLVFgLe2BDh2X0hLBT9Dnve5u7iYY-vKLaEa9i2WIuOhgnH754t2N3oY7LRQnkqoi8OlBIIbfM6SsJ5d6GEfjIcxJ05YUP4vVa6-P_0BvwxzLyPeolgnJJH1Cbc0IuvgUSt9-FdUbUTpSJuu17el_UGUNMLk-eLCu1F8Q6J7Qx5BSBPs4IyV6zYve50WXvOg1L3opnA_PzXlk_A0I_wNTpr30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808246261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Morlacchi, Laura ; Mallardi, Domenica ; Giannì, Maria Lorella ; Roggero, Paola ; Amato, Orsola ; Piemontese, Pasqua ; Consonni, Dario ; Mosca, Fabio</creator><creatorcontrib>Morlacchi, Laura ; Mallardi, Domenica ; Giannì, Maria Lorella ; Roggero, Paola ; Amato, Orsola ; Piemontese, Pasqua ; Consonni, Dario ; Mosca, Fabio</creatorcontrib><description>Fortifying human milk contributes to the prevention of postnatal growth failure in preterm infants. Because of the natural variability of human milk, targeted fortification of human milk has been advocated. However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of prolonged targeted fortification are scarce. We aimed to assess the safety of targeted fortification of human milk in preterm infants compared with standard fortification, as well as the effects on infant growth. We conducted an interventional study during hospital stay in healthy very low birth weight preterm infants who were exclusively fed human milk. Pools of human milk collected for 24 h were analysed using mid-infrared transmission spectroscopy. Targeted fortification of human milk was performed by adding macronutrients to native human milk to obtain optimal ratios of fat (4.4 g), carbohydrates (8.8 g), and protein (3 g) per 100 ml. The intervention period lasted 4-7 weeks. Weekly weight and daily growth rates were compared with those of a standardized fortification group of very low birth weight preterm infants who received standard fortified human milk (n = 10). The osmolality as well as the metabolic and gastrointestinal tolerance were monitored. Intergroup differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A total of 10 preterm infants (birth weight 1223 ± 195 g; gestational age 29.1 ± 1.03 weeks) were enrolled and 118 samples of pooled milk were analysed. On average, 1.4 ± 0.1 g of protein, 2.3 ± 0.5 g of carbohydrate, and 0.3 ± 0.1 g of fat per 100 ml were added to the milk. Osmolality values after target fortification were within recommended limits (376 ± 66 mOsml/kg). Weekly weight gain (205.5 g; 95 % CI 177-233 vs 155 g; 95 % CI 132-178; p = 0.025) and daily growth rates (15.7 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 14.5-16.9 vs 12.3 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 10.7-13.9; p = 0.005) were higher in infants receiving target fortification than in infants receiving standardized fortification. The infants receiving targeted fortified milk consumed similar volumes as infants in the standardized fortification group (148 ± 4.5 vs 146 ± 4 ml/kg/day). No signs of either gastrointestinal or metabolic intolerance were observed. Target fortification appears to promote growth in very low birth weight preterm infants without any detrimental effects. Trial registration NCT02716337.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-5876</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-5876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0957-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27370649</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Body fluid osmolality ; Breast milk ; Carbohydrates - analysis ; Child development ; Female ; Food, Fortified - analysis ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature - physiology ; Infants (Premature) ; Lipids - analysis ; Male ; Milk, Human - chemistry ; Nutritional aspects ; Nutritional Status</subject><ispartof>Journal of translational medicine, 2016-07, Vol.14 (1), p.195-195, Article 195</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-bbdd1a729a365072ab93fb67eef432e2bb28a31459529e809eff1ce1db366f043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-bbdd1a729a365072ab93fb67eef432e2bb28a31459529e809eff1ce1db366f043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930619/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4930619/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27370649$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morlacchi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallardi, Domenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannì, Maria Lorella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roggero, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amato, Orsola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piemontese, Pasqua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consonni, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Fabio</creatorcontrib><title>Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study</title><title>Journal of translational medicine</title><addtitle>J