Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain
Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scientific reports 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28642-28642, Article 28642 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 28642 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28642 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Fabrizi, Lorenzo Verriotis, Madeleine Williams, Gemma Lee, Amy Meek, Judith Olhede, Sofia Fitzgerald, Maria |
description | Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/srep28642 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4125488181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkV1LHDEUhkOxqFgv_AMl4I0WtubkY5zcCCK2FoTe1OuQyZzsRmaTNZkR_PdmWbusmpuEnIcnb3gJOQH2E5hoL0rGFW8byb-QQ86kmnHB-d7O-YAcl_LI6lJcS9D75IBfCqmEgENydxtd6kOc0-TpEt3CxuDsQGNyweFqDCnSPniPudAQ6bhAavtpGKmNfb3wNo60yzbEb-Srt0PB47f9iDz8uv13cze7__v7z831_cwpJseZ5h0qCb5Bb1ln-05wkIoxUKprROt7x9Azj-LSS6Y00xocgu6lbEAry8QRudp4V1O3xN5hHLMdzCqHpc0vJtlg3k9iWJh5ejZSc2ihrYKzN0FOTxOW0SxDcTgMNmKaioG2phGMt7Kipx_QxzTlWL-3phpgAM1aeL6hXE6ltuG3YYCZdUVmW1Flv--m35L_C6nAjw1Q6ijOMe88-cn2Cs4-mfk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806101168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Nature Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Fabrizi, Lorenzo ; Verriotis, Madeleine ; Williams, Gemma ; Lee, Amy ; Meek, Judith ; Olhede, Sofia ; Fitzgerald, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Fabrizi, Lorenzo ; Verriotis, Madeleine ; Williams, Gemma ; Lee, Amy ; Meek, Judith ; Olhede, Sofia ; Fitzgerald, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/srep28642</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27345331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/378/2571/2575 ; 631/378/2620/2618 ; 631/378/3917 ; 692/308/3187 ; Adult ; Adults ; Babies ; Brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; Brain - growth & development ; Brain research ; Connectome ; Electrodes ; Electroencephalography ; Female ; Frequency analysis ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Male ; Middle Aged ; multidisciplinary ; Nerve Net - physiology ; Newborn babies ; Nociception - physiology ; Pain ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28642-28642, Article 28642</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jun 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921818/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921818/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,41096,42165,51551,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27345331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verriotis, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olhede, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain.</description><subject>631/378/2571/2575</subject><subject>631/378/2620/2618</subject><subject>631/378/3917</subject><subject>692/308/3187</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain - growth & development</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Connectome</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Nerve Net - physiology</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Nociception - physiology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkV1LHDEUhkOxqFgv_AMl4I0WtubkY5zcCCK2FoTe1OuQyZzsRmaTNZkR_PdmWbusmpuEnIcnb3gJOQH2E5hoL0rGFW8byb-QQ86kmnHB-d7O-YAcl_LI6lJcS9D75IBfCqmEgENydxtd6kOc0-TpEt3CxuDsQGNyweFqDCnSPniPudAQ6bhAavtpGKmNfb3wNo60yzbEb-Srt0PB47f9iDz8uv13cze7__v7z831_cwpJseZ5h0qCb5Bb1ln-05wkIoxUKprROt7x9Azj-LSS6Y00xocgu6lbEAry8QRudp4V1O3xN5hHLMdzCqHpc0vJtlg3k9iWJh5ejZSc2ihrYKzN0FOTxOW0SxDcTgMNmKaioG2phGMt7Kipx_QxzTlWL-3phpgAM1aeL6hXE6ltuG3YYCZdUVmW1Flv--m35L_C6nAjw1Q6ijOMe88-cn2Cs4-mfk</recordid><startdate>20160627</startdate><enddate>20160627</enddate><creator>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Verriotis, Madeleine</creator><creator>Williams, Gemma</creator><creator>Lee, Amy</creator><creator>Meek, Judith</creator><creator>Olhede, Sofia</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Maria</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160627</creationdate><title>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</title><author>Fabrizi, Lorenzo ; Verriotis, Madeleine ; Williams, Gemma ; Lee, Amy ; Meek, Judith ; Olhede, Sofia ; Fitzgerald, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-92be541f6efa0badb3214500155b638fdc0ef0fe37f40590991ce19d446195a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>631/378/2571/2575</topic><topic>631/378/2620/2618</topic><topic>631/378/3917</topic><topic>692/308/3187</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain - growth & development</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Connectome</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Nerve Net - physiology</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Nociception - physiology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verriotis, Madeleine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olhede, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fabrizi, Lorenzo</au><au>Verriotis, Madeleine</au><au>Williams, Gemma</au><au>Lee, Amy</au><au>Meek, Judith</au><au>Olhede, Sofia</au><au>Fitzgerald, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2016-06-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28642</spage><epage>28642</epage><pages>28642-28642</pages><artnum>28642</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Newborn human infants display robust pain behaviour and specific cortical activity following noxious skin stimulation, but it is not known whether brain processing of nociceptive information differs in infants and adults. Imaging studies have emphasised the overlap between infant and adult brain connectome architecture, but electrophysiological analysis of infant brain nociceptive networks can provide further understanding of the functional postnatal development of pain perception. Here we hypothesise that the human infant brain encodes noxious information with different neuronal patterns compared to adults. To test this we compared EEG responses to the same time-locked noxious skin lance in infants aged 0–19 days (n = 18, clinically required) and adults aged 23–48 years (n = 21). Time-frequency analysis revealed that while some features of adult nociceptive network activity are present in infants at longer latencies, including beta-gamma oscillations, infants display a distinct, long latency, noxious evoked 18-fold energy increase in the fast delta band (2–4 Hz) that is absent in adults. The differences in activity between infants and adults have a widespread topographic distribution across the brain. These data support our hypothesis and indicate important postnatal changes in the encoding of mechanical pain in the human brain.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>27345331</pmid><doi>10.1038/srep28642</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2016-06, Vol.6 (1), p.28642-28642, Article 28642 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921818 |
source | MEDLINE; Nature Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | 631/378/2571/2575 631/378/2620/2618 631/378/3917 692/308/3187 Adult Adults Babies Brain Brain - diagnostic imaging Brain - growth & development Brain research Connectome Electrodes Electroencephalography Female Frequency analysis Humanities and Social Sciences Humans Infant, Newborn Infants Male Middle Aged multidisciplinary Nerve Net - physiology Newborn babies Nociception - physiology Pain Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | Encoding of mechanical nociception differs in the adult and infant brain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A00%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Encoding%20of%20mechanical%20nociception%20differs%20in%20the%20adult%20and%20infant%20brain&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Fabrizi,%20Lorenzo&rft.date=2016-06-27&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28642&rft.epage=28642&rft.pages=28642-28642&rft.artnum=28642&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/srep28642&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E4125488181%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806101168&rft_id=info:pmid/27345331&rfr_iscdi=true |