Experimental Comparison of Knife-Edge and Multi-Parallel Slit Collimators for Prompt Gamma Imaging of Proton Pencil Beams

More and more camera concepts are being investigated to try and seize the opportunity of instantaneous range verification of proton therapy treatments offered by prompt gammas emitted along the proton tracks. Focusing on one-dimensional imaging with a passive collimator, the present study experiment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in oncology 2016-06, Vol.6, p.156-156
Hauptverfasser: Smeets, Julien, Roellinghoff, Frauke, Janssens, Guillaume, Perali, Irene, Celani, Andrea, Fiorini, Carlo, Freud, Nicolas, Testa, Etienne, Prieels, Damien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 156
container_issue
container_start_page 156
container_title Frontiers in oncology
container_volume 6
creator Smeets, Julien
Roellinghoff, Frauke
Janssens, Guillaume
Perali, Irene
Celani, Andrea
Fiorini, Carlo
Freud, Nicolas
Testa, Etienne
Prieels, Damien
description More and more camera concepts are being investigated to try and seize the opportunity of instantaneous range verification of proton therapy treatments offered by prompt gammas emitted along the proton tracks. Focusing on one-dimensional imaging with a passive collimator, the present study experimentally compared in combination with the first, clinically compatible, dedicated camera device the performances of instances of the two main options: a knife-edge slit (KES) and a multi-parallel slit (MPS) design. These two options were experimentally assessed in this specific context as they were previously demonstrated through analytical and numerical studies to allow similar performances in terms of Bragg peak retrieval precision and spatial resolution in a general context. Both collimators were prototyped according to the conclusions of Monte Carlo optimization studies under constraints of equal weight (40 mm tungsten alloy equivalent thickness) and of the specificities of the camera device under consideration (in particular 4 mm segmentation along beam axis and no time-of-flight discrimination, both of which less favorable to the MPS performance than to the KES one). Acquisitions of proton pencil beams of 100, 160, and 230 MeV in a PMMA target revealed that, in order to reach a given level of statistical precision on Bragg peak depth retrieval, the KES collimator requires only half the dose the present MPS collimator needs, making the KES collimator a preferred option for a compact camera device aimed at imaging only the Bragg peak position. On the other hand, the present MPS collimator proves more effective at retrieving the entrance of the beam in the target in the context of an extended camera device aimed at imaging the whole proton track within the patient.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fonc.2016.00156
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1806438497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-9369bf91ad9138c686336e025aa7f1dc06b31306b7c6a3a57989cc8d58f4d243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9PHCEcxYlpo0Y9e2s4todZYWCY4dLEbrZquk03qQdv5LsMs9LwYwuzRv_7Ml1rtByAfHnvQ14eQueUzBjr5MUQg57VhIoZIbQRB-i4rhmvJGd3717dj9BZzr9IWaIhlLBDdFS3nIuO1MfoafG4Ncl6E0ZweB79FpLNMeA44G_BDqZa9BuDIfT4-86NtlpBAueMwz-dHYvBOethjCnjISa8SoUw4ivwHvCNh40NmwlV5mOBrkzQ1uEvBnw-Re8HcNmcPZ8n6Pbr4nZ-XS1_XN3ML5eV5rIdK8mEXA-SQi8p67ToBGPCkLoBaAfaayLWjLKyt1oAg6aVndS665tu4H3N2Qn6vMdud2tvel2ClgBqWzJDelIRrHr7Euy92sQHxWVNeSML4NMecP-f7fpyqaYZKbK2afkDLdqPz5-l-Htn8qi8zdo4B8HEXVa0I4KzrgQr0ou9VKeYczLDC5sSNdWrpnrVVK_6W29xfHid5EX_r0z2B2CzodU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1806438497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental Comparison of Knife-Edge and Multi-Parallel Slit Collimators for Prompt Gamma Imaging of Proton Pencil Beams</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Smeets, Julien ; Roellinghoff, Frauke ; Janssens, Guillaume ; Perali, Irene ; Celani, Andrea ; Fiorini, Carlo ; Freud, Nicolas ; Testa, Etienne ; Prieels, Damien</creator><creatorcontrib>Smeets, Julien ; Roellinghoff, Frauke ; Janssens, Guillaume ; Perali, Irene ; Celani, Andrea ; Fiorini, Carlo ; Freud, Nicolas ; Testa, Etienne ; Prieels, Damien</creatorcontrib><description>More and more camera concepts are being investigated to try and seize the opportunity of instantaneous range verification of proton therapy treatments offered by prompt gammas emitted along the proton tracks. Focusing on one-dimensional imaging with a passive collimator, the present study experimentally compared in combination with the first, clinically compatible, dedicated camera device the performances of instances of the two main options: a knife-edge slit (KES) and a multi-parallel slit (MPS) design. These two options were experimentally assessed in this specific context as they were previously demonstrated through analytical and numerical studies to allow similar performances in terms of Bragg peak retrieval precision and spatial resolution in a general context. Both collimators were prototyped according to the conclusions of Monte Carlo optimization studies under constraints of equal weight (40 mm tungsten alloy equivalent thickness) and of the specificities of the camera device under consideration (in particular 4 mm segmentation along beam axis