Transl Med</addtitle><description>Fortifying human milk contributes to the prevention of postnatal growth failure in preterm infants. Because of the natural variability of human milk, targeted fortification of human milk has been advocated. However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of prolonged targeted fortification are scarce. We aimed to assess the safety of targeted fortification of human milk in preterm infants compared with standard fortification, as well as the effects on infant growth. We conducted an interventional study during hospital stay in healthy very low birth weight preterm infants who were exclusively fed human milk. Pools of human milk collected for 24 h were analysed using mid-infrared transmission spectroscopy. Targeted fortification of human milk was performed by adding macronutrients to native human milk to obtain optimal ratios of fat (4.4 g), carbohydrates (8.8 g), and protein (3 g) per 100 ml. The intervention period lasted 4-7 weeks. Weekly weight and daily growth rates were compared with those of a standardized fortification group of very low birth weight preterm infants who received standard fortified human milk (n = 10). The osmolality as well as the metabolic and gastrointestinal tolerance were monitored. Intergroup differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A total of 10 preterm infants (birth weight 1223 ± 195 g; gestational age 29.1 ± 1.03 weeks) were enrolled and 118 samples of pooled milk were analysed. On average, 1.4 ± 0.1 g of protein, 2.3 ± 0.5 g of carbohydrate, and 0.3 ± 0.1 g of fat per 100 ml were added to the milk. Osmolality values after target fortification were within recommended limits (376 ± 66 mOsml/kg). Weekly weight gain (205.5 g; 95 % CI 177-233 vs 155 g; 95 % CI 132-178; p = 0.025) and daily growth rates (15.7 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 14.5-16.9 vs 12.3 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 10.7-13.9; p = 0.005) were higher in infants receiving target fortification than in infants receiving standardized fortification. The infants receiving targeted fortified milk consumed similar volumes as infants in the standardized fortification group (148 ± 4.5 vs 146 ± 4 ml/kg/day). No signs of either gastrointestinal or metabolic intolerance were observed. Target fortification appears to promote growth in very low birth weight preterm infants without any detrimental effects. Trial registration NCT02716337.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Body fluid osmolality</subject><subject>Breast milk</subject><subject>Carbohydrates - analysis</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food, Fortified - analysis</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature - physiology</subject><subject>Infants (Premature)</subject><subject>Lipids - analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Milk, Human - chemistry</subject><subject>Nutritional aspects</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><issn>1479-5876</issn><issn>1479-5876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstu1TAUtBAVfcAHsEGW2LBJ61eceAO6qqCtVIkNrC0nOb51SeyL7VTK3-P0lj4Q8sL28cwcn9Eg9J6SU0pbeZYoU7KpCJUVUXVTLa_QERWNquq2ka-fnQ_RcUq3hDBRC_UGHbKGN0QKdYSWq4SziVvIMGAbYnbW9Sa74HGw-GaejMddBJMyntz4C5dr2GU3mRH7OUd3j0w5mgzbZRXAu1i04oSdt8bn9AVvfDmX0h34FV2YKc_D8hYdWDMmePewn6Cf377-OL-srr9fXJ1vrqteKJGrrhsGahqmDJc1aZjpFLedbACs4AxY17HWcCpqVTMFLVFgLe2BDh2X0hLBT9Dnve5u7iYY-vKLaEa9i2WIuOhgnH754t2N3oY7LRQnkqoi8OlBIIbfM6SsJ5d6GEfjIcxJ05YUP4vVa6-P_0BvwxzLyPeolgnJJH1Cbc0IuvgUSt9-FdUbUTpSJuu17el_UGUNMLk-eLCu1F8Q6J7Qx5BSBPs4IyV6zYve50WXvOg1L3opnA_PzXlk_A0I_wNTpr30</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Morlacchi, Laura</creator><creator>Mallardi, Domenica</creator><creator>Giannì, Maria Lorella</creator><creator>Roggero, Paola</creator><creator>Amato, Orsola</creator><creator>Piemontese, Pasqua</creator><creator>Consonni, Dario</creator><creator>Mosca, Fabio</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study</title><author>Morlacchi, Laura ; Mallardi, Domenica ; Giannì, Maria Lorella ; Roggero, Paola ; Amato, Orsola ; Piemontese, Pasqua ; Consonni, Dario ; Mosca, Fabio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-bbdd1a729a365072ab93fb67eef432e2bb28a31459529e809eff1ce1db366f043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Body fluid osmolality</topic><topic>Breast milk</topic><topic>Carbohydrates - analysis</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food, Fortified - analysis</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature - physiology</topic><topic>Infants (Premature)</topic><topic>Lipids - analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Milk, Human - chemistry</topic><topic>Nutritional aspects</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morlacchi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallardi, Domenica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannì, Maria