A history-based method to estimate animal preference
Giving animals their preferred items (e.g., environmental enrichment) has been suggested as a method to improve animal welfare, thus raising the question of how to determine what animals want. Most studies have employed choice tests for detecting animal preferences. However, whether choice tests rep...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28328-28328, Article 28328 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 28328 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28328 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Maia, Caroline Marques Volpato, Gilson Luiz |
description | Giving animals their preferred items (e.g., environmental enrichment) has been suggested as a method to improve animal welfare, thus raising the question of how to determine what animals want. Most studies have employed choice tests for detecting animal preferences. However, whether choice tests represent animal preferences remains a matter of controversy. Here, we present a history-based method to analyse data from individual choice tests to discriminate between preferred and non-preferred items. This method differentially weighs choices from older and recent tests performed over time. Accordingly, we provide both a preference index that identifies preferred items contrasted with non-preferred items in successive multiple-choice tests and methods to detect the strength of animal preferences for each item. We achieved this goal by investigating colour choices in the Nile tilapia fish species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/srep28328 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4923856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800403908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-532dd620ca7f4e8c0df26c6b1d1ad492e839294e211697d88bf6290894e42ef23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkd9LwzAQx4MoTuYe_Aek4IsK1eSSdumLMIa_YOCLPoe0uW4dbVOTTth_b8bmmJqXC3cfvve9O0IuGL1jlMt777ADyUEekTOgIomBAxwf_Adk5P2ShpdAJlh2SgYw5gkFxs-ImESLyvfWreNcezRRg_3Cmqi3Efq-anSPkW5DrKPOYYkO2wLPyUmpa4-jXRySj6fH9-lLPHt7fp1OZnEhuOzjhIMxKdBCj0uBsqCmhLRIc2aYNiIDlDwLjhAYS7OxkTIvU8ioDCkBWAIfkoetbrfKGzQFtr3Ttepc8OPWyupK_a601ULN7ZcK4lwmaRC43gk4-7kKA6mm8gXWtW7RrrxiklJBeegZ0Ks_6NKuXBvG21Apo4wlLFA3W6pw1ofNl3szjKrNOdT-HIG9PHS_J3-WH4DbLeBDqZ2jO2j5T-0bYZaStw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806101151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A history-based method to estimate animal preference</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Maia, Caroline Marques ; Volpato, Gilson Luiz</creator><creatorcontrib>Maia, Caroline Marques ; Volpato, Gilson Luiz</creatorcontrib><description>Giving animals their preferred items (e.g., environmental enrichment) has been suggested as a method to improve animal welfare, thus raising the question of how to determine what animals want. Most studies have employed choice tests for detecting animal preferences. However, whether choice tests represent animal preferences remains a matter of controversy. Here, we present a history-based method to analyse data from individual choice tests to discriminate between preferred and non-preferred items. This method differentially weighs choices from older and recent tests performed over time. Accordingly, we provide both a preference index that identifies preferred items contrasted with non-preferred items in successive multiple-choice tests and methods to detect the strength of animal preferences for each item. We achieved this goal by investigating colour choices in the Nile tilapia fish species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep28328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27350213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/2649/1409 ; 631/601/18 ; Animal welfare ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Choice Behavior - physiology ; Color ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; multidisciplinary ; Physiology ; Preferences ; Science ; Tilapia - physiology</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28328-28328, Article 28328</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jun 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-532dd620ca7f4e8c0df26c6b1d1ad492e839294e211697d88bf6290894e42ef23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-532dd620ca7f4e8c0df26c6b1d1ad492e839294e211697d88bf6290894e42ef23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923856/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4923856/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,41120,42189,51576,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27350213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maia, Caroline Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Gilson Luiz</creatorcontrib><title>A history-based method to estimate animal preference</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Giving animals their preferred items (e.g., environmental enrichment) has been suggested as a method to improve animal welfare, thus raising the question of how to determine what animals want. Most studies have employed choice tests for detecting animal preferences. However, whether choice tests represent animal preferences remains a matter of controversy. Here, we present a history-based method to analyse data from individual choice tests to discriminate between preferred and non-preferred items. This method differentially weighs choices from older and recent tests performed over time. Accordingly, we provide both a preference index that identifies preferred items contrasted with non-preferred items in successive multiple-choice tests and methods to detect the strength of animal preferences for each item. We achieved this goal by investigating colour choices in the Nile tilapia fish species.</description><subject>631/378/2649/1409</subject><subject>631/601/18</subject><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Choice Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Tilapia - physiology</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkd9LwzAQx4MoTuYe_Aek4IsK1eSSdumLMIa_YOCLPoe0uW4dbVOTTth_b8bmmJqXC3cfvve9O0IuGL1jlMt777ADyUEekTOgIomBAxwf_Adk5P2ShpdAJlh2SgYw5gkFxs-ImESLyvfWreNcezRRg_3Cmqi3Efq-anSPkW5DrKPOYYkO2wLPyUmpa4-jXRySj6fH9-lLPHt7fp1OZnEhuOzjhIMxKdBCj0uBsqCmhLRIc2aYNiIDlDwLjhAYS7OxkTIvU8ioDCkBWAIfkoetbrfKGzQFtr3Ttepc8OPWyupK_a601ULN7ZcK4lwmaRC43gk4-7kKA6mm8gXWtW7RrrxiklJBeegZ0Ks_6NKuXBvG21Apo4wlLFA3W6pw1ofNl3szjKrNOdT-HIG9PHS_J3-WH4DbLeBDqZ2jO2j5T-0bYZaStw</recordid><startdate>20160628</startdate><enddate>20160628</enddate><creator>Maia, Caroline Marques</creator><creator>Volpato, Gilson Luiz</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160628</creationdate><title>A history-based method to estimate animal preference</title><author>Maia, Caroline Marques ; Volpato, Gilson Luiz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-532dd620ca7f4e8c0df26c6b1d1ad492e839294e211697d88bf6290894e42ef23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>631/378/2649/1409</topic><topic>631/601/18</topic><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Choice Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Tilapia - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maia, Caroline Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpato, Gilson Luiz</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maia, Caroline Marques</au><au>Volpato, Gilson Luiz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A history-based method to estimate animal preference</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2016-06-28</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28328</spage><epage>28328</epage><pages>28328-28328</pages><artnum>28328</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Giving animals their preferred items (e.g., environmental enrichment) has been suggested as a method to improve animal welfare, thus raising the question of how to determine what animals want. Most studies have employed choice tests for detecting animal preferences. However, whether choice tests represent animal preferences remains a matter of controversy. Here, we present a history-based method to analyse data from individual choice tests to discriminate between preferred and non-preferred items. This method differentially weighs choices from older and recent tests performed over time. Accordingly, we provide both a preference index that identifies preferred items contrasted with non-preferred items in successive multiple-choice tests and methods to detect the strength of animal preferences for each item. We achieved this goal by investigating colour choices in the Nile tilapia fish species.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27350213</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep28328</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28328-28328, Article 28328 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4923856 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Nature Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | 631/378/2649/1409 631/601/18 Animal welfare Animals Behavior, Animal - physiology Choice Behavior - physiology Color Humanities and Social Sciences multidisciplinary Physiology Preferences Science Tilapia - physiology |
title | A history-based method to estimate animal preference |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A27%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20history-based%20method%20to%20estimate%20animal%20preference&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Maia,%20Caroline%20Marques&rft.date=2016-06-28&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28328&rft.epage=28328&rft.pages=28328-28328&rft.artnum=28328&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep28328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1800403908%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806101151&rft_id=info:pmid/27350213&rfr_iscdi=true |