Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain

Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientific reports 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28642-28642, Article 28642
Hauptverfasser: Fabrizi, Lorenzo, Verriotis, Madeleine, Williams, Gemma, Lee, Amy, Meek, Judith, Olhede, Sofia, Fitzgerald, Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 28642
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28642
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 6
creator Fabrizi, Lorenzo
Verriotis, Madeleine
Williams, Gemma
Lee, Amy
Meek, Judith
Olhede, Sofia
Fitzgerald, Maria
description Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/srep28642
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4125488181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkV1LHDEUhkOxqFgv_AMl4I0WtubkY5zcCCK2FoTe1OuQyZzsRmaTNZkR_PdmWbusmpuEnIcnb3gJOQH2E5hoL0rGFW8byb-QQ86kmnHB-d7O-YAcl_LI6lJcS9D75IBfCqmEgENydxtd6kOc0-TpEt3CxuDsQGNyweFqDCnSPniPudAQ6bhAavtpGKmNfb3wNo60yzbEb-Srt0PB47f9iDz8uv13cze7__v7z831_cwpJseZ5h0qCb5Bb1ln-05wkIoxUKprROt7x9Azj-LSS6Y00xocgu6lbEAry8QRudp4V1O3xN5hHLMdzCqHpc0vJtlg3k9iWJh5ejZSc2ihrYKzN0FOTxOW0SxDcTgMNmKaioG2phGMt7Kipx_QxzTlWL-3phpgAM1aeL6hXE6ltuG3YYCZdUVmW1Flv--m35L_C6nAjw1Q6ijOMe88-cn2Cs4-mfk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806101168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Fabrizi, Lorenzo ; Verriotis, Madeleine ; Williams, Gemma ; Lee, Amy ; Meek, Judith ; Olhede, Sofia ; Fitzgerald, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabrizi, Lorenzo ; Verriotis, Madeleine ; Williams, Gemma ; Lee, Amy ; Meek, Judith ; Olhede, Sofia ; Fitzgerald, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep28642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27345331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/2571/2575 ; 631/378/2620/2618 ; 631/378/3917 ; 692/308/3187 ; Adult ; Adults ; Babies ; Brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - growth &amp; development ; Brain research ; Connectome ; Electrodes ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Frequency analysis ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Newborn babies ; Nociception - physiology ; Pain ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28642-28642, Article 28642</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jun 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921818/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921818/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27345331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verriotis, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olhede, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain.</description><subject>631/378/2571/2575</subject><subject>631/378/2620/2618</subject><subject>631/378/3917</subject><subject>692/308/3187</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Connectome</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Nociception - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkV1LHDEUhkOxqFgv_AMl4I0WtubkY5zcCCK2FoTe1OuQyZzsRmaTNZkR_PdmWbusmpuEnIcnb3gJOQH2E5hoL0rGFW8byb-QQ86kmnHB-d7O-YAcl_LI6lJcS9D75IBfCqmEgENydxtd6kOc0-TpEt3CxuDsQGNyweFqDCnSPniPudAQ6bhAavtpGKmNfb3wNo60yzbEb-Srt0PB47f9iDz8uv13cze7__v7z831_cwpJseZ5h0qCb5Bb1ln-05wkIoxUKprROt7x9Azj-LSS6Y00xocgu6lbEAry8QRudp4V1O3xN5hHLMdzCqHpc0vJtlg3k9iWJh5ejZSc2ihrYKzN0FOTxOW0SxDcTgMNmKaioG2phGMt7Kipx_QxzTlWL-3phpgAM1aeL6hXE6ltuG3YYCZdUVmW1Flv--m35L_C6nAjw1Q6ijOMe88-cn2Cs4-mfk</recordid><startdate>20160627</startdate><enddate>20160627</enddate><creator>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Verriotis, Madeleine</creator><creator>Williams, Gemma</creator><creator>Lee, Amy</creator><creator>Meek, Judith</creator><creator>Olhede, Sofia</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Maria</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160627</creationdate><title>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</title><author>Fabrizi, Lorenzo ; Verriotis, Madeleine ; Williams, Gemma ; Lee, Amy ; Meek, Judith ; Olhede, Sofia ; Fitzgerald, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>631/378/2571/2575</topic><topic>631/378/2620/2618</topic><topic>631/378/3917</topic><topic>692/308/3187</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Connectome</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Nociception - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verriotis, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olhede, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</au><au>Verriotis, Madeleine</au><au>Williams, Gemma</au><au>Lee, Amy</au><au>Meek, Judith</au><au>Olhede, Sofia</au><au>Fitzgerald, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2016-06-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28642</spage><epage>28642</epage><pages>28642-28642</pages><artnum>28642</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27345331</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep28642</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28642-28642, Article 28642
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921818
source MEDLINE; Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects 631/378/2571/2575
631/378/2620/2618
631/378/3917
692/308/3187
Adult
Adults
Babies
Brain
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - growth & development
Brain research
Connectome
Electrodes
Electroencephalography
Female
Frequency analysis
Humanities and Social Sciences
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Male
Middle Aged
multidisciplinary
Nerve Net - physiology
Newborn babies
Nociception - physiology
Pain
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
title Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A00%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Encoding%20of%20mechanical%20nociception%20differs%20in%20the%20adult%20and%20infant%20brain&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Fabrizi,%20Lorenzo&rft.date=2016-06-27&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28642&rft.epage=28642&rft.pages=28642-28642&rft.artnum=28642&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep28642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4125488181%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806101168&rft_id=info:pmid/27345331&rfr_iscdi=true