Lorella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roggero, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amato, Orsola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piemontese, Pasqua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Consonni, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Fabio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of translational medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morlacchi, Laura</au><au>Mallardi, Domenica</au><au>Giannì, Maria Lorella</au><au>Roggero, Paola</au><au>Amato, Orsola</au><au>Piemontese, Pasqua</au><au>Consonni, Dario</au><au>Mosca, Fabio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of translational medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Transl Med</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>195</epage><pages>195-195</pages><artnum>195</artnum><issn>1479-5876</issn><eissn>1479-5876</eissn><abstract>Fortifying human milk contributes to the prevention of postnatal growth failure in preterm infants. Because of the natural variability of human milk, targeted fortification of human milk has been advocated. However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of prolonged targeted fortification are scarce. We aimed to assess the safety of targeted fortification of human milk in preterm infants compared with standard fortification, as well as the effects on infant growth. We conducted an interventional study during hospital stay in healthy very low birth weight preterm infants who were exclusively fed human milk. Pools of human milk collected for 24 h were analysed using mid-infrared transmission spectroscopy. Targeted fortification of human milk was performed by adding macronutrients to native human milk to obtain optimal ratios of fat (4.4 g), carbohydrates (8.8 g), and protein (3 g) per 100 ml. The intervention period lasted 4-7 weeks. Weekly weight and daily growth rates were compared with those of a standardized fortification group of very low birth weight preterm infants who received standard fortified human milk (n = 10). The osmolality as well as the metabolic and gastrointestinal tolerance were monitored. Intergroup differences were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A total of 10 preterm infants (birth weight 1223 ± 195 g; gestational age 29.1 ± 1.03 weeks) were enrolled and 118 samples of pooled milk were analysed. On average, 1.4 ± 0.1 g of protein, 2.3 ± 0.5 g of carbohydrate, and 0.3 ± 0.1 g of fat per 100 ml were added to the milk. Osmolality values after target fortification were within recommended limits (376 ± 66 mOsml/kg). Weekly weight gain (205.5 g; 95 % CI 177-233 vs 155 g; 95 % CI 132-178; p = 0.025) and daily growth rates (15.7 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 14.5-16.9 vs 12.3 g/kg/day; 95 % CI 10.7-13.9; p = 0.005) were higher in infants receiving target fortification than in infants receiving standardized fortification. The infants receiving targeted fortified milk consumed similar volumes as infants in the standardized fortification group (148 ± 4.5 vs 146 ± 4 ml/kg/day). No signs of either gastrointestinal or metabolic intolerance were observed. Target fortification appears to promote growth in very low birth weight preterm infants without any detrimental effects. Trial registration NCT02716337.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>27370649</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12967-016-0957-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1479-5876
ispartof Journal of translational medicine, 2016-07, Vol.14 (1), p.195-195, Article 195
issn 1479-5876
1479-5876
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4930619
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Body fluid osmolality
Breast milk
Carbohydrates - analysis
Child development
Female
Food, Fortified - analysis
Health aspects
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature - physiology
Infants (Premature)
Lipids - analysis
Male
Milk, Human - chemistry
Nutritional aspects
Nutritional Status
title Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A51%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20targeted%20fortification%20of%20human%20breast%20milk%20an%20optimal%20nutrition%20strategy%20for%20preterm%20infants?%20An%20interventional%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20translational%20medicine&rft.au=Morlacchi,%20Laura&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=195&rft.pages=195-195&rft.artnum=195&rft.issn=1479-5876&rft.eissn=1479-5876&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12967-016-0957-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA461912659%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808246261&rft_id=info:pmid/27370649&rft_galeid=A461912659&rfr_iscdi=true