and no time-of-flight discrimination, both of which less favorable to the MPS performance than to the KES one). Acquisitions of proton pencil beams of 100, 160, and 230 MeV in a PMMA target revealed that, in order to reach a given level of statistical precision on Bragg peak depth retrieval, the KES collimator requires only half the dose the present MPS collimator needs, making the KES collimator a preferred option for a compact camera device aimed at imaging only the Bragg peak position. On the other hand, the present MPS collimator proves more effective at retrieving the entrance of the beam in the target in the context of an extended camera device aimed at imaging the whole proton track within the patient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00156</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27446802</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media</publisher><subject>Bioengineering ; Instrumentation and Detectors ; Life Sciences ; Medical Physics ; Nuclear medicine ; Oncology ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in oncology, 2016-06, Vol.6, p.156-156</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Smeets, Roellinghoff, Janssens, Perali, Celani, Fiorini, Freud, Testa and Prieels. 2016 Smeets, Roellinghoff, Janssens, Perali, Celani, Fiorini, Freud, Testa and Prieels</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-9369bf91ad9138c686336e025aa7f1dc06b31306b7c6a3a57989cc8d58f4d243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-9369bf91ad9138c686336e025aa7f1dc06b31306b7c6a3a57989cc8d58f4d243</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0815-7056</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921459/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4921459/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446802$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01457574$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smeets, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roellinghoff, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perali, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celani, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorini, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freud, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieels, Damien</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental Comparison of Knife-Edge and Multi-Parallel Slit Collimators for Prompt Gamma Imaging of Proton Pencil Beams</title><title>Frontiers in oncology</title><addtitle>Front Oncol</addtitle><description>More and more camera concepts are being investigated to try and seize the opportunity of instantaneous range verification of proton therapy treatments offered by prompt gammas emitted along the proton tracks. Focusing on one-dimensional imaging with a passive collimator, the present study experimentally compared in combination with the first, clinically compatible, dedicated camera device the performances of instances of the two main options: a knife-edge slit (KES) and a multi-parallel slit (MPS) design. These two options were experimentally assessed in this specific context as they were previously demonstrated through analytical and numerical studies to allow similar performances in terms of Bragg peak retrieval precision and spatial resolution in a general context. Both collimators were prototyped according to the conclusions of Monte Carlo optimization studies under constraints of equal weight (40 mm tungsten alloy equivalent thickness) and of the specificities of the camera device under consideration (in particular 4 mm segmentation along beam axis and no time-of-flight discrimination, both of which less favorable to the MPS performance than to the KES one). Acquisitions of proton pencil beams of 100, 160, and 230 MeV in a PMMA target revealed that, in order to reach a given level of statistical precision on Bragg peak depth retrieval, the KES collimator requires only half the dose the present MPS collimator needs, making the KES collimator a preferred option for a compact camera device aimed at imaging only the Bragg peak position. On the other hand, the present MPS collimator proves more effective at retrieving the entrance of the beam in the target in the context of an extended camera device aimed at imaging the whole proton track within the patient.</description><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Instrumentation and Detectors</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical Physics</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>2234-943X</issn><issn>2234-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc9PHCEcxYlpo0Y9e2s4todZYWCY4dLEbrZquk03qQdv5LsMs9LwYwuzRv_7Ml1rtByAfHnvQ14eQueUzBjr5MUQg57VhIoZIbQRB-i4rhmvJGd3717dj9BZzr9IWaIhlLBDdFS3nIuO1MfoafG4Ncl6E0ZweB79FpLNMeA44G_BDqZa9BuDIfT4-86NtlpBAueMwz-dHYvBOethjCnjISa8SoUw4ivwHvCNh40NmwlV5mOBrkzQ1uEvBnw-Re8HcNmcPZ8n6Pbr4nZ-XS1_XN3ML5eV5rIdK8mEXA-SQi8p67ToBGPCkLoBaAfaayLWjLKyt1oAg6aVndS665tu4H3N2Qn6vMdud2tvel2ClgBqWzJDelIRrHr7Euy92sQHxWVNeSML4NMecP-f7fpyqaYZKbK2afkDLdqPz5-l-Htn8qi8zdo4B8HEXVa0I4KzrgQr0ou9VKeYczLDC5sSNdWrpnrVVK_6W29xfHid5EX_r0z2B2CzodU</recordid><startdate>20160627</startdate><enddate>20160627</enddate><creator>Smeets, Julien</creator><creator>Roellinghoff, Frauke</creator><creator>Janssens, Guillaume</creator><creator>Perali, Irene</creator><creator>Celani, Andrea</creator><creator>Fiorini, Carlo</creator><creator>Freud, Nicolas</creator><creator>Testa, Etienne</creator><creator>Prieels, Damien</creator><general>Frontiers Media</general><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-7056</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160627</creationdate><title>Experimental Comparison of Knife-Edge and Multi-Parallel Slit Collimators for Prompt Gamma Imaging of Proton Pencil Beams</title><author>Smeets, Julien ; Roellinghoff, Frauke ; Janssens, Guillaume ; Perali, Irene ; Celani, Andrea ; Fiorini, Carlo ; Freud, Nicolas ; Testa, Etienne ; Prieels, Damien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-9369bf91ad9138c686336e025aa7f1dc06b31306b7c6a3a57989cc8d58f4d243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Instrumentation and Detectors</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical Physics</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smeets, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roellinghoff, Frauke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssens, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perali, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celani, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiorini, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freud, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Testa, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieels, Damien</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smeets, Julien</au><au>Roellinghoff, Frauke</au><au>Janssens, Guillaume</au><au>Perali, Irene</au><au>Celani, Andrea</au><au>Fiorini, Carlo</au><au>Freud, Nicolas</au><au>Testa, Etienne</au><au>Prieels, Damien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental Comparison of Knife-Edge and Multi-Parallel Slit Collimators for Prompt Gamma Imaging of Proton Pencil Beams</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-06-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>156</spage><epage>156</epage><pages>156-156</pages><issn>2234-943X</issn><eissn>2234-943X</eissn><abstract>More and more camera concepts are being investigated to try and seize the opportunity of instantaneous range verification of proton therapy treatments offered by prompt gammas emitted along the proton tracks. Focusing on one-dimensional imaging with a passive collimator, the present study experimentally compared in combination with the first, clinically compatible, dedicated camera device the performances of instances of the two main options: a knife-edge slit (KES) and a multi-parallel slit (MPS) design. These two options were experimentally assessed in this specific context as they were previously demonstrated through analytical and numerical studies to allow similar performances in terms of Bragg peak retrieval precision and spatial resolution in a general context. Both collimators were prototyped according to the conclusions of Monte Carlo optimization studies under constraints of equal weight (40 mm tungsten alloy equivalent thickness) and of the specificities of the camera device under consideration (in particular 4 mm segmentation along beam axis and no time-of-flight discrimination, both of which less favorable to the MPS performance than to the KES one). Acquisitions of proton pencil beams of 100, 160, and 230 MeV in a PMMA target revealed that, in order to reach a given level of statistical precision on Bragg peak depth retrieval, the KES collimator requires only half the dose the present MPS collimator needs, making the KES collimator a preferred option for a compact camera device aimed at imaging only the Bragg peak position. On the other hand, the present MPS collimator proves more effective at retrieving the entrance of the beam in the target in the context of an extended camera device aimed at imaging the whole proton track within the patient.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media</pub><pmid>27446802</pmid><doi>10.3389/fonc.2016.00156</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-7056</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-943X
ispartof Frontiers in oncology, 2016-06, Vol.6, p.156-156
issn 2234-943X
2234-943X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4921459
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bioengineering
Instrumentation and Detectors
Life Sciences
Medical Physics
Nuclear medicine
Oncology
Physics
title Experimental Comparison of Knife-Edge and Multi-Parallel Slit Collimators for Prompt Gamma Imaging of Proton Pencil Beams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A26%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20Comparison%20of%20Knife-Edge%20and%20Multi-Parallel%20Slit%20Collimators%20for%20Prompt%20Gamma%20Imaging%20of%20Proton%20Pencil%20Beams&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20oncology&rft.au=Smeets,%20Julien&rft.date=2016-06-27&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=156&rft.pages=156-156&rft.issn=2234-943X&rft.eissn=2234-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fonc.2016.00156&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1806438497%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1806438497&rft_id=info:pmid/27446802&rfr_iscdi=true